# Utility of a hybrid approach to the hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the muon anomalous magnetic moment

**INSPIRE:** [2844222](https://inspirehep.net/literature/2844222)
**arXiv:** [2410\.23832](https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.23832)
**DOI:** [10\.1103/PhysRevD\.111\.014513](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.014513)

**Authors:** Davies, C\.T\.H\., Kronfeld, A\.S\., Lepage, G\.P\., McNeile, C\., Van de Water, R\.S\.

**Submitted:** 31 October 2024

**Subjects:**
- hep\-lat
- hep\-ph
- Lattice
- Phenomenology\-HEP

**Journal reference:** Phys\.Rev\.D 111 \(1\) 014513 \(2025\)

**Citations:** 6

## Abstract

An accurate calculation of the leading\-order hadronic vacuum polarization \(LOHVP\) contribution to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon \(\<math display\="inline"\>\<msub\>\<mi\>a\</mi\>\<mi\>μ\</mi\>\</msub\>\</math\>\) is key to determining whether a discrepancy, suggesting new physics, exists between the Standard Model and experimental results\. This calculation can be expressed as an integral over Euclidean time of a current\-current correlator \<math display\="inline"\>\<mi\>G\</mi\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mi\>t\</mi\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\</math\>, where \<math display\="inline"\>\<mi\>G\</mi\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mi\>t\</mi\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\</math\> can be calculated using lattice QCD or, with dispersion relations, from experimental data for \<math display\="inline"\>\<msup\>\<mi\>e\</mi\>\<mo\>\+\</mo\>\</msup\>\<msup\>\<mi\>e\</mi\>\<mo\>\-\</mo\>\</msup\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>→\</mo\>\<mtext\>hadrons\</mtext\>\</math\>\. The BMW/DMZ collaboration recently presented a hybrid approach in which \<math display\="inline"\>\<mi\>G\</mi\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mi\>t\</mi\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\</math\> is calculated using lattice QCD for most of the contributing \<math display\="inline"\>\<mi\>t\</mi\>\</math\> range, but using experimental data for the largest \<math display\="inline"\>\<mi\>t\</mi\>\</math\> \(lowest energy\) region\. Here we study the advantages of varying the position \<math display\="inline"\>\<mi\>t\</mi\>\<mo\>\=\</mo\>\<msub\>\<mi\>t\</mi\>\<mn\>1\</mn\>\</msub\>\</math\> separating lattice QCD from data\-driven contributions\. The total LOHVP contribution should be independent of \<math display\="inline"\>\<msub\>\<mi\>t\</mi\>\<mn\>1\</mn\>\</msub\>\</math\>, providing both a test of the experimental input and the robustness of the hybrid approach\. We use this criterion and a correlated fit to show that Fermilab/HPQCD/MILC lattice QCD results from 2019 strongly favor the CMD\-3 cross section data for \<math display\="inline"\>\<msup\>\<mi\>e\</mi\>\<mo\>\+\</mo\>\</msup\>\<msup\>\<mi\>e\</mi\>\<mo\>\-\</mo\>\</msup\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>→\</mo\>\<msup\>\<mi\>π\</mi\>\<mo\>\+\</mo\>\</msup\>\<msup\>\<mi\>π\</mi\>\<mo\>\-\</mo\>\</msup\>\</math\> over a combination of earlier experimental results for this channel\. Further, the resulting total LOHVP contribution obtained is consistent with the result obtained by BMW/DMZ, and supports the scenario in which there is no significant discrepancy between the experimental value for \<math display\="inline"\>\<msub\>\<mi\>a\</mi\>\<mi\>μ\</mi\>\</msub\>\</math\> and that expected in the Standard Model\. We then discuss how improved lattice results in this hybrid approach could provide a more accurate total LOHVP across a wider range of \<math display\="inline"\>\<msub\>\<mi\>t\</mi\>\<mn\>1\</mn\>\</msub\>\</math\> values with an uncertainty that is smaller than that from either lattice QCD or data\-driven approaches on their own\.