1. **Gauge\-equivariant pooling layers for preconditioners in lattice QCD**, Christoph Lehner, and Tilo Wettig, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **110** (3) 034517 (2024) [arXiv:2304.10438](https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.10438) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.034517](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.034517)

2. **Locality\-constrained autoregressive cum conditional normalizing flow for lattice field theory simulations**, Dinesh P\. R (2023) [arXiv:2304.01798](https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.01798)

3. **Geometrical aspects of lattice gauge equivariant convolutional neural networks**, Jimmy Aronsson, David I\. Müller, and Daniel Schuh (2023) [arXiv:2303.11448](https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.11448)

4. **Detecting and mitigating mode\-collapse for flow\-based sampling of lattice field theories**, Kim A\. Nicoli, Christopher J\. Anders, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Pan Kessel, and Shinichi Nakajima, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **108** (11) 114501 (2023) [arXiv:2302.14082](https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.14082) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.114501](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.114501)

5. **Learning trivializing flows**, David Albandea, Luigi Del Debbio, Pilar Hern\\'andez, Richard Kenway, J\. Marsh Rossney, and Alberto Ramos, *Eur\. Phys\. J\. C* **83** (7) 676 (2023) [arXiv:2302.08408](https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.08408) [doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11838-8](https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11838-8)

6. **Gauge\-equivariant neural networks as preconditioners in lattice QCD**, Christoph Lehner, and Tilo Wettig, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **108** (3) 034503 (2023) [arXiv:2302.05419](https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.05419) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.034503](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.034503)

7. **Optimizing design choices for neural quantum states**, Moritz Reh, Markus Schmitt, and Martin Gärttner, *Phys\. Rev\. B* **107** (19) 195115 (2023) [arXiv:2301.06788](https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.06788) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.107.195115](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.195115)

8. **Generative models for scalar field theories: how to deal with poor scaling?**, Javad Komijani, and Marina K\. Marinkovic, *PoS* **LATTICE2022** 019 (2023) [arXiv:2301.01504](https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.01504) [doi:10.22323/1.430.0019](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.430.0019)

9. **Learning trivializing gradient flows for lattice gauge theories**, Simone Bacchio, Pan Kessel, Stefan Schaefer, and Lorenz Vaitl, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **107** (5) L051504 (2023) [arXiv:2212.08469](https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.08469) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.L051504](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.L051504)

10. **Applications of Lattice Gauge Equivariant Neural Networks**, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, and David I\. Müller, *EPJ Web Conf\.* **274** 09001 (2022) [arXiv:2212.00832](https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.00832) [doi:10.1051/epjconf/202227409001](https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202227409001)

11. **The density of states method in Yang\-Mills theories and first order phase transitions**, David Mason, Biagio Lucini, Maurizio Piai, Enrico Rinaldi, and Davide Vadacchino, *EPJ Web Conf\.* **274** 08007 (2022) [arXiv:2211.10373](https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.10373) [doi:10.1051/epjconf/202227408007](https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202227408007)

12. **Aspects of scaling and scalability for flow\-based sampling of lattice QCD**, Ryan Abbott, and others, *Eur\. Phys\. J\. A* **59** (11) 257 (2023) [arXiv:2211.07541](https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.07541) [doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01154-w](https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01154-w)

13. **Improving efficiency of the path optimization method for a gauge theory**, Yusuke Namekawa, Kouji Kashiwa, Hidefumi Matsuda, Akira Ohnishi, and Hayato Takase, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **107** (3) 034509 (2023) [arXiv:2210.05402](https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.05402) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.034509](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.034509)

14. **Sampling QCD field configurations with gauge\-equivariant flow models**, Ryan Abbott, and others, *PoS* **LATTICE2022** 036 (2023) [arXiv:2208.03832](https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.03832) [doi:10.22323/1.430.0036](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.430.0036)

15. **Gauge\-equivariant flow models for sampling in lattice field theories with pseudofermions**, Ryan Abbott, and others, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **106** (7) 074506 (2022) [arXiv:2207.08945](https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.08945) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074506](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074506)

16. **Conditional normalizing flow for Markov chain Monte\~Carlo sampling in the critical region of lattice field theory**, Ankur Singha, Dipankar Chakrabarti, and Vipul Arora, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **107** (1) 014512 (2023) [arXiv:2207.00980](https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.00980) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.014512](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.014512)

17. **Learning lattice quantum field theories with equivariant continuous flows**, Mathis Gerdes, Pim de Haan, Corrado Rainone, Roberto Bondesan, and Miranda C\. N\. Cheng, *SciPost Phys\.* **15** (6) 238 (2023) [arXiv:2207.00283](https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.00283) [doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.6.238](https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.6.238)

18. **A method to estimate observables with infinite variance in fermionic systems**, Cagin Yunus, and William Detmold, *PoS* **LATTICE2021** 145 (2022) [doi:10.22323/1.396.0145](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.396.0145)

19. **Infinite variance in Monte\~Carlo sampling of lattice field theories**, Cagin Yunus, and William Detmold, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **106** (9) 094506 (2022) [arXiv:2205.01001](https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.01001) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.094506](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.094506)

20. **Flow\-based density of states for complex actions**, Jan M\. Pawlowski, and Julian M\. Urban, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **108** (5) 054511 (2023) [arXiv:2203.01243](https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.01243) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.054511](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.054511)

21. **Flow\-based sampling in the lattice Schwinger model at criticality**, Michael S\. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C\. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo J\. Rezende, Fernando Romero\-L\\'opez, Phiala E\. Shanahan, and Julian M\. Urban, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **106** (1) 014514 (2022) [arXiv:2202.11712](https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.11712) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.014514](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.014514)

22. **Renormalization group flow as optimal transport**, Jordan Cotler, and Semon Rezchikov, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **108** (2) 025003 (2023) [arXiv:2202.11737](https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.11737) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.025003](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.025003)

23. **Tackling critical slowing down using global correction steps with equivariant flows: the case of the Schwinger model**, Jacob Finkenrath (2022) [arXiv:2201.02216](https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.02216)

24. **Density of states for gravitational waves**, Felix Springer, and David Schaich, *PoS* **LATTICE2021** 043 (2022) [arXiv:2112.11868](https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.11868) [doi:10.22323/1.396.0043](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.396.0043)

25. **HMC with Normalizing Flows**, Sam Foreman, Taku Izubuchi, Luchang Jin, Xiao\-Yong Jin, James C\. Osborn, and Akio Tomiya, *PoS* **LATTICE2021** 073 (2022) [arXiv:2112.01586](https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.01586) [doi:10.22323/1.396.0073](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.396.0073)

26. **Machine Learning of Thermodynamic Observables in the Presence of Mode Collapse**, Kim A\. Nicoli, Christopher J\. Anders, Lena Funcke, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Pan Kessel, Shinichi Nakajima, and Paolo Stornati, *PoS* **LATTICE2021** 338 (2022) [arXiv:2111.11303](https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.11303) [doi:10.22323/1.396.0338](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.396.0338)

27. **Master\-field simulations of QCD**, Patrick Fritzsch, John Bulava, Marco C\\\`e, Anthony Francis, Martin Lüscher, and Antonio Rago, *PoS* **LATTICE2021** 465 (2022) [arXiv:2111.11544](https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.11544) [doi:10.22323/1.396.0465](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.396.0465)

28. **Flow\-based sampling for multimodal and extended\-mode distributions in lattice field theory**, Daniel C\. Hackett, Chung\-Chun Hsieh, Sahil Pontula, Michael S\. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Jiunn\-Wei Chen, Kai\-Feng Chen, Kyle Cranmer, Gurtej Kanwar, and Phiala E\. Shanahan (2021) [arXiv:2107.00734](https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.00734)

29. **Flow\-based sampling for fermionic lattice field theories**, Michael S\. Albergo, Gurtej Kanwar, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo J\. Rezende, Julian M\. Urban, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C\. Hackett, and Phiala E\. Shanahan, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **104** (11) 114507 (2021) [arXiv:2106.05934](https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.05934) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.114507](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.114507)

30. **Efficient modeling of trivializing maps for lattice \{\\ensuremath\{\\phi\}\}4 theory using normalizing flows: A first look at scalability**, Luigi Del Debbio, Joe Marsh Rossney, and Michael Wilson, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **104** (9) 094507 (2021) [arXiv:2105.12481](https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.12481) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.094507](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.094507)

31. **Gauge covariant neural network for quarks and gluons**, Yuki Nagai, and Akio Tomiya, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **111** (7) 074501 (2025) [arXiv:2103.11965](https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.11965) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.074501](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.074501)

32. **Path integral contour deformations for observables in $SU\(N\)$ gauge theory**, William Detmold, Gurtej Kanwar, Henry Lamm, Michael L\. Wagman, and Neill C\. Warrington, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **103** (9) 094517 (2021) [arXiv:2101.12668](https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.12668) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.094517](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.094517)

33. **Introduction to Normalizing Flows for Lattice Field Theory**, Michael S\. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Daniel C\. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, Kyle Cranmer, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E\. Shanahan (2021) [arXiv:2101.08176](https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.08176)

34. **Lattice Gauge Equivariant Convolutional Neural Networks**, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I\. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **128** (3) 032003 (2022) [arXiv:2012.12901](https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.12901) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.032003](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.032003)

35. **Sampling using $SU\(N\)$ gauge equivariant flows**, Denis Boyda, Gurtej Kanwar, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Michael S\. Albergo, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C\. Hackett, and Phiala E\. Shanahan, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **103** (7) 074504 (2021) [arXiv:2008.05456](https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.05456) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074504](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074504)

36. **Estimation of Thermodynamic Observables in Lattice Field Theories with Deep Generative Models**, Kim A\. Nicoli, Christopher J\. Anders, Lena Funcke, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Pan Kessel, Shinichi Nakajima, and Paolo Stornati, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **126** (3) 032001 (2021) [arXiv:2007.07115](https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.07115) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.032001](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.032001)

37. **Equivariant flow\-based sampling for lattice gauge theory**, Gurtej Kanwar, Michael S\. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C\. Hackett, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E\. Shanahan, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **125** (12) 121601 (2020) [arXiv:2003.06413](https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.06413) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.121601](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.121601)

38. **Normalizing Flows on Tori and Spheres**, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, George Papamakarios, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Michael S\. Albergo, Gurtej Kanwar, Phiala E\. Shanahan, and Kyle Cranmer (2020) [arXiv:2002.02428](https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.02428)

39. **Neural Spline Flows**, Conor Durkan, Artur Bekasov, Iain Murray, and George Papamakarios (2019) [arXiv:1906.04032](https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.04032)

40. **Flow\-based generative models for Markov chain Monte Carlo in lattice field theory**, M\. S\. Albergo, G\. Kanwar, and P\. E\. Shanahan, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **100** (3) 034515 (2019) [arXiv:1904.12072](https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.12072) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.034515](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.034515)

41. **Status and Future Perspectives for Lattice Gauge Theory Calculations to the Exascale and Beyond**, B\\'alint Jo\\'o, Chulwoo Jung, Norman H\. Christ, William Detmold, Robert Edwards, Martin Savage, and Phiala Shanahan, *Eur\. Phys\. J\. A* **55** (11) 199 (2019) [arXiv:1904.09725](https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.09725) [doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12919-7](https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2019-12919-7)

42. **Hot\-dense Lattice QCD: USQCD whitepaper 2018**, Alexei Bazavov, Frithjof Karsch, Swagato Mukherjee, and Peter Petreczky, *Eur\. Phys\. J\. A* **55** (11) 194 (2019) [arXiv:1904.09951](https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.09951) [doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12922-0](https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2019-12922-0)

43. **Lattice QCD and Neutrino\-Nucleus Scattering**, Andreas S\. Kronfeld, David G\. Richards, William Detmold, Rajan Gupta, Huey\-Wen Lin, Keh\-Fei Liu, Aaron S\. Meyer, Raza Sufian, and Sergey Syritsyn, *Eur\. Phys\. J\. A* **55** (11) 196 (2019) [arXiv:1904.09931](https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.09931) [doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12916-x](https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2019-12916-x)

44. **The Role of Lattice QCD in Searches for Violations of Fundamental Symmetries and Signals for New Physics**, Vincenzo Cirigliano, Zohreh Davoudi, Tanmoy Bhattacharya, Taku Izubuchi, Phiala E\. Shanahan, Sergey Syritsyn, and Michael L\. Wagman, *Eur\. Phys\. J\. A* **55** (11) 197 (2019) [arXiv:1904.09704](https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.09704) [doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12889-8](https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2019-12889-8)

45. **Opportunities for Lattice QCD in Quark and Lepton Flavor Physics**, Christoph Lehner, and others, *Eur\. Phys\. J\. A* **55** (11) 195 (2019) [arXiv:1904.09479](https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.09479) [doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12891-2](https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2019-12891-2)

46. **Hadrons and Nuclei**, William Detmold, Robert G\. Edwards, Jozef J\. Dudek, Michael Engelhardt, Huey\-Wen Lin, Stefan Meinel, Kostas Orginos, and Phiala Shanahan, *Eur\. Phys\. J\. A* **55** (11) 193 (2019) [arXiv:1904.09512](https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.09512) [doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12902-4](https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2019-12902-4)

47. **Attention Is All You Need**, Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N\. Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin, *31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems* (2017) [arXiv:1706.03762](https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03762)

48. **An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms**, Sebastian Ruder (2016) [arXiv:1609.04747](https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.04747)

49. **Density estimation using Real NVP**, Laurent Dinh, Jascha Sohl\-Dickstein, and Samy Bengio (2016) [arXiv:1605.08803](https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.08803)

50. **Variational Inference with Normalizing Flows**, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Shakir Mohamed (2015) [arXiv:1505.05770](https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.05770)

51. **Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization**, Diederik P\. Kingma, and Jimmy Ba, *International Conference on Learning Representations* (2014) [arXiv:1412.6980](https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980)

52. **NICE: Non\-linear Independent Components Estimation**, Laurent Dinh, David Krueger, and Yoshua Bengio (2014) [arXiv:1410.8516](https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.8516)

53. **Comparison of the gradient flow with cooling in $SU\(3\)$ pure gauge theory**, Claudio Bonati, and Massimo D'Elia, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **89** (10) 105005 (2014) [arXiv:1401.2441](https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.2441) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.105005](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.105005)

54. **A Family of Nonparametric Density Estimation Algorithms**, E\. G\. Tabak, and Cristina V\. Turner, *Commun\. Pure Appl\. Math\.* **66** (2) 145–164 (2013) [doi:10.1002/cpa.21423](https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.21423)

55. **Investigating the critical slowing down of QCD simulations**, Stefan Schaefer, Rainer Sommer, and Francesco Virotta, *PoS* **LAT2009** 032 (2009) [arXiv:0910.1465](https://arxiv.org/abs/0910.1465) [doi:10.22323/1.091.0032](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.091.0032)

56. **Trivializing maps, the Wilson flow and the HMC algorithm**, Martin Luscher, *Commun\. Math\. Phys\.* **293** 899–919 (2010) [arXiv:0907.5491](https://arxiv.org/abs/0907.5491) [doi:10.1007/s00220-009-0953-7](https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-009-0953-7)

57. **Actions for dynamical fermion simulations: Are we ready to go?**, Karl Jansen, *Nucl\. Phys\. B Proc\. Suppl\.* **129** 3–16 (2004) [arXiv:hep-lat/0311039](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/0311039) [doi:10.1016/S0920-5632(03)02502-7](https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5632(03)02502-7)

58. **Overrelaxation Algorithms for Lattice Field Theories**, Stephen L\. Adler, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **37** 458 (1988) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.37.458](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.37.458)

59. **Overrelaxed Heat Bath and Metropolis Algorithms for Accelerating Pure Gauge Monte Carlo Calculations**, Frank R\. Brown, and Thomas J\. Woch, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **58** 2394 (1987) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.2394](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.2394)

60. **Hybrid Monte Carlo**, S\. Duane, A\. D\. Kennedy, B\. J\. Pendleton, and D\. Roweth, *Phys\. Lett\. B* **195** 216–222 (1987) [doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)91197-X](https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(87)91197-X)

61. **Improved Heat Bath Method for Monte Carlo Calculations in Lattice Gauge Theories**, A\. D\. Kennedy, and B\. J\. Pendleton, *Phys\. Lett\. B* **156** 393–399 (1985) [doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)91632-6](https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(85)91632-6)

62. **A New Method for Updating SU\(N\) Matrices in Computer Simulations of Gauge Theories**, N\. Cabibbo, and E\. Marinari, *Phys\. Lett\. B* **119** 387–390 (1982) [doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)90696-7](https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(82)90696-7)

63. **Monte Carlo Study of Quantized SU\(2\) Gauge Theory**, M\. Creutz, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **21** 2308–2315 (1980) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.21.2308](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.21.2308)

64. **Confinement of Quarks**, Kenneth G\. Wilson, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **10** 2445–2459 (1974) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.10.2445](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.10.2445)

65. **Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines**, N\. Metropolis, A\. W\. Rosenbluth, M\. N\. Rosenbluth, A\. H\. Teller, and E\. Teller, *J\. Chem\. Phys\.* **21** 1087–1092 (1953) [doi:10.1063/1.1699114](https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1699114)