# Hadronic vacuum polarization for the muon \<math display\="inline"\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>g\</mi\>\<mo\>\-\</mo\>\<mn\>2\</mn\>\</mrow\>\</math\> from lattice QCD: Complete short and intermediate windows

**INSPIRE:** [2848256](https://inspirehep.net/literature/2848256)
**arXiv:** [2411\.09656](https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.09656)
**DOI:** [10\.1103/PhysRevD\.111\.094508](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.094508)

**Authors:** Bazavov, Alexei, Clarke, David A\., Davies, Christine T\.H\., DeTar, Carleton, El\-Khadra, Aida X\., Gámiz, Elvira, Gottlieb, Steven, Grebe, Anthony V\., Hostetler, Leon, Jay, William I\., Jeong, Hwancheol, Kronfeld, Andreas S\., Lahert, Shaun, Laiho, Jack, Lepage, G\. Peter, Lynch, Michael, Lytle, Andrew T\., McNeile, Craig, Neil, Ethan T\., Peterson, Curtis T\., Simone, James N\., Sitison, Jacob W\., Van de Water, Ruth S\., Vaquero, Alejandro

**Submitted:** 14 November 2024

**Subjects:**
- hep\-lat
- hep\-ex
- hep\-ph
- Lattice
- Experiment\-HEP
- Phenomenology\-HEP

**Journal reference:** Phys\.Rev\.D 111 \(9\) 094508 \(2025\)

**Citations:** 54

## Abstract

We present complete results for the hadronic vacuum polarization \(HVP\) contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment \<math display\="inline"\>\<msub\>\<mi\>a\</mi\>\<mi\>μ\</mi\>\</msub\>\</math\> in the short\- and intermediate\-distance window regions, which account for roughly 10% and 35% of the total HVP contribution to \<math display\="inline"\>\<msub\>\<mi\>a\</mi\>\<mi\>μ\</mi\>\</msub\>\</math\>, respectively\. In particular, we perform lattice\-QCD calculations for the isospin\-symmetric connected and disconnected contributions, as well as corrections due to strong\-isospin breaking\. For the short\-distance window observables, we investigate the so\-called log\-enhancement effects as well as the significant oscillations associated with staggered quarks in this region\. For the dominant, isospin\-symmetric light\-quark\-connected contribution, we obtain \<math display\="inline"\>\<mrow\>\<msubsup\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>a\</mi\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>μ\</mi\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>l\</mi\>\<mi\>l\</mi\>\<mo\>,\</mo\>\<mi\>SD\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</msubsup\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mi\>conn\</mi\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\<mo\>\=\</mo\>\<mn\>48\.139\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>11\</mn\>\<msub\>\<mrow\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>stat\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</msub\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>91\</mn\>\<msub\>\<mrow\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>syst\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</msub\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\[\</mo\>\<mn\>92\</mn\>\<msub\>\<mrow\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\]\</mo\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mtext\>total\</mtext\>\</mrow\>\</msub\>\<mo\>×\</mo\>\<msup\>\<mrow\>\<mn\>10\</mn\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mo\>\-\</mo\>\<mn\>10\</mn\>\</mrow\>\</msup\>\</mrow\>\</math\> and \<math display\="inline"\>\<mrow\>\<msubsup\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>a\</mi\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>μ\</mi\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>l\</mi\>\<mi\>l\</mi\>\<mo\>,\</mo\>\<mi mathvariant\="normal"\>W\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</msubsup\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>conn\</mi\>\</mrow\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\<mo\>\=\</mo\>\<mn\>206\.90\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>14\</mn\>\<msub\>\<mrow\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>stat\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</msub\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>61\</mn\>\<msub\>\<mrow\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>syst\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</msub\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\[\</mo\>\<mn\>63\</mn\>\<msub\>\<mrow\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\]\</mo\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mtext\>total\</mtext\>\</mrow\>\</msub\>\<mo\>×\</mo\>\<msup\>\<mrow\>\<mn\>10\</mn\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mo\>\-\</mo\>\<mn\>10\</mn\>\</mrow\>\</msup\>\</mrow\>\</math\>\. We use Bayesian model averaging to fully estimate the covariance matrix between the individual contributions\. Our determinations of the complete window contributions are \<math display\="inline"\>\<mrow\>\<msubsup\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>a\</mi\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>μ\</mi\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>SD\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</msubsup\>\<mo\>\=\</mo\>\<mn\>69\.05\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>1\</mn\>\<msub\>\<mrow\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>stat\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</msub\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>21\</mn\>\<msub\>\<mrow\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>syst\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</msub\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\[\</mo\>\<mn\>21\</mn\>\<msub\>\<mrow\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\]\</mo\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mtext\>total\</mtext\>\</mrow\>\</msub\>\<mo\>×\</mo\>\<msup\>\<mrow\>\<mn\>10\</mn\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mo\>\-\</mo\>\<mn\>10\</mn\>\</mrow\>\</msup\>\</mrow\>\</math\> and \<math display\="inline"\>\<mrow\>\<msubsup\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>a\</mi\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>μ\</mi\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi mathvariant\="normal"\>W\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</msubsup\>\<mo\>\=\</mo\>\<mn\>236\.45\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>17\</mn\>\<msub\>\<mrow\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>stat\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</msub\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>83\</mn\>\<msub\>\<mrow\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>syst\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</msub\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\[\</mo\>\<mn\>85\</mn\>\<msub\>\<mrow\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\]\</mo\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mtext\>total\</mtext\>\</mrow\>\</msub\>\<mo\>×\</mo\>\<msup\>\<mrow\>\<mn\>10\</mn\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mo\>\-\</mo\>\<mn\>10\</mn\>\</mrow\>\</msup\>\</mrow\>\</math\>\. This work is part of our ongoing effort to compute all contributions to HVP with an overall uncertainty at the few\-permille level\.