{ "revision_id": 8, "uuid": "ce5f7772-f280-4b57-9d58-27a3f4c337e5", "created": "2026-04-29T04:09:19.767569+00:00", "links": { "bibtex": "https://inspirehep.net/api/literature/3149743?format=bibtex", "latex-eu": "https://inspirehep.net/api/literature/3149743?format=latex-eu", "latex-us": "https://inspirehep.net/api/literature/3149743?format=latex-us", "json": "https://inspirehep.net/api/literature/3149743?format=json", "json-expanded": "https://inspirehep.net/api/literature/3149743?format=json-expanded", "cv": "https://inspirehep.net/api/literature/3149743?format=cv", "citations": "https://inspirehep.net/api/literature/?q=refersto%3Arecid%3A3149743" }, "id": "3149743", "updated": "2026-04-30T06:42:01.452090+00:00", "metadata": { "citation_count_without_self_citations": 0, "citation_count": 0, "core": true, "titles": [ { "title": "Determination of heavy meson light-cone distribution amplitudes: theoretical framework and lattice simulations", "source": "arXiv" } ], "$schema": "https://inspirehep.net/schemas/records/hep.json", "authors": [ { "uuid": "83f548ee-a453-448b-b127-e1b0f3ac2967", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/authors/3066864" }, "full_name": "Gao, Hao-Fei", "affiliations": [ { "value": "Shanghai Jiao Tong U.", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/institutions/911458" } }, { "value": "Shanghai Jiaotong U.", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/institutions/904740" } }, { "value": "Tsung-Dao Lee Inst., Shanghai", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/institutions/1664092" } } ], "raw_affiliations": [ { "value": "State Key Laboratory of Dark Matter Physics, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology," }, { "value": "Key Laboratory for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology (MOE), School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China" }, { "value": "Tsung-Dao Lee Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 201210, China" } ] }, { "uuid": "5ae6653c-f602-4200-b4ef-724267da9f86", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/authors/2735644" }, "full_name": "Han, Xue-Ying", "affiliations": [ { "value": "Beijing, Inst. High Energy Phys.", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/institutions/903123" } }, { "value": "Beijing, GUCAS", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/institutions/904611" } } ], "curated_relation": true, "raw_affiliations": [ { "value": "Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China" }, { "value": "School of Physical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China" } ] }, { "uuid": "47022600-87fc-4d85-b37e-5c1aecb4688b", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/authors/1965075" }, "full_name": "Hua, Jun", "affiliations": [ { "value": "South China Normal U.", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/institutions/905674" } } ], "raw_affiliations": [ { "value": "Key Laboratory of Atomic and Subatomic Structure and Quantum Control (MOE), Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Structure and Fundamental Interactions of Matter," }, { "value": "Institute of Quantum Matter, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China" }, { "value": "Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory of Quantum Matter, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Nuclear Science, Southern Nuclear Science Computing Center," }, { "value": "South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China" } ] }, { "uuid": "23d0e86b-cd9b-401d-a8e7-d5614d3190bd", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/authors/1004347" }, "full_name": "Ji, Xiangdong", "affiliations": [ { "value": "Shanghai Jiao Tong U.", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/institutions/911458" } }, { "value": "Shanghai Jiaotong U.", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/institutions/904740" } }, { "value": "Tsung-Dao Lee Inst., Shanghai", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/institutions/1664092" } }, { "value": "Maryland U.", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/institutions/902990" } } ], "raw_affiliations": [ { "value": "State Key Laboratory of Dark Matter Physics, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology," }, { "value": "Key Laboratory for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology (MOE), School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China" }, { "value": "Tsung-Dao Lee Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 201210, China" }, { "value": "Maryland Center for Fundamental Physics, Department of Physics, University of Maryland, 4296 Stadium Dr., College Park, MD 20742, USA" } ] }, { "uuid": "fdf2000a-ee04-4987-81ba-a2ae07410118", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/authors/2098865" }, "full_name": "Jiang, Xiangyu", "affiliations": [ { "value": "Beijing, Inst. Theor. Phys.", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/institutions/903895" } } ], "raw_affiliations": [ { "value": "CAS Key Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China" } ] }, { "uuid": "0566487f-479d-4e4a-ba46-623409e96b06", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/authors/999703" }, "full_name": "Lü, Cai-Dian", "affiliations": [ { "value": "Beijing, Inst. High Energy Phys.", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/institutions/903123" } }, { "value": "Beijing, GUCAS", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/institutions/904611" } } ], "raw_affiliations": [ { "value": "Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China" }, { "value": "School of Physical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China" } ] }, { "uuid": "2f41f48c-ed9b-464e-91cc-054bfab70e16", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/authors/990041" }, "full_name": "Schäfer, Andreas", "affiliations": [ { "value": "Regensburg U.", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/institutions/903753" } }, { "value": "Taiwan, Natl. Taiwan U.", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/institutions/904661" } } ], "raw_affiliations": [ { "value": "Institut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Regensburg, D-93040 Regensburg, Germany" }, { "value": "Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 106, China" } ] }, { "uuid": "f10aedfc-76c1-4d93-bea5-b0b67243338a", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/authors/3149746" }, "full_name": "Jin-XinTan" }, { "uuid": "91f07733-88c5-43bd-a741-c3088c710c20", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/authors/2968898" }, "full_name": "Wang, Ji-Hao", "affiliations": [ { "value": "Beijing, Inst. Theor. Phys.", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/institutions/903895" } } ], "curated_relation": true, "raw_affiliations": [ { "value": "CAS Key Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China" } ] }, { "uuid": "29c86358-a31a-485a-8dbc-0ac953294b6d", "emails": [ "wei.wang@sjtu.edu.cn" ], "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/authors/1058694" }, "full_name": "Wang, Wei", "affiliations": [ { "value": "Shanghai Jiao Tong U.", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/institutions/911458" } }, { "value": "Shanghai Jiaotong U.", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/institutions/904740" } }, { "value": "Hui Zhou, Inst. Modern Phys.", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/institutions/2739073" } } ], "raw_affiliations": [ { "value": "State Key Laboratory of Dark Matter Physics, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology," }, { "value": "Key Laboratory for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology (MOE), School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China" }, { "value": "Southern Center for Nuclear-Science Theory (SCNT), Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Huizhou 516000, Guangdong Province, China" } ] }, { "uuid": "fd5a03ee-592e-4548-b3f1-7c82250dadd3", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/authors/1666432" }, "full_name": "Xu, Ji", "affiliations": [ { "value": "Lanzhou U.", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/institutions/904070" } } ], "raw_affiliations": [ { "value": "School of Nuclear Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China" } ] }, { "uuid": "18cd5708-89d6-4725-8231-a203995e0f25", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/authors/1069146" }, "full_name": "Yang, Yi-Bo", "affiliations": [ { "value": "Beijing, GUCAS", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/institutions/904611" } }, { "value": "Beijing, Inst. Theor. Phys.", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/institutions/903895" } }, { "value": "HIAS, UCAS, Hangzhou", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/institutions/1783783" } }, { "value": "ICTP-AP, Beijing", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/institutions/1636674" } } ], "raw_affiliations": [ { "value": "School of Physical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China" }, { "value": "CAS Key Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Institute of Theoretical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China" }, { "value": "School of Fundamental Physics and Mathematical Sciences, Hangzhou Institute for Advanced Study, UCAS, Hangzhou 310024, China" }, { "value": "International Centre for Theoretical Physics Asia-Pacific, Beijing/Hangzhou, China" } ] }, { "uuid": "b285b013-62aa-4d13-9038-63e21addf150", "emails": [ "zhangqa@buaa.edu.cn" ], "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/authors/1712071" }, "full_name": "Zhang, Fu-Wei", "affiliations": [ { "value": "Neimunggu U.", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/institutions/903801" } } ], "raw_affiliations": [ { "value": "School of Physical Science and Technology, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China" } ] }, { "uuid": "19b3d3a7-e5e4-483c-8e67-6cebf902e4bb", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/authors/1061615" }, "full_name": "Zhang, Jian-Hui", "affiliations": [ { "value": "CUHK, Shenzhen", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/institutions/1852741" } } ], "raw_affiliations": [ { "value": "School of Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen 518172, China" } ] }, { "uuid": "68929eb9-43ff-485b-9244-2e56e338c153", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/authors/2374408" }, "full_name": "Zhang, Jia-Lu", "affiliations": [ { "value": "Shanghai Jiao Tong U.", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/institutions/911458" } }, { "value": "Shanghai Jiaotong U.", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/institutions/904740" } }, { "value": "Tsung-Dao Lee Inst., Shanghai", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/institutions/1664092" } } ], "raw_affiliations": [ { "value": "State Key Laboratory of Dark Matter Physics, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology," }, { "value": "Key Laboratory for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology (MOE), School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China" }, { "value": "Tsung-Dao Lee Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 201210, China" } ] }, { "uuid": "999b54d9-fac3-4370-8a29-ef532c17064f", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/authors/2940155" }, "full_name": "Zhang, Mu-Hua", "curated_relation": true }, { "uuid": "55838f37-d734-4ccf-a73b-7d4d2e27441c", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/authors/1712071" }, "full_name": "Zhang, Qi-An", "affiliations": [ { "value": "Shanghai Jiao Tong U.", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/institutions/911458" } }, { "value": "Shanghai Jiaotong U.", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/institutions/904740" } }, { "value": "Tsung-Dao Lee Inst., Shanghai", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/institutions/1664092" } }, { "value": "Beihang U.", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/institutions/908524" } } ], "raw_affiliations": [ { "value": "State Key Laboratory of Dark Matter Physics, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology," }, { "value": "Key Laboratory for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology (MOE), School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China" }, { "value": "Tsung-Dao Lee Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 201210, China" }, { "value": "School of Physics, Beihang University, Beijing 102206, China" } ] }, { "uuid": "e34239e4-a00f-4f7c-beb5-6a74e0961eb2", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/authors/1375695" }, "full_name": "Zhao, Shuai", "affiliations": [ { "value": "Tianjin U.", "record": { "$ref": "https://inspirehep.net/api/institutions/1604854" } } ], "raw_affiliations": [ { "value": "School of Science, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China" } ] } ], "curated": true, "figures": [ { "key": "5424d118e58fdf95cce0c446281796f9", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/5424d118e58fdf95cce0c446281796f9", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "Comparison between the LaMET and Lattice OPE approaches. The two methods are complementary: LaMET provides access to the $x$-dependent structure, while Lattice OPE yields precise low-moment constraints. : Gauge ensembles used in this work. We list the lattice spacing $a$, volume $L^3\\times T$, pion mass $m_\\pi$, and the tuned $D$-meson mass $m_D$ for each ensemble. The last two columns show the statistics used in the LaMET quasi-DA calculation and in the lattice-OPE determination of the lowest LCDA moments, quoted as $n_{\\rm cfg}\\times n_{\\rm meas}$.", "filename": "logo.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "ea4d2ecb713343bd7b25a7bed2e1f66c", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/ea4d2ecb713343bd7b25a7bed2e1f66c", "label": "fig:disprelation", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "Dispersion relation of the boosted $D$ meson on the ensembles used in this work. The effective ground-state energy $E_{\\rm eff}$ extracted from two-point correlators is shown as a function of the momentum magnitude $P$ for C24P29, C48P14, F32P30, F32P21, G36P29, and H48P32. The dashed curve denotes the continuum relativistic dispersion relation $E^2={m_{D}}^2+P^2$, where $m_{D}=1.87\\,{\\rm GeV}$.", "filename": "dispersion_relation.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "f42dd4142e16cf6ecb73501554b83b2f", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/f42dd4142e16cf6ecb73501554b83b2f", "label": "fig:smallPz_ME", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "Hybrid-scheme renormalization in coordinate space. The reference-momentum matrix element at $P_{\\rm ref}^z\\simeq0.5~{\\rm GeV}$ is shown as a function of the spatial separation $z$ (points), together with the perturbative short-distance curve \\cite{Izubuchi:2018srq} and the long-distance fit used to determine $Z_R$.", "filename": "hybrid_renorm.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "6739b9c55f432d583137daa207595081", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/6739b9c55f432d583137daa207595081", "label": "fig:renormME_with_a", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "Renormalized matrix elements $\\tilde{M}^R(\\lambda,P^z)$ at $P^z\\simeq2.5~{\\rm GeV}$ as functions of $\\lambda=zP^z$ on the F32P30, G36P29 and H48P32 ensembles (upper: real part; lower: imaginary part).", "filename": "lambda_extrapolation_different_ens.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "f07149ec7eeb50545ffe654708129734", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/f07149ec7eeb50545ffe654708129734", "label": "fig:renormME_with_Pz", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "Momentum dependence of the renormalized matrix elements on the H48P32 ensemble. Results for $P^z\\simeq2.5$, $3.0$ and $3.5~{\\rm GeV}$ are shown as functions of $\\lambda=zP^z$ (upper: real part; lower: imaginary part).", "filename": "lambda_extrapolation_different_pz.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "c1352ca3f5fbd8d7d6762fac93ecc43f", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/c1352ca3f5fbd8d7d6762fac93ecc43f", "label": "fig:zs_dependence", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "Dependence of $\\tilde{M}^R(\\lambda,P^z)$ on the hybrid separation scale $z_s$ on H48P32 at $P^z\\simeq3.5~{\\rm GeV}$, comparing two representative choices of $z_s$ (upper: real part; lower: imaginary part).", "filename": "lambda_extrapolation_shift_zs.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "b061ae76e6d775c6489a30869d4e6fe1", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/b061ae76e6d775c6489a30869d4e6fe1", "label": "fig:extra_renormME_with_a", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "Comparison of the original (data points) and extrapolated results (colored bands) at $P^z\\simeq2.5\\,{\\rm GeV}$ with different lattice spacings. More cases can be found in the Appendix.", "filename": "lambda_extrapolation_extrapolation.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "08df2337a6a06d778688880947b8b556", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/08df2337a6a06d778688880947b8b556", "label": "fig:lamet_matching_example", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "Comparison between the renormalized quasi-DA $\\tilde{\\phi}(x,P^z)$ on the H48P32 ensemble with $P^z\\simeq3.5~{\\rm GeV}$, and the matched QCD LCDA $\\phi(y,\\mu)$ at $\\mu=m_D$.", "filename": "LaMET_matching.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "5d8e00615bccf5837212f1c94eb6ef1c", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/5d8e00615bccf5837212f1c94eb6ef1c", "label": "fig:qcd_lcda_ensembles", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "$D$ meson QCD LCDA $\\phi(y,\\mu=m_D)$ obtained from LaMET matching for different ensembles and momenta. The gray band shows the final result of $\\phi(y,\\mu=m_D)$ after extrapolating to $a\\to0$, $P^z\\to\\infty$, and $m_\\pi\\to m_\\pi^{\\rm phy}$. Only statistic errors are included in the resulting bands.", "filename": "QCD_LCDAs.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "5f658d1fc854f7230bc76d65329ba2d3", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/5f658d1fc854f7230bc76d65329ba2d3", "label": "fig:gegenbauer_moments_qcd_lcda", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "Comparison of the first two Gegenbauer moments, $a_1$ and $a_2$, extracted from the fitted QCD LCDAs on individual ensembles and from the final extrapolated QCD LCDA at the physical point. The filled and open markers represent $a_1$ and $a_2$, respectively.", "filename": "Compare_Moments_broken_axis.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "842188c81d57fe3d260b27ee7b947025", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/842188c81d57fe3d260b27ee7b947025", "label": "fig:error_budget_phi", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "Error budget for the final result of $D$ meson QCD LCDA, showing statistical uncertainties and systematic ones from different sources. Total uncertainties are obtained by adding these contributions in quadrature.", "filename": "Syst_and_stat_err_QCD_LCDA_bar_percentage.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "8f8659e71a162042d05eca515673d7ae", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/8f8659e71a162042d05eca515673d7ae", "label": "fig:re_OPE_moments", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "Renormalized ratios $\\mathcal{R}^{-}_{1,b}$ (blue, $\\vec p=\\vec0$) and $\\mathcal{R}^{-}_{1,a}$ (orange, smallest nonzero $\\vec p$) versus source--sink separation $t$ for extracting $\\langle\\xi\\rangle^{\\overline{\\rm MS}}$ on C48P14 (left) and H48P32 (right). The band denotes the model-averaged plateau fit to $\\mathcal{R}^{-}_{1,b}$, which is consistent with that from with $\\mathcal{R}^{-}_{1,a}$ within errors.", "filename": "C48P14_Firstmoment_PS_re.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "afe4118830bdbc60f8bcf4a0dfd3e632", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/afe4118830bdbc60f8bcf4a0dfd3e632", "label": "fig:re_OPE_moments", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "Renormalized ratios $\\mathcal{R}^{-}_{1,b}$ (blue, $\\vec p=\\vec0$) and $\\mathcal{R}^{-}_{1,a}$ (orange, smallest nonzero $\\vec p$) versus source--sink separation $t$ for extracting $\\langle\\xi\\rangle^{\\overline{\\rm MS}}$ on C48P14 (left) and H48P32 (right). The band denotes the model-averaged plateau fit to $\\mathcal{R}^{-}_{1,b}$, which is consistent with that from with $\\mathcal{R}^{-}_{1,a}$ within errors.", "filename": "H48P32_Firstmoment_PS_re.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "9010d025a5c70ccf4706fff008d6ee7c", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/9010d025a5c70ccf4706fff008d6ee7c", "label": "fig:re_OPE_moments_second", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "Renormalized ratio estimators for the second moment $\\langle\\xi^2\\rangle$ (in the $\\overline{\\rm MS}$ scheme at $\\mu=m_D$) on two representative ensembles. Blue points show $\\mathcal{R}^{-}_{2,a1}$ and orange points show $\\mathcal{R}^{+}_{2,a2}$ as functions of the source--sink separation $t$. The shaded band indicates the model-averaged plateau fit used to extract $\\langle\\xi^2\\rangle^{\\overline{\\rm MS}}$.", "filename": "C48P14_Secondmoment_PS_re.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "d3e74d03019b233aa97413d5d421af04", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/d3e74d03019b233aa97413d5d421af04", "label": "fig:re_OPE_moments_second", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "Renormalized ratio estimators for the second moment $\\langle\\xi^2\\rangle$ (in the $\\overline{\\rm MS}$ scheme at $\\mu=m_D$) on two representative ensembles. Blue points show $\\mathcal{R}^{-}_{2,a1}$ and orange points show $\\mathcal{R}^{+}_{2,a2}$ as functions of the source--sink separation $t$. The shaded band indicates the model-averaged plateau fit used to extract $\\langle\\xi^2\\rangle^{\\overline{\\rm MS}}$.", "filename": "H48P32_Secondmoment_PS_re.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "9fd9c54bde9e51480d933c8604a10b12", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/9fd9c54bde9e51480d933c8604a10b12", "label": "fig:OPE_moments_extrap", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "Combined continuum and physical-mass extrapolations of the renormalized lattice-OPE moments at $\\mu=m_D$. Data points correspond to the ensembles listed in the ``OPE moments'' column of Table~\\ref{tab:ensembles} (including two ensembles at the same lattice spacing with different $m_\\pi$), and the band shows the fit using Eq.~\\eqref{eq:OPE_moment_extrap}. The marker at the physical point indicates the extrapolated result. The upper-left, upper-right, and lower panels show the results for $\\langle\\xi\\rangle$, $\\langle\\xi^2\\rangle$, and $\\langle1\\rangle$, respectively.", "filename": "Firstmoment_pmdependence_mD.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "a5bec405b4ece02eda9b081d4b98d08f", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/a5bec405b4ece02eda9b081d4b98d08f", "label": "fig:OPE_moments_extrap", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "Combined continuum and physical-mass extrapolations of the renormalized lattice-OPE moments at $\\mu=m_D$. Data points correspond to the ensembles listed in the ``OPE moments'' column of Table~\\ref{tab:ensembles} (including two ensembles at the same lattice spacing with different $m_\\pi$), and the band shows the fit using Eq.~\\eqref{eq:OPE_moment_extrap}. The marker at the physical point indicates the extrapolated result. The upper-left, upper-right, and lower panels show the results for $\\langle\\xi\\rangle$, $\\langle\\xi^2\\rangle$, and $\\langle1\\rangle$, respectively.", "filename": "Secondmoment_pmdependence_mD.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "4dec8a019309bae26caaeba797f24d67", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/4dec8a019309bae26caaeba797f24d67", "label": "fig:OPE_moments_extrap", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "Combined continuum and physical-mass extrapolations of the renormalized lattice-OPE moments at $\\mu=m_D$. Data points correspond to the ensembles listed in the ``OPE moments'' column of Table~\\ref{tab:ensembles} (including two ensembles at the same lattice spacing with different $m_\\pi$), and the band shows the fit using Eq.~\\eqref{eq:OPE_moment_extrap}. The marker at the physical point indicates the extrapolated result. The upper-left, upper-right, and lower panels show the results for $\\langle\\xi\\rangle$, $\\langle\\xi^2\\rangle$, and $\\langle1\\rangle$, respectively.", "filename": "Zerothmoment_pmdependence_mD.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "9143d0ee567b76082734f8b8d6c10a60", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/9143d0ee567b76082734f8b8d6c10a60", "label": "fig:moment_compare_LaMET_OPE", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "Benchmark of the lowest Gegenbauer moments. The blue (orange) points show $a_1$ ($a_2$) extracted from fits to the LaMET-reconstructed $\\phi(y,\\mu)$ truncated at different maximal orders $N$; the orange and blue bands indicate constant fits used to obtain the final LaMET values. The green and purple bands denote the corresponding moments obtained from lattice-OPE after conversion via Eq.~\\eqref{eq:GandLmoments}.", "filename": "Compare_Moments_LaMET_OPE.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "ecb0c260a286c68dd36905179b36f904", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/ecb0c260a286c68dd36905179b36f904", "label": "fig:HQET_LCDA_peak_tail", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "HQET LCDA $\\varphi^+(\\omega,\\mu)$ reconstructed from the QCD LCDA in the peak region (orange band) and from the perturbative tail formula at large $\\omega$ (blue band). The gray-shaded interval indicates the intermediate and endpoint regions where neither approach is fully predictive.", "filename": "HQET_LCDA_peak_tail.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "caca169dcdaf5ecf74bb8e7de6379d51", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/caca169dcdaf5ecf74bb8e7de6379d51", "label": "fig:HQET_LCDA_param", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "Reconstruction of the HQET LCDA $\\varphi^+(\\omega,\\mu)$ using the Laguerre-polynomial parametrization in Eq.~\\eqref{eq:HQETLCDAsmallomegaexpansion2}. The bands show fits with truncation orders $K=2,3,4,5$ constrained by the first-principles information in the peak region and in the perturbative tail.", "filename": "HQET_LCDA_reconstruction.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "7be0f7dd530b0b69013dc27cf0772068", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/7be0f7dd530b0b69013dc27cf0772068", "label": "fig:RCs_first_moments_mD", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "RI/SMOM$\\to\\overline{\\rm MS}$ renormalization factors for the first-moment operators, shown as $Z_{r2a}/Z_A$ (left) and $Z_{r2b}/Z_A$ (right) versus $a^2p^2$ for all ensembles.", "filename": "r2a_r2b_ZA.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "913575219b37011cb1dcb932b666bf1f", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/913575219b37011cb1dcb932b666bf1f", "label": "fig:RCs_second_moments_mD", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "RI/SMOM$\\to\\overline{\\rm MS}$ renormalization matrix elements for the second-moment operator multiplet, shown as $Z_{11}/Z_A$, $Z_{12}/Z_A$, $Z_{21}/Z_A$, and $Z_{22}/Z_A$ versus $a^2p^2$ for all ensembles.", "filename": "Z11_Z12_Z21_Z22_ZA.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "79e49a09101b2c910a72f330f503c1f8", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/79e49a09101b2c910a72f330f503c1f8", "label": "fig:MEs_F32P30", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "The figures present results from the F32P30 ensemble and compare the combinations for \\{$\\it z,P^z$\\}=\\{1,0.50 GeV\\},\\{3,0.50 GeV\\},\\{5,0.50 GeV\\},\\{1,2.50 GeV\\},\\{1,2.50 GeV\\}, and \\{1,2.50 GeV\\}, respectively. The upper and lower panels correspond to the real and imaginary parts of the matrix elements, respectively. For z=1 we employ a two-state fit, while for all other z values we use a one-state fit.", "filename": "MEs_F32P30_pz1_z1.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "b15da0df8a7b78790bbbd2cde9807822", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/b15da0df8a7b78790bbbd2cde9807822", "label": "fig:MEs_F32P30", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "The figures present results from the F32P30 ensemble and compare the combinations for \\{$\\it z,P^z$\\}=\\{1,0.50 GeV\\},\\{3,0.50 GeV\\},\\{5,0.50 GeV\\},\\{1,2.50 GeV\\},\\{1,2.50 GeV\\}, and \\{1,2.50 GeV\\}, respectively. The upper and lower panels correspond to the real and imaginary parts of the matrix elements, respectively. For z=1 we employ a two-state fit, while for all other z values we use a one-state fit.", "filename": "MEs_F32P30_pz5_z1.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "0d0bb41425ac0c8a3221fc5808a94430", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/0d0bb41425ac0c8a3221fc5808a94430", "label": "fig:MEs_F32P30", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "The figures present results from the F32P30 ensemble and compare the combinations for \\{$\\it z,P^z$\\}=\\{1,0.50 GeV\\},\\{3,0.50 GeV\\},\\{5,0.50 GeV\\},\\{1,2.50 GeV\\},\\{1,2.50 GeV\\}, and \\{1,2.50 GeV\\}, respectively. The upper and lower panels correspond to the real and imaginary parts of the matrix elements, respectively. For z=1 we employ a two-state fit, while for all other z values we use a one-state fit.", "filename": "MEs_F32P30_pz1_z3.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "04740fabd47e2cdcb65fec21a314a562", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/04740fabd47e2cdcb65fec21a314a562", "label": "fig:MEs_F32P30", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "The figures present results from the F32P30 ensemble and compare the combinations for \\{$\\it z,P^z$\\}=\\{1,0.50 GeV\\},\\{3,0.50 GeV\\},\\{5,0.50 GeV\\},\\{1,2.50 GeV\\},\\{1,2.50 GeV\\}, and \\{1,2.50 GeV\\}, respectively. The upper and lower panels correspond to the real and imaginary parts of the matrix elements, respectively. For z=1 we employ a two-state fit, while for all other z values we use a one-state fit.", "filename": "MEs_F32P30_pz5_z3.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "eb7c853c2eb58651b5b8afbb3bb84b95", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/eb7c853c2eb58651b5b8afbb3bb84b95", "label": "fig:MEs_F32P30", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "The figures present results from the F32P30 ensemble and compare the combinations for \\{$\\it z,P^z$\\}=\\{1,0.50 GeV\\},\\{3,0.50 GeV\\},\\{5,0.50 GeV\\},\\{1,2.50 GeV\\},\\{1,2.50 GeV\\}, and \\{1,2.50 GeV\\}, respectively. The upper and lower panels correspond to the real and imaginary parts of the matrix elements, respectively. For z=1 we employ a two-state fit, while for all other z values we use a one-state fit.", "filename": "MEs_F32P30_pz1_z5.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "61222fcb198abaa6c9b0e5bdb7a82eb9", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/61222fcb198abaa6c9b0e5bdb7a82eb9", "label": "fig:MEs_F32P30", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "The figures present results from the F32P30 ensemble and compare the combinations for \\{$\\it z,P^z$\\}=\\{1,0.50 GeV\\},\\{3,0.50 GeV\\},\\{5,0.50 GeV\\},\\{1,2.50 GeV\\},\\{1,2.50 GeV\\}, and \\{1,2.50 GeV\\}, respectively. The upper and lower panels correspond to the real and imaginary parts of the matrix elements, respectively. For z=1 we employ a two-state fit, while for all other z values we use a one-state fit.", "filename": "MEs_F32P30_pz5_z5.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "1c4b472ba4368681e523f2825ee331db", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/1c4b472ba4368681e523f2825ee331db", "label": "fig:MEs_H48P32", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "The figures present results from the H48P32 ensemble and compare the combinations for \\{$\\it z,P^z$\\}=\\{1,0.50 GeV\\},\\{3,0.50 GeV\\},\\{5,0.50 GeV\\},\\{1,2.49 GeV\\},\\{1,2.49 GeV\\}, and \\{1,2.49 GeV\\}, respectively. The upper and lower panels correspond to the real and imaginary parts of the matrix elements, respectively. For z=1 we employ a two-state fit, while for all other z values we use a one-state fit.", "filename": "MEs_H48P32_pz1_z1.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "6e3709b91a9a6dec5e4afb94c2c36fb4", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/6e3709b91a9a6dec5e4afb94c2c36fb4", "label": "fig:MEs_H48P32", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "The figures present results from the H48P32 ensemble and compare the combinations for \\{$\\it z,P^z$\\}=\\{1,0.50 GeV\\},\\{3,0.50 GeV\\},\\{5,0.50 GeV\\},\\{1,2.49 GeV\\},\\{1,2.49 GeV\\}, and \\{1,2.49 GeV\\}, respectively. The upper and lower panels correspond to the real and imaginary parts of the matrix elements, respectively. For z=1 we employ a two-state fit, while for all other z values we use a one-state fit.", "filename": "MEs_H48P32_pz5_z1.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "58e6a5e13e00cc39eea284546e33db31", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/58e6a5e13e00cc39eea284546e33db31", "label": "fig:MEs_H48P32", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "The figures present results from the H48P32 ensemble and compare the combinations for \\{$\\it z,P^z$\\}=\\{1,0.50 GeV\\},\\{3,0.50 GeV\\},\\{5,0.50 GeV\\},\\{1,2.49 GeV\\},\\{1,2.49 GeV\\}, and \\{1,2.49 GeV\\}, respectively. The upper and lower panels correspond to the real and imaginary parts of the matrix elements, respectively. For z=1 we employ a two-state fit, while for all other z values we use a one-state fit.", "filename": "MEs_H48P32_pz1_z3.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "26198f4472afd7a9a09b55c562fc93f6", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/26198f4472afd7a9a09b55c562fc93f6", "label": "fig:MEs_H48P32", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "The figures present results from the H48P32 ensemble and compare the combinations for \\{$\\it z,P^z$\\}=\\{1,0.50 GeV\\},\\{3,0.50 GeV\\},\\{5,0.50 GeV\\},\\{1,2.49 GeV\\},\\{1,2.49 GeV\\}, and \\{1,2.49 GeV\\}, respectively. The upper and lower panels correspond to the real and imaginary parts of the matrix elements, respectively. For z=1 we employ a two-state fit, while for all other z values we use a one-state fit.", "filename": "MEs_H48P32_pz5_z3.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "56a5cf83711ebb6b1a2eea4c53193619", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/56a5cf83711ebb6b1a2eea4c53193619", "label": "fig:MEs_H48P32", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "The figures present results from the H48P32 ensemble and compare the combinations for \\{$\\it z,P^z$\\}=\\{1,0.50 GeV\\},\\{3,0.50 GeV\\},\\{5,0.50 GeV\\},\\{1,2.49 GeV\\},\\{1,2.49 GeV\\}, and \\{1,2.49 GeV\\}, respectively. The upper and lower panels correspond to the real and imaginary parts of the matrix elements, respectively. For z=1 we employ a two-state fit, while for all other z values we use a one-state fit.", "filename": "MEs_H48P32_pz1_z5.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "5d587cbc45ea1928372eba358d7be0dc", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/5d587cbc45ea1928372eba358d7be0dc", "label": "fig:MEs_H48P32", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "The figures present results from the H48P32 ensemble and compare the combinations for \\{$\\it z,P^z$\\}=\\{1,0.50 GeV\\},\\{3,0.50 GeV\\},\\{5,0.50 GeV\\},\\{1,2.49 GeV\\},\\{1,2.49 GeV\\}, and \\{1,2.49 GeV\\}, respectively. The upper and lower panels correspond to the real and imaginary parts of the matrix elements, respectively. For z=1 we employ a two-state fit, while for all other z values we use a one-state fit.", "filename": "MEs_H48P32_pz5_z5.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "e201de9b7e413be655233a5abac23337", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/e201de9b7e413be655233a5abac23337", "label": "fig:more_lambda_extrapolation_1", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "$\\lambda$-extrapolation results (colored bands) at $P^z\\simeq2.5\\,{\\rm GeV}$ with different lattice spacings(upper: real part; lower: imaginary part). The left and right panels correspond to $z_s=0.10$ fm and $z_s=0.21$ fm, respectively.", "filename": "lambda_extrapolation_different_a_zs0.10_lambdachange0.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "7e7688ca666e9c010838e93d56a73f0a", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/7e7688ca666e9c010838e93d56a73f0a", "label": "fig:more_lambda_extrapolation_1", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "$\\lambda$-extrapolation results (colored bands) at $P^z\\simeq2.5\\,{\\rm GeV}$ with different lattice spacings(upper: real part; lower: imaginary part). The left and right panels correspond to $z_s=0.10$ fm and $z_s=0.21$ fm, respectively.", "filename": "lambda_extrapolation_different_a_zs0.21_lambdachange0.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "c5ee72c86c34678ad379ed0c4f162fa2", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/c5ee72c86c34678ad379ed0c4f162fa2", "label": "fig:more_lambda_extrapolation_2", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "$\\lambda$-extrapolation results (colored bands) at $P^z\\simeq2.5\\,{\\rm GeV}$ with different lattice spacings(upper: real part; lower: imaginary part). The left and right panels correspond to shifting the starting point of the $\\lambda$ extrapolation by one data point backward (smaller $\\lambda$) and forward (larger $\\lambda$), respectively.", "filename": "lambda_extrapolation_different_a_zs0.16_lambdachange-1.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "7a0eecf3b04d918febca50b733db2a06", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/7a0eecf3b04d918febca50b733db2a06", "label": "fig:more_lambda_extrapolation_2", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "$\\lambda$-extrapolation results (colored bands) at $P^z\\simeq2.5\\,{\\rm GeV}$ with different lattice spacings(upper: real part; lower: imaginary part). The left and right panels correspond to shifting the starting point of the $\\lambda$ extrapolation by one data point backward (smaller $\\lambda$) and forward (larger $\\lambda$), respectively.", "filename": "lambda_extrapolation_different_a_zs0.16_lambdachange1.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "135df05052b4bbc7480e95439f4ffefb", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/135df05052b4bbc7480e95439f4ffefb", "label": "fig:more_lambda_extrapolation_3", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "$\\lambda$-extrapolation results (colored bands) at $P^z\\simeq2.5$, $3.0$ and $3.5~{\\rm GeV}$ on H48P32 ensemble(upper: real part; lower: imaginary part). The left and right panels correspond to $z_s=0.16$ fm and $z_s=0.26$ fm, respectively.", "filename": "lambda_extrapolation_different_pz_zs0.16_lambdachange0.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "4d9732501d148f92b71f086dab7c0281", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/4d9732501d148f92b71f086dab7c0281", "label": "fig:more_lambda_extrapolation_3", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "$\\lambda$-extrapolation results (colored bands) at $P^z\\simeq2.5$, $3.0$ and $3.5~{\\rm GeV}$ on H48P32 ensemble(upper: real part; lower: imaginary part). The left and right panels correspond to $z_s=0.16$ fm and $z_s=0.26$ fm, respectively.", "filename": "lambda_extrapolation_different_pz_zs0.21_lambdachange0.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "7ca70cfb776ab7730d386a4a69321237", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/7ca70cfb776ab7730d386a4a69321237", "label": "fig:more_lambda_extrapolation_4", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "$\\lambda$-extrapolation results (colored bands) at $P^z\\simeq2.5$, $3.0$ and $3.5~{\\rm GeV}$ on H48P32 ensemble(upper: real part; lower: imaginary part). The left and right panels correspond to shifting the starting point of the $\\lambda$ extrapolation by one data point backward (smaller $\\lambda$) and forward (larger $\\lambda$), respectively.", "filename": "lambda_extrapolation_different_pz_zs0.16_lambdachange-1.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "73470c83f5eab6388cfa823f22749993", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/73470c83f5eab6388cfa823f22749993", "label": "fig:more_lambda_extrapolation_4", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "$\\lambda$-extrapolation results (colored bands) at $P^z\\simeq2.5$, $3.0$ and $3.5~{\\rm GeV}$ on H48P32 ensemble(upper: real part; lower: imaginary part). The left and right panels correspond to shifting the starting point of the $\\lambda$ extrapolation by one data point backward (smaller $\\lambda$) and forward (larger $\\lambda$), respectively.", "filename": "lambda_extrapolation_different_pz_zs0.16_lambdachange1.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "0de95ae6ff13f9a912a46361f5667dd5", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/0de95ae6ff13f9a912a46361f5667dd5", "label": "fig:quasi-DA_in_momentum_space", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "Quasi-DA in momentum space at $\\it\\{a,P^z\\}$ = \\{0.1053 fm,2.5 GeV\\},\\{0.0775 fm,2.5 GeV\\},\\{0.0683 fm,2.5 GeV\\},\\{0.0519 fm,2.5 GeV\\},\\{0.0519 fm,3.0 GeV\\},\\{0.0519 fm,3.5 GeV\\}, respectively. The left and right panels correspond to different lattice spacings and different momenta, respectively.", "filename": "lambda_extrapolation_mom_space_different_ensembles.png", "material": "preprint" }, { "key": "42476c2611052fe0c66df11eda6cd6db", "url": "https://inspirehep.net/files/42476c2611052fe0c66df11eda6cd6db", "label": "fig:quasi-DA_in_momentum_space", "source": "arxiv", "caption": "Quasi-DA in momentum space at $\\it\\{a,P^z\\}$ = \\{0.1053 fm,2.5 GeV\\},\\{0.0775 fm,2.5 GeV\\},\\{0.0683 fm,2.5 GeV\\},\\{0.0519 fm,2.5 GeV\\},\\{0.0519 fm,3.0 GeV\\},\\{0.0519 fm,3.5 GeV\\}, respectively. The left and right panels correspond to different lattice spacings and different momenta, respectively.", "filename": "lambda_extrapolation_mom_space_different_mom.png", "material": "preprint" } ], "license": [ { "url": "http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/", "license": "CC BY 4.0", "material": "preprint" } ], "texkeys": [ "LPC:2026vyv", "Gao:2026wki" ], "citeable": true, "abstracts": [ { "value": "We present a first-principles determination of heavy meson light-cone distribution amplitudes (LCDAs) from lattice QCD in the continuum limit, improving substantially on our previous pioneering study. Within the heavy-quark large-momentum effective theory (HQLaMET) framework, supplemented by lattice QCD calculations of the OPE moments, we analyze six ensembles with lattice spacings ranging from $a=0.0519-0.1053$ fm and pion masses from $m_π=135.5-317.2$ MeV, thereby enabling controlled continuum, chiral, and infinite-momentum extrapolations to the physical point. Momentum-smeared sources, hypercubic-smeared Wilson lines, and optimized interpolating operators are adopted to significantly improved signals for the nonlocal correlators. Within a unified framework, we determine both QCD LCDAs and HQET LCDAs. Our resulting QCD LCDAs of $D$ meson peak at $y\\approx 0.2-0.3$, with total uncertainties below $30\\%$ for $0.1