Improved analysis of isovector nucleon matrix elements with <math display="inline"><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>N</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>f</mi></mrow></msub><mo>=</mo><mn>2</mn><mo>+</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></math> flavors of <math display="inline"><mrow><mi mathvariant="script">O</mi><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mi>a</mi><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow></math> improved Wilson fermions

INSPIRE: 2755378
arXiv: 2402.03024
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.074507

Authors: Djukanovic, Dalibor, von Hippel, Georg, Meyer, Harvey B., Ottnad, Konstantin, Wittig, Hartmut

Submitted: 5 February 2024

Subjects:

Journal reference: Phys.Rev.D 109 (7) 074507 (2024)

Citations: 18

Abstract

We present an update of our determination of the isovector charges <math display="inline"><mrow><msubsup><mrow><mi>g</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>u</mi><mo>-</mo><mi>d</mi></mrow></msubsup></mrow></math>, <math display="inline"><msubsup><mi>g</mi><mi>S</mi><mrow><mi>u</mi><mo>-</mo><mi>d</mi></mrow></msubsup></math> and <math display="inline"><msubsup><mi>g</mi><mi>T</mi><mrow><mi>u</mi><mo>-</mo><mi>d</mi></mrow></msubsup></math>, and the isovector twist-2 forward matrix elements <math display="inline"><mo stretchy="false">⟨</mo><mi>x</mi><msub><mo stretchy="false">⟩</mo><mrow><mi>u</mi><mo>-</mo><mi>d</mi></mrow></msub></math>, <math display="inline"><mrow><mo stretchy="false">⟨</mo><mi>x</mi><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">⟩</mo></mrow><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mi><mi>u</mi><mo>-</mo><mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mi><mi>d</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math> and <math display="inline"><mrow><mo stretchy="false">⟨</mo><mi>x</mi><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">⟩</mo></mrow><mrow><mi>δ</mi><mi>u</mi><mo>-</mo><mi>δ</mi><mi>d</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math> on the <math display="inline"><msub><mi>N</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">f</mi></msub><mo>=</mo><mn>2</mn><mo>+</mo><mn>1</mn></math> gauge ensembles generated by the Coordinated Lattice Simulations (CLS) effort. We have significantly extended our coverage of the parameter space by adding ensembles at the physical pion mass and fine lattice spacing, at nearly physical pion masses and very fine lattice spacings, and at very large physical lattice volumes, enabling a well-controlled extrapolation to the physical point. Another major improvement is achieved owing to the extended range of source-sink separations, which allows us to perform two-state fits to summed correlator ratios, leading to a much higher level of control over excited-state effects. Systematic uncertainties from the chiral, continuum and infinite-volume extrapolations are incorporated via model averages based on the Akaike information criterion. Our final results at the physical point are <math display="inline"><mrow><msubsup><mrow><mi>g</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>A</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>u</mi><mo>-</mo><mi>d</mi></mrow></msubsup><mo>=</mo><mn>1.254</mn><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mn>19</mn><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mrow><mi>stat</mi></mrow></msub><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mn>15</mn><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mrow><mi>sys</mi></mrow></msub><mo stretchy="false">[</mo><mn>24</mn><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">]</mo></mrow><mrow><mtext>total</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></math>, <math display="inline"><mrow><msubsup><mrow><mi>g</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>S</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>u</mi><mo>-</mo><mi>d</mi></mrow></msubsup><mo>=</mo><mn>1.203</mn><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mn>77</mn><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mrow><mi>stat</mi></mrow></msub><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mn>81</mn><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mrow><mi>sys</mi></mrow></msub><mo stretchy="false">[</mo><mn>112</mn><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">]</mo></mrow><mrow><mtext>total</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></math>, <math display="inline"><mrow><msubsup><mrow><mi>g</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>T</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>u</mi><mo>-</mo><mi>d</mi></mrow></msubsup><mo>=</mo><mn>0.993</mn><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mn>15</mn><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mrow><mi>stat</mi></mrow></msub><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mn>05</mn><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mrow><mi>sys</mi></mrow></msub><mo stretchy="false">[</mo><mn>16</mn><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">]</mo></mrow><mrow><mtext>total</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></math>, <math display="inline"><mrow><mo stretchy="false">⟨</mo><mi>x</mi><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">⟩</mo></mrow><mrow><mi>u</mi><mo>-</mo><mi>d</mi></mrow></msub><mo>=</mo><mn>0.153</mn><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mn>15</mn><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mrow><mi>stat</mi></mrow></msub><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mn>10</mn><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mrow><mi>sys</mi></mrow></msub><mo stretchy="false">[</mo><mn>17</mn><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">]</mo></mrow><mrow><mtext>total</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></math>, <math display="inline"><mrow><mo stretchy="false">⟨</mo><mi>x</mi><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">⟩</mo></mrow><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mi><mi>u</mi><mo>-</mo><mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mi><mi>d</mi></mrow></msub><mo>=</mo><mn>0.207</mn><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mn>15</mn><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mrow><mi>stat</mi></mrow></msub><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mn>06</mn><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mrow><mi>sys</mi></mrow></msub><mo stretchy="false">[</mo><mn>16</mn><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">]</mo></mrow><mrow><mtext>total</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></math>, and <math display="inline"><mrow><mo stretchy="false">⟨</mo><mi>x</mi><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">⟩</mo></mrow><mrow><mi>δ</mi><mi>u</mi><mo>-</mo><mi>δ</mi><mi>d</mi></mrow></msub><mo>=</mo><mn>0.195</mn><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mn>17</mn><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mrow><mi>stat</mi></mrow></msub><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mn>15</mn><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mrow><mi>sys</mi></mrow></msub><mo stretchy="false">[</mo><mn>23</mn><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">]</mo></mrow><mrow><mtext>total</mtext></mrow></msub></mrow></math>. While our results for the isovector charges are in excellent agreement with the FLAG 21 averages, we note that our error for the tensor charge <math display="inline"><msubsup><mi>g</mi><mi>T</mi><mrow><mi>u</mi><mo>-</mo><mi>d</mi></mrow></msubsup></math> is considerably smaller.