# Physical\-mass calculation of \<math display\="inline"\>\<mi\>ρ\</mi\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>770\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\</math\> and \<math display\="inline"\>\<msup\>\<mi\>K\</mi\>\<mo\>\*\</mo\>\</msup\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>892\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\</math\> resonance parameters via \<math display\="inline"\>\<mi\>π\</mi\>\<mi\>π\</mi\>\</math\> and \<math display\="inline"\>\<mi\>K\</mi\>\<mi\>π\</mi\>\</math\> scattering amplitudes from lattice QCD

**INSPIRE:** [2802555](https://inspirehep.net/literature/2802555)
**arXiv:** [2406\.19193](https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.19193)
**DOI:** [10\.1103/PhysRevD\.111\.054510](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.054510)

**Authors:** Boyle, Peter, Erben, Felix, Gülpers, Vera, Hansen, Maxwell T\., Joswig, Fabian, Marshall, Michael, Lachini, Nelson Pitanga, Portelli, Antonin

**Submitted:** 27 June 2024

**Subjects:**
- hep\-lat
- hep\-ph
- Lattice
- Phenomenology\-HEP

**Journal reference:** Phys\.Rev\.D 111 \(5\) 054510 \(2025\)

**Citations:** 20

## Abstract

We present our study of the \<math display\="inline"\>\<mi\>ρ\</mi\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>770\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\</math\> and \<math display\="inline"\>\<msup\>\<mi\>K\</mi\>\<mo\>\*\</mo\>\</msup\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>892\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\</math\> resonances from lattice quantum chromodynamics \(QCD\) employing domain\-wall fermions at physical quark masses\. We determine the finite\-volume energy spectrum in various momentum frames and obtain phase\-shift parametrizations via the Lüscher formalism and as a final step the complex resonance poles of the \<math display\="inline"\>\<mi\>π\</mi\>\<mi\>π\</mi\>\</math\> and \<math display\="inline"\>\<mi\>K\</mi\>\<mi\>π\</mi\>\</math\> elastic scattering amplitudes via an analytical continuation of the models\. By sampling a large number of representative sets of underlying energy\-level fits, we also assign a systematic uncertainty to our final results\. This is a significant extension to data\-driven analysis methods that have been used in lattice QCD to date, due to the two\-step nature of the formalism\. Our final pole positions, \<math display\="inline"\>\<mi\>M\</mi\>\<mo\>\+\</mo\>\<mi\>i\</mi\>\<mi mathvariant\="normal"\>Γ\</mi\>\<mo\>/\</mo\>\<mn\>2\</mn\>\</math\>, with all statistical and systematic errors exposed, are \<math display\="inline"\>\<mrow\>\<msub\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>M\</mi\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<msup\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>K\</mi\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mo\>\*\</mo\>\</mrow\>\</msup\>\</mrow\>\</msub\>\<mo\>\=\</mo\>\<mn\>893\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>2\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>8\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>54\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>2\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mi\>MeV\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</math\> and \<math display\="inline"\>\<msub\>\<mi mathvariant\="normal"\>Γ\</mi\>\<msup\>\<mi\>K\</mi\>\<mo\>\*\</mo\>\</msup\>\</msub\>\<mo\>\=\</mo\>\<mn\>51\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>2\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>11\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>3\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>0\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mi\>MeV\</mi\>\</math\> for the \<math display\="inline"\>\<msup\>\<mi\>K\</mi\>\<mo\>\*\</mo\>\</msup\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>892\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\</math\> resonance and \<math display\="inline"\>\<mrow\>\<msub\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>M\</mi\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>ρ\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</msub\>\<mo\>\=\</mo\>\<mn\>796\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>5\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>15\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>48\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>2\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mi\>MeV\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</math\> and \<math display\="inline"\>\<msub\>\<mi mathvariant\="normal"\>Γ\</mi\>\<mi\>ρ\</mi\>\</msub\>\<mo\>\=\</mo\>\<mn\>192\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>10\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>28\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>12\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>0\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mi\>MeV\</mi\>\</math\> for the \<math display\="inline"\>\<mi\>ρ\</mi\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>770\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\</math\> resonance\. The four differently grouped sources of uncertainties are, in the order of occurrence: statistical, data\-driven systematic, an estimation of systematic effects beyond our computation \(dominated by the fact that we employ a single lattice spacing\), and the error from the scale\-setting uncertainty on our ensemble\.