# Long\-Distance Window of the Hadronic Vacuum Polarization for the Muon \<math display\="inline"\>\<mi\>g\</mi\>\<mo\>\-\</mo\>\<mn\>2\</mn\>\</math\>

**INSPIRE:** [2843080](https://inspirehep.net/literature/2843080)
**arXiv:** [2410\.20590](https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.20590)
**DOI:** [10\.1103/PhysRevLett\.134\.201901](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.201901)

**Authors:** Blum, T\., Boyle, P\.A\., Bruno, M\., Chakraborty, B\., Erben, F\., Gülpers, V\., Hackl, A\., Hermansson\-Truedsson, N\., Hill, R\.C\., Izubuchi, T\., Jin, L\., Jung, C\., Lehner, C\., McKeon, J\., Meyer, A\.S\., Tomii, M\., Tsang, J\.T\., Tuo, X\.\-Y\.

**Submitted:** 27 October 2024

**Subjects:**
- hep\-lat
- hep\-ph
- Lattice
- Phenomenology\-HEP

**Journal reference:** Phys\.Rev\.Lett\. 134 \(20\) 201901 \(2025\)

**Citations:** 85

## Abstract

We provide the first ab initio calculation of the Euclidean long\-distance window of the isospin\-symmetric light\-quark connected contribution to the hadronic vacuum polarization for the muon \<math display\="inline"\>\<mi\>g\</mi\>\<mo\>\-\</mo\>\<mn\>2\</mn\>\</math\> and find \<math display\="inline"\>\<mrow\>\<msubsup\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>a\</mi\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>μ\</mi\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>LD\</mi\>\<mo\>,\</mo\>\<mi\>iso\</mi\>\<mo\>,\</mo\>\<mi\>conn\</mi\>\<mo\>,\</mo\>\<mi\>ud\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</msubsup\>\<mo\>\=\</mo\>\<mn\>411\.4\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>4\.3\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>2\.4\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\<mo\>×\</mo\>\<msup\>\<mrow\>\<mn\>10\</mn\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mo\>\-\</mo\>\<mn\>10\</mn\>\</mrow\>\</msup\>\</mrow\>\</math\>\. We also provide the currently most precise calculation of the total isospin\-symmetric light\-quark connected contribution, \<math display\="inline"\>\<mrow\>\<msubsup\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>a\</mi\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>μ\</mi\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>iso\</mi\>\<mo\>,\</mo\>\<mi\>conn\</mi\>\<mo\>,\</mo\>\<mi\>ud\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</msubsup\>\<mo\>\=\</mo\>\<mn\>666\.2\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>4\.3\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>2\.5\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\<mo\>×\</mo\>\<msup\>\<mrow\>\<mn\>10\</mn\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mo\>\-\</mo\>\<mn\>10\</mn\>\</mrow\>\</msup\>\</mrow\>\</math\> in the BMW20 world, which is more than \<math display\="inline"\>\<mrow\>\<mn\>4\</mn\>\<mi\>σ\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</math\> larger compared to the data\-driven estimates of Boito et al\. \[Phys\. Rev\. D 107, 074001 \(2023\)\] and \<math display\="inline"\>\<mrow\>\<mn\>1\.7\</mn\>\<mi\>σ\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</math\> larger compared to the lattice QCD result of BMW20\.