1. **Advances in machine\-learning\-based sampling motivated by lattice quantum chromodynamics**, Kyle Cranmer, Gurtej Kanwar, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo J\. Rezende, and Phiala E\. Shanahan, *Nature Rev\. Phys\.* **5** (9) 526–535 (2023) [arXiv:2309.01156](https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.01156) [doi:10.1038/s42254-023-00616-w](https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-023-00616-w)

2. **Normalizing flows for lattice gauge theory in arbitrary space\-time dimension**, Ryan Abbott, and others (2023) [arXiv:2305.02402](https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02402)

3. **Aspects of scaling and scalability for flow\-based sampling of lattice QCD**, Ryan Abbott, and others, *Eur\. Phys\. J\. A* **59** (11) 257 (2023) [arXiv:2211.07541](https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.07541) [doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01154-w](https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01154-w)

4. **Sampling QCD field configurations with gauge\-equivariant flow models**, Ryan Abbott, and others, *PoS* **LATTICE2022** 036 (2023) [arXiv:2208.03832](https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.03832) [doi:10.22323/1.430.0036](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.430.0036)

5. **Gauge\-equivariant flow models for sampling in lattice field theories with pseudofermions**, Ryan Abbott, and others, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **106** (7) 074506 (2022) [arXiv:2207.08945](https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.08945) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074506](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074506)

6. **A lattice QCD perspective on weak decays of $b$ and $c$ quarks Snowmass 2022 White Paper**, Peter A\. Boyle, and others, *Snowmass 2021* (2022) [arXiv:2205.15373](https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.15373)

7. **Towards glueball masses of large\-N SU\(N\) pure\-gauge theories without topological freezing**, Claudio Bonanno, Massimo D'Elia, Biagio Lucini, and Davide Vadacchino, *Phys\. Lett\. B* **833** 137281 (2022) [arXiv:2205.06190](https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.06190) [doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137281](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137281)

8. **Flow\-based sampling in the lattice Schwinger model at criticality**, Michael S\. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C\. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo J\. Rezende, Fernando Romero\-L\\'opez, Phiala E\. Shanahan, and Julian M\. Urban, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **106** (1) 014514 (2022) [arXiv:2202.11712](https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.11712) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.014514](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.014514)

9. **Applications of Machine Learning to Lattice Quantum Field Theory**, Denis Boyda, and others, *Snowmass 2021* (2022) [arXiv:2202.05838](https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.05838)

10. **Continual Repeated Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlo**, Alexander G\. D\. G\. Matthews, Michael Arbel, Danilo J\. Rezende, and Arnaud Doucet (2022) [arXiv:2201.13117](https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.13117)

11. **Stochastic normalizing flows as non\-equilibrium transformations**, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, Alessandro Nada, and Marco Panero, *JHEP* **07** 015 (2022) [arXiv:2201.08862](https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.08862) [doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2022)015](https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2022)015)

12. **Tackling critical slowing down using global correction steps with equivariant flows: the case of the Schwinger model**, Jacob Finkenrath (2022) [arXiv:2201.02216](https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.02216)

13. **HMC with Normalizing Flows**, Sam Foreman, Taku Izubuchi, Luchang Jin, Xiao\-Yong Jin, James C\. Osborn, and Akio Tomiya, *PoS* **LATTICE2021** 073 (2022) [arXiv:2112.01586](https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.01586) [doi:10.22323/1.396.0073](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.396.0073)

14. **LeapfrogLayers: A Trainable Framework for Effective Topological Sampling**, Sam Foreman, Xiao\-Yong Jin, and James C\. Osborn, *PoS* **LATTICE2021** 508 (2022) [arXiv:2112.01582](https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.01582) [doi:10.22323/1.396.0508](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.396.0508)

15. **Flow\-based sampling for multimodal and extended\-mode distributions in lattice field theory**, Daniel C\. Hackett, Chung\-Chun Hsieh, Sahil Pontula, Michael S\. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Jiunn\-Wei Chen, Kai\-Feng Chen, Kyle Cranmer, Gurtej Kanwar, and Phiala E\. Shanahan (2021) [arXiv:2107.00734](https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.00734)

16. **Flow\-based sampling for fermionic lattice field theories**, Michael S\. Albergo, Gurtej Kanwar, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo J\. Rezende, Julian M\. Urban, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C\. Hackett, and Phiala E\. Shanahan, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **104** (11) 114507 (2021) [arXiv:2106.05934](https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.05934) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.114507](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.114507)

17. **Deep Learning Hamiltonian Monte Carlo**, Sam Foreman, Xiao\-Yong Jin, and James C\. Osborn, *9th International Conference on Learning Representations* (2021) [arXiv:2105.03418](https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.03418)

18. **Entangled Kernels \-\- Beyond Separability**, Riikka Huusari, and Hachem Kadri, *J\. Machine Learning Res\.* **22** 1–40 (2021) [arXiv:2101.05514](https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.05514)

19. **Large\-$N$ $SU\(N\)$ Yang\-Mills theories with milder topological freezing**, Claudio Bonanno, Claudio Bonati, and Massimo D'Elia, *JHEP* **03** 111 (2021) [arXiv:2012.14000](https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.14000) [doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2021)111](https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2021)111)

20. **Sampling using $SU\(N\)$ gauge equivariant flows**, Denis Boyda, Gurtej Kanwar, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Michael S\. Albergo, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C\. Hackett, and Phiala E\. Shanahan, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **103** (7) 074504 (2021) [arXiv:2008.05456](https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.05456) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074504](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074504)

21. **Array programming with NumPy**, Charles R\. Harris, and others, *Nature* **585** (7825) 357–362 (2020) [arXiv:2006.10256](https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.10256) [doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2)

22. **Equivariant flow\-based sampling for lattice gauge theory**, Gurtej Kanwar, Michael S\. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C\. Hackett, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E\. Shanahan, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **125** (12) 121601 (2020) [arXiv:2003.06413](https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.06413) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.121601](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.121601)

23. **SciPy 1\.0\-\-Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python**, Pauli Virtanen, and others, *Nature Meth\.* **17** 261 (2020) [arXiv:1907.10121](https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.10121) [doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2)

24. **Flow\-based generative models for Markov chain Monte Carlo in lattice field theory**, M\. S\. Albergo, G\. Kanwar, and P\. E\. Shanahan, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **100** (3) 034515 (2019) [arXiv:1904.12072](https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.12072) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.034515](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.034515)

25. **Status and Future Perspectives for Lattice Gauge Theory Calculations to the Exascale and Beyond**, B\\'alint Jo\\'o, Chulwoo Jung, Norman H\. Christ, William Detmold, Robert Edwards, Martin Savage, and Phiala Shanahan, *Eur\. Phys\. J\. A* **55** (11) 199 (2019) [arXiv:1904.09725](https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.09725) [doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12919-7](https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2019-12919-7)

26. **Hot\-dense Lattice QCD: USQCD whitepaper 2018**, Alexei Bazavov, Frithjof Karsch, Swagato Mukherjee, and Peter Petreczky, *Eur\. Phys\. J\. A* **55** (11) 194 (2019) [arXiv:1904.09951](https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.09951) [doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12922-0](https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2019-12922-0)

27. **Lattice QCD and Neutrino\-Nucleus Scattering**, Andreas S\. Kronfeld, David G\. Richards, William Detmold, Rajan Gupta, Huey\-Wen Lin, Keh\-Fei Liu, Aaron S\. Meyer, Raza Sufian, and Sergey Syritsyn, *Eur\. Phys\. J\. A* **55** (11) 196 (2019) [arXiv:1904.09931](https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.09931) [doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12916-x](https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2019-12916-x)

28. **The Role of Lattice QCD in Searches for Violations of Fundamental Symmetries and Signals for New Physics**, Vincenzo Cirigliano, Zohreh Davoudi, Tanmoy Bhattacharya, Taku Izubuchi, Phiala E\. Shanahan, Sergey Syritsyn, and Michael L\. Wagman, *Eur\. Phys\. J\. A* **55** (11) 197 (2019) [arXiv:1904.09704](https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.09704) [doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12889-8](https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2019-12889-8)

29. **Opportunities for Lattice QCD in Quark and Lepton Flavor Physics**, Christoph Lehner, and others, *Eur\. Phys\. J\. A* **55** (11) 195 (2019) [arXiv:1904.09479](https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.09479) [doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12891-2](https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2019-12891-2)

30. **Hadrons and Nuclei**, William Detmold, Robert G\. Edwards, Jozef J\. Dudek, Michael Engelhardt, Huey\-Wen Lin, Stefan Meinel, Kostas Orginos, and Phiala Shanahan, *Eur\. Phys\. J\. A* **55** (11) 193 (2019) [arXiv:1904.09512](https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.09512) [doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12902-4](https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2019-12902-4)

31. **Neural Network Renormalization Group**, Shuo\-Hui Li, and Lei Wang, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **121** (26) 260601 (2018) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.260601](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.260601)

32. **Horovod: fast and easy distributed deep learning in TensorFlow**, Alexander Sergeev, and Mike Del Balso (2018) [arXiv:1802.05799](https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.05799)

33. **Fighting topological freezing in the two\-dimensional CPN\-1 model**, Martin Hasenbusch, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **96** (5) 054504 (2017) [arXiv:1706.04443](https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.04443) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.054504](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.054504)

34. **Density estimation using Real NVP**, Laurent Dinh, Jascha Sohl\-Dickstein, and Samy Bengio (2016) [arXiv:1605.08803](https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.08803)

35. **Variational Inference with Normalizing Flows**, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Shakir Mohamed (2015) [arXiv:1505.05770](https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.05770)

36. **NICE: Non\-linear Independent Components Estimation**, Laurent Dinh, David Krueger, and Yoshua Bengio (2014) [arXiv:1410.8516](https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.8516)

37. **Continuous smearing of Wilson Loops**, Robert Lohmayer, and Herbert Neuberger, *PoS* **LATTICE2011** 249 (2011) [arXiv:1110.3522](https://arxiv.org/abs/1110.3522) [doi:10.22323/1.139.0249](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.139.0249)

38. **Lattice QCD without topology barriers**, Martin Luscher, and Stefan Schaefer, *JHEP* **07** 036 (2011) [arXiv:1105.4749](https://arxiv.org/abs/1105.4749) [doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2011)036](https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2011)036)

39. **Critical slowing down and error analysis in lattice QCD simulations**, Stefan Schaefer, Rainer Sommer, and Francesco Virotta, *Nucl\. Phys\. B* **845** 93–119 (2011) [arXiv:1009.5228](https://arxiv.org/abs/1009.5228) [doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2010.11.020](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2010.11.020)

40. **Properties and uses of the Wilson flow in lattice QCD**, Martin Lüscher, *JHEP* **08** 071 (2010) [arXiv:1006.4518](https://arxiv.org/abs/1006.4518) [doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2010)071](https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2010)071)

41. **Investigating the critical slowing down of QCD simulations**, Stefan Schaefer, Rainer Sommer, and Francesco Virotta, *PoS* **LAT2009** 032 (2009) [arXiv:0910.1465](https://arxiv.org/abs/0910.1465) [doi:10.22323/1.091.0032](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.091.0032)

42. **Trivializing maps, the Wilson flow and the HMC algorithm**, Martin Luscher, *Commun\. Math\. Phys\.* **293** 899–919 (2010) [arXiv:0907.5491](https://arxiv.org/abs/0907.5491) [doi:10.1007/s00220-009-0953-7](https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-009-0953-7)

43. **The Monte Carlo method in quantum field theory**, Colin Morningstar, *21st Annual Hampton University Graduate Studies Program* (2007) [arXiv:hep-lat/0702020](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/0702020)

44. **Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment**, John D\. Hunter, *Comput\. Sci\. Eng\.* **9** (3) 90–95 (2007) [doi:10.1109/MCSE.2007.55](https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55)

45. **Infinite N phase transitions in continuum Wilson loop operators**, R\. Narayanan, and H\. Neuberger, *JHEP* **03** 064 (2006) [arXiv:hep-th/0601210](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0601210) [doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/03/064](https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2006/03/064)

46. **Parallel tempering: Theory, applications, and new perspectives**, David J\. Earl, and Michael W\. Deem, *Phys\. Chem\. Chem\. Phys\.* **7** (23) 3910 (2005) [arXiv:physics/0508111](https://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0508111) [doi:10.1039/b509983h](https://doi.org/10.1039/b509983h)

47. **Critical slowing down of topological modes**, Luigi Del Debbio, Gian Mario Manca, and Ettore Vicari, *Phys\. Lett\. B* **594** 315–323 (2004) [arXiv:hep-lat/0403001](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/0403001) [doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.05.038](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2004.05.038)

48. **Monte Carlo errors with less errors**, Ulli Wolff, *Comput\. Phys\. Commun\.* **156** 143–153 (2004) [arXiv:hep-lat/0306017](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/0306017) [doi:10.1016/S0010-4655(03)00467-3](https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4655(03)00467-3)

49. **Annealed importance sampling**, Radford M\. Neal, *Stat\. Comput\.* **11** (2) 125–139 (2001) [doi:10.1023/A:1008923215028](https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008923215028)

50. **Hybrid Monte Carlo and topological modes of full QCD**, B\. Alles, G\. Boyd, Massimo D'Elia, A\. Di Giacomo, and E\. Vicari, *Phys\. Lett\. B* **389** 107–111 (1996) [arXiv:hep-lat/9607049](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/9607049) [doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(96)01247-6](https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(96)01247-6)

51. **CRITICAL SLOWING DOWN**, Ulli Wolff, *Nucl\. Phys\. B Proc\. Suppl\.* **17** 93–102 (1990) [doi:10.1016/0920-5632(90)90224-I](https://doi.org/10.1016/0920-5632(90)90224-I)

52. **Overrelaxation Algorithms for Lattice Field Theories**, Stephen L\. Adler, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **37** 458 (1988) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.37.458](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.37.458)

53. **Overrelaxed Heat Bath and Metropolis Algorithms for Accelerating Pure Gauge Monte Carlo Calculations**, Frank R\. Brown, and Thomas J\. Woch, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **58** 2394 (1987) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.2394](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.2394)

54. **Hybrid Monte Carlo**, S\. Duane, A\. D\. Kennedy, B\. J\. Pendleton, and D\. Roweth, *Phys\. Lett\. B* **195** 216–222 (1987) [doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)91197-X](https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(87)91197-X)

55. **Replica Monte Carlo Simulation of Spin\-Glasses**, Robert H\. Swendsen, and Jian\-Sheng Wang, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **57** (21) 2607 (1986) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.2607](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.2607)

56. **Improved Heat Bath Method for Monte Carlo Calculations in Lattice Gauge Theories**, A\. D\. Kennedy, and B\. J\. Pendleton, *Phys\. Lett\. B* **156** 393–399 (1985) [doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)91632-6](https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(85)91632-6)

57. **A New Method for Updating SU\(N\) Matrices in Computer Simulations of Gauge Theories**, N\. Cabibbo, and E\. Marinari, *Phys\. Lett\. B* **119** 387–390 (1982) [doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)90696-7](https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(82)90696-7)

58. **Monte Carlo Study of Quantized SU\(2\) Gauge Theory**, M\. Creutz, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **21** 2308–2315 (1980) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.21.2308](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.21.2308)

59. **Confinement of Quarks**, Kenneth G\. Wilson, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **10** 2445–2459 (1974) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.10.2445](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.10.2445)

60. **Monte Carlo Sampling Methods Using Markov Chains and Their Applications**, W\. K\. Hastings, *Biometrika* **57** 97–109 (1970) [doi:10.1093/biomet/57.1.97](https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/57.1.97)

61. **Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines**, N\. Metropolis, A\. W\. Rosenbluth, M\. N\. Rosenbluth, A\. H\. Teller, and E\. Teller, *J\. Chem\. Phys\.* **21** 1087–1092 (1953) [doi:10.1063/1.1699114](https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1699114)

62. **On Information and Sufficiency**, S\. Kullback, and R\. A\. Leibler, *The Annals of Mathematical Statistics* **22** (1) 79–86 (1951) [doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729694](https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177729694)