# Search for Light Dark Matter with 259 Days of Data in PandaX\-4T

**INSPIRE:** [2947399](https://inspirehep.net/literature/2947399)
**arXiv:** [2507\.11930](https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.11930)
**DOI:** [10\.1103/rtnh\-jn8s](https://doi.org/10.1103/rtnh-jn8s)

**Authors:** Zhang, Minzhen, Bo, Zihao, Chen, Wei, Chen, Xun, Chen, Yunhua, Cheng, Chen, Cui, Xiangyi, Deng, Manna, Fan, Yingjie, Fang, Deqing, Fu, Xuanye, Gao, Zhixing, Ge, Yujie, Geng, Lisheng, Giboni, Karl, Guo, Xunan, Guo, Xuyuan, Guo, Zichao, Han, Chencheng, Han, Ke, He, Changda, He, Jinrong, Huang, Houqi, Huang, Junting, Huang, Yule, Hou, Ruquan, Ji, Xiangdong, Ju, Yonglin, Lan, Xiaorun, Li, Chenxiang, Li, Jiafu, Li, Mingchuan, Li, Peiyuan, Li, Shuaijie, Li, Tao, Li, Yangdong, Li, Zhiyuan, Lin, Qing, Liu, Jianglai, Liu, Yuanchun, Lu, Congcong, Lu, Xiaoying, Luo, Lingyin, Luo, Yunyang, Ma, Yugang, Mao, Yajun, Meng, Yue, Pang, Binyu, Qi, Ningchun, Qian, Zhicheng, Ren, Xiangxiang, Shan, Dong, Shang, Xiaofeng, Shao, Xiyuan, Shen, Guofang, Shen, Manbin, Sun, Wenliang, Sun, Xuyan, Tao, Yi, Tian, Yueqiang, Tian, Yuxin, Wang, Anqing, Wang, Guanbo, Wang, Hao, Wang, Haoyu, Wang, Jiamin, Wang, Lei, Wang, Meng, Wang, Qiuhong, Wang, Shaobo, Wang, Shibo, Wang, Siguang, Wang, Wei, Wang, Xu, Wang, Zhou, Wei, Yuehuan, Wu, Weihao, Wu, Yuan, Xiao, Mengjiao, Xiao, Xiang, Xiong, Kaizhi, Xu, Jianqin, Xu, Yifan, Yao, Shunyu, Yan, Binbin, Yan, Xiyu, Yang, Yong, Ye, Peihua, Yu, Chunxu, Yuan, Ying, Yuan, Zhe, Yun, Youhui, Zeng, Xinning, Zhang, Peng, Zhang, Shibo, Zhang, Siyuan, Zhang, Shu, Zhang, Tao, Zhang, Wei, Zhang, Yang, Zhang, Yingxin, Zhang, Yuanyuan, Zhao, Li, Zhao, Kangkang, Zhou, Jifang, Zhou, Jiaxu, Zhou, Jiayi, Zhou, Ning, Zhou, Xiaopeng, Zhou, Zhizhen, Zhu, Chenhui

**Submitted:** 16 July 2025

**Subjects:**
- hep\-ex
- Experiment\-HEP

**Journal reference:** Phys\.Rev\.Lett\. 135 \(21\) 211001 \(2025\)

**Citations:** 28

## Abstract

We present a search for light dark matter particles through their interactions with atomic electrons and nucleons, utilizing PandaX\-4T data with an effective exposure of \<math display\="inline"\>\<mrow\>\<mn\>1\.04\</mn\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mi\>tonne\</mi\>\<mo\>·\</mo\>\<mi\>year\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</math\> for ionization\-only data and \<math display\="inline"\>\<mrow\>\<mn\>1\.20\</mn\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mi\>tonne\</mi\>\<mo\>·\</mo\>\<mi\>year\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</math\> for paired data\. Our analysis focuses on the energy range \(efficiency \<math display\="inline"\>\<mo\>&gt;\</mo\>\<mn\>0\.01\</mn\>\</math\>\) of approximately 0\.33 to 3 keV for nuclear recoils and from 0\.04 to 0\.39 keV for electronic recoils\. We establish the most stringent constraints on spin\-independent dark matter\-nucleon interactions within a mass range of \<math display\="inline"\>\<mrow\>\<mn\>2\.5\</mn\>\<mi\>–\</mi\>\<mn\>5\.0\</mn\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mi\>GeV\</mi\>\<mo\>/\</mo\>\<msup\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>c\</mi\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mn\>2\</mn\>\</mrow\>\</msup\>\</mrow\>\</math\>, spin\-dependent neutron\-only interactions within \<math display\="inline"\>\<mrow\>\<mn\>1\.0\</mn\>\<mi\>–\</mi\>\<mn\>5\.6\</mn\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mi\>GeV\</mi\>\<mo\>/\</mo\>\<msup\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>c\</mi\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mn\>2\</mn\>\</mrow\>\</msup\>\</mrow\>\</math\>, and spin\-dependent proton\-only interactions within \<math display\="inline"\>\<mrow\>\<mn\>1\.0\</mn\>\<mi\>–\</mi\>\<mn\>4\.1\</mn\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mi\>GeV\</mi\>\<mo\>/\</mo\>\<msup\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>c\</mi\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mn\>2\</mn\>\</mrow\>\</msup\>\</mrow\>\</math\>\. Their corresponding limits at \<math display\="inline"\>\<mrow\>\<mn\>3\</mn\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mi\>GeV\</mi\>\<mo\>/\</mo\>\<msup\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>c\</mi\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mn\>2\</mn\>\</mrow\>\</msup\>\</mrow\>\</math\> are \<math display\="inline"\>\<mn\>1\.1\</mn\>\<mo\>×\</mo\>\<msup\>\<mn\>10\</mn\>\<mrow\>\<mo\>\-\</mo\>\<mn\>43\</mn\>\</mrow\>\</msup\>\</math\>, \<math display\="inline"\>\<mn\>8\.4\</mn\>\<mo\>×\</mo\>\<msup\>\<mn\>10\</mn\>\<mrow\>\<mo\>\-\</mo\>\<mn\>40\</mn\>\</mrow\>\</msup\>\</math\>, and \<math display\="inline"\>\<mrow\>\<mn\>2\.8\</mn\>\<mo\>×\</mo\>\<msup\>\<mrow\>\<mn\>10\</mn\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mo\>\-\</mo\>\<mn\>38\</mn\>\</mrow\>\</msup\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<msup\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>cm\</mi\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mn\>2\</mn\>\</mrow\>\</msup\>\</mrow\>\</math\>, respectively\. Additionally, our results improve the upper limits on the dark matter\-electron scattering cross section by a factor of 1\.5 and 9\.3 for heavy and light mediator scenarios, respectively, within \<math display\="inline"\>\<mn\>50\</mn\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mi\>MeV\</mi\>\<mo\>/\</mo\>\<msup\>\<mi\>c\</mi\>\<mn\>2\</mn\>\</msup\>\</math\> to \<math display\="inline"\>\<mn\>10\</mn\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mi\>GeV\</mi\>\<mo\>/\</mo\>\<msup\>\<mi\>c\</mi\>\<mn\>2\</mn\>\</msup\>\</math\>, compared with previous best results\. The improved limits reach \<math display\="inline"\>\<mn\>1\.5\</mn\>\<mo\>×\</mo\>\<mrow\>\<msup\>\<mrow\>\<mn\>10\</mn\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mo\>\-\</mo\>\<mn\>41\</mn\>\</mrow\>\</msup\>\</mrow\>\</math\> and \<math display\="inline"\>\<mrow\>\<mn\>5\.6\</mn\>\<mo\>×\</mo\>\<mrow\>\<msup\>\<mrow\>\<mn\>10\</mn\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mo\>\-\</mo\>\<mn\>37\</mn\>\</mrow\>\</msup\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<msup\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>cm\</mi\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mn\>2\</mn\>\</mrow\>\</msup\>\</mrow\>\</mrow\>\</math\> at \<math display\="inline"\>\<mn\>200\</mn\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mi\>MeV\</mi\>\<mo\>/\</mo\>\<msup\>\<mi\>c\</mi\>\<mn\>2\</mn\>\</msup\>\</math\> for the heavy and light mediators, respectively\.