1. Warm start of variational quantum algorithms for quadratic unconstrained binary optimization problems, Yahui Chai, Karl Jansen, Stefan Kühn, Tim Schwägerl, and Tobias Stollenwerk, EPJ Quant. Technol. 13 (1) 9, (2026), arXiv:2407.02569 doi:10.1140/epjqt/s40507-025-00452-0
2. Performant near-term quantum combinatorial optimization, Titus D. Morris, Ananth Kaushik, Martin Roetteler, and Phillip C. Lotshaw, (2024), arXiv:2404.16135
3. Adiabatic bottlenecks in quantum annealing and nonequilibrium dynamics of paramagnons, Tim Bode, and Frank K. Wilhelm, Phys. Rev. A 110 (1) 012611, (2024), arXiv:2403.11548 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.110.012611
4. Short-depth QAOA circuits and quantum annealing on higher-order ising models, Elijah Pelofske, Andreas Bärtschi, and Stephan Eidenbenz, npj Quantum Inf. 10 (1) 30, (2024), doi:10.1038/s41534-024-00825-w
5. Quantum Combinatorial Optimization in the NISQ Era: A Systematic Mapping Study, Felix Gemeinhardt, Antonio Garmendia, Manuel Wimmer, Benjamin Weder, and Frank Leymann, ACM Comput. Surveys 56 (3) 1–36, (2024), doi:10.1145/3620668
6. Does provable absence of barren plateaus imply classical simulability?, M. Cerezo, and others, Nature Commun. 16 (1) 7907, (2025), arXiv:2312.09121 doi:10.1038/s41467-025-63099-6
7. Single-layer digitized-counterdiabatic quantum optimization for p-spin models, Huijie Guan, Fei Zhou, Francisco Albarr\'an-Arriagada, Xi Chen, Enrique Solano, Narendra N. Hegade, and He-Liang Huang, Quantum Sci. Technol. 10 (1) 015006, (2025), arXiv:2311.06682 doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ad7880
8. A Lie algebraic theory of barren plateaus for deep parameterized quantum circuits, Michael Ragone, Bojko N. Bakalov, Fr\'ed\'eric Sauvage, Alexander F. Kemper, Carlos Ortiz Marrero, Martin Larocca, and M. Cerezo, Nature Commun. 15 (1) 7172, (2024), arXiv:2309.09342 doi:10.1038/s41467-024-49909-3
9. Untitled, Enrico Fontana, Dylan Herman, Shouvanik Chakrabarti, Niraj Kumar, Romina Yalovetzky, Jamie Heredge, Shree Hari Sureshbabu, and Marco Pistoia, Nature Commun. 15 (1) 7171, (2024), arXiv:2309.07902 doi:10.1038/s41467-024-49910-w
10. Lie-algebraic classical simulations for quantum computing, Matthew L. Goh, Martin Larocca, Lukasz Cincio, M. Cerezo, and Fr\'ed\'eric Sauvage, Phys. Rev. Res. 7 (3) 033266, (2025), arXiv:2308.01432 doi:10.1103/3y65-f5w6
11. Symmetry enhanced variational quantum imaginary time evolution, Xiaoyang Wang, Yahui Chai, Maria Demidik, Xu Feng, Karl Jansen, and Cenk Tüysüz, (2023), arXiv:2307.13598
12. A review on Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm and its variants, Kostas Blekos, Dean Brand, Andrea Ceschini, Chiao-Hui Chou, Rui-Hao Li, Komal Pandya, and Alessandro Summer, Phys. Rept. 1068 1–66, (2024), arXiv:2306.09198 doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.03.002
13. Evidence for the utility of quantum computing before fault tolerance, Youngseok Kim, and others, Nature 618 (7965) 500–505, (2023), doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06096-3
14. An expressive ansatz for low-depth quantum approximate optimisation, V. Vijendran, Aritra Das, Dax Enshan Koh, Syed M. Assad, and Ping Koy Lam, Quantum Sci. Technol. 9 (2) 025010, (2024), arXiv:2302.04479 doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ad200a
15. Theory for Equivariant Quantum Neural Networks, Quynh T. Nguyen, Louis Schatzki, Paolo Braccia, Michael Ragone, Patrick J. Coles, Frederic Sauvage, Martin Larocca, and M. Cerezo, PRX Quantum 5 (2) 020328, (2024), arXiv:2210.08566 doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.5.020328
16. Representation Theory for Geometric Quantum Machine Learning, Michael Ragone, Paolo Braccia, Quynh T. Nguyen, Louis Schatzki, Patrick J. Coles, Frederic Sauvage, Martin Larocca, and M. Cerezo, (2022), arXiv:2210.07980
17. Building spatial symmetries into parameterized quantum circuits for faster training, Frederic Sauvage, Martin Larocca, Patrick J. Coles, and M. Cerezo, Quantum Sci. Technol. 9 (1) 015029, (2024), arXiv:2207.14413 doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ad152e
18. Dynamical decoupling for superconducting qubits: A performance survey, Nic Ezzell, Bibek Pokharel, Lina Tewala, Gregory Quiroz, and Daniel A. Lidar, Phys. Rev. Applied 20 (6) 064027, (2023), arXiv:2207.03670 doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.20.064027
19. Exploiting Symmetry in Variational Quantum Machine Learning, Johannes Jakob Meyer, Marian Mularski, Elies Gil-Fuster, Antonio Anna Mele, Francesco Arzani, Alissa Wilms, and Jens Eisert, PRX Quantum 4 (1) 010328, (2023), arXiv:2205.06217 doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.010328
20. Group-Invariant Quantum Machine Learning, Martin Larocca, Frederic Sauvage, Faris M. Sbahi, Guillaume Verdon, Patrick J. Coles, and M. Cerezo, PRX Quantum 3 (3) 030341, (2022), arXiv:2205.02261 doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.3.030341
21. Quantum dropout: On and over the hardness of quantum approximate optimization algorithm, Zhen-Duo Wang, Zhenduo Wang, Pei-Lin Zheng, Biao Wu, and Yi Zhang, Phys. Rev. Res. 5 (2) 023171, (2023), arXiv:2203.10101 doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.023171
22. Quantum Optimization of Maximum Independent Set using Rydberg Atom Arrays, Sepehr Ebadi, and others, Science 376 1209, (2022), arXiv:2202.09372 doi:10.1126/science.abo6587
23. Challenges and Opportunities in Quantum Machine Learning, M. Cerezo, Guillaume Verdon, Hsin-Yuan Huang, Lukasz Cincio, and Patrick J. Coles, Nature Computat. Sci. 2 567–576, (2022), arXiv:2303.09491 doi:10.1038/s43588-022-00311-3
24. Shortcuts to the quantum approximate optimization algorithm, Yahui Chai, Yong-Jian Han, Yu-Chun Wu, Ye Li, Menghan Dou, and Guo-Ping Guo, Phys. Rev. A 105 (4) 042415, (2022), arXiv:2112.10943 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.105.042415
25. Quantum computational quantification of protein{\textendash}ligand interactions, Josh John Mellor Kirsopp, Cono Di Paola, David Zsolt Manrique, Michal Krompiec, Gabriel Greene-Diniz, Wolfgang Guba, Agnes Meyder, Detlef Wolf, Martin Strahm, and David Mu\~noz Ramo, Int. J. Quant. Chem. 122 (22) e26975, (2022), arXiv:2110.08163 doi:10.1002/qua.26975
26. Multi-angle quantum approximate optimization algorithm, Rebekah Herrman, Phillip C. Lotshaw, James Ostrowski, Travis S. Humble, and George Siopsis, Sci. Rep. 12 (1) 6781, (2022), arXiv:2109.11455 doi:10.1038/s41598-022-10555-8
27. Counterdiabaticity and the quantum approximate optimization algorithm, Jonathan Wurtz, and Peter J. Love, Quantum 6 635, (2022), arXiv:2106.15645 doi:10.22331/q-2022-01-27-635
28. Equivalence of quantum barren plateaus to cost concentration and narrow gorges, Andrew Arrasmith, Zo\"e Holmes, M. Cerezo, and Patrick J. Coles, Quantum Sci. Technol. 7 (4) 045015, (2022), arXiv:2104.05868 doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ac7d06
29. Avoiding local minima in Variational Quantum Algorithms with Neural Networks, Javier Rivera-Dean, Patrick Huembeli, Antonio Ac\'\in, and Joseph Bowles, (2021), arXiv:2104.02955
30. MaxCut quantum approximate optimization algorithm performance guarantees for p{\ensuremath{>}}1, Jonathan Wurtz, and Peter J. Love, Phys. Rev. A 103 (4) 042612, (2021), arXiv:2010.11209 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.103.042612
31. Quantum Computation of Finite-Temperature Static and Dynamical Properties of Spin Systems Using Quantum Imaginary Time Evolution, Shi-Ning Sun, Mario Motta, Ruslan N. Tazhigulov, Adrian T. K. Tan, Garnet Kin-Lic Chan, and Austin J. Minnich, PRX Quantum 2 (1) 010317, (2021), arXiv:2009.03542 doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.010317
32. Adaptive quantum approximate optimization algorithm for solving combinatorial problems on a quantum computer, Linghua Zhu, Ho Lun Tang, George S. Barron, F. A. Calderon-Vargas, Nicholas J. Mayhall, Edwin Barnes, and Sophia E. Economou, Phys. Rev. Res. 4 (3) 033029, (2022), arXiv:2005.10258 doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.033029
33. The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm Needs to See the Whole Graph: Worst Case Examples, Edward Farhi, David Gamarnik, and Sam Gutmann, (2020), arXiv:2005.08747
34. Improving Variational Quantum Optimization using CVaR, Panagiotis Kl. Barkoutsos, Giacomo Nannicini, Anton Robert, Ivano Tavernelli, and Stefan Woerner, Quantum 4 256, (2020), arXiv:1907.04769 doi:10.22331/q-2020-04-20-256
35. Cost function dependent barren plateaus in shallow parametrized quantum circuits, M. Cerezo, Akira Sone, Tyler Volkoff, Lukasz Cincio, and Patrick J. Coles, Nature Commun. 12 (1) 1791, (2021), arXiv:2001.00550 doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21728-w
36. Shortcuts to adiabaticity: Concepts, methods, and applications, D. Gu\'ery-Odelin, A. Ruschhaupt, A. Kiely, E. Torrontegui, S. Mart\'\inez-Garaot, and J. G. Muga, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91 (4) 045001, (2019), arXiv:1904.08448 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.91.045001
37. Obstacles to Variational Quantum Optimization from Symmetry Protection, Sergey Bravyi, Alexander Kliesch, Robert Koenig, and Eugene Tang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (26) 260505, (2020), arXiv:1910.08980 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.260505
38. Variational ansatz-based quantum simulation of imaginary time evolution, Sam McArdle, Tyson Jones, Suguru Endo, Ying Li, Simon C. Benjamin, and Xiao Yuan, npj Quantum Inf. 5 75, (2019), arXiv:1804.03023 doi:10.1038/s41534-019-0187-2
39. SU(2) non-Abelian gauge field theory in one dimension on digital quantum computers, Natalie Klco, Jesse R. Stryker, and Martin J. Savage, Phys. Rev. D 101 (7) 074512, (2020), arXiv:1908.06935 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.074512
40. SciPy 1.0--Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python, Pauli Virtanen, and others, Nature Meth. 17 261, (2020), arXiv:1907.10121 doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2
41. Quantum Annealing: a journey through Digitalization, Control, and hybrid Quantum Variational schemes, Glen Bigan Mbeng, Rosario Fazio, and Giuseppe Santoro, (2019), arXiv:1906.08948
42. Determining eigenstates and thermal states on a quantum computer using quantum imaginary time evolution, Mario Motta, Chong Sun, Adrian Teck Keng Tan, Matthew J. O' Rourke, Erika Ye, Austin J. Minnich, Fernando G. S. L. Brand\~ao, and Garnet Kin-Lic Chan, Nature Phys. 16 205–210, (2019), arXiv:1901.07653 doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0704-4
43. Performance of the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm on the Maximum Cut Problem, Gavin E. Crooks, (2018), arXiv:1811.08419
44. Potential of quantum computing for drug discovery, Y. Cao, J. Romero, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, (2018), doi:10.1147/jrd.2018.2888987
45. Quantum computational chemistry, Sam McArdle, Suguru Endo, Alan Aspuru-Guzik, Simon C. Benjamin, and Xiao Yuan, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92 (1) 015003, (2020), arXiv:1808.10402 doi:10.1103/revmodphys.92.015003
46. Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapes, Jarrod R. McClean, Sergio Boixo, Vadim N. Smelyanskiy, Ryan Babbush, and Hartmut Neven, Nature Commun. 9 4812, (2018), arXiv:1803.11173 doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07090-4
47. Quantum-classical computation of Schwinger model dynamics using quantum computers, N. Klco, E. F. Dumitrescu, A. J. McCaskey, T. D. Morris, R. C. Pooser, M. Sanz, E. Solano, P. Lougovski, and M. J. Savage, Phys. Rev. A 98 (3) 032331, (2018), arXiv:1803.03326 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.98.032331
48. Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond, John Preskill, Quantum 2 79, (2018), arXiv:1801.00862 doi:10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79
49. Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets, Abhinav Kandala, Antonio Mezzacapo, Kristan Temme, Maika Takita, Markus Brink, Jerry M. Chow, and Jay M. Gambetta, Nature 549 (7671) 242–246, (2017), arXiv:1704.05018 doi:10.1038/nature23879
50. Solving strongly correlated electron models on a quantum computer, Dave Wecker, Matthew B. Hastings, Nathan Wiebe, Bryan K. Clark, Chetan Nayak, and Matthias Troyer, Phys. Rev. A 92 (6) 062318, (2015), arXiv:1506.05135 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.92.062318
51. A Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm, Edward Farhi, Jeffrey Goldstone, and Sam Gutmann, (2014), arXiv:1411.4028
52. A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor, Alberto Peruzzo, Jarrod McClean, Peter Shadbolt, Man-Hong Yung, Xiao-Qi Zhou, Peter J. Love, Al\'an Aspuru-Guzik, and Jeremy L. O'Brien, Nature Commun. 5 (1) 4213, (2014), arXiv:1304.3061 doi:10.1038/ncomms5213
53. Optimal Inapproximability Results for MAX-CUT and Other 2-Variable CSPs?, Khot Subhash, Kindler Guy, Mossel Elchanan, and O\textquoterightDonnell Ryan, SIAM J. Comput. 37 (1) 319–357, (2007), doi:10.1137/S0097539705447372
54. Lieb-Robinson Bounds and the Generation of Correlations and Topological Quantum Order, S. Bravyi, M. B. Hastings, and F. Verstraete, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 050401, (2006), arXiv:quant-ph/0603121 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.050401
55. Efficient simulation of one-dimensional quantum many-body systems, G. Vidal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 040502, (2004), arXiv:quant-ph/0310089 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.040502
56. Efficient Classical Simulation of Slightly Entangled Quantum Computations, Guifr\'e Vidal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (14) 147902, (2003), arXiv:quant-ph/0301063 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.147902
57. A Quantum Adiabatic Evolution Algorithm Applied to Random Instances of an NP-Complete Problem, Edward Farhi, Jeffrey Goldstone, Sam Gutmann, Joshua Lapan, Andrew Lundgren, and Daniel Preda, Science 292 (5516) 1057726, (2001), arXiv:quant-ph/0104129 doi:10.1126/science.1057726
58. Quantum Computation by Adiabatic Evolution, Edward Farhi, Jeffrey Goldstone, Sam Gutmann, and Michael Sipser, (2000), arXiv:quant-ph/0001106
59. Suppressing environmental noise in quantum computation through pulse control, Lu-Ming Duan, and Guang-Can Guo, Phys. Lett. A 261 (3-4) 139–144, (1999), doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(99)00592-7
60. Dynamical decoupling of open quantum systems, Lorenza Viola, Emanuel Knill, and Seth Lloyd, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 2417–2421, (1999), arXiv:quant-ph/9809071 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.2417
61. Dynamical suppression of decoherence in two state quantum systems, Lorenza Viola, and Seth Lloyd, Phys. Rev. A 58 2733, (1998), arXiv:quant-ph/9803057 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.58.2733
62. Complexity of Computer Computations, (1972), doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-2001-2