1. Scaling flow-based approaches for topology sampling in SU(3) gauge theory, Claudio Bonanno, Andrea Bulgarelli, Elia Cellini, Alessandro Nada, Dario Panfalone, Davide Vadacchino, and Lorenzo Verzichelli, JHEP 04 051, (2026), arXiv:2510.25704 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2026)051
2. Lattice Evidence That Scalar Glueballs are Small, Ryan Abbott, Daniel C. Hackett, Dimitra A. Pefkou, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136 (4) 041901, (2026), arXiv:2508.21821 doi:10.1103/67xg-qxhz
3. Stochastic automatic differentiation and the signal to noise problem, Guilherme Catumba, and Alberto Ramos, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (9) 1037, (2025), arXiv:2502.15570 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14690-0
4. Progress in Normalizing Flows for 4d Gauge Theories, Ryan Abbott, Denis Boyda, Gurtej Kanwar, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Daniel C. Hackett, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, PoS LATTICE2024 066, (2025), arXiv:2502.00263 doi:10.22323/1.466.0066
5. CASK: A Gauge Covariant Transformer for Lattice Gauge Theory, Yuki Nagai, Hiroshi Ohno, and Akio Tomiya, PoS LATTICE2024 030, (2025), arXiv:2501.16955 doi:10.22323/1.466.0030
6. Nonperturbative trivializing flows for lattice gauge theories, Mathis Gerdes, Pim de Haan, Roberto Bondesan, and Miranda C. N. Cheng, Phys. Rev. D 112 (9) 094516, (2025), arXiv:2410.13161 doi:10.1103/31d5-hvp6
7. NETS: A Non-Equilibrium Transport Sampler, Michael S. Albergo, and Eric Vanden-Eijnden, (2024), arXiv:2410.02711
8. Practical applications of machine-learned flows on gauge fields, Ryan Abbott, Denis Boyda, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, Julian M. Urban, and Michael S. Albergo, PoS LATTICE2023 011, (2024), arXiv:2404.11674 doi:10.22323/1.453.0011
9. Applications of flow models to the generation of correlated lattice QCD ensembles, Ryan Abbott, Aleksandar Botev, Denis Boyda, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 109 (9) 094514, (2024), arXiv:2401.10874 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.094514
10. Training normalizing flows with computationally intensive target probability distributions, Piotr Bia\las, Piotr Korcyl, and Tomasz Stebel, Comput. Phys. Commun. 298 109094, (2024), arXiv:2308.13294 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2024.109094
11. Stochastic automatic differentiation for Monte Carlo processes, Guilherme Catumba, Alberto Ramos, and Bryan Zaldivar, Comput. Phys. Commun. 307 109396, (2025), arXiv:2307.15406 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2024.109396
12. Novel approach for computing gradients of physical observables, Simone Bacchio, Phys. Rev. D 108 (9) L091508, (2023), arXiv:2305.07932 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.L091508
13. Normalizing flows for lattice gauge theory in arbitrary space-time dimension, Ryan Abbott, and others, (2023), arXiv:2305.02402
14. Learning trivializing gradient flows for lattice gauge theories, Simone Bacchio, Pan Kessel, Stefan Schaefer, and Lorenz Vaitl, Phys. Rev. D 107 (5) L051504, (2023), arXiv:2212.08469 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.L051504
15. Aspects of scaling and scalability for flow-based sampling of lattice QCD, Ryan Abbott, and others, Eur. Phys. J. A 59 (11) 257, (2023), arXiv:2211.07541 doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01154-w
16. Gauge-equivariant flow models for sampling in lattice field theories with pseudofermions, Ryan Abbott, and others, Phys. Rev. D 106 (7) 074506, (2022), arXiv:2207.08945 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074506
17. Flow-based sampling in the lattice Schwinger model at criticality, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 106 (1) 014514, (2022), arXiv:2202.11712 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.014514
18. Gauge covariant neural network for quarks and gluons, Yuki Nagai, and Akio Tomiya, Phys. Rev. D 111 (7) 074501, (2025), arXiv:2103.11965 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.074501
19. Entangled Kernels -- Beyond Separability, Riikka Huusari, and Hachem Kadri, J. Machine Learning Res. 22 1–40, (2021), arXiv:2101.05514
20. Lattice Gauge Equivariant Convolutional Neural Networks, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (3) 032003, (2022), arXiv:2012.12901 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.032003
21. Array programming with NumPy, Charles R. Harris, and others, Nature 585 (7825) 357–362, (2020), arXiv:2006.10256 doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2
22. PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library, Adam Paszke, and others, (2019), arXiv:1912.01703
23. SciPy 1.0--Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python, Pauli Virtanen, and others, Nature Meth. 17 261, (2020), arXiv:1907.10121 doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2
24. Flow-based generative models for Markov chain Monte Carlo in lattice field theory, M. S. Albergo, G. Kanwar, and P. E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 100 (3) 034515, (2019), arXiv:1904.12072 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.034515
25. Status and Future Perspectives for Lattice Gauge Theory Calculations to the Exascale and Beyond, B\'alint Jo\'o, Chulwoo Jung, Norman H. Christ, William Detmold, Robert Edwards, Martin Savage, and Phiala Shanahan, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 199, (2019), arXiv:1904.09725 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12919-7
26. Horovod: fast and easy distributed deep learning in TensorFlow, Alexander Sergeev, and Mike Del Balso, (2018), arXiv:1802.05799
27. On the Feynman-Hellmann Theorem in Quantum Field Theory and the Calculation of Matrix Elements, Chris Bouchard, Chia Cheng Chang, Thorsten Kurth, Kostas Orginos, and Andre Walker-Loud, Phys. Rev. D 96 (1) 014504, (2017), arXiv:1612.06963 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.014504
28. Density estimation using Real NVP, Laurent Dinh, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, and Samy Bengio, (2016), arXiv:1605.08803
29. Variational Inference with Normalizing Flows, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Shakir Mohamed, (2015), arXiv:1505.05770
30. A Lattice Study of the Glue in the Nucleon, R. Horsley, R. Millo, Y. Nakamura, H. Perlt, D. Pleiter, P. E. L. Rakow, G. Schierholz, A. Schiller, F. Winter, and J. M. Zanotti, Phys. Lett. B 714 312–316, (2012), arXiv:1205.6410 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.07.004
31. Computational Strategies in Lattice QCD, Martin Luscher, Les Houches Summer School: Session 93: Modern perspectives in lattice QCD: Quantum field theory and high performance computing 331–399, (2010), arXiv:1002.4232
32. Trivializing maps, the Wilson flow and the HMC algorithm, Martin Luscher, Commun. Math. Phys. 293 899–919, (2010), arXiv:0907.5491 doi:10.1007/s00220-009-0953-7
33. Lattice QCD with two light Wilson quarks and maximally twisted mass, Carsten Urbach, PoS LATTICE2007 022, (2007), arXiv:0710.1517 doi:10.22323/1.042.0022
34. Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment, John D. Hunter, Comput. Sci. Eng. 9 (3) 90–95, (2007), doi:10.1109/MCSE.2007.55
35. A Conditioning Technique for Matrix Inversion for Wilson Fermions, Thomas A. DeGrand, Comput. Phys. Commun. 52 161–164, (1988), doi:10.1016/0010-4655(88)90180-4
36. A New Method for Fermion Monte Carlo, Gyan Bhanot, Urs M. Heller, and Ion O. Stamatescu, Phys. Lett. B 129 440–444, (1983), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90136-3
37. On Information and Sufficiency, S. Kullback, and R. A. Leibler, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 22 (1) 79–86, (1951), doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729694