1. Precision Determination of Baryon Masses including Isospin-breaking, Alexander M. Segner, Andreas Risch, and Hartmut Wittig, PoS LATTICE2023 044, (2024), arXiv:2312.09065 doi:10.22323/1.453.0044
  2. Precision Calculation of the Electromagnetic Radii of the Proton and Neutron from Lattice QCD, Dalibor Djukanovic, Georg von Hippel, Harvey B. Meyer, Konstantin Ottnad, Miguel Salg, and Hartmut Wittig, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (21) 211901, (2024), arXiv:2309.07491 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.211901
  3. Low-mode deflation for twisted-mass and RHMC reweighting in lattice QCD, Simon Kuberski, Comput. Phys. Commun. 300 109173, (2024), arXiv:2306.02385 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2024.109173
  4. Octet baryon isovector charges from Nf=2+1 lattice QCD, Gunnar S. Bali, Sara Collins, Simon Heybrock, Marius Löffler, Rudolf Rödl, Wolfgang Söldner, and Simon Weishäupl, Phys. Rev. D 108 (3) 034512, (2023), arXiv:2305.04717 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.034512
  5. Nucleon Sigma Terms with Nf=2+1 Flavors of O(a)-Improved Wilson Fermions, Andria Agadjanov, Dalibor Djukanovic, Georg von Hippel, Harvey B. Meyer, Konstantin Ottnad, and Hartmut Wittig, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (26) 261902, (2023), arXiv:2303.08741 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.261902
  6. The New AMBER Experiment at the CERN SPS, Catarina Quintans, Few Body Syst. 63 (4) 72, (2022), doi:10.1007/s00601-022-01769-7
  7. Improved information criteria for Bayesian model averaging in lattice field theory, Ethan T. Neil, and Jacob W. Sitison, Phys. Rev. D 109 (1) 014510, (2024), arXiv:2208.14983 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.014510
  8. Review of Particle Physics, R. L. Workman, and others, PTEP 2022 083C01, (2022), doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac097
  9. Isovector axial form factor of the nucleon from lattice QCD, Dalibor Djukanovic, Georg von Hippel, Jonna Koponen, Harvey B. Meyer, Konstantin Ottnad, Tobias Schulz, and Hartmut Wittig, Phys. Rev. D 106 (7) 074503, (2022), arXiv:2207.03440 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074503
  10. The proton structure in and out of muonic hydrogen, Aldo Antognini, Franziska Hagelstein, and Vladimir Pascalutsa, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 72 389, (2022), arXiv:2205.10076 doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-101920-024709
  11. The hadronic running of the electromagnetic coupling and the electroweak mixing angle from lattice QCD, Marco C\`e, Antoine G\'erardin, Georg von Hippel, Harvey B. Meyer, Kohtaroh Miura, Konstantin Ottnad, Andreas Risch, Teseo San Jos\'e, Jonas Wilhelm, and Hartmut Wittig, JHEP 08 220, (2022), arXiv:2203.08676 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2022)220
  12. Low-energy electron scattering facilities in Japan, Toshimi Suda, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2391 (1) 012004, (2022), doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2391/1/012004
  13. FLAG Review 2021, Y. Aoki, and others, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (10) 869, (2022), arXiv:2111.09849 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10536-1
  14. New Insights into the Nucleon{\textquoteright}s Electromagnetic Structure, Yong-Hui Lin, Hans-Werner Hammer, and Ulf-G. Meißner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (5) 052002, (2022), arXiv:2109.12961 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.052002
  15. MUSE: The MUon Scattering Experiment, Ethan Cline, Jan Bernauer, Evangeline J. Downie, and Ronald Gilman, SciPost Phys. Proc. 5 023, (2021), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysProc.5.023
  16. Calculation of the derivative of nucleon form factors in Nf=2+1 lattice QCD at M{\ensuremath{\pi}}=138{\,}{\,}MeV on a (5.5{\,}{\,}fm)3 volume, Ken-Ichi Ishikawa, Yoshinobu Kuramashi, Shoichi Sasaki, Eigo Shintani, and Takeshi Yamazaki, Phys. Rev. D 104 (7) 074514, (2021), arXiv:2107.07085 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.074514
  17. Dispersion-theoretical analysis of the electromagnetic form factors of the nucleon: Past, present and future, Yong-Hui Lin, Hans-Werner Hammer, and Ulf-G. Meißner, Eur. Phys. J. A 57 (8) 255, (2021), arXiv:2106.06357 doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00562-0
  18. CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2018*, Eite Tiesinga, Peter J. Mohr, David B. Newell, and Barry N. Taylor, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93 (2) 025010, (2021), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.93.025010
  19. High-precision determination of the electric and magnetic radius of the proton, Yong-Hui Lin, Hans-Werner Hammer, and Ulf-G Meißner, Phys. Lett. B 816 136254, (2021), arXiv:2102.11642 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136254
  20. Isovector electromagnetic form factors of the nucleon from lattice QCD and the proton radius puzzle, D. Djukanovic, T. Harris, G. von Hippel, P. M. Junnarkar, H. B. Meyer, D. Mohler, K. Ottnad, T. Schulz, J. Wilhelm, and H. Wittig, Phys. Rev. D 103 (9) 094522, (2021), arXiv:2102.07460 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.094522
  21. Two-photon frequency comb spectroscopy of atomic hydrogen, Alexey Grinin, Arthur Matveev, Dylan C. Yost, Lothar Maisenbacher, Vitaly Wirthl, Randolf Pohl, Theodor W. Hänsch, and Thomas Udem, Science 370 (6520) abc7776, (2020), doi:10.1126/science.abc7776
  22. Excited states in nucleon structure calculations, Konstantin Ottnad, Eur. Phys. J. A 57 (2) 50, (2021), arXiv:2011.12471 doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00355-5
  23. The proton size, Jean-Philippe Karr, Dominique Marchand, and Eric Voutier, Nature Rev. Phys. 2 (11) 601–614, (2020), doi:10.1038/s42254-020-0229-x
  24. PRad-II: A New Upgraded High Precision Measurement of the Proton Charge Radius, A. Gasparian, and others, (2020), arXiv:2009.10510
  25. Remarks on strange-quark simulations with Wilson fermions, Daniel Mohler, and Stefan Schaefer, Phys. Rev. D 102 (7) 074506, (2020), arXiv:2003.13359 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.074506
  26. Leading hadronic contribution to the muon magnetic moment from lattice QCD, Sz. Borsanyi, and others, Nature 593 (7857) 51–55, (2021), arXiv:2002.12347 doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03418-1
  27. Model-independent determination of the nucleon charge radius from lattice QCD, Constantia Alexandrou, Kyriakos Hadjiyiannakou, Giannis Koutsou, Konstantin Ottnad, and Marcus Petschlies, Phys. Rev. D 101 (11) 114504, (2020), arXiv:2002.06984 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.114504
  28. Precise determination of the proton magnetic radius from electron scattering data, J. M. Alarc\'on, D. W. Higinbotham, and C. Weiss, Phys. Rev. C 102 (3) 035203, (2020), arXiv:2002.05167 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.102.035203
  29. Collimation of Target Induced Halo Following MAGIX at MESA, Ben Ledroit, and Kurt Aulenbacher, THPRB019, (2019), doi:10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2019-THPRB019
  30. The proton radius: From a puzzle to precision, Hans-Werner Hammer, and Ulf-G Meißner, Sci. Bull. 65 257–258, (2020), arXiv:1912.03881 doi:10.1016/j.scib.2019.12.012
  31. A small proton charge radius from an electron{\textendash}proton scattering experiment, W. Xiong, and others, Nature 575 (7781) 147–150, (2019), doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1721-2
  32. The proton charge radius extracted from the initial-state radiation experiment at MAMI, M. Mihovilovi\vc, and others, Eur. Phys. J. A 57 (3) 107, (2021), arXiv:1905.11182 doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00414-x
  33. Nucleon isovector charges and twist-2 matrix elements with $N_f=2+1$ dynamical Wilson quarks, Tim Harris, Georg von Hippel, Parikshit Junnarkar, Harvey B. Meyer, Konstantin Ottnad, Jonas Wilhelm, Hartmut Wittig, and Linus Wrang, Phys. Rev. D 100 (3) 034513, (2019), arXiv:1905.01291 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.034513
  34. Frequency-splitting estimators of single-propagator traces, Leonardo Giusti, Tim Harris, Alessandro Nada, and Stefan Schaefer, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (7) 586, (2019), arXiv:1903.10447 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7049-0
  35. A measurement of the atomic hydrogen Lamb shift and the proton charge radius, N. Bezginov, T. Valdez, M. Horbatsch, A. Marsman, A. C. Vutha, and E. A. Hessels, Science 365 (6457) 1007–1012, (2019), doi:10.1126/science.aau7807
  36. Proton and neutron electromagnetic form factors from lattice QCD, C. Alexandrou, S. Bacchio, M. Constantinou, J. Finkenrath, K. Hadjiyiannakou, K. Jansen, G. Koutsou, and A. Vaquero Aviles-Casco, Phys. Rev. D 100 (1) 014509, (2019), arXiv:1812.10311 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.014509
  37. Nonperturbative renormalization and $O(a)$-improvement of the nonsinglet vector current with $N_f=2+1$ Wilson fermions and tree-level Symanzik improved gauge action, Antoine Gerardin, Tim Harris, and Harvey B. Meyer, Phys. Rev. D 99 (1) 014519, (2019), arXiv:1811.08209 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.014519
  38. Nucleon form factors and root-mean-square radii on a (10.8 fm)$^4$ lattice at the physical point, Eigo Shintani, Ken-Ichi Ishikawa, Yoshinobu Kuramashi, Shoichi Sasaki, and Takeshi Yamazaki, Phys. Rev. D 99 (1) 014510, (2019), arXiv:1811.07292 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.014510
  39. Nucleon form factors on a large volume lattice near the physical point in 2+1 flavor QCD, Ken-Ichi Ishikawa, Yoshinobu Kuramashi, Shoichi Sasaki, Natsuki Tsukamoto, Akira Ukawa, and Takeshi Yamazaki, Phys. Rev. D 98 (7) 074510, (2018), arXiv:1807.03974 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.074510
  40. A Cryogenic Supersonic Jet Target for Electron Scattering Experiments at MAGIX@MESA and MAMI, S. Grieser, Daniel Bonaventura, Philipp Brand, Catharina Hargens, Benjamin Hetz, Lukas Leßmann, Christina Westphälinger, and Alfons Khoukaz, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 906 120–126, (2018), arXiv:1806.05409 doi:10.1016/j.nima.2018.07.076
  41. New Measurement of the $1S-3S$ Transition Frequency of Hydrogen: Contribution to the Proton Charge Radius Puzzle, H\'el\`ene Fleurbaey, Sandrine Galtier, Simon Thomas, Marie Bonnaud, Lucile Julien, Fran\ccois Biraben, Fran\ccois Nez, Michel Abgrall, and Jocelyne Gu\'ena, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (18) 183001, (2018), arXiv:1801.08816 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.183001
  42. Computing the nucleon charge and axial radii directly at $Q^2=0$ in lattice QCD, Nesreen Hasan, Jeremy Green, Stefan Meinel, Michael Engelhardt, Stefan Krieg, John Negele, Andrew Pochinsky, and Sergey Syritsyn, Phys. Rev. D 97 (3) 034504, (2018), arXiv:1711.11385 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.034504
  43. The Rydberg constant and proton size from atomic hydrogen, Axel Beyer, and others, Science 358 (6359) 79–85, (2017), doi:10.1126/science.aah6677
  44. Proton and Neutron Electromagnetic Form Factors and Uncertainties, Zhihong Ye, John Arrington, Richard J. Hill, and Gabriel Lee, Phys. Lett. B 777 8–15, (2018), arXiv:1707.09063 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.11.023
  45. Nucleon electromagnetic form factors using lattice simulations at the physical point, Constantia Alexandrou, Martha Constantinou, Kyriakos Hadjiyiannakou, Karl Jansen, Christos Kallidonis, Giannis Koutsou, and Alejandro Vaquero Aviles-Casco, Phys. Rev. D 96 (3) 034503, (2017), arXiv:1706.00469 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.034503
  46. On the $\pi\pi$ continuum in the nucleon form factors and the proton radius puzzle, M. Hoferichter, B. Kubis, J. Ruiz de Elvira, H. -W. Hammer, and U. -G. Meißner, Eur. Phys. J. A 52 (11) 331, (2016), arXiv:1609.06722 doi:10.1140/epja/i2016-16331-7
  47. Setting the scale for the CLS $2 + 1$ flavor ensembles, Mattia Bruno, Tomasz Korzec, and Stefan Schaefer, Phys. Rev. D 95 (7) 074504, (2017), arXiv:1608.08900 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.074504
  48. Quark Contraction Tool {\textemdash} QCT, Dalibor Djukanovic, Comput. Phys. Commun. 247 106950, (2020), arXiv:1603.01576 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2019.106950
  49. Extraction of the proton radius from electron-proton scattering data, Gabriel Lee, John R. Arrington, and Richard J. Hill, Phys. Rev. D 92 (1) 013013, (2015), arXiv:1505.01489 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.013013
  50. Nucleon electromagnetic form factors in two-flavor QCD, S. Capitani, M. Della Morte, D. Djukanovic, G. von Hippel, J. Hua, B. Jäger, B. Knippschild, H. B. Meyer, T. D. Rae, and H. Wittig, Phys. Rev. D 92 (5) 054511, (2015), arXiv:1504.04628 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.054511
  51. The Proton Radius Puzzle, Carl E. Carlson, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 82 59–77, (2015), arXiv:1502.05314 doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2015.01.002
  52. Simulation of QCD with N$_{f} =$ 2 $+$ 1 flavors of non-perturbatively improved Wilson fermions, Mattia Bruno, and others, JHEP 02 043, (2015), arXiv:1411.3982 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2015)043
  53. Theoretical Constraints and Systematic Effects in the Determination of the Proton Form Factors, I. T. Lorenz, Ulf-G. Meißner, H. -W. Hammer, and Y. -B. Dong, Phys. Rev. D 91 (1) 014023, (2015), arXiv:1411.1704 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.014023
  54. Ab initio calculation of the neutron-proton mass difference, Sz. Borsanyi, and others, Science 347 1452–1455, (2015), arXiv:1406.4088 doi:10.1126/science.1257050
  55. Nucleon electromagnetic form factors from lattice QCD using a nearly physical pion mass, J. R. Green, J. W. Negele, A. V. Pochinsky, S. N. Syritsyn, M. Engelhardt, and S. Krieg, Phys. Rev. D 90 074507, (2014), arXiv:1404.4029 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.074507
  56. Up, down, strange and charm quark masses with N$_f$ = 2+1+1 twisted mass lattice QCD, N. Carrasco, and others, Nucl. Phys. B 887 19–68, (2014), arXiv:1403.4504 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2014.07.025
  57. Electric form factors of the octet baryons from lattice QCD and chiral extrapolation, P. E. Shanahan, A. W. Thomas, R. D. Young, J. M. Zanotti, R. Horsley, Y. Nakamura, D. Pleiter, P. E. L. Rakow, G. Schierholz, and H. Stüben, Phys. Rev. D 90 034502, (2014), arXiv:1403.1965 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.034502
  58. Covariant approximation averaging, Eigo Shintani, Rudy Arthur, Thomas Blum, Taku Izubuchi, Chulwoo Jung, and Christoph Lehner, Phys. Rev. D 91 (11) 114511, (2015), arXiv:1402.0244 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.114511
  59. Magnetic form factors of the octet baryons from lattice QCD and chiral extrapolation, P. E. Shanahan, A. W. Thomas, R. D. Young, J. M. Zanotti, R. Horsley, Y. Nakamura, D. Pleiter, P. E. L. Rakow, G. Schierholz, and H. Stüben, Phys. Rev. D 89 074511, (2014), arXiv:1401.5862 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.074511
  60. Review of Lattice Results Concerning Low-Energy Particle Physics, Sinya Aoki, and others, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 2890, (2014), arXiv:1310.8555 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-2890-7
  61. Scalar pion form factor in two-flavor lattice QCD, Vera Gülpers, Georg von Hippel, and Hartmut Wittig, Phys. Rev. D 89 (9) 094503, (2014), arXiv:1309.2104 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.094503
  62. Electric and magnetic form factors of the proton, J. C. Bernauer, and others, Phys. Rev. C 90 (1) 015206, (2014), arXiv:1307.6227 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.90.015206
  63. Nucleon Charges and Electromagnetic Form Factors from 2+1+1-Flavor Lattice QCD, Tanmoy Bhattacharya, Saul D. Cohen, Rajan Gupta, Anosh Joseph, Huey-Wen Lin, and Boram Yoon, Phys. Rev. D 89 (9) 094502, (2014), arXiv:1306.5435 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.094502
  64. The Shape of Covariantly Smeared Sources in Lattice QCD, Georg M. von Hippel, Benjamin Jäger, Thomas D. Rae, and Hartmut Wittig, JHEP 09 014, (2013), arXiv:1306.1440 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2013)014
  65. Improvement of $N_f$ = 3 lattice QCD with Wilson fermions and tree-level improved gauge action, John Bulava, and Stefan Schaefer, Nucl. Phys. B 874 188–197, (2013), arXiv:1304.7093 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2013.05.019
  66. Nucleon form factors and moments of generalized parton distributions using $N_f=2+1+1$ twisted mass fermions, C. Alexandrou, M. Constantinou, S. Dinter, V. Drach, K. Jansen, C. Kallidonis, and G. Koutsou, Phys. Rev. D 88 (1) 014509, (2013), arXiv:1303.5979 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.014509
  67. Hierarchical Probing for Estimating the Trace of the Matrix Inverse on Toroidal Lattices, Andreas Stathopoulos, Jesse Laeuchli, and Kostas Orginos, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 35 (5) S299–S322, (2013), arXiv:1302.4018 doi:10.1137/120881452
  68. Proton Structure from the Measurement of $2S-2P$ Transition Frequencies of Muonic Hydrogen, Aldo Antognini, and others, Science 339 417–420, (2013), doi:10.1126/science.1230016
  69. Electromagnetic form factors of the nucleon in effective field theory, T. Bauer, J. C. Bernauer, and S. Scherer, Phys. Rev. C 86 065206, (2012), arXiv:1209.3872 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.86.065206
  70. New class of variance-reduction techniques using lattice symmetries, Thomas Blum, Taku Izubuchi, and Eigo Shintani, Phys. Rev. D 88 (9) 094503, (2013), arXiv:1208.4349 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.094503
  71. Lattice QCD with open boundary conditions and twisted-mass reweighting, Martin Luscher, and Stefan Schaefer, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184 519–528, (2013), arXiv:1206.2809 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2012.10.003
  72. Origins of Mass, Frank Wilczek, Central Eur. J. Phys. 10 1021–1037, (2012), arXiv:1206.7114 doi:10.2478/s11534-012-0121-0
  73. The nucleon axial charge from lattice QCD with controlled errors, S. Capitani, M. Della Morte, G. von Hippel, B. Jager, A. Juttner, B. Knippschild, H. B. Meyer, and H. Wittig, Phys. Rev. D 86 074502, (2012), arXiv:1205.0180 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.074502
  74. CODATA Recommended Values of the Fundamental Physical Constants: 2010, Peter J. Mohr, Barry N. Taylor, and David B. Newell, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 1527–1605, (2012), arXiv:1203.5425 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.84.1527
  75. Lattice QCD without topology barriers, Martin Luscher, and Stefan Schaefer, JHEP 07 036, (2011), arXiv:1105.4749 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2011)036
  76. Critical slowing down and error analysis in lattice QCD simulations, Stefan Schaefer, Rainer Sommer, and Francesco Virotta, Nucl. Phys. B 845 93–119, (2011), arXiv:1009.5228 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2010.11.020
  77. Model independent extraction of the proton charge radius from electron scattering, Richard J. Hill, and Gil Paz, Phys. Rev. D 82 113005, (2010), arXiv:1008.4619 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.113005
  78. The size of the proton, Randolf Pohl, and others, Nature 466 213–216, (2010), doi:10.1038/nature09250
  79. Nucleon structure from mixed action calculations using 2+1 flavors of asqtad sea and domain wall valence fermions, J. D. Bratt, and others, Phys. Rev. D 82 094502, (2010), arXiv:1001.3620 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.094502
  80. Effective noise reduction techniques for disconnected loops in Lattice QCD, Gunnar S. Bali, Sara Collins, and Andreas Schafer, Comput. Phys. Commun. 181 1570–1583, (2010), arXiv:0910.3970 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2010.05.008
  81. Nucleon Electromagnetic Form Factors from Lattice QCD using 2+1 Flavor Domain Wall Fermions on Fine Lattices and Chiral Perturbation Theory, S. N. Syritsyn, and others, Phys. Rev. D 81 034507, (2010), arXiv:0907.4194 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.81.034507
  82. Nucleon form factors with 2+1 flavor dynamical domain-wall fermions, Takeshi Yamazaki, Yasumichi Aoki, Tom Blum, Huey-Wen Lin, Shigemi Ohta, Shoichi Sasaki, Robert Tweedie, and James Zanotti, Phys. Rev. D 79 114505, (2009), arXiv:0904.2039 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.114505
  83. Nucleon strangeness form factors from N(f) = 2+1 clover fermion lattice QCD, Takumi Doi, Mridupawan Deka, Shao-Jing Dong, Terrence Draper, Keh-Fei Liu, Devdatta Mankame, Nilmani Mathur, and Thomas Streuer, Phys. Rev. D 80 094503, (2009), arXiv:0903.3232 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.094503
  84. Nucleon form factors with dynamical twisted mass fermions, Constantia Alexandrou, Tomasz Korzec, Giannis Koutsou, Mariane Brinet, Jaume Carbonell, Vincent Drach, Pierre-Antoine Harraud, and Remi Baron, PoS LATTICE2008 139, (2008), arXiv:0811.0724 doi:10.22323/1.066.0139
  85. Fluctuations and reweighting of the quark determinant on large lattices, Martin Luscher, and Filippo Palombi, PoS LATTICE2008 049, (2008), arXiv:0810.0946 doi:10.22323/1.066.0049
  86. Dynamical Twisted Mass Fermions with Light Quarks: Simulation and Analysis Details, Philippe Boucaud, and others, Comput. Phys. Commun. 179 695–715, (2008), arXiv:0803.0224 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2008.06.013
  87. Accelerating dynamical fermion computations using the rational hybrid Monte Carlo (RHMC) algorithm with multiple pseudofermion fields, M. A. Clark, and A. D. Kennedy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 051601, (2007), arXiv:hep-lat/0608015 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.051601
  88. Dispersion analysis of the nucleon form-factors including meson continua, M. A. Belushkin, H. -W. Hammer, and U. -G. Meissner, Phys. Rev. C 75 035202, (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0608337 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.75.035202
  89. Decay width of light quark hybrid meson from the lattice, C. McNeile, and Christopher Michael, Phys. Rev. D 73 074506, (2006), arXiv:hep-lat/0603007 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.73.074506
  90. The Chroma software system for lattice QCD, Robert G. Edwards, and Balint Joo, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 140 832, (2005), arXiv:hep-lat/0409003 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2004.11.254
  91. Universality of the rho-meson coupling in effective field theory, D. Djukanovic, M. R. Schindler, J. Gegelia, G. Japaridze, and S. Scherer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 122002, (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0407239 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.122002
  92. Nucleon masses and magnetic moments in a finite volume, Silas R. Beane, Phys. Rev. D 70 034507, (2004), arXiv:hep-lat/0403015 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.034507
  93. Lattice QCD and the Schwarz alternating procedure, Martin Luscher, JHEP 05 052, (2003), arXiv:hep-lat/0304007 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2003/05/052
  94. Nucleon electromagnetic form-factors on the lattice and in chiral effective field theory, M. Gockeler, T. R. Hemmert, R. Horsley, D. Pleiter, Paul E. L. Rakow, A. Schafer, and G. Schierholz, Phys. Rev. D 71 034508, (2005), arXiv:hep-lat/0303019 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.034508
  95. Automatized one loop calculations in four-dimensions and D-dimensions, T. Hahn, and M. Perez-Victoria, Comput. Phys. Commun. 118 153–165, (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9807565 doi:10.1016/S0010-4655(98)00173-8
  96. A New exact method for dynamical fermion computations with nonlocal actions, A. D. Kennedy, Ivan Horvath, and Stefan Sint, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 73 834–836, (1999), arXiv:hep-lat/9809092 doi:10.1016/S0920-5632(99)85217-7
  97. The form-factors of the nucleon at small momentum transfer, Veronique Bernard, Harold W. Fearing, Thomas R. Hemmert, and Ulf G. Meissner, Nucl. Phys. A 635 121–145, (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9801297 doi:10.1016/S0375-9474(98)00175-4
  98. Dispersion theoretical analysis of the nucleon electromagnetic form-factors, P. Mergell, Ulf G. Meissner, and D. Drechsel, Nucl. Phys. A 596 367–396, (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9506375 doi:10.1016/0375-9474(95)00339-8
  99. New Algorithms for One Loop Integrals, G. J. van Oldenborgh, and J. A. M. Vermaseren, Z. Phys. C 46 425–438, (1990), doi:10.1007/BF01621031
  100. Nonsinglet Axial Vector Couplings of the Baryon Octet in Lattice {QCD}, S. Gusken, U. Low, K. H. Mutter, R. Sommer, A. Patel, and K. Schilling, Phys. Lett. B 227 266–269, (1989), doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(89)80034-6
  101. A Lattice Study of Nucleon Structure, G. Martinelli, and Christopher T. Sachrajda, Nucl. Phys. B 316 355–372, (1989), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(89)90035-7
  102. A Conditioning Technique for Matrix Inversion for Wilson Fermions, Thomas A. DeGrand, Comput. Phys. Commun. 52 161–164, (1988), doi:10.1016/0010-4655(88)90180-4
  103. Glueball Masses and String Tension in Lattice QCD, M. Albanese, and others, Phys. Lett. B 192 163–169, (1987), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)91160-9
  104. Scalar Densities and Baryon Mass Differences in Lattice {QCD} With Wilson Fermions, L. Maiani, G. Martinelli, M. L. Paciello, and B. Taglienti, Nucl. Phys. B 293 420, (1987), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(87)90078-2
  105. Improved Continuum Limit Lattice Action for QCD with Wilson Fermions, B. Sheikholeslami, and R. Wohlert, Nucl. Phys. B 259 572, (1985), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90002-1
  106. On-shell improved lattice gauge theories, M. Luscher, and P. Weisz, Commun. Math. Phys. 98 (3) 433, (1985), doi:10.1007/BF01205792
  107. Considerations on Numerical Analysis of {QCD}, H. W. Hamber, E. Marinari, G. Parisi, and C. Rebbi, Nucl. Phys. B 225 475, (1983), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(83)90528-X
  108. A new look at the statistical model identification, H. Akaike, IEEE Trans. Automatic Control 19 (6) 716–723, (1974), doi:10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
  109. Confinement of Quarks, Kenneth G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 10 2445–2459, (1974), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.10.2445
  110. Advantages of the Color Octet Gluon Picture, H. Fritzsch, Murray Gell-Mann, and H. Leutwyler, Phys. Lett. B 47 365–368, (1973), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(73)90625-4
  111. Algebra of current components and decay widths of rho and K* mesons, Riazuddin, and Fayyazuddin, Phys. Rev. 147 1071–1073, (1966), doi:10.1103/PhysRev.147.1071
  112. Partially conserved axial vector current and the decays of vector mesons, Ken Kawarabayashi, and Mahiko Suzuki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 16 255, (1966), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.16.255