1. Gauge-equivariant pooling layers for preconditioners in lattice QCD, Christoph Lehner, and Tilo Wettig, Phys. Rev. D 110 (3) 034517, (2024), arXiv:2304.10438 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.034517
2. Locality-constrained autoregressive cum conditional normalizing flow for lattice field theory simulations, Dinesh P. R, (2023), arXiv:2304.01798
3. Geometrical aspects of lattice gauge equivariant convolutional neural networks, Jimmy Aronsson, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, (2023), arXiv:2303.11448
4. Detecting and mitigating mode-collapse for flow-based sampling of lattice field theories, Kim A. Nicoli, Christopher J. Anders, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Pan Kessel, and Shinichi Nakajima, Phys. Rev. D 108 (11) 114501, (2023), arXiv:2302.14082 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.114501
5. Learning trivializing flows, David Albandea, Luigi Del Debbio, Pilar Hern\'andez, Richard Kenway, J. Marsh Rossney, and Alberto Ramos, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (7) 676, (2023), arXiv:2302.08408 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11838-8
6. Gauge-equivariant neural networks as preconditioners in lattice QCD, Christoph Lehner, and Tilo Wettig, Phys. Rev. D 108 (3) 034503, (2023), arXiv:2302.05419 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.034503
7. Optimizing design choices for neural quantum states, Moritz Reh, Markus Schmitt, and Martin Gärttner, Phys. Rev. B 107 (19) 195115, (2023), arXiv:2301.06788 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.107.195115
8. Generative models for scalar field theories: how to deal with poor scaling?, Javad Komijani, and Marina K. Marinkovic, PoS LATTICE2022 019, (2023), arXiv:2301.01504 doi:10.22323/1.430.0019
9. Learning trivializing gradient flows for lattice gauge theories, Simone Bacchio, Pan Kessel, Stefan Schaefer, and Lorenz Vaitl, Phys. Rev. D 107 (5) L051504, (2023), arXiv:2212.08469 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.L051504
10. Applications of Lattice Gauge Equivariant Neural Networks, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, and David I. Müller, EPJ Web Conf. 274 09001, (2022), arXiv:2212.00832 doi:10.1051/epjconf/202227409001
11. The density of states method in Yang-Mills theories and first order phase transitions, David Mason, Biagio Lucini, Maurizio Piai, Enrico Rinaldi, and Davide Vadacchino, EPJ Web Conf. 274 08007, (2022), arXiv:2211.10373 doi:10.1051/epjconf/202227408007
12. Aspects of scaling and scalability for flow-based sampling of lattice QCD, Ryan Abbott, and others, Eur. Phys. J. A 59 (11) 257, (2023), arXiv:2211.07541 doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01154-w
13. Improving efficiency of the path optimization method for a gauge theory, Yusuke Namekawa, Kouji Kashiwa, Hidefumi Matsuda, Akira Ohnishi, and Hayato Takase, Phys. Rev. D 107 (3) 034509, (2023), arXiv:2210.05402 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.034509
14. Sampling QCD field configurations with gauge-equivariant flow models, Ryan Abbott, and others, PoS LATTICE2022 036, (2023), arXiv:2208.03832 doi:10.22323/1.430.0036
15. Gauge-equivariant flow models for sampling in lattice field theories with pseudofermions, Ryan Abbott, and others, Phys. Rev. D 106 (7) 074506, (2022), arXiv:2207.08945 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074506
16. Conditional normalizing flow for Markov chain Monte~Carlo sampling in the critical region of lattice field theory, Ankur Singha, Dipankar Chakrabarti, and Vipul Arora, Phys. Rev. D 107 (1) 014512, (2023), arXiv:2207.00980 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.014512
17. Learning lattice quantum field theories with equivariant continuous flows, Mathis Gerdes, Pim de Haan, Corrado Rainone, Roberto Bondesan, and Miranda C. N. Cheng, SciPost Phys. 15 (6) 238, (2023), arXiv:2207.00283 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.6.238
18. A method to estimate observables with infinite variance in fermionic systems, Cagin Yunus, and William Detmold, PoS LATTICE2021 145, (2022), doi:10.22323/1.396.0145
19. Infinite variance in Monte~Carlo sampling of lattice field theories, Cagin Yunus, and William Detmold, Phys. Rev. D 106 (9) 094506, (2022), arXiv:2205.01001 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.094506
20. Flow-based density of states for complex actions, Jan M. Pawlowski, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 108 (5) 054511, (2023), arXiv:2203.01243 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.054511
21. Flow-based sampling in the lattice Schwinger model at criticality, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 106 (1) 014514, (2022), arXiv:2202.11712 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.014514
22. Renormalization group flow as optimal transport, Jordan Cotler, and Semon Rezchikov, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2) 025003, (2023), arXiv:2202.11737 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.025003
23. Tackling critical slowing down using global correction steps with equivariant flows: the case of the Schwinger model, Jacob Finkenrath, (2022), arXiv:2201.02216
24. Density of states for gravitational waves, Felix Springer, and David Schaich, PoS LATTICE2021 043, (2022), arXiv:2112.11868 doi:10.22323/1.396.0043
25. HMC with Normalizing Flows, Sam Foreman, Taku Izubuchi, Luchang Jin, Xiao-Yong Jin, James C. Osborn, and Akio Tomiya, PoS LATTICE2021 073, (2022), arXiv:2112.01586 doi:10.22323/1.396.0073
26. Machine Learning of Thermodynamic Observables in the Presence of Mode Collapse, Kim A. Nicoli, Christopher J. Anders, Lena Funcke, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Pan Kessel, Shinichi Nakajima, and Paolo Stornati, PoS LATTICE2021 338, (2022), arXiv:2111.11303 doi:10.22323/1.396.0338
27. Master-field simulations of QCD, Patrick Fritzsch, John Bulava, Marco C\`e, Anthony Francis, Martin Lüscher, and Antonio Rago, PoS LATTICE2021 465, (2022), arXiv:2111.11544 doi:10.22323/1.396.0465
28. Flow-based sampling for multimodal and extended-mode distributions in lattice field theory, Daniel C. Hackett, Chung-Chun Hsieh, Sahil Pontula, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Jiunn-Wei Chen, Kai-Feng Chen, Kyle Cranmer, Gurtej Kanwar, and Phiala E. Shanahan, (2021), arXiv:2107.00734
29. Flow-based sampling for fermionic lattice field theories, Michael S. Albergo, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Julian M. Urban, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 104 (11) 114507, (2021), arXiv:2106.05934 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.114507
30. Efficient modeling of trivializing maps for lattice {\ensuremath{\phi}}4 theory using normalizing flows: A first look at scalability, Luigi Del Debbio, Joe Marsh Rossney, and Michael Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 104 (9) 094507, (2021), arXiv:2105.12481 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.094507
31. Gauge covariant neural network for quarks and gluons, Yuki Nagai, and Akio Tomiya, Phys. Rev. D 111 (7) 074501, (2025), arXiv:2103.11965 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.074501
32. Path integral contour deformations for observables in $SU(N)$ gauge theory, William Detmold, Gurtej Kanwar, Henry Lamm, Michael L. Wagman, and Neill C. Warrington, Phys. Rev. D 103 (9) 094517, (2021), arXiv:2101.12668 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.094517
33. Introduction to Normalizing Flows for Lattice Field Theory, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, Kyle Cranmer, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E. Shanahan, (2021), arXiv:2101.08176
34. Lattice Gauge Equivariant Convolutional Neural Networks, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (3) 032003, (2022), arXiv:2012.12901 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.032003
35. Sampling using $SU(N)$ gauge equivariant flows, Denis Boyda, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Michael S. Albergo, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 103 (7) 074504, (2021), arXiv:2008.05456 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074504
36. Estimation of Thermodynamic Observables in Lattice Field Theories with Deep Generative Models, Kim A. Nicoli, Christopher J. Anders, Lena Funcke, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Pan Kessel, Shinichi Nakajima, and Paolo Stornati, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (3) 032001, (2021), arXiv:2007.07115 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.032001
37. Equivariant flow-based sampling for lattice gauge theory, Gurtej Kanwar, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (12) 121601, (2020), arXiv:2003.06413 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.121601
38. Normalizing Flows on Tori and Spheres, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, George Papamakarios, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Michael S. Albergo, Gurtej Kanwar, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Kyle Cranmer, (2020), arXiv:2002.02428
39. Neural Spline Flows, Conor Durkan, Artur Bekasov, Iain Murray, and George Papamakarios, (2019), arXiv:1906.04032
40. Flow-based generative models for Markov chain Monte Carlo in lattice field theory, M. S. Albergo, G. Kanwar, and P. E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 100 (3) 034515, (2019), arXiv:1904.12072 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.034515
41. Status and Future Perspectives for Lattice Gauge Theory Calculations to the Exascale and Beyond, B\'alint Jo\'o, Chulwoo Jung, Norman H. Christ, William Detmold, Robert Edwards, Martin Savage, and Phiala Shanahan, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 199, (2019), arXiv:1904.09725 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12919-7
42. Hot-dense Lattice QCD: USQCD whitepaper 2018, Alexei Bazavov, Frithjof Karsch, Swagato Mukherjee, and Peter Petreczky, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 194, (2019), arXiv:1904.09951 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12922-0
43. Lattice QCD and Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering, Andreas S. Kronfeld, David G. Richards, William Detmold, Rajan Gupta, Huey-Wen Lin, Keh-Fei Liu, Aaron S. Meyer, Raza Sufian, and Sergey Syritsyn, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 196, (2019), arXiv:1904.09931 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12916-x
44. The Role of Lattice QCD in Searches for Violations of Fundamental Symmetries and Signals for New Physics, Vincenzo Cirigliano, Zohreh Davoudi, Tanmoy Bhattacharya, Taku Izubuchi, Phiala E. Shanahan, Sergey Syritsyn, and Michael L. Wagman, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 197, (2019), arXiv:1904.09704 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12889-8
45. Opportunities for Lattice QCD in Quark and Lepton Flavor Physics, Christoph Lehner, and others, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 195, (2019), arXiv:1904.09479 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12891-2
46. Hadrons and Nuclei, William Detmold, Robert G. Edwards, Jozef J. Dudek, Michael Engelhardt, Huey-Wen Lin, Stefan Meinel, Kostas Orginos, and Phiala Shanahan, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 193, (2019), arXiv:1904.09512 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12902-4
47. Attention Is All You Need, Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin, 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, (2017), arXiv:1706.03762
48. An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms, Sebastian Ruder, (2016), arXiv:1609.04747
49. Density estimation using Real NVP, Laurent Dinh, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, and Samy Bengio, (2016), arXiv:1605.08803
50. Variational Inference with Normalizing Flows, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Shakir Mohamed, (2015), arXiv:1505.05770
51. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization, Diederik P. Kingma, and Jimmy Ba, International Conference on Learning Representations, (2014), arXiv:1412.6980
52. NICE: Non-linear Independent Components Estimation, Laurent Dinh, David Krueger, and Yoshua Bengio, (2014), arXiv:1410.8516
53. Comparison of the gradient flow with cooling in $SU(3)$ pure gauge theory, Claudio Bonati, and Massimo D'Elia, Phys. Rev. D 89 (10) 105005, (2014), arXiv:1401.2441 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.105005
54. A Family of Nonparametric Density Estimation Algorithms, E. G. Tabak, and Cristina V. Turner, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 66 (2) 145–164, (2013), doi:10.1002/cpa.21423
55. Investigating the critical slowing down of QCD simulations, Stefan Schaefer, Rainer Sommer, and Francesco Virotta, PoS LAT2009 032, (2009), arXiv:0910.1465 doi:10.22323/1.091.0032
56. Trivializing maps, the Wilson flow and the HMC algorithm, Martin Luscher, Commun. Math. Phys. 293 899–919, (2010), arXiv:0907.5491 doi:10.1007/s00220-009-0953-7
57. Actions for dynamical fermion simulations: Are we ready to go?, Karl Jansen, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 129 3–16, (2004), arXiv:hep-lat/0311039 doi:10.1016/S0920-5632(03)02502-7
58. Overrelaxation Algorithms for Lattice Field Theories, Stephen L. Adler, Phys. Rev. D 37 458, (1988), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.37.458
59. Overrelaxed Heat Bath and Metropolis Algorithms for Accelerating Pure Gauge Monte Carlo Calculations, Frank R. Brown, and Thomas J. Woch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58 2394, (1987), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.2394
60. Hybrid Monte Carlo, S. Duane, A. D. Kennedy, B. J. Pendleton, and D. Roweth, Phys. Lett. B 195 216–222, (1987), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)91197-X
61. Improved Heat Bath Method for Monte Carlo Calculations in Lattice Gauge Theories, A. D. Kennedy, and B. J. Pendleton, Phys. Lett. B 156 393–399, (1985), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)91632-6
62. A New Method for Updating SU(N) Matrices in Computer Simulations of Gauge Theories, N. Cabibbo, and E. Marinari, Phys. Lett. B 119 387–390, (1982), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)90696-7
63. Monte Carlo Study of Quantized SU(2) Gauge Theory, M. Creutz, Phys. Rev. D 21 2308–2315, (1980), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.21.2308
64. Confinement of Quarks, Kenneth G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 10 2445–2459, (1974), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.10.2445
65. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines, N. Metropolis, A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller, J. Chem. Phys. 21 1087–1092, (1953), doi:10.1063/1.1699114