1. Precision Calculation of the Electromagnetic Radii of the Proton and Neutron from Lattice QCD, Dalibor Djukanovic, Georg von Hippel, Harvey B. Meyer, Konstantin Ottnad, Miguel Salg, and Hartmut Wittig, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (21) 211901, (2024), arXiv:2309.07491 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.211901
2. Electromagnetic form factors of the nucleon from Nf=2+1 lattice QCD, Dalibor Djukanovic, Georg von Hippel, Harvey B. Meyer, Konstantin Ottnad, Miguel Salg, and Hartmut Wittig, Phys. Rev. D 109 (9) 094510, (2024), arXiv:2309.06590 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.094510
3. Low-mode deflation for twisted-mass and RHMC reweighting in lattice QCD, Simon Kuberski, Comput. Phys. Commun. 300 109173, (2024), arXiv:2306.02385 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2024.109173
4. Chiral perturbation theory of the hyperfine splitting in (muonic) hydrogen, Franziska Hagelstein, Vadim Lensky, and Vladimir Pascalutsa, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (8) 762, (2023), arXiv:2305.09633 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11866-4
5. Comprehensive theory of the Lamb shift in light muonic atoms, K. Pachucki, V. Lensky, F. Hagelstein, S. S. Li Muli, S. Bacca, and R. Pohl, Rev. Mod. Phys. 96 (1) 015001, (2024), arXiv:2212.13782 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.96.015001
6. Improved information criteria for Bayesian model averaging in lattice field theory, Ethan T. Neil, and Jacob W. Sitison, Phys. Rev. D 109 (1) 014510, (2024), arXiv:2208.14983 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.014510
7. The proton structure in and out of muonic hydrogen, Aldo Antognini, Franziska Hagelstein, and Vladimir Pascalutsa, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 72 389, (2022), arXiv:2205.10076 doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-101920-024709
8. Laser excitation of the 1s-hyperfine transition in muonic hydrogen, Pedro Amaro, and others, SciPost Phys. 13 (2) 020, (2022), arXiv:2112.00138 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.13.2.020
9. FLAG Review 2021, Y. Aoki, and others, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (10) 869, (2022), arXiv:2111.09849 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10536-1
10. New Insights into the Nucleon{\textquoteright}s Electromagnetic Structure, Yong-Hui Lin, Hans-Werner Hammer, and Ulf-G. Meißner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (5) 052002, (2022), arXiv:2109.12961 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.052002
11. Measurement of the muon transfer rate from muonic hydrogen to oxygen in the range 70-336 K, C. Pizzolotto, and others, Phys. Lett. A 403 127401, (2021), arXiv:2105.06701 doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2021.127401
12. The FAMU experiment: muonic hydrogen high precision spectroscopy studies, C. Pizzolotto, and others, Eur. Phys. J. A 56 (7) 185, (2020), doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00195-9
13. Remarks on strange-quark simulations with Wilson fermions, Daniel Mohler, and Stefan Schaefer, Phys. Rev. D 102 (7) 074506, (2020), arXiv:2003.13359 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.074506
14. Parametrization and applications of the low-$Q^2$ nucleon vector form factors, Kaushik Borah, Richard J. Hill, Gabriel Lee, and Oleksandr Tomalak, Phys. Rev. D 102 (7) 074012, (2020), arXiv:2003.13640 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.074012
15. Leading hadronic contribution to the muon magnetic moment from lattice QCD, Sz. Borsanyi, and others, Nature 593 (7857) 51–55, (2021), arXiv:2002.12347 doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03418-1
16. The proton charge radius extracted from the initial-state radiation experiment at MAMI, M. Mihovilovi\vc, and others, Eur. Phys. J. A 57 (3) 107, (2021), arXiv:1905.11182 doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00414-x
17. Setting the scale for the CLS $2 + 1$ flavor ensembles, Mattia Bruno, Tomasz Korzec, and Stefan Schaefer, Phys. Rev. D 95 (7) 074504, (2017), arXiv:1608.08900 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.074504
18. Quark Contraction Tool {\textemdash} QCT, Dalibor Djukanovic, Comput. Phys. Commun. 247 106950, (2020), arXiv:1603.01576 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2019.106950
19. Extraction of the proton radius from electron-proton scattering data, Gabriel Lee, John R. Arrington, and Richard J. Hill, Phys. Rev. D 92 (1) 013013, (2015), arXiv:1505.01489 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.013013
20. Breakdown of the expansion of finite-size corrections to the hydrogen Lamb shift in moments of charge distribution, Franziska Hagelstein, and Vladimir Pascalutsa, Phys. Rev. A 91 (4) 040502, (2015), arXiv:1502.03721 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.91.040502
21. Simulation of QCD with N$_{f} =$ 2 $+$ 1 flavors of non-perturbatively improved Wilson fermions, Mattia Bruno, and others, JHEP 02 043, (2015), arXiv:1411.3982 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2015)043
22. Laser spectroscopy of the hyperfine splitting energy in the ground state of muonic hydrogen, Masaharu Sato, and others, 20th International Conference on Particles and Nuclei 460–463, (2014), doi:10.3204/DESY-PROC-2014-04/67
23. The two-photon exchange contribution to muonic hydrogen from chiral perturbation theory, Clara Peset, and Antonio Pineda, Nucl. Phys. B 887 69–111, (2014), arXiv:1406.4524 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2014.07.027
24. Ab initio calculation of the neutron-proton mass difference, Sz. Borsanyi, and others, Science 347 1452–1455, (2015), arXiv:1406.4088 doi:10.1126/science.1257050
25. Review of Lattice Results Concerning Low-Energy Particle Physics, Sinya Aoki, and others, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 2890, (2014), arXiv:1310.8555 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-2890-7
26. Electric and magnetic form factors of the proton, J. C. Bernauer, and others, Phys. Rev. C 90 (1) 015206, (2014), arXiv:1307.6227 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.90.015206
27. Improvement of $N_f$ = 3 lattice QCD with Wilson fermions and tree-level improved gauge action, John Bulava, and Stefan Schaefer, Nucl. Phys. B 874 188–197, (2013), arXiv:1304.7093 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2013.05.019
28. Proton Structure from the Measurement of $2S-2P$ Transition Frequencies of Muonic Hydrogen, Aldo Antognini, and others, Science 339 417–420, (2013), doi:10.1126/science.1230016
29. Electromagnetic form factors of the nucleon in effective field theory, T. Bauer, J. C. Bernauer, and S. Scherer, Phys. Rev. C 86 065206, (2012), arXiv:1209.3872 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.86.065206
30. Lattice QCD with open boundary conditions and twisted-mass reweighting, Martin Luscher, and Stefan Schaefer, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184 519–528, (2013), arXiv:1206.2809 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2012.10.003
31. Proton structure corrections to hyperfine splitting in muonic hydrogen, Carl E. Carlson, Vahagn Nazaryan, and Keith Griffioen, Phys. Rev. A 83 042509, (2011), arXiv:1101.3239 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.83.042509
32. The RMS Charge Radius of the Proton and Zemach Moments, Michael O. Distler, Jan C. Bernauer, and Thomas Walcher, Phys. Lett. B 696 343–347, (2011), arXiv:1011.1861 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.12.067
33. QED is not endangered by the proton's size, A. De Rujula, Phys. Lett. B 693 555–558, (2010), arXiv:1008.3861 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.08.074
34. Model independent extraction of the proton charge radius from electron scattering, Richard J. Hill, and Gil Paz, Phys. Rev. D 82 113005, (2010), arXiv:1008.4619 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.113005
35. The size of the proton, Randolf Pohl, and others, Nature 466 213–216, (2010), doi:10.1038/nature09250
36. Properties and uses of the Wilson flow in lattice QCD, Martin Lüscher, JHEP 08 071, (2010), arXiv:1006.4518 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2010)071
37. Fluctuations and reweighting of the quark determinant on large lattices, Martin Luscher, and Filippo Palombi, PoS LATTICE2008 049, (2008), arXiv:0810.0946 doi:10.22323/1.066.0049
38. Dispersion analysis of the nucleon form-factors including meson continua, M. A. Belushkin, H. -W. Hammer, and U. -G. Meissner, Phys. Rev. C 75 035202, (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0608337 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.75.035202
39. Electromagnetic form-factors of the nucleon in chiral perturbation theory including vector mesons, Matthias R. Schindler, Jambul Gegelia, and Stefan Scherer, Eur. Phys. J. A 26 1–5, (2005), arXiv:nucl-th/0509005 doi:10.1140/epja/i2005-10145-8
40. Comment on `Constraints on proton structure from precision atomic physics measurements', James Lewis Friar, and I. Sick, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 049101, (2005), arXiv:nucl-th/0503020 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.049101
41. The Chroma software system for lattice QCD, Robert G. Edwards, and Balint Joo, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 140 832, (2005), arXiv:hep-lat/0409003 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2004.11.254
42. Zemach and magnetic radius of the proton from the hyperfine splitting in hydrogen, A. V. Volotka, V. M. Shabaev, G. Plunien, and G. Soff, Eur. Phys. J. D 33 (1) 23–27, (2005), arXiv:physics/0405118 doi:10.1140/epjd/e2005-00025-9
43. Proton polarizability contribution to the hyperfine splitting in muonic hydrogen, R. N. Faustov, E. V. Cherednikova, and A. P. Martynenko, Nucl. Phys. A 703 365–377, (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0108044 doi:10.1016/S0375-9474(01)01461-0
44. Proton polarizability contribution to the hydrogen hyperfine splitting, R. N. Faustov, and A. P. Martynenko, Phys. Atom. Nucl. 65 265–270, (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0007044 doi:10.1134/1.1451940
45. Low-energy analysis of the nucleon electromagnetic form-factors, Bastian Kubis, and Ulf-G. Meissner, Nucl. Phys. A 679 698–734, (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0007056 doi:10.1016/S0375-9474(00)00378-X
46. Proton structure effects in muonic hydrogen, Krzysztof Pachucki, Phys. Rev. A 60 3593–3598, (1999), arXiv:physics/9906002 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.60.3593
47. Theory of the Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen, Krzysztof Pachucki, Phys. Rev. A 53 2092–2100, (1996), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.53.2092
48. Dispersion theoretical analysis of the nucleon electromagnetic form-factors, P. Mergell, Ulf G. Meissner, and D. Drechsel, Nucl. Phys. A 596 367–396, (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9506375 doi:10.1016/0375-9474(95)00339-8
49. Improved Continuum Limit Lattice Action for QCD with Wilson Fermions, B. Sheikholeslami, and R. Wohlert, Nucl. Phys. B 259 572, (1985), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90002-1
50. On-shell improved lattice gauge theories, M. Luscher, and P. Weisz, Commun. Math. Phys. 98 (3) 433, (1985), doi:10.1007/BF01205792
51. Exclusive Processes in Perturbative Quantum Chromodynamics, G. Peter Lepage, and Stanley J. Brodsky, Phys. Rev. D 22 2157, (1980), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.22.2157
52. Nuclear Finite Size Effects in Light Muonic Atoms, James Lewis Friar, Annals Phys. 122 151, (1979), doi:10.1016/0003-4916(79)90300-2
53. A new look at the statistical model identification, H. Akaike, IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 19 (6) 716–723, (1974), doi:10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
54. Proton Structure and the Hyperfine Shift in Hydrogen, A. C. Zemach, Phys. Rev. 104 1771–1781, (1956), doi:10.1103/PhysRev.104.1771