# Comparison of the mixed\-fermion\-action effects using different fermion and gauge actions with \<math display\="inline"\>\<mrow\>\<mn\>2\</mn\>\<mo\>\+\</mo\>\<mn\>1\</mn\>\</mrow\>\</math\> and \<math display\="inline"\>\<mrow\>\<mn\>2\</mn\>\<mo\>\+\</mo\>\<mn\>1\</mn\>\<mo\>\+\</mo\>\<mn\>1\</mn\>\</mrow\>\</math\> flavors

**INSPIRE:** [3094665](https://inspirehep.net/literature/3094665)
**arXiv:** [2512\.19265](https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.19265)
**DOI:** [10\.1103/wcft\-g4g5](https://doi.org/10.1103/wcft-g4g5)

**Authors:** Zhang, Zun\-Xian, Cai, Mengchu, Hu, Bolun, Jiang, Xiangyu, Meng, Xiao\-Lan, Yang, Yi\-Bo, Zhao, Dian\-Jun

**Submitted:** 22 December 2025

**Subjects:**
- hep\-lat
- Lattice

**Journal reference:** Phys\.Rev\.D 113 \(5\) 054515 \(2026\)

**Citations:** 1

## Abstract

The leading\-order low\-energy constant \<math display\="inline"\>\<msub\>\<mi mathvariant\="normal"\>Δ\</mi\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>mix\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</msub\>\</math\> in mixed\-action chiral perturbation theory is calculated using \<math display\="inline"\>\<mn\>2\</mn\>\<mo\>\+\</mo\>\<mn\>1\</mn\>\<mo\>\+\</mo\>\<mn\>1\</mn\>\</math\>\-flavor gauge ensembles with HISQ fermions and a tadpole\-improved Symanzik gauge action at four lattice spacings \<math display\="inline"\>\<mi\>a\</mi\>\<mo\>∈\</mo\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\[\</mo\>\<mn\>0\.048\</mn\>\<mo\>,\</mo\>\<mn\>0\.111\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\]\</mo\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mi\>fm\</mi\>\</math\>\. By comparing our results to those from different actions and a \<math display\="inline"\>\<mn\>2\</mn\>\<mo\>\+\</mo\>\<mn\>1\</mn\>\</math\>\-flavor case, We find that the fermion action has the dominant impact, the gauge action has a secondary but measurable effect, and the contribution from charm quark loops is negligible within our current uncertainties\.