1. The superconducting grid-states qubit, Long B. Nguyen, and others, (2025), arXiv:2509.14656
2. Scalable fluxonium-qubit architecture with tunable interactions between noncomputational levels, Peng Zhao, Guming Zhao, Shaowei Li, Chen Zha, and Ming Gong, Phys. Rev. Applied 25 (4) 044072, (2026), arXiv:2504.09888 doi:10.1103/mfjl-5rk6
3. Nondegenerate Noise-Resilient Superconducting Qubit, Max Hays, Junghyun Kim, and William D. Oliver, PRX Quantum 6 (4) 040321, (2025), arXiv:2502.15459 doi:10.1103/dd96-gcb6
4. Suppressing chaos with mixed superconducting-qubit devices, Ben Blain, Giampiero Marchegiani, Luigi Amico, and Gianluigi Catelani, Phys. Rev. Applied 24 (1) 014048, (2025), arXiv:2410.18543 doi:10.1103/pl85-jd9y
5. Truncation-free quantum simulation of pure-gauge compact QED using Josephson arrays, Guy Pardo, Julian Bender, Nadav Katz, and Erez Zohar, Quantum Sci. Technol. 10 (3) 035011, (2025), arXiv:2410.11413 doi:10.1088/2058-9565/adce2a
6. Flat-Band (De)localization Emulated with a Superconducting Qubit Array, Ilan T. Rosen, and others, Phys. Rev. X 15 (2) 021091, (2025), arXiv:2410.07878 doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.15.021091
7. Exact and approximate fluxonium array modes, Stephen Sorokanich, Max Hays, and Neill C. Warrington, Phys. Rev. B 110 (12) 125404, (2024), arXiv:2406.18492 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.110.125404
8. A synthetic magnetic vector potential in a 2D superconducting qubit array, Ilan T. Rosen, and others, Nature Phys. 20 (12) 1881–1887, (2024), arXiv:2405.00873 doi:10.1038/s41567-024-02661-3
9. Dephasing in Fluxonium Qubits from Coherent Quantum Phase Slips, Mallika T. Randeria, and others, PRX Quantum 5 (3) 030341, (2024), arXiv:2404.02989 doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.5.030341
10. Tunable Inductive Coupler for High-Fidelity Gates Between Fluxonium Qubits, Helin Zhang, and others, PRX Quantum 5 (2) 020326, (2024), arXiv:2309.05720 doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.5.020326
11. Signal-to-noise improvement through neural network contour deformations for 3D {\ensuremath{\boldsymbol{\mathit{S}}}}{\ensuremath{\boldsymbol{\mathit{U}}}}(2) lattice gauge theory, Yin Lin, William Detmold, Gurtej Kanwar, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Michael L. Wagman, PoS LATTICE2023 043, (2024), arXiv:2309.00600 doi:10.22323/1.453.0043
12. High-Sensitivity ac-Charge Detection with a MHz-Frequency Fluxonium Qubit, B. -L. Najera-Santos, and others, Phys. Rev. X 14 (1) 011007, (2024), arXiv:2307.14329 doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.14.011007
13. Variational Monte Carlo algorithm for lattice gauge theories with continuous gauge groups: A study of (2+1)-dimensional compact QED with dynamical fermions at finite density, Julian Bender, Patrick Emonts, and J. Ignacio Cirac, Phys. Rev. Res. 5 (4) 043128, (2023), arXiv:2304.05916 doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.043128
14. High-Fidelity, Frequency-Flexible Two-Qubit Fluxonium Gates with a Transmon Coupler, Leon Ding, and others, Phys. Rev. X 13 (3) 031035, (2023), arXiv:2304.06087 doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.13.031035
15. Detecting Hidden Photon Dark Matter Using the Direct Excitation of Transmon Qubits, Shion Chen, Hajime Fukuda, Toshiaki Inada, Takeo Moroi, Tatsumi Nitta, and Thanaporn Sichanugrist, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (21) 211001, (2023), arXiv:2212.03884 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.211001
16. Improved information criteria for Bayesian model averaging in lattice field theory, Ethan T. Neil, and Jacob W. Sitison, Phys. Rev. D 109 (1) 014510, (2024), arXiv:2208.14983 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.014510
17. Reducing the sign problem with line integrals, Rasmus N. Larsen, JHEP 02 041, (2025), arXiv:2205.02257 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2025)041
18. Granular aluminium nanojunction fluxonium qubit, D. Rieger, S. Günzler, M. Spiecker, P. Paluch, P. Winkel, L. Hahn, J. K. Hohmann, A. Bacher, W. Wernsdorfer, and I. M. Pop, Nature Materials 21 194–199, (2022), arXiv:2202.01776 doi:10.1038/s41563-022-01417-9
19. Perspective on traveling wave microwave parametric amplifiers, Martina Esposito, Arpit Ranadive, Luca Planat, and Nicolas Roch, Appl. Phys. Lett. 119 (12) 120501, (2021), arXiv:2107.13033 doi:10.1063/5.0064892
20. Quantum sensing with superconducting circuits, S. Danilin, and M. Weides, (2021), arXiv:2103.11022
21. Millisecond Coherence in a Superconducting Qubit, Aaron Somoroff, Quentin Ficheux, Raymond A. Mencia, Haonan Xiong, Roman V. Kuzmin, and Vladimir E. Manucharyan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (26) 267001, (2023), arXiv:2103.08578 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.267001
22. Transmon platform for quantum computing challenged by chaotic fluctuations, Christoph Berke, Evangelos Varvelis, Simon Trebst, Alexander Altland, and David P. DiVincenzo, Nature Commun. 13 (1) 2495, (2022), arXiv:2012.05923 doi:10.1038/s41467-022-29940-y
23. The superconducting quasicharge qubit, Ivan V. Pechenezhskiy, Raymond A. Mencia, Long B. Nguyen, Yen-Hsiang Lin, and Vladimir E. Manucharyan, Nature 585 (7825) 368–371, (2020), arXiv:1907.02937 doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2687-9
24. The quantum sine-Gordon model with quantum circuits, Ananda Roy, Dirk Schuricht, Johannes Hauschild, Frank Pollmann, and Hubert Saleur, Nucl. Phys. B 968 115445, (2021), arXiv:2007.06874 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2021.115445
25. Complex paths around the sign problem, Andrei Alexandru, Gokce Basar, Paulo F. Bedaque, and Neill C. Warrington, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94 (1) 015006, (2022), arXiv:2007.05436 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.94.015006
26. Real-time dynamics in 2+1d compact QED using complex periodic Gaussian states, Julian Bender, Patrick Emonts, Erez Zohar, and J. Ignacio Cirac, Phys. Rev. Res. 2 (4) 043145, (2020), arXiv:2006.10038 doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043145
27. Circuit quantum electrodynamics, Alexandre Blais, Arne L. Grimsmo, S. M. Girvin, and Andreas Wallraff, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93 (2) 025005, (2021), arXiv:2005.12667 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.93.025005
28. Charged multihadron systems in lattice QCD+QED, S. R. Beane, and others, Phys. Rev. D 103 (5) 054504, (2021), arXiv:2003.12130 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.054504
29. Path integral contour deformations for noisy observables, William Detmold, Gurtej Kanwar, Michael L. Wagman, and Neill C. Warrington, Phys. Rev. D 102 (1) 014514, (2020), arXiv:2003.05914 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.014514
30. Hybrid quantum systems with circuit quantum electrodynamics, A. A. Clerk, K. W. Lehnert, P. Bertet, J. R. Petta, and Y. Nakamura, Nature Phys. 16 (3) 257–267, (2020), doi:10.1038/s41567-020-0797-9
31. Efficient modeling of superconducting quantum circuits with tensor networks, Agustin Di Paolo, Thomas E. Baker, Alexandre Foley, David S\'en\'echal, and Alexandre Blais, npj Quantum Inf. 7 11, (2021), arXiv:1912.01018 doi:10.1038/s41534-020-00352-4
32. New density of states approaches to finite density lattice QCD, Christof Gattringer, Michael Mandl, and Pascal Törek, Phys. Rev. D 100 (11) 114517, (2019), arXiv:1911.05320 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.114517
33. Experimental Realization of a Protected Superconducting Circuit Derived from the 0{\textendash}{\ensuremath{\pi}} Qubit, Andr\'as Gyenis, Pranav S. Mundada, Agustin Di Paolo, Thomas M. Hazard, Xinyuan You, David I. Schuster, Jens Koch, Alexandre Blais, and Andrew A. Houck, PRX Quantum 2 (1) 010339, (2021), arXiv:1910.07542 doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.010339
34. Bifluxon: Fluxon-Parity-Protected Superconducting Qubit, Konstantin Kalashnikov, and others, PRX Quantum 1 (1) 010307, (2020), arXiv:1910.03769 doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.1.010307
35. Right-sizing fluxonium against charge noise, Ari Mizel, and Yariv Yanay, Phys. Rev. B 102 014512, (2020), arXiv:1910.01090 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.102.014512
36. Spectrum and coherence properties of the current-mirror qubit, D. K. Weiss, Andy C. Y. Li, D. G. Ferguson, and Jens Koch, Phys. Rev. B 100 (22) 224507, (2019), arXiv:1908.04615 doi:10.1103/physrevb.100.224507
37. A quantum engineer's guide to superconducting qubits, P. Krantz, M. Kjaergaard, F. Yan, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, Appl. Phys. Rev. 6 (2) 021318, (2019), arXiv:1904.06560 doi:10.1063/1.5089550
38. Nanowire Superinductance Fluxonium Qubit, T. \,M. Hazard, Andr\'as Gyenis, A. Di Paolo, A. \,T. Asfaw, S. \,A. Lyon, A. Blais, and A. \,A. Houck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (1) 010504, (2019), arXiv:1805.00938 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.010504
39. Complex Langevin for Lattice QCD, D. K. Sinclair, and J. B. Kogut, PoS LATTICE2018 143, (2018), arXiv:1810.11880 doi:10.22323/1.334.0143
40. High-Coherence Fluxonium Qubit, Long B. Nguyen, Yen-Hsiang Lin, Aaron Somoroff, Raymond Mencia, Nicholas Grabon, and Vladimir E. Manucharyan, Phys. Rev. X 9 (4) 041041, (2019), arXiv:1810.11006 doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.9.041041
41. Statistical Angles on the Lattice QCD Signal-to-Noise Problem, Michael L. Wagman, (2017), arXiv:1711.00062
42. Introduction to quantum electromagnetic circuits, Uri Vool, and Michel H. Devoret, Int. J. Circuit Theor. Appl. 45 (7) 897–934, (2017), arXiv:1610.03438 doi:10.1002/cta.2359
43. Introduction to parametric amplification of quantum signals with Josephson circuits, Ananda Roy, and Michel Devoret, Comptes Rendus Physique 17 740–755, (2016), arXiv:1605.00539 doi:10.1016/j.crhy.2016.07.012
44. Approaches to the sign problem in lattice field theory, Christof Gattringer, and Kurt Langfeld, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 31 (22) 1643007, (2016), arXiv:1603.09517 doi:10.1142/S0217751X16430077
45. A near{\textendash}quantum-limited Josephson traveling-wave parametric amplifier, C. Macklin, K. O\textquoterightBrien, D. Hover, M. E. Schwartz, V. Bolkhovsky, X. Zhang, W. D. Oliver, and I. Siddiqi, Science 350 (6258) 307–310, (2015), doi:10.1126/science.aaa8525
46. Collective modes in the fluxonium qubit, G. Viola, and G. Catelani, Phys. Rev. B 92 224511, (2015), arXiv:1506.08599 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.92.224511
47. Propagating phonons coupled to an artificial atom, Martin V. Gustafsson, Thomas Aref, Anton Frisk Kockum, Maria K. Ekström, Göran Johansson, and Per Delsing, Science 346 (6206) 207–211, (2014), doi:10.1126/science.1257219
48. Symmetries and collective excitations in large superconducting circuits, David G. Ferguson, A. A. Houck, and Jens Koch, Phys. Rev. X 3 011003, (2013), arXiv:1208.5747 doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.3.011003
49. Evidence for coherent quantum phase slips across a Josephson junction array, Vladimir E. Manucharyan, Nicholas A. Masluk, Archana Kamal, Jens Koch, Leonid I. Glazman, and Michel H. Devoret, Phys. Rev. B 85 (2) 024521, (2012), arXiv:1012.1928 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.85.024521
50. Nanomechanical measurements of a superconducting qubit, M. D. LaHaye, J. Suh, P. M. Echternach, K. C. Schwab, and M. L. Roukes, Nature 459 (7249) 960–964, (2009), doi:10.1038/nature08093
51. Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box, Jens Koch, Terri M. Yu, Jay Gambetta, A. A. Houck, D. I. Schuster, J. Majer, Alexandre Blais, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Phys. Rev. A 76 (4) 042319, (2007), arXiv:cond-mat/0703002 doi:10.1103/physreva.76.042319
52. Computational complexity and fundamental limitations to fermionic quantum Monte Carlo simulations, Matthias Troyer, and Uwe-Jens Wiese, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 170201, (2005), arXiv:cond-mat/0408370 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.170201
53. Aharonov-Casher-Effect Suppression of Macroscopic Tunneling of Magnetic Flux, Jonathan R. Friedman, and D. V. Averin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 050403, (2002), arXiv:cond-mat/0109544 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.050403
54. Hybrid Monte Carlo, S. Duane, A. D. Kennedy, B. J. Pendleton, and D. Roweth, Phys. Lett. B 195 216–222, (1987), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)91197-X
55. Topological Quantum Effects for Neutral Particles, Y. Aharonov, and A. Casher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53 319, (1984), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.319