1. Normalizing flows for lattice gauge theory in arbitrary space-time dimension, Ryan Abbott, and others, (2023), arXiv:2305.02402
2. GPT-4 Technical Report, OpenAI, and others, (2023), arXiv:2303.08774
3. Generative models for scalar field theories: how to deal with poor scaling?, Javad Komijani, and Marina K. Marinkovic, PoS LATTICE2022 019, (2023), arXiv:2301.01504 doi:10.22323/1.430.0019
4. GomalizingFlow.jl: A Julia package for Flow-based sampling algorithm for lattice field theory, Akio Tomiya, and Satoshi Terasaki, (2022), arXiv:2208.08903
5. Sampling QCD field configurations with gauge-equivariant flow models, Ryan Abbott, and others, PoS LATTICE2022 036, (2023), arXiv:2208.03832 doi:10.22323/1.430.0036
6. Gauge-equivariant flow models for sampling in lattice field theories with pseudofermions, Ryan Abbott, and others, Phys. Rev. D 106 (7) 074506, (2022), arXiv:2207.08945 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074506
7. Flow-based sampling in the lattice Schwinger model at criticality, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 106 (1) 014514, (2022), arXiv:2202.11712 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.014514
8. Machine Learning Trivializing Maps: A First Step Towards Understanding How Flow-Based Samplers Scale Up, Luigi Del Debbio, Joe Marsh Rossney, and Michael Wilson, PoS LATTICE2021 059, (2022), arXiv:2112.15532 doi:10.22323/1.396.0059
9. Flow-based sampling for multimodal and extended-mode distributions in lattice field theory, Daniel C. Hackett, Chung-Chun Hsieh, Sahil Pontula, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Jiunn-Wei Chen, Kai-Feng Chen, Kyle Cranmer, Gurtej Kanwar, and Phiala E. Shanahan, (2021), arXiv:2107.00734
10. Flow-based sampling for fermionic lattice field theories, Michael S. Albergo, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Julian M. Urban, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 104 (11) 114507, (2021), arXiv:2106.05934 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.114507
11. Efficient modeling of trivializing maps for lattice {\ensuremath{\phi}}4 theory using normalizing flows: A first look at scalability, Luigi Del Debbio, Joe Marsh Rossney, and Michael Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 104 (9) 094507, (2021), arXiv:2105.12481 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.094507
12. Gauge covariant neural network for quarks and gluons, Yuki Nagai, and Akio Tomiya, Phys. Rev. D 111 (7) 074501, (2025), arXiv:2103.11965 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.074501
13. Self-learning Monte Carlo for non-Abelian gauge theory with dynamical fermions, Yuki Nagai, Akinori Tanaka, and Akio Tomiya, Phys. Rev. D 107 (5) 054501, (2023), arXiv:2010.11900 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.054501
14. An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale, Alexey Dosovitskiy, and others, (2020), arXiv:2010.11929
15. Sampling using $SU(N)$ gauge equivariant flows, Denis Boyda, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Michael S. Albergo, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 103 (7) 074504, (2021), arXiv:2008.05456 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074504
16. Language Models are Few-Shot Learners, Tom B. Brown, and others, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 33 1901, (2020), arXiv:2005.14165
17. Equivariant flow-based sampling for lattice gauge theory, Gurtej Kanwar, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (12) 121601, (2020), arXiv:2003.06413 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.121601
18. Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models, Jared Kaplan, Sam McCandlish, Tom Henighan, Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Chess, Rewon Child, Scott Gray, Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, and Dario Amodei, (2020), arXiv:2001.08361
19. Flow-based generative models for Markov chain Monte Carlo in lattice field theory, M. S. Albergo, G. Kanwar, and P. E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 100 (3) 034515, (2019), arXiv:1904.12072 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.034515
20. Self-learning Monte Carlo method with Behler-Parrinello neural networks, Yuki Nagai, Masahiko Okumura, and Akinori Tanaka, Phys. Rev. B 101 (11) 115111, (2020), arXiv:1807.04955 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.101.115111
21. Self-learning Monte Carlo with deep neural networks, Huitao Shen, Junwei Liu, and Liang Fu, Phys. Rev. B 97 (20) 205140, (2018), doi:10.1103/physrevb.97.205140
22. Decoupled Weight Decay Regularization, Ilya Loshchilov, and Frank Hutter, (2017), arXiv:1711.05101
23. Attention Is All You Need, Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin, 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, (2017), arXiv:1706.03762
24. Self-learning Monte Carlo method, Junwei Liu, Yang Qi, Zi Yang Meng, and Liang Fu, Phys. Rev. B 95 (4) 041101, (2017), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.95.041101
25. Self-learning Monte Carlo method and cumulative update in fermion systems, Junwei Liu, Huitao Shen, Yang Qi, Zi Yang Meng, and Liang Fu, Phys. Rev. B 95 (24) 241104, (2017), arXiv:1611.09364 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.95.241104
26. Group Equivariant Convolutional Networks, Taco S. Cohen, and Max Welling, (2016), arXiv:1602.07576
27. Julia: A Fresh Approach to Numerical Computing, Jeff Bezanson, Alan Edelman, Stefan Karpinski, and Viral B. Shah, SIAM Rev. 59 (1) 65–98, (2017), arXiv:1411.1607 doi:10.1137/141000671
28. Efficient Langevin simulation of coupled classical fields and fermions, Kipton Barros, and Yasuyuki Kato, Phys. Rev. B 88 (23) 235101, (2013), doi:10.1103/physrevb.88.235101
29. Hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm for the double exchange model, J. L. Alonso, L. A. Fernandez, F. Guinea, V. Laliena, and V. Martin-Mayor, Nucl. Phys. B 596 587–610, (2001), arXiv:cond-mat/0007450 doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00681-7
30. Indirect Exchange Coupling of Nuclear Magnetic Moments by Conduction Electrons, M. A. Ruderman, and C. Kittel, Phys. Rev. 96 (1) 99, (1954), doi:10.1103/PhysRev.96.99