1. Lattice field theories with a sign problem, Gert Aarts, and D\'enes Sexty, (2026), arXiv:2604.24290
2. Gauge-Equivariant Graph Neural Networks for Lattice Gauge Theories, Ali Rayat, Yaohang Li, and Gia-Wei Chern, (2026), arXiv:2604.20797
3. Solving Functional Renormalization Group Equations with Neural Networks, Yang-yang Tan, Wei-jie Fu, Lianyi He, and Lingxiao Wang, (2026), arXiv:2603.21151
4. Normalizing-flow-based density of states for (1+1)D U(1) lattice gauge theory with a $θ$-term, Simran Singh, and Lena Funcke, 42th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2026), arXiv:2603.12501
5. From strong interactions to Dark Matter: the non-perturbative QCD sphaleron rate, Claudio Bonanno, 42th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2026), arXiv:2603.01577
6. Lattice Gauge Theory via LLVM-Level Automatic Differentiation, Yuki Nagai, Akio Tomiya, and Hiroshi Ohno, (2026), arXiv:2602.20516
7. Quantum computation and machine learning in high energy nuclear physics, Shuzhe Shi, J. Subatomic Part. Cosmol. 5 100326, (2026), doi:10.1016/j.jspc.2026.100326
8. Intrinsic Width of the Flux Tube as a tool to explore confining mechanisms in Lattice Gauge Theories, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, Alessandro Nada, Dario Panfalone, and Lorenzo Verzichelli, (2026), arXiv:2601.19520
9. Generalizable Equivariant Diffusion Models for Non-Abelian Lattice Gauge Theory, Gert Aarts, Diaa E. Habibi, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, Thomas R. Ranner, Lingxiao Wang, Wei Wang, and Qianteng Zhu, (2026), arXiv:2601.19552
10. Toward Scalable Normalizing Flows for the Hubbard Model, Janik Kreit, Andrea Bulgarelli, Lena Funcke, Thomas Luu, Dominic Schuh, Simran Singh, and Lorenzo Verzichelli, 42th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2026), arXiv:2601.18273
11. On the integration of quantum machine learning into hybrid frameworks for high energy particle physics, Serpil Yalcin Kuzu, and Ayben Karasu Uysal, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (12) 1457, (2025), doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-15189-4
12. Computing quantum entanglement with machine learning, Andrea Bulgarelli, Elia Cellini, Karl Jansen, Stefan Kühn, Alessandro Nada, Shinichi Nakajima, Kim A. Nicoli, and Marco Panero, 42th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2025), arXiv:2512.11389
13. Entanglement in lattice field theory: new methods and new results, Andrea Bulgarelli, (2025)
14. Scaling flow-based approaches for topology sampling in SU(3) gauge theory, Claudio Bonanno, Andrea Bulgarelli, Elia Cellini, Alessandro Nada, Dario Panfalone, Davide Vadacchino, and Lorenzo Verzichelli, JHEP 04 051, (2026), arXiv:2510.25704 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2026)051
15. Physics-driven deep learning for studying strongly interacting systems, Lingxiao Wang, PoS QCHSC24 257, (2025), doi:10.22323/1.483.0257
16. Efficient lattice field theory simulation using adaptive normalizing flow on a resistive memory-based neural differential equation solver, Meng Xu, Jichang Yang, Ning Lin, Qundao Xu, Siqi Tang, Han Wang, Xiaojuan Qi, Zhongrui Wang, and Ming Xu, (2025), arXiv:2509.12812
17. Phase diagram and eigenvalue dynamics of stochastic gradient descent in multilayer neural networks, Chanju Park, Biagio Lucini, and Gert Aarts, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 6 (4) 045048, (2025), arXiv:2509.01349 doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ae1acc
18. Studying Effective String Theory using deep generative models, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, and Alessandro Nada, PoS QCHSC24 034, (2025), arXiv:2508.20610 doi:10.22323/1.483.0034
19. Simulating correlated electrons with symmetry-enforced normalizing flows, Dominic Schuh, Janik Kreit, Evan Berkowitz, Lena Funcke, Thomas Luu, Kim A. Nicoli, and Marcel Rodekamp, Phys. Rev. Res. 8 (1) L012071, (2026), arXiv:2506.17015 doi:10.1103/4741-cvvs
20. Multilevel Generative Samplers for Investigating Critical Phenomena, Ankur Singha, Elia Cellini, Kim A. Nicoli, Karl Jansen, Stefan Kühn, and Shinichi Nakajima, International Conference on Learning Representations, (2025), arXiv:2503.08918
21. Ultrafast, event-by-event heavy-ion simulations for next-generation experiments, Manjunath Omana Kuttan, Kai Zhou, Jan Steinheimer, and Horst Stoecker, Phys. Rev. C 112 (5) 054907, (2025), arXiv:2502.16330 doi:10.1103/wyq5-hlp5
22. Physics-conditioned diffusion models for lattice gauge theory, Qianteng Zhu, Gert Aarts, Wei Wang, Kai Zhou, and Lingxiao Wang, JHEP 03 111, (2026), arXiv:2502.05504 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2026)111
23. Exploring Generative Networks for Manifolds with Non-Trivial Topology, Shi-Yang Chen, Gert Aarts, and Biagio Lucini, PoS LATTICE2024 042, (2025), arXiv:2502.02127 doi:10.22323/1.466.0042
24. Simulating the Hubbard Model with Equivariant Normalizing Flows, Dominic Schuh, Janik Kreit, Evan Berkowitz, Lena Funcke, Thomas Luu, Kim A. Nicoli, and Marcel Rodekampb, PoS LATTICE2024 069, (2025), arXiv:2501.07371 doi:10.22323/1.466.0069
25. Physics-driven learning for inverse problems in quantum chromodynamics, Gert Aarts, Kenji Fukushima, Tetsuo Hatsuda, Andreas Ipp, Shuzhe Shi, Lingxiao Wang, and Kai Zhou, Nature Rev. Phys. 7 (3) 154–163, (2025), arXiv:2501.05580 doi:10.1038/s42254-024-00798-x
26. Machine learning a perfect lattice action for the O(3) non-linear sigma-model, Liane Backfried, (2025), doi:10.34726/hss.2025.124787
27. Stochastic normalizing flows for Effective String Theory, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, and Alessandro Nada, PoS LATTICE2024 027, (2025), arXiv:2412.19109 doi:10.22323/1.466.0027
28. Diffusion models and stochastic quantisation in lattice field theory, Gert Aarts, Lingxiao Wang, and Kai Zhou, PoS LATTICE2024 037, (2025), arXiv:2412.13704 doi:10.22323/1.466.0037
29. Scaling of stochastic normalizing flows in SU(3) lattice gauge theory, Andrea Bulgarelli, Elia Cellini, and Alessandro Nada, Phys. Rev. D 111 (7) 074517, (2025), arXiv:2412.00200 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.074517
30. On learning higher-order cumulants in diffusion models, Gert Aarts, Diaa E. Habibi, Lingxiao Wang, and Kai Zhou, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 6 (2) 025004, (2025), arXiv:2410.21212 doi:10.1088/2632-2153/adc53a
31. Diffusion models for lattice gauge field simulations, Qianteng Zhu, Gert Aarts, Wei Wang, Kai Zhou, and Lingxiao Wang, Postponed: Machine Learning and the Physical Sciences}: {Workshop at NeurIPS 2024, (2024), arXiv:2410.19602
32. Flow-Based Sampling for Entanglement Entropy and the Machine Learning of Defects, Andrea Bulgarelli, Elia Cellini, Karl Jansen, Stefan Kühn, Alessandro Nada, Shinichi Nakajima, Kim A. Nicoli, and Marco Panero, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 (15) 151601, (2025), arXiv:2410.14466 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.151601
33. Towards Designing Scalable Quantum-Enhanced Generative Networks for Neutrino Physics Experiments with Liquid Argon Time Projection Chambers, Andrea Delgado, Diego Venegas-Vargas, Adam Huynh, and Kevon Carroll, (2024), arXiv:2410.12650
34. Sampling SU(3) pure gauge theory with Stochastic Normalizing Flows, Andrea Bulgarelli, Elia Cellini, and Alessandro Nada, PoS LATTICE2024 040, (2025), arXiv:2409.18861 doi:10.22323/1.466.0040
35. Numerical determination of the width and shape of the effective string using Stochastic Normalizing Flows, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, and Alessandro Nada, JHEP 02 090, (2025), arXiv:2409.15937 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2025)090
36. R{\'e}nyi entanglement entropy of a spin chain with generative neural networks, Piotr Bia\las, Piotr Korcyl, Tomasz Stebel, and Dawid Zapolski, Phys. Rev. E 110 (4) 044116, (2024), arXiv:2406.06193 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.110.044116
37. Bayesian RG flow in neural network field theories, Jessica N. Howard, Marc S. Klinger, Anindita Maiti, and Alexander G. Stapleton, SciPost Phys. Core 8 027, (2025), arXiv:2405.17538 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.8.1.027
38. Practical applications of machine-learned flows on gauge fields, Ryan Abbott, Denis Boyda, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, Julian M. Urban, and Michael S. Albergo, PoS LATTICE2023 011, (2024), arXiv:2404.11674 doi:10.22323/1.453.0011
39. Multiscale Normalizing Flows for Gauge Theories, Ryan Abbott, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, PoS LATTICE2023 035, (2024), arXiv:2404.10819 doi:10.22323/1.453.0035
40. A comparative lattice analysis of $SU(2)$ dark glueballs, Min-Huan Chu, Jun-Hui Lai, Wei Wang, Jialu Zhang, and Qianteng Zhu, Chin. Phys. C 48 (8), (2024), arXiv:2402.03959 doi:10.1088/1674-1137/ad4e24
41. Global sampling of Feynman's diagrams through normalizing flow, Luca Leoni, and Cesare Franchini, Phys. Rev. Res. 6 (3) 033041, (2024), arXiv:2402.00736 doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.033041
42. Applications of flow models to the generation of correlated lattice QCD ensembles, Ryan Abbott, Aleksandar Botev, Denis Boyda, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 109 (9) 094514, (2024), arXiv:2401.10874 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.094514
43. Flow-based sampling for lattice field theories, Gurtej Kanwar, 40th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2024), arXiv:2401.01297
44. NeuLat: a toolbox for neural samplers in lattice field theories, Kim A. Nicoli, Christopher J. Anders, Lena Funcke, Karl Jansen, Shinichi Nakajima, and Pan Kessel, PoS LATTICE2023 286, (2024), doi:10.22323/1.453.0286
45. Generative Diffusion Models for Lattice Field Theory, Lingxiao Wang, Gert Aarts, and Kai Zhou, 37th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, (2023), arXiv:2311.03578
46. Equivariant transformer is all you need, Akio Tomiya, and Yuki Nagai, PoS LATTICE2023 001, (2024), arXiv:2310.13222 doi:10.22323/1.453.0001
47. Neural Activity in Quarks Language: Lattice Field Theory for a Network of Real Neurons, Giampiero Bardella, Simone Franchini, Liming Pan, Riccardo Balzan, Surabhi Ramawat, Emiliano Brunamonti, Pierpaolo Pani, and Stefano Ferraina, Entropy 26 (6) 495, (2024), arXiv:2310.09178 doi:10.3390/e26060495
48. Scalar field restricted Boltzmann machine as an ultraviolet regulator, Gert Aarts, Biagio Lucini, and Chanju Park, Phys. Rev. D 109 (3) 034521, (2024), arXiv:2309.15002 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.034521
49. The NFLikelihood: An unsupervised DNNLikelihood from normalizing flows, Humberto Reyes-Gonzalez, and Riccardo Torre, SciPost Phys. Core 7 048, (2024), arXiv:2309.09743 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.7.3.048
50. Comparison of Affine and Rational Quadratic Spline Coupling and Autoregressive Flows through Robust Statistical Tests, Andrea Coccaro, Marco Letizia, Humberto Reyes-Gonzalez, and Riccardo Torre, Symmetry 16 (8) 942, (2024), arXiv:2302.12024 doi:10.3390/sym16080942