1. Physics-conditioned diffusion models for lattice gauge theory, Qianteng Zhu, Gert Aarts, Wei Wang, Kai Zhou, and Lingxiao Wang, JHEP 03 111, (2026), arXiv:2502.05504 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2026)111
2. Machine-learning approaches to accelerating lattice simulations, Scott Lawrence, PoS LATTICE2024 010, (2025), arXiv:2502.02670 doi:10.22323/1.466.0010
3. Progress in Normalizing Flows for 4d Gauge Theories, Ryan Abbott, Denis Boyda, Gurtej Kanwar, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Daniel C. Hackett, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, PoS LATTICE2024 066, (2025), arXiv:2502.00263 doi:10.22323/1.466.0066
4. Diffusion models and stochastic quantisation in lattice field theory, Gert Aarts, Lingxiao Wang, and Kai Zhou, PoS LATTICE2024 037, (2025), arXiv:2412.13704 doi:10.22323/1.466.0037
5. Diffusion models learn distributions generated by complex Langevin dynamics, Diaa Eddin Habibi, Gert Aarts, Lingxiao Wang, and Kai Zhou, PoS LATTICE2024 039, (2025), arXiv:2412.01919 doi:10.22323/1.466.0039
6. Scaling of stochastic normalizing flows in SU(3) lattice gauge theory, Andrea Bulgarelli, Elia Cellini, and Alessandro Nada, Phys. Rev. D 111 (7) 074517, (2025), arXiv:2412.00200 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.074517
7. Diffusion models for lattice gauge field simulations, Qianteng Zhu, Gert Aarts, Wei Wang, Kai Zhou, and Lingxiao Wang, Postponed: Machine Learning and the Physical Sciences}: {Workshop at NeurIPS 2024, (2024), arXiv:2410.19602
8. Multiscale Normalizing Flows for Gauge Theories, Ryan Abbott, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, PoS LATTICE2023 035, (2024), arXiv:2404.10819 doi:10.22323/1.453.0035
9. Generative Diffusion Models for Lattice Field Theory, Lingxiao Wang, Gert Aarts, and Kai Zhou, 37th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, (2023), arXiv:2311.03578
10. Diffusion models as stochastic quantization in lattice field theory, Lingxiao Wang, Gert Aarts, and Kai Zhou, JHEP 05 060, (2024), arXiv:2309.17082 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2024)060
11. Generative models for scalar field theories: how to deal with poor scaling?, Javad Komijani, and Marina K. Marinkovic, PoS LATTICE2022 019, (2023), arXiv:2301.01504 doi:10.22323/1.430.0019
12. Aspects of scaling and scalability for flow-based sampling of lattice QCD, Ryan Abbott, and others, Eur. Phys. J. A 59 (11) 257, (2023), arXiv:2211.07541 doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01154-w
13. Topological susceptibility of N$_{f}$ = 2 + 1 QCD from staggered fermions spectral projectors at high temperatures, Andreas Athenodorou, Claudio Bonanno, Claudio Bonati, Giuseppe Clemente, Francesco D'Angelo, Massimo D'Elia, Lorenzo Maio, Guido Martinelli, Francesco Sanfilippo, and Antonino Todaro, JHEP 10 197, (2022), arXiv:2208.08921 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2022)197
14. Sampling QCD field configurations with gauge-equivariant flow models, Ryan Abbott, and others, PoS LATTICE2022 036, (2023), arXiv:2208.03832 doi:10.22323/1.430.0036
15. Gauge-equivariant flow models for sampling in lattice field theories with pseudofermions, Ryan Abbott, and others, Phys. Rev. D 106 (7) 074506, (2022), arXiv:2207.08945 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074506
16. Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latents, Aditya Ramesh, Prafulla Dhariwal, Alex Nichol, Casey Chu, and Mark Chen, (2022), arXiv:2204.06125
17. Flow-based sampling in the lattice Schwinger model at criticality, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 106 (1) 014514, (2022), arXiv:2202.11712 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.014514
18. Applications of Machine Learning to Lattice Quantum Field Theory, Denis Boyda, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2202.05838
19. Improved topological sampling for lattice gauge theories, David Albandea, Pilar Hern\'andez, Alberto Ramos, and Fernando Romero-L\'opez, PoS LATTICE2021 183, (2022), arXiv:2111.05745 doi:10.22323/1.396.0183
20. Efficient modeling of trivializing maps for lattice {\ensuremath{\phi}}4 theory using normalizing flows: A first look at scalability, Luigi Del Debbio, Joe Marsh Rossney, and Michael Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 104 (9) 094507, (2021), arXiv:2105.12481 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.094507
21. Monte~Carlo evaluation of the continuum limit of the two-point function of two Euclidean Higgs real scalar fields subject to affine quantization, Riccardo Fantoni, and John R. Klauder, Phys. Rev. D 104 (5) 054514, (2021), arXiv:2107.08601 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.054514
22. Introduction to Normalizing Flows for Lattice Field Theory, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, Kyle Cranmer, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E. Shanahan, (2021), arXiv:2101.08176
23. Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential Equations, Yang Song, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Diederik P. Kingma, Abhishek Kumar, Stefano Ermon, and Ben Poole, (2020), arXiv:2011.13456
24. Sampling using $SU(N)$ gauge equivariant flows, Denis Boyda, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Michael S. Albergo, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 103 (7) 074504, (2021), arXiv:2008.05456 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074504
25. Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models, Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel, (2020), arXiv:2006.11239
26. Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domains, Matthew Tancik, Pratul P. Srinivasan, Ben Mildenhall, Sara Fridovich-Keil, Nithin Raghavan, Utkarsh Singhal, Ravi Ramamoorthi, Jonathan T. Barron, and Ren Ng, (2020), arXiv:2006.10739
27. Array programming with NumPy, Charles R. Harris, and others, Nature 585 (7825) 357–362, (2020), arXiv:2006.10256 doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2
28. Equivariant flow-based sampling for lattice gauge theory, Gurtej Kanwar, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (12) 121601, (2020), arXiv:2003.06413 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.121601
29. Normalizing Flows on Tori and Spheres, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, George Papamakarios, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Michael S. Albergo, Gurtej Kanwar, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Kyle Cranmer, (2020), arXiv:2002.02428
30. Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inference, George Papamakarios, Eric Nalisnick, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Shakir Mohamed, and Balaji Lakshminarayanan, J. Machine Learning Res. 22 (1) 2617–2680, (2021), arXiv:1912.02762 doi:10.5555/3546258.3546315
31. PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library, Adam Paszke, and others, (2019), arXiv:1912.01703
32. SciPy 1.0--Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python, Pauli Virtanen, and others, Nature Meth. 17 261, (2020), arXiv:1907.10121 doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2
33. Flow-based generative models for Markov chain Monte Carlo in lattice field theory, M. S. Albergo, G. Kanwar, and P. E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 100 (3) 034515, (2019), arXiv:1904.12072 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.034515
34. Neural Ordinary Differential Equations, Ricky T. Q. Chen, Yulia Rubanova, Jesse Bettencourt, and David Duvenaud, (2018), arXiv:1806.07366
35. Attention Is All You Need, Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin, 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, (2017), arXiv:1706.03762
36. The topological susceptibility in the large-$N$ limit of SU($N$) Yang{\textendash}Mills theory, Marco C\`e, Miguel Garc\'\ia Vera, Leonardo Giusti, and Stefan Schaefer, Phys. Lett. B 762 232–236, (2016), arXiv:1607.05939 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.09.029
37. Density estimation using Real NVP, Laurent Dinh, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, and Samy Bengio, (2016), arXiv:1605.08803
38. Non-Gaussianities in the topological charge distribution of the SU(3) Yang--Mills theory, Marco C\`e, Cristian Consonni, Georg P. Engel, and Leonardo Giusti, Phys. Rev. D 92 (7) 074502, (2015), arXiv:1506.06052 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.074502
39. Variational Inference with Normalizing Flows, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Shakir Mohamed, (2015), arXiv:1505.05770
40. U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation, Olaf Ronneberger, Philipp Fischer, and Thomas Brox, (2015), arXiv:1505.04597
41. Deep Unsupervised Learning using Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Eric A. Weiss, Niru Maheswaranathan, and Surya Ganguli, (2015), arXiv:1503.03585
42. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization, Diederik P. Kingma, and Jimmy Ba, International Conference on Learning Representations, (2014), arXiv:1412.6980
43. Generative Adversarial Networks, Ian J. Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio, (2014), arXiv:1406.2661
44. Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes, Diederik P. Kingma, and Max Welling, (2013), arXiv:1312.6114
45. Universality of the topological susceptibility in the SU(3) gauge theory, Martin Luscher, and Filippo Palombi, JHEP 09 110, (2010), arXiv:1008.0732 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2010)110
46. Quantum chromodynamics on the lattice, Christof Gattringer, and Christian B. Lang, 788, (2010), doi:10.1007/978-3-642-01850-3
47. Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment, John D. Hunter, Comput. Sci. Eng. 9 (3) 90–95, (2007), doi:10.1109/MCSE.2007.55
48. Topological susceptibility in the SU(3) gauge theory, Luigi Del Debbio, Leonardo Giusti, and Claudio Pica, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 032003, (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0407052 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.032003
49. Monte Carlo errors with less errors, Ulli Wolff, Comput. Phys. Commun. 156 143–153, (2004), arXiv:hep-lat/0306017 doi:10.1016/S0010-4655(03)00467-3
50. Hybrid Monte Carlo and topological modes of full QCD, B. Alles, G. Boyd, Massimo D'Elia, A. Di Giacomo, and E. Vicari, Phys. Lett. B 389 107–111, (1996), arXiv:hep-lat/9607049 doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(96)01247-6
51. An Introduction to quantum field theory, Michael E. Peskin, and Daniel V. Schroeder, (1995), doi:10.1201/9780429503559
52. Quantum fields on a lattice, I. Montvay, and G. Munster, (1997), doi:10.1017/CBO9780511470783
53. An Exact local hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm for gauge theories, A. D. Kennedy, and K. M. Bitar, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 34 786–788, (1994), arXiv:hep-lat/9311017 doi:10.1016/0920-5632(94)90514-2
54. Hybrid Monte Carlo simulations of a two-dimensional gauge theory, Sourendu Gupta, Phys. Lett. B 278 317–322, (1992), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(92)90200-N
55. CRITICAL SLOWING DOWN, Ulli Wolff, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 17 93–102, (1990), doi:10.1016/0920-5632(90)90224-I
56. Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena, Jean Zinn-Justin, 77, (2025)
57. A Stochastic Estimator of the Trace of the Influence Matrix for Laplacian Smoothing Splines, M. F. Hutchinson, Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 18 (3) 1059–1076, (1989), doi:10.1080/03610918908812806
58. Stochastic Quantization, Poul H. Damgaard, and Helmuth Huffel, Phys. Rept. 152 227, (1987), doi:10.1016/0370-1573(87)90144-X
59. Hybrid Monte Carlo, S. Duane, A. D. Kennedy, B. J. Pendleton, and D. Roweth, Phys. Lett. B 195 216–222, (1987), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)91197-X
60. TOPOLOGICAL CHARGE IN LATTICE GAUGE THEORY, J. Polonyi, Prog. Math. Phys. 8 168–180, (1983)
61. Critical Properties from Monte Carlo Coarse Graining and Renormalization, K. Binder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47 693–696, (1981), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.693
62. Topology of Lattice Gauge Fields, M. Luscher, Commun. Math. Phys. 85 39, (1982), doi:10.1007/BF02029132
63. Confinement of Quarks, Kenneth G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 10 2445–2459, (1974), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.10.2445
64. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines, N. Metropolis, A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller, J. Chem. Phys. 21 1087–1092, (1953), doi:10.1063/1.1699114
65. On Information and Sufficiency, S. Kullback, and R. A. Leibler, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 22 (1) 79–86, (1951), doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729694
66. The principle of least action in quantum mechanics, Richard Phillips Feynman, (1942), doi:10.1142/9789812567635_0001
67. Untitled, C. Runge, Math. Ann. 46 (2) 167–178, (1895), doi:10.1007/BF01446807