# Quark masses and low\-energy constants in the continuum from the tadpole\-improved clover ensembles

**INSPIRE:** [2705351](https://inspirehep.net/literature/2705351)
**arXiv:** [2310\.00814](https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.00814)
**DOI:** [10\.1103/PhysRevD\.109\.054507](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.054507)

**Authors:** Hu, Zhi\-Cheng, Hu, Bo\-Lun, Wang, Ji\-Hao, Gong, Ming, Liu, Guoming, Liu, Liuming, Sun, Peng, Sun, Wei, Wang, Wei, Yang, Yi\-Bo, Zhao, Dian\-Jun

**Submitted:** 1 October 2023

**Subjects:**
- hep\-lat
- hep\-ph
- Lattice
- Phenomenology\-HEP

**Journal reference:** Phys\.Rev\.D 109 \(5\) 054507 \(2024\)

**Citations:** 54

## Abstract

We present the light\-flavor quark masses and low\-energy constants using the \<math display\="inline"\>\<mrow\>\<mn\>2\</mn\>\<mo\>\+\</mo\>\<mn\>1\</mn\>\</mrow\>\</math\> flavor full\-QCD ensembles with stout smeared\-clover fermion action and Symanzik gauge action\. Both the fermion and gauge actions are tadpole improved self\-consistently\. The simulations are performed on 11 ensembles at three lattice spacings \<math display\="inline"\>\<mi\>a\</mi\>\<mo\>∈\</mo\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\[\</mo\>\<mn\>0\.05\</mn\>\<mo\>,\</mo\>\<mn\>0\.11\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\]\</mo\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mi\>fm\</mi\>\</math\>, four spatial sizes \<math display\="inline"\>\<mi\>L\</mi\>\<mo\>∈\</mo\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\[\</mo\>\<mn\>2\.5\</mn\>\<mo\>,\</mo\>\<mn\>5\.1\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\]\</mo\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mi\>fm\</mi\>\</math\>, seven pion masses \<math display\="inline"\>\<msub\>\<mi\>m\</mi\>\<mi\>π\</mi\>\</msub\>\<mo\>∈\</mo\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\[\</mo\>\<mn\>135\</mn\>\<mo\>,\</mo\>\<mn\>350\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\]\</mo\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mi\>MeV\</mi\>\</math\>, and several values of the strange quark mass\. The quark mass is defined through the partially conserved axial current relation and renormalized to \<math display\="inline"\>\<mrow\>\<mover accent\="true"\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>MS\</mi\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mo stretchy\="true"\>¯\</mo\>\</mrow\>\</mover\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>2\</mn\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mi\>GeV\</mi\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\</mrow\>\</math\> through the intermediate regularization independent momentum subtraction scheme\. The systematic uncertainty of using the symmetric momentum subtraction scheme is also included\. Eventually, we predict \<math display\="inline"\>\<msub\>\<mi\>m\</mi\>\<mi\>u\</mi\>\</msub\>\<mo\>\=\</mo\>\<mn\>2\.45\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>22\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>20\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mi\>MeV\</mi\>\</math\>, \<math display\="inline"\>\<msub\>\<mi\>m\</mi\>\<mi\>d\</mi\>\</msub\>\<mo\>\=\</mo\>\<mn\>4\.74\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>11\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>09\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mi\>MeV\</mi\>\</math\>, and \<math display\="inline"\>\<msub\>\<mi\>m\</mi\>\<mi\>s\</mi\>\</msub\>\<mo\>\=\</mo\>\<mn\>98\.8\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>2\.9\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>4\.7\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mi\>MeV\</mi\>\</math\> with the systematic uncertainties from lattice spacing determination, continuum extrapolation and renormalization constant included\. We also obtain the chiral condensate \<math display\="inline"\>\<msup\>\<mi mathvariant\="normal"\>Σ\</mi\>\<mrow\>\<mn\>1\</mn\>\<mo\>/\</mo\>\<mn\>3\</mn\>\</mrow\>\</msup\>\<mo\>\=\</mo\>\<mn\>268\.6\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>3\.6\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>0\.7\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mi\>MeV\</mi\>\</math\> and the pion decay constant \<math display\="inline"\>\<mi\>F\</mi\>\<mo\>\=\</mo\>\<mn\>86\.6\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>7\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>1\.4\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mi\>MeV\</mi\>\</math\> in the \<math display\="inline"\>\<msub\>\<mi\>N\</mi\>\<mi\>f\</mi\>\</msub\>\<mo\>\=\</mo\>\<mn\>2\</mn\>\</math\> chiral limit, and the next\-to\-leading order low\-energy constants \<math display\="inline"\>\<msub\>\<mo\>ℓ\</mo\>\<mn\>3\</mn\>\</msub\>\<mo\>\=\</mo\>\<mn\>2\.43\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>54\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>05\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\</math\> and \<math display\="inline"\>\<msub\>\<mo\>ℓ\</mo\>\<mn\>4\</mn\>\</msub\>\<mo\>\=\</mo\>\<mn\>4\.322\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>75\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>96\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\</math\>\.
