1. Machine Learning for Lattice QCD, Akio Tomiya, J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 94 (3) 031006, (2025), doi:10.7566/JPSJ.94.031006
2. Variational quantum simulation of ground states and thermal states for lattice gauge theory with multi-objective optimization, Lang-Xing Cheng, and Dan-Bo Zhang, Phys. Lett. A 546 130516, (2025), arXiv:2408.17300 doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2025.130516
3. Deep learning lattice gauge theories, Anuj Apte, Clay Cordova, Tzu-Chen Huang, and Anthony Ashmore, Phys. Rev. B 110 (16) 165133, (2024), arXiv:2405.14830 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.110.165133
4. Emergent U(1) lattice gauge theory in Rydberg atom arrays, Yanting Cheng, and Hui Zhai, Nature Rev. Phys. 6 566–576, (2024), arXiv:2401.07708 doi:10.1038/s42254-024-00749-6
5. Advances in machine-learning-based sampling motivated by lattice quantum chromodynamics, Kyle Cranmer, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Nature Rev. Phys. 5 (9) 526–535, (2023), arXiv:2309.01156 doi:10.1038/s42254-023-00616-w
6. Self-learning Monte Carlo with equivariant Transformer, Yuki Nagai, and Akio Tomiya, J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 93 114007, (2024), arXiv:2306.11527 doi:10.7566/JPSJ.93.114007
7. Gauge-equivariant pooling layers for preconditioners in lattice QCD, Christoph Lehner, and Tilo Wettig, Phys. Rev. D 110 (3) 034517, (2024), arXiv:2304.10438 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.034517
8. Gauge-equivariant neural networks as preconditioners in lattice QCD, Christoph Lehner, and Tilo Wettig, Phys. Rev. D 108 (3) 034503, (2023), arXiv:2302.05419 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.034503
9. Gauge-equivariant flow models for sampling in lattice field theories with pseudofermions, Ryan Abbott, and others, Phys. Rev. D 106 (7) 074506, (2022), arXiv:2207.08945 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074506
10. Machine learning in the search for new fundamental physics, Georgia Karagiorgi, Gregor Kasieczka, Scott Kravitz, Benjamin Nachman, and David Shih, Nature Rev. Phys. 4 (6) 399–412, (2022), doi:10.1038/s42254-022-00455-1
11. Colloquium: Machine learning in nuclear physics, Amber Boehnlein, and others, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94 (3) 031003, (2022), arXiv:2112.02309 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.94.031003
12. Thermalization dynamics of a gauge theory on a quantum simulator, Zhao-Yu Zhou, Guo-Xian Su, Jad C. Halimeh, Robert Ott, Hui Sun, Philipp Hauke, Bing Yang, Zhen-Sheng Yuan, Jürgen Berges, and Jian-Wei Pan, Science 377 (6603) abl6277, (2022), arXiv:2107.13563 doi:10.1126/science.abl6277
13. Generalization capabilities of translationally equivariant neural networks, Srinath Bulusu, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, Phys. Rev. D 104 (7) 074504, (2021), arXiv:2103.14686 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.074504
14. Gauge covariant neural network for quarks and gluons, Yuki Nagai, and Akio Tomiya, Phys. Rev. D 111 (7) 074501, (2025), arXiv:2103.11965 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.074501
15. Modern Machine Learning and Particle Physics, Matthew D. Schwartz, (2021), arXiv:2103.12226 doi:10.1162/99608f92.beeb1183
16. Gauge-invariant and anyonic-symmetric autoregressive neural network for quantum lattice models, Di Luo, Zhuo Chen, Kaiwen Hu, Zhizhen Zhao, Vera Mikyoung Hur, and Bryan K. Clark, Phys. Rev. Res. 5 (1) 013216, (2023), arXiv:2101.07243 doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.013216
17. Lattice Gauge Equivariant Convolutional Neural Networks, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (3) 032003, (2022), arXiv:2012.12901 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.032003
18. Gauge Equivariant Neural Networks for Quantum Lattice Gauge Theories, Di Luo, Giuseppe Carleo, Bryan K. Clark, and James Stokes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (27) 276402, (2021), arXiv:2012.05232 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.276402
19. Self-learning Monte Carlo for non-Abelian gauge theory with dynamical fermions, Yuki Nagai, Akinori Tanaka, and Akio Tomiya, Phys. Rev. D 107 (5) 054501, (2023), arXiv:2010.11900 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.054501
20. Sampling using $SU(N)$ gauge equivariant flows, Denis Boyda, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Michael S. Albergo, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 103 (7) 074504, (2021), arXiv:2008.05456 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074504
21. Machine Learning for Condensed Matter Physics, Edwin A. Bedolla-Montiel, Luis Carlos Padierna, and Ram\'on Casta\~neda-Priego, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 33 (5) 053001, (2021), arXiv:2005.14228 doi:10.1088/1361-648X/abb895
22. Equivariant flow-based sampling for lattice gauge theory, Gurtej Kanwar, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (12) 121601, (2020), arXiv:2003.06413 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.121601
23. Flow-based generative models for Markov chain Monte Carlo in lattice field theory, M. S. Albergo, G. Kanwar, and P. E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 100 (3) 034515, (2019), arXiv:1904.12072 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.034515
24. Machine learning and the physical sciences, Giuseppe Carleo, Ignacio Cirac, Kyle Cranmer, Laurent Daudet, Maria Schuld, Naftali Tishby, Leslie Vogt-Maranto, and Lenka Zdeborov\'a, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91 (4) 045002, (2019), arXiv:1903.10563 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.91.045002
25. Machine learning meets quantum physics, Sankar Das Sarma, Dong-Ling Deng, and Lu-Ming Duan, Phys. Today 72 (3) 48–54, (2019), arXiv:1903.03516 doi:10.1063/PT.3.4164
26. Lattice gauge theories and string dynamics in Rydberg atom quantum simulators, Federica M. Surace, Paolo P. Mazza, Giuliano Giudici, Alessio Lerose, Andrea Gambassi, and Marcello Dalmonte, Phys. Rev. X 10 (2) 021041, (2020), arXiv:1902.09551 doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.10.021041
27. How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?, Keyulu Xu, Weihua Hu, Jure Leskovec, and Stefanie Jegelka, (2018), arXiv:1810.00826
28. Machine learning for molecular and materials science, Keith T. Butler, Daniel W. Davies, Hugh Cartwright, Olexandr Isayev, and Aron Walsh, Nature 559 (7715) 547–555, (2018), doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0337-2
29. Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistry, Justin Gilmer, Samuel S. Schoenholz, Patrick F. Riley, Oriol Vinyals, and George E. Dahl, (2017), arXiv:1704.01212
30. Quantum Spin Liquid States, Yi Zhou, Kazushi Kanoda, and Tai-Kai Ng, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89 (2) 025003, (2017), arXiv:1607.03228 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.89.025003
31. Group Equivariant Convolutional Networks, Taco S. Cohen, and Max Welling, (2016), arXiv:1602.07576
32. Quantum spin liquids: a review, Lucile Savary, and Leon Balents, Rept. Prog. Phys. 80 (1) 016502, (2017), arXiv:1601.03742 doi:10.1088/0034-4885/80/1/016502
33. Quantum Simulations of Lattice Gauge Theories using Ultracold Atoms in Optical Lattices, Erez Zohar, J. Ignacio Cirac, and Benni Reznik, Rept. Prog. Phys. 79 (1) 014401, (2016), arXiv:1503.02312 doi:10.1088/0034-4885/79/1/014401
34. Ultracold Quantum Gases and Lattice Systems: Quantum Simulation of Lattice Gauge Theories, Uwe-Jens Wiese, Annalen Phys. 525 777–796, (2013), arXiv:1305.1602 doi:10.1002/andp.201300104
35. Quantum simulations of gauge theories with ultracold atoms: local gauge invariance from angular momentum conservation, Erez Zohar, J. Ignacio Cirac, and Benni Reznik, Phys. Rev. A 88 023617, (2013), arXiv:1303.5040 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.88.023617
36. Simulations of non-Abelian gauge theories with optical lattices, L. Tagliacozzo, A. Celi, P. Orland, and M. Lewenstein, Nature Commun. 4 2615, (2013), arXiv:1211.2704 doi:10.1038/ncomms3615
37. Atomic Quantum Simulation of Dynamical Gauge Fields coupled to Fermionic Matter: From String Breaking to Evolution after a Quench, D. Banerjee, M. Dalmonte, M. Muller, E. Rico, P. Stebler, U. -J. Wiese, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 175302, (2012), arXiv:1205.6366 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.175302
38. The Graph Neural Network Model, F. Scarselli, M. Gori, Ah Chung Tsoi, M. Hagenbuchner, and G. Monfardini, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 20 (1) 61–80, (2009), doi:10.1109/tnn.2008.2005605
39. Doping a Mott insulator: Physics of high-temperature superconductivity, Patrick A. Lee, Naoto Nagaosa, and Xiao-Gang Wen, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78 17–85, (2006), arXiv:cond-mat/0410445 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.78.17
40. Quantum orders and symmetric spin liquids, Xiao-Gang Wen, Phys. Rev. B 65 165113, (2002), arXiv:cond-mat/0107071 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.65.165113
41. QCD as a quantum link model, R. Brower, S. Chandrasekharan, and U. J. Wiese, Phys. Rev. D 60 094502, (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9704106 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.60.094502
42. Quantum link models: A Discrete approach to gauge theories, S. Chandrasekharan, and U. J. Wiese, Nucl. Phys. B 492 455–474, (1997), arXiv:hep-lat/9609042 doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00006-0
43. Mean-field theory of spin-liquid states with finite energy gap and topological orders, X. Wen, Phys. Rev. B 44 (6) 2664–2672, (1991), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.44.2664
44. Large n limit of the Heisenberg-Hubbard model: Implications for high t(c) supconductors, Ian Affleck, and J. Brad Marston, Phys. Rev. B 37 3774–3777, (1987), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.37.3774
45. An Introduction to Lattice Gauge Theory and Spin Systems, John B. Kogut, Rev. Mod. Phys. 51 659, (1979), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.51.659
46. Phase Diagrams of Lattice Gauge Theories with Higgs Fields, Eduardo H. Fradkin, and Stephen H. Shenker, Phys. Rev. D 19 3682–3697, (1979), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.19.3682
47. Hamiltonian Formulation of Wilson's Lattice Gauge Theories, John B. Kogut, and Leonard Susskind, Phys. Rev. D 11 395–408, (1975), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.11.395
48. Confinement of Quarks, Kenneth G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 10 2445–2459, (1974), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.10.2445