# Lattice QCD Calculation of Electroweak Box Contributions to Superallowed Nuclear and Neutron Beta Decays

**INSPIRE:** [2692415](https://inspirehep.net/literature/2692415)
**arXiv:** [2308\.16755](https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.16755)
**DOI:** [10\.1103/PhysRevLett\.132\.191901](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.191901)

**Authors:** Ma, Peng\-Xiang, Feng, Xu, Gorchtein, Mikhail, Jin, Lu\-Chang, Liu, Keh\-Fei, Seng, Chien\-Yeah, Wang, Bi\-Geng, Zhang, Zhao\-Long

**Submitted:** 31 August 2023

**Subjects:**
- hep\-lat
- hep\-ph
- nucl\-ex
- Lattice
- Phenomenology\-HEP
- Experiment\-Nucl

**Journal reference:** Phys\.Rev\.Lett\. 132 \(19\) 191901 \(2024\)

**Citations:** 47

## Abstract

We present the first lattice QCD calculation of the universal axial \<math display\="inline"\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>γ\</mi\>\<mi\>W\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</math\>\-box contribution \<math display\="inline"\>\<mrow\>\<msubsup\>\<mrow\>\<mo\>□\</mo\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>γ\</mi\>\<mi\>W\</mi\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>V\</mi\>\<mi\>A\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</msubsup\>\</mrow\>\</math\> to both superallowed nuclear and neutron beta decays\. This contribution emerges as a significant component within the theoretical uncertainties surrounding the extraction of \<math display\="inline"\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\|\</mo\>\<msub\>\<mi\>V\</mi\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>u\</mi\>\<mi\>d\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</msub\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\|\</mo\>\</math\> from superallowed decays\. Our calculation is conducted using two domain wall fermion ensembles at the physical pion mass\. To construct the nucleon four\-point correlation functions, we employ the random sparsening field technique\. Furthermore, we incorporate long\-distance contributions to the hadronic function using the infinite\-volume reconstruction method\. Upon performing the continuum extrapolation, we arrive at \<math display\="inline"\>\<mrow\>\<msubsup\>\<mrow\>\<mo\>□\</mo\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>γ\</mi\>\<mi\>W\</mi\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>V\</mi\>\<mi\>A\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</msubsup\>\<mo\>\=\</mo\>\<mn\>3\.65\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>7\</mn\>\<msub\>\<mrow\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>lat\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</msub\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>1\</mn\>\<msub\>\<mrow\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>PT\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</msub\>\<mo\>×\</mo\>\<msup\>\<mrow\>\<mn\>10\</mn\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mo\>\-\</mo\>\<mn\>3\</mn\>\</mrow\>\</msup\>\</mrow\>\</math\>\. Consequently, this yields a slightly higher value of \<math display\="inline"\>\<mrow\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\|\</mo\>\<msub\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>V\</mi\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>u\</mi\>\<mi\>d\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</msub\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\|\</mo\>\<mo\>\=\</mo\>\<mn\>0\.973\</mn\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mn\>86\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>11\</mn\>\<msub\>\<mrow\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>exp\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</msub\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>9\</mn\>\<msub\>\<mrow\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>RC\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</msub\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>27\</mn\>\<msub\>\<mrow\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>NS\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</msub\>\</mrow\>\</math\>, reducing the previous \<math display\="inline"\>\<mn\>2\.1\</mn\>\<mi\>σ\</mi\>\</math\> tension with the CKM unitarity to \<math display\="inline"\>\<mn\>1\.8\</mn\>\<mi\>σ\</mi\>\</math\>\. Additionally, we calculate the vector \<math display\="inline"\>\<mi\>γ\</mi\>\<mi\>W\</mi\>\</math\>\-box contribution to the axial charge \<math display\="inline"\>\<msub\>\<mi\>g\</mi\>\<mi\>A\</mi\>\</msub\>\</math\>, denoted as \<math display\="inline"\>\<msubsup\>\<mo\>□\</mo\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>γ\</mi\>\<mi\>W\</mi\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>V\</mi\>\<mi\>V\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</msubsup\>\</math\>, and explore its potential implications\.