1. **Normalizing flows for lattice gauge theory in arbitrary space\-time dimension**, Ryan Abbott, and others (2023) [arXiv:2305.02402](https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02402)

2. **GPT\-4 Technical Report**, OpenAI, and others (2023) [arXiv:2303.08774](https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774)

3. **Generative models for scalar field theories: how to deal with poor scaling?**, Javad Komijani, and Marina K\. Marinkovic, *PoS* **LATTICE2022** 019 (2023) [arXiv:2301.01504](https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.01504) [doi:10.22323/1.430.0019](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.430.0019)

4. **GomalizingFlow\.jl: A Julia package for Flow\-based sampling algorithm for lattice field theory**, Akio Tomiya, and Satoshi Terasaki (2022) [arXiv:2208.08903](https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.08903)

5. **Sampling QCD field configurations with gauge\-equivariant flow models**, Ryan Abbott, and others, *PoS* **LATTICE2022** 036 (2023) [arXiv:2208.03832](https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.03832) [doi:10.22323/1.430.0036](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.430.0036)

6. **Gauge\-equivariant flow models for sampling in lattice field theories with pseudofermions**, Ryan Abbott, and others, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **106** (7) 074506 (2022) [arXiv:2207.08945](https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.08945) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074506](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074506)

7. **Flow\-based sampling in the lattice Schwinger model at criticality**, Michael S\. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C\. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo J\. Rezende, Fernando Romero\-L\\'opez, Phiala E\. Shanahan, and Julian M\. Urban, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **106** (1) 014514 (2022) [arXiv:2202.11712](https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.11712) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.014514](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.014514)

8. **Machine Learning Trivializing Maps: A First Step Towards Understanding How Flow\-Based Samplers Scale Up**, Luigi Del Debbio, Joe Marsh Rossney, and Michael Wilson, *PoS* **LATTICE2021** 059 (2022) [arXiv:2112.15532](https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.15532) [doi:10.22323/1.396.0059](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.396.0059)

9. **Flow\-based sampling for multimodal and extended\-mode distributions in lattice field theory**, Daniel C\. Hackett, Chung\-Chun Hsieh, Sahil Pontula, Michael S\. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Jiunn\-Wei Chen, Kai\-Feng Chen, Kyle Cranmer, Gurtej Kanwar, and Phiala E\. Shanahan (2021) [arXiv:2107.00734](https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.00734)

10. **Flow\-based sampling for fermionic lattice field theories**, Michael S\. Albergo, Gurtej Kanwar, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo J\. Rezende, Julian M\. Urban, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C\. Hackett, and Phiala E\. Shanahan, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **104** (11) 114507 (2021) [arXiv:2106.05934](https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.05934) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.114507](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.114507)

11. **Efficient modeling of trivializing maps for lattice \{\\ensuremath\{\\phi\}\}4 theory using normalizing flows: A first look at scalability**, Luigi Del Debbio, Joe Marsh Rossney, and Michael Wilson, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **104** (9) 094507 (2021) [arXiv:2105.12481](https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.12481) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.094507](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.094507)

12. **Gauge covariant neural network for quarks and gluons**, Yuki Nagai, and Akio Tomiya, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **111** (7) 074501 (2025) [arXiv:2103.11965](https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.11965) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.074501](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.074501)

13. **Self\-learning Monte Carlo for non\-Abelian gauge theory with dynamical fermions**, Yuki Nagai, Akinori Tanaka, and Akio Tomiya, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **107** (5) 054501 (2023) [arXiv:2010.11900](https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.11900) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.054501](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.054501)

14. **An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale**, Alexey Dosovitskiy, and others (2020) [arXiv:2010.11929](https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.11929)

15. **Sampling using $SU\(N\)$ gauge equivariant flows**, Denis Boyda, Gurtej Kanwar, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Michael S\. Albergo, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C\. Hackett, and Phiala E\. Shanahan, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **103** (7) 074504 (2021) [arXiv:2008.05456](https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.05456) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074504](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074504)

16. **Language Models are Few\-Shot Learners**, Tom B\. Brown, and others, *Adv\. Neural Inf\. Process\. Syst\.* **33** 1901 (2020) [arXiv:2005.14165](https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14165)

17. **Equivariant flow\-based sampling for lattice gauge theory**, Gurtej Kanwar, Michael S\. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C\. Hackett, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E\. Shanahan, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **125** (12) 121601 (2020) [arXiv:2003.06413](https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.06413) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.121601](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.121601)

18. **Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models**, Jared Kaplan, Sam McCandlish, Tom Henighan, Tom B\. Brown, Benjamin Chess, Rewon Child, Scott Gray, Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, and Dario Amodei (2020) [arXiv:2001.08361](https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.08361)

19. **Flow\-based generative models for Markov chain Monte Carlo in lattice field theory**, M\. S\. Albergo, G\. Kanwar, and P\. E\. Shanahan, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **100** (3) 034515 (2019) [arXiv:1904.12072](https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.12072) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.034515](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.034515)

20. **Self\-learning Monte Carlo method with Behler\-Parrinello neural networks**, Yuki Nagai, Masahiko Okumura, and Akinori Tanaka, *Phys\. Rev\. B* **101** (11) 115111 (2020) [arXiv:1807.04955](https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.04955) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.101.115111](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.115111)

21. **Self\-learning Monte Carlo with deep neural networks**, Huitao Shen, Junwei Liu, and Liang Fu, *Phys\. Rev\. B* **97** (20) 205140 (2018) [doi:10.1103/physrevb.97.205140](https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.97.205140)

22. **Decoupled Weight Decay Regularization**, Ilya Loshchilov, and Frank Hutter (2017) [arXiv:1711.05101](https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.05101)

23. **Attention Is All You Need**, Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N\. Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin, *31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems* (2017) [arXiv:1706.03762](https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762)

24. **Self\-learning Monte Carlo method**, Junwei Liu, Yang Qi, Zi Yang Meng, and Liang Fu, *Phys\. Rev\. B* **95** (4) 041101 (2017) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.95.041101](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.041101)

25. **Self\-learning Monte Carlo method and cumulative update in fermion systems**, Junwei Liu, Huitao Shen, Yang Qi, Zi Yang Meng, and Liang Fu, *Phys\. Rev\. B* **95** (24) 241104 (2017) [arXiv:1611.09364](https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.09364) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.95.241104](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.241104)

26. **Group Equivariant Convolutional Networks**, Taco S\. Cohen, and Max Welling (2016) [arXiv:1602.07576](https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.07576)

27. **Julia: A Fresh Approach to Numerical Computing**, Jeff Bezanson, Alan Edelman, Stefan Karpinski, and Viral B\. Shah, *SIAM Rev\.* **59** (1) 65–98 (2017) [arXiv:1411.1607](https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.1607) [doi:10.1137/141000671](https://doi.org/10.1137/141000671)

28. **Efficient Langevin simulation of coupled classical fields and fermions**, Kipton Barros, and Yasuyuki Kato, *Phys\. Rev\. B* **88** (23) 235101 (2013) [doi:10.1103/physrevb.88.235101](https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.88.235101)

29. **Hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm for the double exchange model**, J\. L\. Alonso, L\. A\. Fernandez, F\. Guinea, V\. Laliena, and V\. Martin\-Mayor, *Nucl\. Phys\. B* **596** 587–610 (2001) [arXiv:cond-mat/0007450](https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0007450) [doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00681-7](https://doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00681-7)

30. **Indirect Exchange Coupling of Nuclear Magnetic Moments by Conduction Electrons**, M\. A\. Ruderman, and C\. Kittel, *Phys\. Rev\.* **96** (1) 99 (1954) [doi:10.1103/PhysRev.96.99](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.96.99)