1. **Gauge\-equivariant neural networks as preconditioners in lattice QCD**, Christoph Lehner, and Tilo Wettig, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **108** (3) 034503 (2023) [arXiv:2302.05419](https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.05419) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.034503](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.034503)

2. **Learning trivializing gradient flows for lattice gauge theories**, Simone Bacchio, Pan Kessel, Stefan Schaefer, and Lorenz Vaitl, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **107** (5) L051504 (2023) [arXiv:2212.08469](https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.08469) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.L051504](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.L051504)

3. **Aspects of scaling and scalability for flow\-based sampling of lattice QCD**, Ryan Abbott, and others, *Eur\. Phys\. J\. A* **59** (11) 257 (2023) [arXiv:2211.07541](https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.07541) [doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01154-w](https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01154-w)

4. **Neural\-network preconditioners for solving the Dirac equation in lattice gauge theory**, Salvatore Cal\\\`\\i, Daniel C\. Hackett, Yin Lin, Phiala E\. Shanahan, and Brian Xiao, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **107** (3) 034508 (2023) [arXiv:2208.02728](https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.02728) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.034508](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.034508)

5. **Gauge\-equivariant flow models for sampling in lattice field theories with pseudofermions**, Ryan Abbott, and others, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **106** (7) 074506 (2022) [arXiv:2207.08945](https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.08945) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074506](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074506)

6. **Conditional normalizing flow for Markov chain Monte\~Carlo sampling in the critical region of lattice field theory**, Ankur Singha, Dipankar Chakrabarti, and Vipul Arora, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **107** (1) 014512 (2023) [arXiv:2207.00980](https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.00980) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.014512](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.014512)

7. **Learning lattice quantum field theories with equivariant continuous flows**, Mathis Gerdes, Pim de Haan, Corrado Rainone, Roberto Bondesan, and Miranda C\. N\. Cheng, *SciPost Phys\.* **15** (6) 238 (2023) [arXiv:2207.00283](https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.00283) [doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.6.238](https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.6.238)

8. **Flow\-based sampling in the lattice Schwinger model at criticality**, Michael S\. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C\. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo J\. Rezende, Fernando Romero\-L\\'opez, Phiala E\. Shanahan, and Julian M\. Urban, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **106** (1) 014514 (2022) [arXiv:2202.11712](https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.11712) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.014514](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.014514)

9. **Stochastic normalizing flows as non\-equilibrium transformations**, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, Alessandro Nada, and Marco Panero, *JHEP* **07** 015 (2022) [arXiv:2201.08862](https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.08862) [doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2022)015](https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2022)015)

10. **Tackling critical slowing down using global correction steps with equivariant flows: the case of the Schwinger model**, Jacob Finkenrath (2022) [arXiv:2201.02216](https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.02216)

11. **HMC with Normalizing Flows**, Sam Foreman, Taku Izubuchi, Luchang Jin, Xiao\-Yong Jin, James C\. Osborn, and Akio Tomiya, *PoS* **LATTICE2021** 073 (2022) [arXiv:2112.01586](https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.01586) [doi:10.22323/1.396.0073](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.396.0073)

12. **Scaling Up Machine Learning For Quantum Field Theory with Equivariant Continuous Flows**, Pim de Haan, Corrado Rainone, Miranda C\. N\. Cheng, and Roberto Bondesan (2021) [arXiv:2110.02673](https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.02673)

13. **Flow\-based sampling for multimodal and extended\-mode distributions in lattice field theory**, Daniel C\. Hackett, Chung\-Chun Hsieh, Sahil Pontula, Michael S\. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Jiunn\-Wei Chen, Kai\-Feng Chen, Kyle Cranmer, Gurtej Kanwar, and Phiala E\. Shanahan (2021) [arXiv:2107.00734](https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.00734)

14. **Flow\-based sampling for fermionic lattice field theories**, Michael S\. Albergo, Gurtej Kanwar, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo J\. Rezende, Julian M\. Urban, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C\. Hackett, and Phiala E\. Shanahan, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **104** (11) 114507 (2021) [arXiv:2106.05934](https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.05934) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.114507](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.114507)

15. **Gauge covariant neural network for quarks and gluons**, Yuki Nagai, and Akio Tomiya, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **111** (7) 074501 (2025) [arXiv:2103.11965](https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.11965) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.074501](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.074501)

16. **Entangled Kernels \-\- Beyond Separability**, Riikka Huusari, and Hachem Kadri, *J\. Machine Learning Res\.* **22** 1–40 (2021) [arXiv:2101.05514](https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.05514)

17. **Self\-learning Monte Carlo for non\-Abelian gauge theory with dynamical fermions**, Yuki Nagai, Akinori Tanaka, and Akio Tomiya, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **107** (5) 054501 (2023) [arXiv:2010.11900](https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.11900) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.054501](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.054501)

18. **Sampling using $SU\(N\)$ gauge equivariant flows**, Denis Boyda, Gurtej Kanwar, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Michael S\. Albergo, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C\. Hackett, and Phiala E\. Shanahan, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **103** (7) 074504 (2021) [arXiv:2008.05456](https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.05456) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074504](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074504)

19. **Language Models are Few\-Shot Learners**, Tom B\. Brown, and others, *Adv\. Neural Inf\. Process\. Syst\.* **33** 1901 (2020) [arXiv:2005.14165](https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14165)

20. **Equivariant flow\-based sampling for lattice gauge theory**, Gurtej Kanwar, Michael S\. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C\. Hackett, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E\. Shanahan, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **125** (12) 121601 (2020) [arXiv:2003.06413](https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.06413) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.121601](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.121601)

21. **Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models**, Jared Kaplan, Sam McCandlish, Tom Henighan, Tom B\. Brown, Benjamin Chess, Rewon Child, Scott Gray, Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, and Dario Amodei (2020) [arXiv:2001.08361](https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.08361)

22. **Bayesian parameter estimation using conditional variational autoencoders for gravitational\-wave astronomy**, Hunter Gabbard, Chris Messenger, Ik Siong Heng, Francesco Tonolini, and Roderick Murray\-Smith, *Nature Phys\.* **18** (1) 112–117 (2022) [arXiv:1909.06296](https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.06296) [doi:10.1038/s41567-021-01425-7](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01425-7)

23. **Flow\-based generative models for Markov chain Monte Carlo in lattice field theory**, M\. S\. Albergo, G\. Kanwar, and P\. E\. Shanahan, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **100** (3) 034515 (2019) [arXiv:1904.12072](https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.12072) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.034515](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.034515)

24. **Status and Future Perspectives for Lattice Gauge Theory Calculations to the Exascale and Beyond**, B\\'alint Jo\\'o, Chulwoo Jung, Norman H\. Christ, William Detmold, Robert Edwards, Martin Savage, and Phiala Shanahan, *Eur\. Phys\. J\. A* **55** (11) 199 (2019) [arXiv:1904.09725](https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.09725) [doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12919-7](https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2019-12919-7)

25. **Hadrons and Nuclei**, William Detmold, Robert G\. Edwards, Jozef J\. Dudek, Michael Engelhardt, Huey\-Wen Lin, Stefan Meinel, Kostas Orginos, and Phiala Shanahan, *Eur\. Phys\. J\. A* **55** (11) 193 (2019) [arXiv:1904.09512](https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.09512) [doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12902-4](https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2019-12902-4)

26. **Neural Network Renormalization Group**, Shuo\-Hui Li, and Lei Wang, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **121** (26) 260601 (2018) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.260601](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.260601)

27. **Reducing Autocorrelation Times in Lattice Simulations with Generative Adversarial Networks**, Jan M\. Pawlowski, and Julian M\. Urban, *Mach\. Learn\. Sci\. Tech\.* **1** 045011 (2020) [arXiv:1811.03533](https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.03533) [doi:10.1088/2632-2153/abae73](https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/abae73)

28. **Self\-learning Monte Carlo method with Behler\-Parrinello neural networks**, Yuki Nagai, Masahiko Okumura, and Akinori Tanaka, *Phys\. Rev\. B* **101** (11) 115111 (2020) [arXiv:1807.04955](https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.04955) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.101.115111](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.115111)

29. **Self\-learning Monte Carlo with deep neural networks**, Huitao Shen, Junwei Liu, and Liang Fu, *Phys\. Rev\. B* **97** (20) 205140 (2018) [doi:10.1103/physrevb.97.205140](https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.97.205140)

30. **Symmetry\-enforced self\-learning Monte Carlo method applied to the Holstein model**, Chuang Chen, Xiao Yan Xu, Junwei Liu, George Batrouni, Richard Scalettar, and Zi Yang Meng, *Phys\. Rev\. B* **98** (4) 041102 (2018) [arXiv:1802.06177](https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.06177) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.98.041102](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.041102)

31. **Towards reduction of autocorrelation in HMC by machine learning**, Akinori Tanaka, and Akio Tomiya (2017) [arXiv:1712.03893](https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.03893)

32. **Observation of the doubly charmed baryon $\\Xi\_\{cc\}\^\{\+\+\}$**, Roel Aaij, and others, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **119** (11) 112001 (2017) [arXiv:1707.01621](https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.01621) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.112001](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.112001)

33. **Self\-learning Monte Carlo method**, Junwei Liu, Yang Qi, Zi Yang Meng, and Liang Fu, *Phys\. Rev\. B* **95** (4) 041101 (2017) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.95.041101](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.041101)

34. **Accelerated Monte Carlo simulations with restricted Boltzmann machines**, Li Huang, and Lei Wang, *Phys\. Rev\. B* **95** (3) 035105 (2017) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.95.035105](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.035105)

35. **Self\-learning quantum Monte Carlo method in interacting fermion systems**, Xiao Yan Xu, Yang Qi, Junwei Liu, Liang Fu, and Zi Yang Meng, *Phys\. Rev\. B* **96** (4) 041119 (2017) [arXiv:1612.03804](https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.03804) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.96.041119](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.041119)

36. **Self\-learning Monte Carlo method and cumulative update in fermion systems**, Junwei Liu, Huitao Shen, Yang Qi, Zi Yang Meng, and Liang Fu, *Phys\. Rev\. B* **95** (24) 241104 (2017) [arXiv:1611.09364](https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.09364) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.95.241104](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.241104)

37. **WaveNet: A Generative Model for Raw Audio**, Aaron van den Oord, Sander Dieleman, Heiga Zen, Karen Simonyan, Oriol Vinyals, Alex Graves, Nal Kalchbrenner, Andrew Senior, and Koray Kavukcuoglu (2016) [arXiv:1609.03499](https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.03499)

38. **Observation of two new $\\Xi\_b\^\-$ baryon resonances**, Roel Aaij, and others, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **114** 062004 (2015) [arXiv:1411.4849](https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.4849) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.062004](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.062004)

39. **Charmed bottom baryon spectroscopy from lattice QCD**, Zachary S\. Brown, William Detmold, Stefan Meinel, and Kostas Orginos, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **90** (9) 094507 (2014) [arXiv:1409.0497](https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.0497) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.094507](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.094507)

40. **Ab initio calculation of the neutron\-proton mass difference**, Sz\. Borsanyi, and others, *Science* **347** 1452–1455 (2015) [arXiv:1406.4088](https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.4088) [doi:10.1126/science.1257050](https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1257050)

41. **Auto\-Encoding Variational Bayes**, Diederik P\. Kingma, and Max Welling (2013) [arXiv:1312.6114](https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6114)

42. **A Family of Nonparametric Density Estimation Algorithms**, E\. G\. Tabak, and Cristina V\. Turner, *Commun\. Pure Appl\. Math\.* **66** (2) 145–164 (2013) [doi:10.1002/cpa.21423](https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.21423)

43. **Perturbative analysis of the gradient flow in non\-abelian gauge theories**, Martin Luscher, and Peter Weisz, *JHEP* **02** 051 (2011) [arXiv:1101.0963](https://arxiv.org/abs/1101.0963) [doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2011)051](https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2011)051)

44. **Critical slowing down and error analysis in lattice QCD simulations**, Stefan Schaefer, Rainer Sommer, and Francesco Virotta, *Nucl\. Phys\. B* **845** 93–119 (2011) [arXiv:1009.5228](https://arxiv.org/abs/1009.5228) [doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2010.11.020](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2010.11.020)

45. **Trivializing maps, the Wilson flow and the HMC algorithm**, Martin Luscher, *Commun\. Math\. Phys\.* **293** 899–919 (2010) [arXiv:0907.5491](https://arxiv.org/abs/0907.5491) [doi:10.1007/s00220-009-0953-7](https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-009-0953-7)

46. **QCDOC: A 10\-teraflops scale computer for lattice QCD**, D\. Chen, and others, *Nucl\. Phys\. B Proc\. Suppl\.* **94** 825–832 (2001) [arXiv:hep-lat/0011004](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/0011004) [doi:10.1016/S0920-5632(01)01014-3](https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5632(01)01014-3)

47. **Hybrid Monte Carlo**, S\. Duane, A\. D\. Kennedy, B\. J\. Pendleton, and D\. Roweth, *Phys\. Lett\. B* **195** 216–222 (1987) [doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)91197-X](https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(87)91197-X)

48. **Monte Carlo Sampling Methods Using Markov Chains and Their Applications**, W\. K\. Hastings, *Biometrika* **57** 97–109 (1970) [doi:10.1093/biomet/57.1.97](https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/57.1.97)

49. **The method of second quantization**, F\. A\. Berezin, *Pure Appl\. Phys\.* **24** 1–228 (1966)

50. **Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines**, N\. Metropolis, A\. W\. Rosenbluth, M\. N\. Rosenbluth, A\. H\. Teller, and E\. Teller, *J\. Chem\. Phys\.* **21** 1087–1092 (1953) [doi:10.1063/1.1699114](https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1699114)

51. **On Information and Sufficiency**, S\. Kullback, and R\. A\. Leibler, *The Annals of Mathematical Statistics* **22** (1) 79–86 (1951) [doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729694](https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177729694)