1. Gauge-equivariant neural networks as preconditioners in lattice QCD, Christoph Lehner, and Tilo Wettig, Phys. Rev. D 108 (3) 034503, (2023), arXiv:2302.05419 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.034503
2. Learning trivializing gradient flows for lattice gauge theories, Simone Bacchio, Pan Kessel, Stefan Schaefer, and Lorenz Vaitl, Phys. Rev. D 107 (5) L051504, (2023), arXiv:2212.08469 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.L051504
3. Aspects of scaling and scalability for flow-based sampling of lattice QCD, Ryan Abbott, and others, Eur. Phys. J. A 59 (11) 257, (2023), arXiv:2211.07541 doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01154-w
4. Neural-network preconditioners for solving the Dirac equation in lattice gauge theory, Salvatore Cal\`\i, Daniel C. Hackett, Yin Lin, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Brian Xiao, Phys. Rev. D 107 (3) 034508, (2023), arXiv:2208.02728 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.034508
5. Gauge-equivariant flow models for sampling in lattice field theories with pseudofermions, Ryan Abbott, and others, Phys. Rev. D 106 (7) 074506, (2022), arXiv:2207.08945 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074506
6. Conditional normalizing flow for Markov chain Monte~Carlo sampling in the critical region of lattice field theory, Ankur Singha, Dipankar Chakrabarti, and Vipul Arora, Phys. Rev. D 107 (1) 014512, (2023), arXiv:2207.00980 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.014512
7. Learning lattice quantum field theories with equivariant continuous flows, Mathis Gerdes, Pim de Haan, Corrado Rainone, Roberto Bondesan, and Miranda C. N. Cheng, SciPost Phys. 15 (6) 238, (2023), arXiv:2207.00283 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.6.238
8. Flow-based sampling in the lattice Schwinger model at criticality, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 106 (1) 014514, (2022), arXiv:2202.11712 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.014514
9. Stochastic normalizing flows as non-equilibrium transformations, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, Alessandro Nada, and Marco Panero, JHEP 07 015, (2022), arXiv:2201.08862 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2022)015
10. Tackling critical slowing down using global correction steps with equivariant flows: the case of the Schwinger model, Jacob Finkenrath, (2022), arXiv:2201.02216
11. HMC with Normalizing Flows, Sam Foreman, Taku Izubuchi, Luchang Jin, Xiao-Yong Jin, James C. Osborn, and Akio Tomiya, PoS LATTICE2021 073, (2022), arXiv:2112.01586 doi:10.22323/1.396.0073
12. Scaling Up Machine Learning For Quantum Field Theory with Equivariant Continuous Flows, Pim de Haan, Corrado Rainone, Miranda C. N. Cheng, and Roberto Bondesan, (2021), arXiv:2110.02673
13. Flow-based sampling for multimodal and extended-mode distributions in lattice field theory, Daniel C. Hackett, Chung-Chun Hsieh, Sahil Pontula, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Jiunn-Wei Chen, Kai-Feng Chen, Kyle Cranmer, Gurtej Kanwar, and Phiala E. Shanahan, (2021), arXiv:2107.00734
14. Flow-based sampling for fermionic lattice field theories, Michael S. Albergo, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Julian M. Urban, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 104 (11) 114507, (2021), arXiv:2106.05934 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.114507
15. Gauge covariant neural network for quarks and gluons, Yuki Nagai, and Akio Tomiya, Phys. Rev. D 111 (7) 074501, (2025), arXiv:2103.11965 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.074501
16. Entangled Kernels -- Beyond Separability, Riikka Huusari, and Hachem Kadri, J. Machine Learning Res. 22 1–40, (2021), arXiv:2101.05514
17. Self-learning Monte Carlo for non-Abelian gauge theory with dynamical fermions, Yuki Nagai, Akinori Tanaka, and Akio Tomiya, Phys. Rev. D 107 (5) 054501, (2023), arXiv:2010.11900 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.054501
18. Sampling using $SU(N)$ gauge equivariant flows, Denis Boyda, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Michael S. Albergo, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 103 (7) 074504, (2021), arXiv:2008.05456 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074504
19. Language Models are Few-Shot Learners, Tom B. Brown, and others, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 33 1901, (2020), arXiv:2005.14165
20. Equivariant flow-based sampling for lattice gauge theory, Gurtej Kanwar, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (12) 121601, (2020), arXiv:2003.06413 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.121601
21. Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models, Jared Kaplan, Sam McCandlish, Tom Henighan, Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Chess, Rewon Child, Scott Gray, Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, and Dario Amodei, (2020), arXiv:2001.08361
22. Bayesian parameter estimation using conditional variational autoencoders for gravitational-wave astronomy, Hunter Gabbard, Chris Messenger, Ik Siong Heng, Francesco Tonolini, and Roderick Murray-Smith, Nature Phys. 18 (1) 112–117, (2022), arXiv:1909.06296 doi:10.1038/s41567-021-01425-7
23. Flow-based generative models for Markov chain Monte Carlo in lattice field theory, M. S. Albergo, G. Kanwar, and P. E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 100 (3) 034515, (2019), arXiv:1904.12072 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.034515
24. Status and Future Perspectives for Lattice Gauge Theory Calculations to the Exascale and Beyond, B\'alint Jo\'o, Chulwoo Jung, Norman H. Christ, William Detmold, Robert Edwards, Martin Savage, and Phiala Shanahan, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 199, (2019), arXiv:1904.09725 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12919-7
25. Hadrons and Nuclei, William Detmold, Robert G. Edwards, Jozef J. Dudek, Michael Engelhardt, Huey-Wen Lin, Stefan Meinel, Kostas Orginos, and Phiala Shanahan, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 193, (2019), arXiv:1904.09512 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12902-4
26. Neural Network Renormalization Group, Shuo-Hui Li, and Lei Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (26) 260601, (2018), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.260601
27. Reducing Autocorrelation Times in Lattice Simulations with Generative Adversarial Networks, Jan M. Pawlowski, and Julian M. Urban, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 1 045011, (2020), arXiv:1811.03533 doi:10.1088/2632-2153/abae73
28. Self-learning Monte Carlo method with Behler-Parrinello neural networks, Yuki Nagai, Masahiko Okumura, and Akinori Tanaka, Phys. Rev. B 101 (11) 115111, (2020), arXiv:1807.04955 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.101.115111
29. Self-learning Monte Carlo with deep neural networks, Huitao Shen, Junwei Liu, and Liang Fu, Phys. Rev. B 97 (20) 205140, (2018), doi:10.1103/physrevb.97.205140
30. Symmetry-enforced self-learning Monte Carlo method applied to the Holstein model, Chuang Chen, Xiao Yan Xu, Junwei Liu, George Batrouni, Richard Scalettar, and Zi Yang Meng, Phys. Rev. B 98 (4) 041102, (2018), arXiv:1802.06177 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.98.041102
31. Towards reduction of autocorrelation in HMC by machine learning, Akinori Tanaka, and Akio Tomiya, (2017), arXiv:1712.03893
32. Observation of the doubly charmed baryon $\Xi_{cc}^{++}$, Roel Aaij, and others, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (11) 112001, (2017), arXiv:1707.01621 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.112001
33. Self-learning Monte Carlo method, Junwei Liu, Yang Qi, Zi Yang Meng, and Liang Fu, Phys. Rev. B 95 (4) 041101, (2017), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.95.041101
34. Accelerated Monte Carlo simulations with restricted Boltzmann machines, Li Huang, and Lei Wang, Phys. Rev. B 95 (3) 035105, (2017), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.95.035105
35. Self-learning quantum Monte Carlo method in interacting fermion systems, Xiao Yan Xu, Yang Qi, Junwei Liu, Liang Fu, and Zi Yang Meng, Phys. Rev. B 96 (4) 041119, (2017), arXiv:1612.03804 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.96.041119
36. Self-learning Monte Carlo method and cumulative update in fermion systems, Junwei Liu, Huitao Shen, Yang Qi, Zi Yang Meng, and Liang Fu, Phys. Rev. B 95 (24) 241104, (2017), arXiv:1611.09364 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.95.241104
37. WaveNet: A Generative Model for Raw Audio, Aaron van den Oord, Sander Dieleman, Heiga Zen, Karen Simonyan, Oriol Vinyals, Alex Graves, Nal Kalchbrenner, Andrew Senior, and Koray Kavukcuoglu, (2016), arXiv:1609.03499
38. Observation of two new $\Xi_b^-$ baryon resonances, Roel Aaij, and others, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 062004, (2015), arXiv:1411.4849 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.062004
39. Charmed bottom baryon spectroscopy from lattice QCD, Zachary S. Brown, William Detmold, Stefan Meinel, and Kostas Orginos, Phys. Rev. D 90 (9) 094507, (2014), arXiv:1409.0497 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.094507
40. Ab initio calculation of the neutron-proton mass difference, Sz. Borsanyi, and others, Science 347 1452–1455, (2015), arXiv:1406.4088 doi:10.1126/science.1257050
41. Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes, Diederik P. Kingma, and Max Welling, (2013), arXiv:1312.6114
42. A Family of Nonparametric Density Estimation Algorithms, E. G. Tabak, and Cristina V. Turner, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 66 (2) 145–164, (2013), doi:10.1002/cpa.21423
43. Perturbative analysis of the gradient flow in non-abelian gauge theories, Martin Luscher, and Peter Weisz, JHEP 02 051, (2011), arXiv:1101.0963 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2011)051
44. Critical slowing down and error analysis in lattice QCD simulations, Stefan Schaefer, Rainer Sommer, and Francesco Virotta, Nucl. Phys. B 845 93–119, (2011), arXiv:1009.5228 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2010.11.020
45. Trivializing maps, the Wilson flow and the HMC algorithm, Martin Luscher, Commun. Math. Phys. 293 899–919, (2010), arXiv:0907.5491 doi:10.1007/s00220-009-0953-7
46. QCDOC: A 10-teraflops scale computer for lattice QCD, D. Chen, and others, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 94 825–832, (2001), arXiv:hep-lat/0011004 doi:10.1016/S0920-5632(01)01014-3
47. Hybrid Monte Carlo, S. Duane, A. D. Kennedy, B. J. Pendleton, and D. Roweth, Phys. Lett. B 195 216–222, (1987), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)91197-X
48. Monte Carlo Sampling Methods Using Markov Chains and Their Applications, W. K. Hastings, Biometrika 57 97–109, (1970), doi:10.1093/biomet/57.1.97
49. The method of second quantization, F. A. Berezin, Pure Appl. Phys. 24 1–228, (1966)
50. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines, N. Metropolis, A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller, J. Chem. Phys. 21 1087–1092, (1953), doi:10.1063/1.1699114
51. On Information and Sufficiency, S. Kullback, and R. A. Leibler, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 22 (1) 79–86, (1951), doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729694