1. Advances in machine-learning-based sampling motivated by lattice quantum chromodynamics, Kyle Cranmer, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Nature Rev. Phys. 5 (9) 526–535, (2023), arXiv:2309.01156 doi:10.1038/s42254-023-00616-w
2. Normalizing flows for lattice gauge theory in arbitrary space-time dimension, Ryan Abbott, and others, (2023), arXiv:2305.02402
3. Aspects of scaling and scalability for flow-based sampling of lattice QCD, Ryan Abbott, and others, Eur. Phys. J. A 59 (11) 257, (2023), arXiv:2211.07541 doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01154-w
4. Sampling QCD field configurations with gauge-equivariant flow models, Ryan Abbott, and others, PoS LATTICE2022 036, (2023), arXiv:2208.03832 doi:10.22323/1.430.0036
5. Gauge-equivariant flow models for sampling in lattice field theories with pseudofermions, Ryan Abbott, and others, Phys. Rev. D 106 (7) 074506, (2022), arXiv:2207.08945 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074506
6. A lattice QCD perspective on weak decays of $b$ and $c$ quarks Snowmass 2022 White Paper, Peter A. Boyle, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2205.15373
7. Towards glueball masses of large-N SU(N) pure-gauge theories without topological freezing, Claudio Bonanno, Massimo D'Elia, Biagio Lucini, and Davide Vadacchino, Phys. Lett. B 833 137281, (2022), arXiv:2205.06190 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137281
8. Flow-based sampling in the lattice Schwinger model at criticality, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 106 (1) 014514, (2022), arXiv:2202.11712 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.014514
9. Applications of Machine Learning to Lattice Quantum Field Theory, Denis Boyda, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2202.05838
10. Continual Repeated Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlo, Alexander G. D. G. Matthews, Michael Arbel, Danilo J. Rezende, and Arnaud Doucet, (2022), arXiv:2201.13117
11. Stochastic normalizing flows as non-equilibrium transformations, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, Alessandro Nada, and Marco Panero, JHEP 07 015, (2022), arXiv:2201.08862 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2022)015
12. Tackling critical slowing down using global correction steps with equivariant flows: the case of the Schwinger model, Jacob Finkenrath, (2022), arXiv:2201.02216
13. HMC with Normalizing Flows, Sam Foreman, Taku Izubuchi, Luchang Jin, Xiao-Yong Jin, James C. Osborn, and Akio Tomiya, PoS LATTICE2021 073, (2022), arXiv:2112.01586 doi:10.22323/1.396.0073
14. LeapfrogLayers: A Trainable Framework for Effective Topological Sampling, Sam Foreman, Xiao-Yong Jin, and James C. Osborn, PoS LATTICE2021 508, (2022), arXiv:2112.01582 doi:10.22323/1.396.0508
15. Flow-based sampling for multimodal and extended-mode distributions in lattice field theory, Daniel C. Hackett, Chung-Chun Hsieh, Sahil Pontula, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Jiunn-Wei Chen, Kai-Feng Chen, Kyle Cranmer, Gurtej Kanwar, and Phiala E. Shanahan, (2021), arXiv:2107.00734
16. Flow-based sampling for fermionic lattice field theories, Michael S. Albergo, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Julian M. Urban, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 104 (11) 114507, (2021), arXiv:2106.05934 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.114507
17. Deep Learning Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, Sam Foreman, Xiao-Yong Jin, and James C. Osborn, 9th International Conference on Learning Representations, (2021), arXiv:2105.03418
18. Entangled Kernels -- Beyond Separability, Riikka Huusari, and Hachem Kadri, J. Machine Learning Res. 22 1–40, (2021), arXiv:2101.05514
19. Large-$N$ $SU(N)$ Yang-Mills theories with milder topological freezing, Claudio Bonanno, Claudio Bonati, and Massimo D'Elia, JHEP 03 111, (2021), arXiv:2012.14000 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2021)111
20. Sampling using $SU(N)$ gauge equivariant flows, Denis Boyda, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Michael S. Albergo, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 103 (7) 074504, (2021), arXiv:2008.05456 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074504
21. Array programming with NumPy, Charles R. Harris, and others, Nature 585 (7825) 357–362, (2020), arXiv:2006.10256 doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2
22. Equivariant flow-based sampling for lattice gauge theory, Gurtej Kanwar, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (12) 121601, (2020), arXiv:2003.06413 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.121601
23. SciPy 1.0--Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python, Pauli Virtanen, and others, Nature Meth. 17 261, (2020), arXiv:1907.10121 doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2
24. Flow-based generative models for Markov chain Monte Carlo in lattice field theory, M. S. Albergo, G. Kanwar, and P. E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 100 (3) 034515, (2019), arXiv:1904.12072 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.034515
25. Status and Future Perspectives for Lattice Gauge Theory Calculations to the Exascale and Beyond, B\'alint Jo\'o, Chulwoo Jung, Norman H. Christ, William Detmold, Robert Edwards, Martin Savage, and Phiala Shanahan, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 199, (2019), arXiv:1904.09725 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12919-7
26. Hot-dense Lattice QCD: USQCD whitepaper 2018, Alexei Bazavov, Frithjof Karsch, Swagato Mukherjee, and Peter Petreczky, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 194, (2019), arXiv:1904.09951 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12922-0
27. Lattice QCD and Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering, Andreas S. Kronfeld, David G. Richards, William Detmold, Rajan Gupta, Huey-Wen Lin, Keh-Fei Liu, Aaron S. Meyer, Raza Sufian, and Sergey Syritsyn, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 196, (2019), arXiv:1904.09931 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12916-x
28. The Role of Lattice QCD in Searches for Violations of Fundamental Symmetries and Signals for New Physics, Vincenzo Cirigliano, Zohreh Davoudi, Tanmoy Bhattacharya, Taku Izubuchi, Phiala E. Shanahan, Sergey Syritsyn, and Michael L. Wagman, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 197, (2019), arXiv:1904.09704 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12889-8
29. Opportunities for Lattice QCD in Quark and Lepton Flavor Physics, Christoph Lehner, and others, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 195, (2019), arXiv:1904.09479 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12891-2
30. Hadrons and Nuclei, William Detmold, Robert G. Edwards, Jozef J. Dudek, Michael Engelhardt, Huey-Wen Lin, Stefan Meinel, Kostas Orginos, and Phiala Shanahan, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 193, (2019), arXiv:1904.09512 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12902-4
31. Neural Network Renormalization Group, Shuo-Hui Li, and Lei Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (26) 260601, (2018), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.260601
32. Horovod: fast and easy distributed deep learning in TensorFlow, Alexander Sergeev, and Mike Del Balso, (2018), arXiv:1802.05799
33. Fighting topological freezing in the two-dimensional CPN-1 model, Martin Hasenbusch, Phys. Rev. D 96 (5) 054504, (2017), arXiv:1706.04443 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.054504
34. Density estimation using Real NVP, Laurent Dinh, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, and Samy Bengio, (2016), arXiv:1605.08803
35. Variational Inference with Normalizing Flows, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Shakir Mohamed, (2015), arXiv:1505.05770
36. NICE: Non-linear Independent Components Estimation, Laurent Dinh, David Krueger, and Yoshua Bengio, (2014), arXiv:1410.8516
37. Continuous smearing of Wilson Loops, Robert Lohmayer, and Herbert Neuberger, PoS LATTICE2011 249, (2011), arXiv:1110.3522 doi:10.22323/1.139.0249
38. Lattice QCD without topology barriers, Martin Luscher, and Stefan Schaefer, JHEP 07 036, (2011), arXiv:1105.4749 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2011)036
39. Critical slowing down and error analysis in lattice QCD simulations, Stefan Schaefer, Rainer Sommer, and Francesco Virotta, Nucl. Phys. B 845 93–119, (2011), arXiv:1009.5228 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2010.11.020
40. Properties and uses of the Wilson flow in lattice QCD, Martin Lüscher, JHEP 08 071, (2010), arXiv:1006.4518 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2010)071
41. Investigating the critical slowing down of QCD simulations, Stefan Schaefer, Rainer Sommer, and Francesco Virotta, PoS LAT2009 032, (2009), arXiv:0910.1465 doi:10.22323/1.091.0032
42. Trivializing maps, the Wilson flow and the HMC algorithm, Martin Luscher, Commun. Math. Phys. 293 899–919, (2010), arXiv:0907.5491 doi:10.1007/s00220-009-0953-7
43. The Monte Carlo method in quantum field theory, Colin Morningstar, 21st Annual Hampton University Graduate Studies Program, (2007), arXiv:hep-lat/0702020
44. Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment, John D. Hunter, Comput. Sci. Eng. 9 (3) 90–95, (2007), doi:10.1109/MCSE.2007.55
45. Infinite N phase transitions in continuum Wilson loop operators, R. Narayanan, and H. Neuberger, JHEP 03 064, (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0601210 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/03/064
46. Parallel tempering: Theory, applications, and new perspectives, David J. Earl, and Michael W. Deem, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 7 (23) 3910, (2005), arXiv:physics/0508111 doi:10.1039/b509983h
47. Critical slowing down of topological modes, Luigi Del Debbio, Gian Mario Manca, and Ettore Vicari, Phys. Lett. B 594 315–323, (2004), arXiv:hep-lat/0403001 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.05.038
48. Monte Carlo errors with less errors, Ulli Wolff, Comput. Phys. Commun. 156 143–153, (2004), arXiv:hep-lat/0306017 doi:10.1016/S0010-4655(03)00467-3
49. Annealed importance sampling, Radford M. Neal, Stat. Comput. 11 (2) 125–139, (2001), doi:10.1023/A:1008923215028
50. Hybrid Monte Carlo and topological modes of full QCD, B. Alles, G. Boyd, Massimo D'Elia, A. Di Giacomo, and E. Vicari, Phys. Lett. B 389 107–111, (1996), arXiv:hep-lat/9607049 doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(96)01247-6
51. CRITICAL SLOWING DOWN, Ulli Wolff, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 17 93–102, (1990), doi:10.1016/0920-5632(90)90224-I
52. Overrelaxation Algorithms for Lattice Field Theories, Stephen L. Adler, Phys. Rev. D 37 458, (1988), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.37.458
53. Overrelaxed Heat Bath and Metropolis Algorithms for Accelerating Pure Gauge Monte Carlo Calculations, Frank R. Brown, and Thomas J. Woch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58 2394, (1987), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.2394
54. Hybrid Monte Carlo, S. Duane, A. D. Kennedy, B. J. Pendleton, and D. Roweth, Phys. Lett. B 195 216–222, (1987), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)91197-X
55. Replica Monte Carlo Simulation of Spin-Glasses, Robert H. Swendsen, and Jian-Sheng Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57 (21) 2607, (1986), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.57.2607
56. Improved Heat Bath Method for Monte Carlo Calculations in Lattice Gauge Theories, A. D. Kennedy, and B. J. Pendleton, Phys. Lett. B 156 393–399, (1985), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)91632-6
57. A New Method for Updating SU(N) Matrices in Computer Simulations of Gauge Theories, N. Cabibbo, and E. Marinari, Phys. Lett. B 119 387–390, (1982), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)90696-7
58. Monte Carlo Study of Quantized SU(2) Gauge Theory, M. Creutz, Phys. Rev. D 21 2308–2315, (1980), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.21.2308
59. Confinement of Quarks, Kenneth G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 10 2445–2459, (1974), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.10.2445
60. Monte Carlo Sampling Methods Using Markov Chains and Their Applications, W. K. Hastings, Biometrika 57 97–109, (1970), doi:10.1093/biomet/57.1.97
61. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines, N. Metropolis, A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller, J. Chem. Phys. 21 1087–1092, (1953), doi:10.1063/1.1699114
62. On Information and Sufficiency, S. Kullback, and R. A. Leibler, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 22 (1) 79–86, (1951), doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729694