1. Quantum mean estimation for lattice field theory, Erik J. Gustafson, Henry Lamm, and Judah Unmuth-Yockey, Phys. Rev. D 107 (11) 114511, (2023), arXiv:2303.00094 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.114511
2. Robustness of Gauge Digitization to Quantum Noise, Erik J. Gustafson, and Henry Lamm, (2023), arXiv:2301.10207
3. Preparing quantum many-body scar states on quantum computers, Erik J. Gustafson, Andy C. Y. Li, Abid Khan, Joonho Kim, Doga Murat Kurkcuoglu, M. Sohaib Alam, Peter P. Orth, Armin Rahmani, and Thomas Iadecola, Quantum 7 1171, (2023), arXiv:2301.08226 doi:10.22331/q-2023-11-07-1171
4. Hypothesis Testing for Error Mitigation: How to Evaluate Error Mitigation, Abdullah Ash Saki, Amara Katabarwa, Salonik Resch, and George Umbrarescu, (2023), arXiv:2301.02690
5. Concepts and conditions for error suppression through randomized compiling, Adam Winick, Joel J. Wallman, Dar Dahlen, Ian Hincks, Egor Ospadov, and Joseph Emerson, (2022), arXiv:2212.07500
6. Applying the noiseless extrapolation error mitigation protocol to calculate real-time quantum field theory scattering phase shifts, Zachary Parks, Arnaud Carignan-Dugas, Erik Gustafson, Yannick Meurice, and Patrick Dreher, Phys. Rev. D 109 (1) 014505, (2024), arXiv:2212.05333 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.014505
7. Stout Smearing on a Quantum Computer, Erik J. Gustafson, (2022), arXiv:2211.05607
8. Purification-based quantum error mitigation of pair-correlated electron simulations, T. E. O'Brien, and others, Nature Phys. 19 (12) 1787–1792, (2023), arXiv:2210.10799 doi:10.1038/s41567-023-02240-y
9. Quantum Computation of Dynamical Quantum Phase Transitions and Entanglement Tomography in a Lattice Gauge Theory, Niklas Mueller, Joseph A. Carolan, Andrew Connelly, Zohreh Davoudi, Eugene F. Dumitrescu, and Kübra Yeter-Aydeniz, PRX Quantum 4 (3) 030323, (2023), arXiv:2210.03089 doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.030323
10. Quantum error mitigation, Zhenyu Cai, Ryan Babbush, Simon C. Benjamin, Suguru Endo, William J. Huggins, Ying Li, Jarrod R. McClean, and Thomas E. O'Brien, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95 (4) 045005, (2023), arXiv:2210.00921 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.95.045005
11. Making Trotterization Adaptive and Energy-Self-Correcting for NISQ Devices and Beyond, Hongzheng Zhao, Marin Bukov, Markus Heyl, and Roderich Moessner, PRX Quantum 4 (3) 030319, (2023), arXiv:2209.12653 doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.030319
12. Report of the Snowmass 2021 Topical Group on Lattice Gauge Theory, Zohreh Davoudi, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2209.10758
13. Efficacy of noisy dynamical decoupling, Jiaan Qi, Xiansong Xu, Dario Poletti, and Hui Khoon Ng, Phys. Rev. A 107 (3) 032615, (2023), arXiv:2209.09039 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.107.032615
14. Engineering Dynamically Decoupled Quantum Simulations with Trapped Ions, W. Morong, K. S. Collins, A. De, E. Stavropoulos, T. You, and C. Monroe, PRX Quantum 4 (1) 010334, (2023), arXiv:2209.05509 doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.010334
15. Towards Quantum Computing Phase Diagrams of Gauge Theories with Thermal Pure Quantum States, Zohreh Davoudi, Niklas Mueller, and Connor Powers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (8) 081901, (2023), arXiv:2208.13112 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.081901
16. Primitive quantum gates for an SU(2) discrete subgroup: Binary tetrahedral, Erik J. Gustafson, Henry Lamm, Felicity Lovelace, and Damian Musk, Phys. Rev. D 106 (11) 114501, (2022), arXiv:2208.12309 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.114501
17. Gauge theory couplings on anisotropic lattices, Marcela Carena, Erik J. Gustafson, Henry Lamm, Ying-Ying Li, and Wanqiang Liu, Phys. Rev. D 106 (11) 114504, (2022), arXiv:2208.10417 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.114504
18. Lattice QCD and Particle Physics, Andreas S. Kronfeld, and others, (2022), arXiv:2207.07641
19. Simulating one-dimensional quantum chromodynamics on a quantum computer: Real-time evolutions of tetra- and pentaquarks, Yasar Y. Atas, Jan F. Haase, Jinglei Zhang, Victor Wei, Sieglinde M. -L. Pfaendler, Randy Lewis, and Christine A. Muschik, Phys. Rev. Res. 5 (3) 033184, (2023), arXiv:2207.03473 doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.033184
20. Dynamical decoupling for superconducting qubits: A performance survey, Nic Ezzell, Bibek Pokharel, Lina Tewala, Gregory Quiroz, and Daniel A. Lidar, Phys. Rev. Applied 20 (6) 064027, (2023), arXiv:2207.03670 doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.20.064027
21. Preparations for quantum simulations of quantum chromodynamics in 1+1 dimensions. I. Axial gauge, Roland C. Farrell, Ivan A. Chernyshev, Sarah J. M. Powell, Nikita A. Zemlevskiy, Marc Illa, and Martin J. Savage, Phys. Rev. D 107 (5) 054512, (2023), arXiv:2207.01731 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.054512
22. Strategies for the determination of the running coupling of (2+1)-dimensional QED with quantum computing, Giuseppe Clemente, Arianna Crippa, and Karl Jansen, Phys. Rev. D 106 (11) 114511, (2022), arXiv:2206.12454 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.114511
23. Quantum simulation of Z2 lattice gauge theory with minimal resources, Reinis Irmejs, Mari Carmen Banuls, and J. Ignacio Cirac, Phys. Rev. D 108 (7) 074503, (2023), arXiv:2206.08909 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.074503
24. Variational thermal quantum simulation of the lattice Schwinger model, Xu-Dan Xie, Xingyu Guo, Hongxi Xing, Zheng-Yuan Xue, Dan-Bo Zhang, and Shi-Liang Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 106 (5) 054509, (2022), arXiv:2205.12767 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.054509
25. Self-mitigating Trotter circuits for SU(2) lattice gauge theory on a quantum computer, Sarmed A Rahman, Randy Lewis, Emanuele Mendicelli, and Sarah Powell, Phys. Rev. D 106 (7) 074502, (2022), arXiv:2205.09247 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074502
26. Quantum computing of the $^6$Li nucleus via ordered unitary coupled cluster, Oriel Kiss, Michele Grossi, Pavel Lougovski, Federico Sanchez, Sofia Vallecorsa, and Thomas Papenbrock, Phys. Rev. C 106 (3) 034325, (2022), arXiv:2205.00864 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.106.034325
27. Analyzing Strategies for Dynamical Decoupling Insertion on IBM Quantum Computer, Siyuan Niu, and Aida Todri-Sanial, (2022), arXiv:2204.14251
28. Volumetric Benchmarking of Error Mitigation with Qermit, Cristina Cirstoiu, Silas Dilkes, Daniel Mills, Seyon Sivarajah, and Ross Duncan, Quantum 7 1059, (2023), arXiv:2204.09725 doi:10.22331/q-2023-07-13-1059
29. Quantum Simulation for High-Energy Physics, Christian W. Bauer, and others, PRX Quantum 4 (2) 027001, (2023), arXiv:2204.03381 doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.027001
30. Effects of Dynamical Decoupling and Pulse-Level Optimizations on IBM Quantum Computers, Siyuan Niu, and Aida Todri-Sanial, IEEE Trans. Quantum Eng. 3 1–10, (2022), arXiv:2204.01471 doi:10.1109/TQE.2022.3203153
31. Emergent Z2 Gauge Theories and Topological Excitations in Rydberg Atom Arrays, Rhine Samajdar, Darshan G. Joshi, Yanting Teng, and Subir Sachdev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (4) 043601, (2023), arXiv:2204.00632 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.043601
32. Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay: A Roadmap for Matching Theory to Experiment, Vincenzo Cirigliano, and others, (2022), arXiv:2203.12169
33. Dynamical quantum phase transitions in a noisy lattice gauge theory, Rasmus Berg Jensen, Simon Panyella Pedersen, and Nikolaj Thomas Zinner, Phys. Rev. B 105 (22) 224309, (2022), arXiv:2203.10927 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.105.224309
34. Confinement in a ${{\mathbb{Z}}}_{2}$ lattice gauge theory on a quantum computer, Julius Mildenberger, Wojciech Mruczkiewicz, Jad C. Halimeh, Zhang Jiang, and Philipp Hauke, Nature Phys. 21 (2) 312–317, (2025), arXiv:2203.08905 doi:10.1038/s41567-024-02723-6
35. Theoretical tools for neutrino scattering: interplay between lattice QCD, EFTs, nuclear physics, phenomenology, and neutrino event generators, L. Alvarez Ruso, and others, J. Phys. G 52 (4) 043001, (2025), arXiv:2203.09030 doi:10.1088/1361-6471/adae26
36. Error-mitigated simulation of quantum many-body scars on quantum computers with pulse-level control, I-Chi Chen, Benjamin Burdick, Yongxin Yao, Peter P. Orth, and Thomas Iadecola, Phys. Rev. Res. 4 (4) 043027, (2022), arXiv:2203.08291 doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.043027
37. Improved Hamiltonians for Quantum Simulations of Gauge Theories, Marcela Carena, Henry Lamm, Ying-Ying Li, and Wanqiang Liu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (5) 051601, (2022), arXiv:2203.02823 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.051601
38. Nuclear Forces for Precision Nuclear Physics: A Collection of Perspectives, Ingo Tews, and others, Few Body Syst. 63 (4) 67, (2022), arXiv:2202.01105 doi:10.1007/s00601-022-01749-x
39. Efficiently improving the performance of noisy quantum computers, Samuele Ferracin, Akel Hashim, Jean-Loup Ville, Ravi Naik, Arnaud Carignan-Dugas, Hammam Qassim, Alexis Morvan, David I. Santiago, Irfan Siddiqi, and Joel J. Wallman, Quantum 8 1410, (2024), arXiv:2201.10672 doi:10.22331/q-2024-07-15-1410
40. Probabilistic error cancellation with sparse Pauli{\textendash}Lindblad models on noisy quantum processors, Ewout van den Berg, Zlatko K. Minev, Abhinav Kandala, and Kristan Temme, Nature Phys. 19 (8) 1116–1121, (2023), arXiv:2201.09866 doi:10.1038/s41567-023-02042-2
41. Measuring qubit stability in a gate-based NISQ hardware processor, Kübra Yeter-Aydeniz, Zachary Parks, Aadithya Nair Thekkiniyedath, Erik Gustafson, Alexander F. Kemper, Raphael C. Pooser, Yannick Meurice, and Patrick Dreher, Quant. Inf. Proc. 22 (2) 96, (2023), arXiv:2201.02899 doi:10.1007/s11128-023-03826-4
42. Digital Quantum Simulation of the Schwinger Model and Symmetry Protection with Trapped Ions, Nhung H. Nguyen, Minh C. Tran, Yingyue Zhu, Alaina M. Green, C. Huerta Alderete, Zohreh Davoudi, and Norbert M. Linke, PRX Quantum 3 (2) 020324, (2022), arXiv:2112.14262 doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.3.020324
43. Preparation of the SU(3) lattice Yang-Mills vacuum with variational quantum methods, Anthony N. Ciavarella, and Ivan A. Chernyshev, Phys. Rev. D 105 (7) 074504, (2022), arXiv:2112.09083 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.074504
44. Quantum error correction with gauge symmetries, Abhishek Rajput, Alessandro Roggero, and Nathan Wiebe, npj Quantum Inf. 9 (1) 41, (2023), arXiv:2112.05186 doi:10.1038/s41534-023-00706-8
45. Fractionalized holes in one-dimensional Z2 gauge theory coupled to fermion matter: Deconfined dynamics and emergent integrability, Aritra Das, Umberto Borla, and Sergej Moroz, Phys. Rev. B 107 (6) 064302, (2023), arXiv:2111.13205 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.107.064302
46. Investigating the variance increase of readout error mitigation through classical bit-flip correction on IBM and Rigetti quantum computers, Constantia Alexandrou, Lena Funcke, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Stefan Kühn, Georgios Polykratis, Paolo Stornati, Xiaoyang Wang, and Tom Weber, PoS LATTICE2021 243, (2022), arXiv:2111.05026 doi:10.22323/1.396.0243
47. The Variational Quantum Eigensolver: A review of methods and best practices, Jules Tilly, and others, Phys. Rept. 986 1–128, (2022), arXiv:2111.05176 doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.08.003
48. Toward the real-time evolution of gauge-invariant $\mathbb Z_2$ and $U(1)$ quantum link models on noisy intermediate-scale quantum hardware with error mitigation, Emilie Huffman, Miguel Garc\'\ia Vera, and Debasish Banerjee, Phys. Rev. D 106 (9) 094502, (2022), arXiv:2109.15065 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.094502
49. Indexed improvements for real-time trotter evolution of a (1 + 1) field theory using NISQ quantum computers, Erik Gustafson, Patrick Dreher, Zheyue Hang, and Yannick Meurice, Quantum Sci. Technol. 6 (4) 045020, (2021), doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ac1dff
50. Hierarchical qubit maps and hierarchically implemented quantum error correction, Natalie Klco, and Martin J. Savage, Phys. Rev. A 104 (6) 062425, (2021), arXiv:2109.01953 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.104.062425
51. Computing Free Energies with Fluctuation Relations on Quantum Computers, Lindsay Bassman Oftelie, Katherine Klymko, Diyi Liu, Norman M. Tubman, and Wibe A. de Jong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (13) 130603, (2022), arXiv:2103.09846 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.130603
52. Primitive quantum gates for dihedral gauge theories, M. Sohaib Alam, Stuart Hadfield, Henry Lamm, and Andy C. Y. Li, Phys. Rev. D 105 (11) 114501, (2022), arXiv:2108.13305 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.114501
53. Active Readout Error Mitigation, Rebecca Hicks, Bryce Kobrin, Christian W. Bauer, and Benjamin Nachman, Phys. Rev. A 105 (1) 012419, (2022), arXiv:2108.12432 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.105.012419
54. Scalable error mitigation for noisy quantum circuits produces competitive expectation values, Youngseok Kim, Christopher J. Wood, Theodore J. Yoder, Seth T. Merkel, Jay M. Gambetta, Kristan Temme, and Abhinav Kandala, Nature Phys. 19 (5) 752–759, (2023), arXiv:2108.09197 doi:10.1038/s41567-022-01914-3
55. Suppression of Crosstalk in Superconducting Qubits Using Dynamical Decoupling, Vinay Tripathi, Huo Chen, Mostafa Khezri, Ka-Wa Yip, E. M. Levenson-Falk, and Daniel A. Lidar, Phys. Rev. Applied 18 (2) 024068, (2022), arXiv:2108.04530 doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.18.024068
56. Lattice renormalization of quantum simulations, Marcela Carena, Henry Lamm, Ying-Ying Li, and Wanqiang Liu, Phys. Rev. D 104 (9) 094519, (2021), arXiv:2107.01166 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.094519
57. Gauge protection in non-abelian lattice gauge theories, Jad C. Halimeh, Haifeng Lang, and Philipp Hauke, New J. Phys. 24 (3) 033015, (2022), arXiv:2106.09032 doi:10.1088/1367-2630/ac5564
58. Quantum simulation of nonequilibrium dynamics and thermalization in the Schwinger model, Wibe A. de Jong, Kyle Lee, James Mulligan, Mateusz P\losko\'n, Felix Ringer, and Xiaojun Yao, Phys. Rev. D 106 (5) 054508, (2022), arXiv:2106.08394 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.054508
59. Qubit readout error mitigation with bit-flip averaging, Alistair W. R. Smith, Kiran E. Khosla, Chris N. Self, and M. S. Kim, Sci. Adv. 7 (47) abi8009, (2021), arXiv:2106.05800 doi:10.1126/sciadv.abi8009
60. Quantum simulation of lattice gauge theories in more than one space dimension{\textemdash}requirements, challenges and methods, Erez Zohar, Phil. Trans. A. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 380 (2216) 20210069, (2021), arXiv:2106.04609 doi:10.1098/rsta.2021.0069
61. Connecting geometry and performance of two-qubit parameterized quantum circuits, Amara Katabarwa, Sukin Sim, Dax Enshan Koh, and Pierre-Luc Dallaire-Demers, Quantum 6 782, (2022), arXiv:2106.02593 doi:10.22331/q-2022-08-23-782
62. Neural Error Mitigation of Near-Term Quantum Simulations, Elizabeth R. Bennewitz, Florian Hopfmueller, Bohdan Kulchytskyy, Juan Carrasquilla, and Pooya Ronagh, Nature Mach. Intell. 4 618–624, (2022), arXiv:2105.08086 doi:10.1038/s42256-022-00509-0
63. Classically emulated digital quantum simulation for screening and confinement in the Schwinger model with a topological term, Masazumi Honda, Etsuko Itou, Yuta Kikuchi, Lento Nagano, and Takuya Okuda, Phys. Rev. D 105 (1) 014504, (2022), arXiv:2105.03276 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.014504
64. Quantum variational approach to lattice gauge theory at nonzero density, Arata Yamamoto, Phys. Rev. D 104 (1) 014506, (2021), arXiv:2104.10669 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.014506
65. Experimental Characterization of Crosstalk Errors with Simultaneous Gate Set Tomography, Kenneth Rudinger, and others, PRX Quantum 2 (4) 040338, (2021), arXiv:2103.09890 doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.040338
66. Mitigating depolarizing noise on quantum computers with noise-estimation circuits, Miroslav Urbanek, Benjamin Nachman, Vincent R. Pascuzzi, Andre He, Christian W. Bauer, and Wibe A. de Jong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (27) 270502, (2021), arXiv:2103.08591 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.270502
67. Real-time lattice gauge theory actions: Unitarity, convergence, and path integral contour deformations, Gurtej Kanwar, and Michael L. Wagman, Phys. Rev. D 104 (1) 014513, (2021), arXiv:2103.02602 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.014513
68. Trailhead for quantum simulation of SU(3) Yang-Mills lattice gauge theory in the local multiplet basis, Anthony Ciavarella, Natalie Klco, and Martin J. Savage, Phys. Rev. D 103 (9) 094501, (2021), arXiv:2101.10227 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.094501
69. Normalizing Flows and the Real-Time Sign Problem, Scott Lawrence, and Yukari Yamauchi, Phys. Rev. D 103 (11) 114509, (2021), arXiv:2101.05755 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.114509
70. Simple mitigation of global depolarizing errors in quantum simulations, Joseph Vovrosh, Kiran E. Khosla, Sean Greenaway, Christopher Self, Myungshik Kim, and Johannes Knolle, Phys. Rev. E 104 (3) 035309, (2021), arXiv:2101.01690 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.104.035309
71. Model-free readout-error mitigation for quantum expectation values, Ewout van den Berg, Zlatko K. Minev, and Kristan Temme, Phys. Rev. A 105 (3) 032620, (2022), arXiv:2012.09738 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.105.032620
72. Non-Abelian gauge invariance from dynamical decoupling, Valentin Kasper, Torsten V. Zache, Fred Jendrzejewski, Maciej Lewenstein, and Erez Zohar, Phys. Rev. D 107 (1) 014506, (2023), arXiv:2012.08620 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.014506
73. Quantum phases of two-dimensional Z2 gauge theory coupled to single-component fermion matter, Umberto Borla, Bhilahari Jeevanesan, Frank Pollmann, and Sergej Moroz, Phys. Rev. B 105 (7) 075132, (2022), arXiv:2012.08543 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.105.075132
74. Toward quantum simulations of $\mathbb{Z}_2$ gauge theory without state preparation, Erik J. Gustafson, and Henry Lamm, Phys. Rev. D 103 (5) 054507, (2021), arXiv:2011.11677 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.054507
75. Measurement Error Mitigation for Variational Quantum Algorithms, George S. Barron, and Christopher J. Wood, (2020), arXiv:2010.08520
76. Gauge-Symmetry Violation Quantum Phase Transition in Lattice Gauge Theories, Maarten Van Damme, Jad C. Halimeh, and Philipp Hauke, (2020), arXiv:2010.07338
77. Nuclear matrix elements from lattice QCD for electroweak and beyond-Standard-Model processes, Zohreh Davoudi, William Detmold, Phiala Shanahan, Kostas Orginos, Assumpta Parre\~no, Martin J. Savage, and Michael L. Wagman, Phys. Rept. 900 1–74, (2021), arXiv:2008.11160 doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.10.004
78. Demonstration of quantum volume 64 on a superconducting quantum computing system, Petar Jurcevic, and others, Quantum Sci. Technol. 6 025020, (2021), arXiv:2008.08571 doi:10.1088/2058-9565/abe519
79. Quantum equation of motion for computing molecular excitation energies on a noisy quantum processor, Pauline J. Ollitrault, Abhinav Kandala, Chun-Fu Chen, Panagiotis Kl. Barkoutsos, Antonio Mezzacapo, Marco Pistoia, Sarah Sheldon, Stefan Woerner, Jay M. Gambetta, and Ivano Tavernelli, Phys. Rev. Res. 2 (4) 043140, (2020), arXiv:1910.12890 doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043140
80. Bayesian model averaging for analysis of lattice field theory results, William I. Jay, and Ethan T. Neil, Phys. Rev. D 103 114502, (2021), arXiv:2008.01069 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.114502
81. Algorithm for quantum computation of particle decays, Anthony Ciavarella, Phys. Rev. D 102 (9) 094505, (2020), arXiv:2007.04447 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.094505
82. Gauge-Symmetry Protection Using Single-Body Terms, Jad C. Halimeh, Haifeng Lang, Julius Mildenberger, Zhang Jiang, and Philipp Hauke, PRX Quantum 2 (4) 040311, (2021), arXiv:2007.00668 doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.040311
83. Faster Digital Quantum Simulation by Symmetry Protection, Minh C. Tran, Yuan Su, Daniel Carney, and Jacob M. Taylor, PRX Quantum 2 (1) 010323, (2021), arXiv:2006.16248 doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.010323
84. The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model, T. Aoyama, and others, Phys. Rept. 887 1–166, (2020), arXiv:2006.04822 doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.07.006
85. Scalable quantum processor noise characterization, Kathleen E. Hamilton, Tyler Kharazi, Titus Morris, Alexander J. McCaskey, Ryan S. Bennink, and Raphael C. Pooser, 2020 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering, (2020), arXiv:2006.01805 doi:10.1109/QCE49297.2020.00060
86. Suppressing Coherent Gauge Drift in Quantum Simulations, Henry Lamm, Scott Lawrence, and Yukari Yamauchi, (2020), arXiv:2005.12688
87. Benchmarking the noise sensitivity of different parametric two-qubit gates in a single superconducting quantum computing platform, M. Ganzhorn, and others, Phys. Rev. Res. 2 (3) 033447, (2020), arXiv:2005.05696 doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033447
88. Hartree-Fock on a superconducting qubit quantum computer, Frank Arute, and others, Science 369 (6507) 1084–1089, (2020), arXiv:2004.04174 doi:10.1126/science.abb9811
89. Quantum approximate optimization of non-planar graph problems on a planar superconducting processor, Matthew P. Harrigan, and others, Nature Phys. 17 (3) 332–336, (2021), arXiv:2004.04197 doi:10.1038/s41567-020-01105-y
90. Quantum Algorithms for Simulating the Lattice Schwinger Model, Alexander F. Shaw, Pavel Lougovski, Jesse R. Stryker, and Nathan Wiebe, Quantum 4 306, (2020), arXiv:2002.11146 doi:10.22331/q-2020-08-10-306
91. Quantum Simulation of Field Theories Without State Preparation, Siddhartha Harmalkar, Henry Lamm, and Scott Lawrence, (2020), arXiv:2001.11490
92. Toward efficient correction of multiqubit measurement errors: pair correlation method, Michael R. Geller, and Mingyu Sun, Quantum Sci. Technol. 6 025009, (2021), arXiv:2001.09980 doi:10.1088/2058-9565/abd5c9
93. Schwinger-Keldysh formalism for Lattice Gauge Theories, Hiroki Hoshina, Hirotsugu Fujii, and Yoshio Kikukawa, PoS LATTICE2019 190, (2020), doi:10.22323/1.363.0190
94. Quantum computation of thermal averages in the presence of a sign problem, Giuseppe Clemente, and others, Phys. Rev. D 101 (7) 074510, (2020), arXiv:2001.05328 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.074510
95. Classically emulated digital quantum simulation of the Schwinger model with a topological term via adiabatic state preparation, Bipasha Chakraborty, Masazumi Honda, Taku Izubuchi, Yuta Kikuchi, and Akio Tomiya, Phys. Rev. D 105 (9) 094503, (2022), arXiv:2001.00485 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.094503
96. Real-time chiral dynamics from a digital quantum simulation, Dmitri E. Kharzeev, and Yuta Kikuchi, Phys. Rev. Res. 2 (2) 023342, (2020), arXiv:2001.00698 doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.023342
97. Reliability of lattice gauge theories, Jad C. Halimeh, and Philipp Hauke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (3) 030503, (2020), arXiv:2001.00024 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.030503
98. Soluble limit and criticality of fermions in Z2 gauge theories, Elio J. König, Piers Coleman, and Alexei M. Tsvelik, Phys. Rev. B 102 (15) 155143, (2020), arXiv:1912.11106 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.102.155143
99. Theory of Trotter Error with Commutator Scaling, Andrew M. Childs, Yuan Su, Minh C. Tran, Nathan Wiebe, and Shuchen Zhu, Phys. Rev. X 11 (1) 011020, (2021), arXiv:1912.08854 doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.11.011020
100. Implementation of XY entangling gates with a single calibrated pulse, Deanna M. Abrams, Nicolas Didier, Blake R. Johnson, Marcus P. da Silva, and Colm A. Ryan, Nature Electron. 3 744–750, (2020), arXiv:1912.04424 doi:10.1038/s41928-020-00498-1
101. Towards grounding nuclear physics in QCD, Christian Drischler, Wick Haxton, Kenneth McElvain, Emanuele Mereghetti, Amy Nicholson, Pavlos Vranas, and Andr\'e Walker-Loud, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 121 103888, (2021), arXiv:1910.07961 doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103888
102. Unfolding quantum computer readout noise, Benjamin Nachman, Miroslav Urbanek, Wibe A. de Jong, and Christian W. Bauer, npj Quantum Inf. 6 84, (2020), arXiv:1910.01969 doi:10.1038/s41534-020-00309-7
103. Confined Phases of One-Dimensional Spinless Fermions Coupled to $Z_2$ Gauge Theory, Umberto Borla, Ruben Verresen, Fabian Grusdt, and Sergej Moroz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (12) 120503, (2020), arXiv:1909.07399 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.120503
104. Detecting crosstalk errors in quantum information processors, Mohan Sarovar, Timothy Proctor, Kenneth Rudinger, Kevin Young, Erik Nielsen, and Robin Blume-Kohout, Quantum 4 321, (2020), arXiv:1908.09855 doi:10.22331/q-2020-09-11-321
105. SU(2) non-Abelian gauge field theory in one dimension on digital quantum computers, Natalie Klco, Jesse R. Stryker, and Martin J. Savage, Phys. Rev. D 101 (7) 074512, (2020), arXiv:1908.06935 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.074512
106. Accelerating Lattice Quantum Field Theory Calculations via Interpolator Optimization Using Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum Computing, A. Avkhadiev, P. E. Shanahan, and R. D. Young, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (8) 080501, (2020), arXiv:1908.04194 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.080501
107. Mitigation of readout noise in near-term quantum devices by classical post-processing based on detector tomography, Filip B. Maciejewski, Zolt\'an Zimbor\'as, and Micha\l Oszmaniec, Quantum 4 257, (2020), arXiv:1907.08518 doi:10.22331/q-2020-04-24-257
108. Neutral B-meson mixing from full lattice QCD at the physical point, R. J. Dowdall, C. T. H. Davies, R. R. Horgan, G. P. Lepage, C. J. Monahan, J. Shigemitsu, and M. Wingate, Phys. Rev. D 100 (9) 094508, (2019), arXiv:1907.01025 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.094508
109. Parameterized quantum circuits as machine learning models, Marcello Benedetti, Erika Lloyd, Stefan Sack, and Mattia Fiorentini, Quantum Sci. Technol. 4 (4) 043001, (2019), arXiv:1906.07682 doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ab4eb5
110. $\mathbb{Z}_N$ gauge theories coupled to topological fermions: QED$_2$ with a quantum-mechanical $θ$ angle, G. Magnifico, D. Vodola, E. Ercolessi, S. P. Kumar, M. Müller, and A. Bermudez, Phys. Rev. B 100 (11) 115152, (2019), arXiv:1906.07005 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.100.115152
111. Suppression of Qubit Crosstalk in a Tunable Coupling Superconducting Circuit, Pranav S. Mundada, Gengyan Zhang, Thomas Hazard, and Andrew A. Houck, Phys. Rev. Applied 12 (5) 054023, (2019), arXiv:1810.04182 doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.054023
112. Verifying multipartite entangled Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger states via multiple quantum coherences, Ken X. Wei, Isaac Lauer, Srikanth Srinivasan, Neereja Sundaresan, Douglas T. McClure, David Toyli, David C. McKay, Jay M. Gambetta, and Sarah Sheldon, Phys. Rev. A 101 (3) 032343, (2020), arXiv:1905.05720 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.101.032343
113. Detector tomography on IBM quantum computers and mitigation of an imperfect measurement, Yanzhu Chen, Maziar Farahzad, Shinjae Yoo, and Tzu-Chieh Wei, Phys. Rev. A 100 (5) 052315, (2019), arXiv:1904.11935 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.100.052315
114. Minimally entangled state preparation of localized wave functions on quantum computers, Natalie Klco, and Martin J. Savage, Phys. Rev. A 102 (1) 012612, (2020), arXiv:1904.10440 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.102.012612
115. Emergence of Gauss' law in a $Z_2$ lattice gauge theory in 1 + 1 dimensions, Jernej Frank, Emilie Huffman, and Shailesh Chandrasekharan, Phys. Lett. B 806 135484, (2020), arXiv:1904.05414 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135484
116. Extracting Success from IBM{\textquoteright}s 20-Qubit Machines Using Error-Aware Compilation, Shin Nishio, Yulu Pan, Takahiko Satoh, Hideharu Amano, and Rodney Van Meter, ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems (JETC) 16 (3) 1–25, (2020), arXiv:1903.10963 doi:10.1145/3386162
117. A quantum cellular automaton for one-dimensional QED, Pablo Arrighi, C\'edric B\'eny, and Terry Farrelly, Quant. Inf. Proc. 19 (3) 88, (2020), arXiv:1903.07007 doi:10.1007/s11128-019-2555-4
118. Genuine 12-Qubit Entanglement on a Superconducting Quantum Processor, Ming Gong, and others, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (11) 110501, (2019), arXiv:1811.02292 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.110501
119. Lattice gauge theories and string dynamics in Rydberg atom quantum simulators, Federica M. Surace, Paolo P. Mazza, Giuliano Giudici, Alessio Lerose, Andrea Gambassi, and Marcello Dalmonte, Phys. Rev. X 10 (2) 021041, (2020), arXiv:1902.09551 doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.10.021041
120. Characterizing large-scale quantum computers via cycle benchmarking, Alexander Erhard, Joel James Wallman, Lukas Postler, Michael Meth, Roman Stricker, Esteban Adrian Martinez, Philipp Schindler, Thomas Monz, Joseph Emerson, and Rainer Blatt, Nature Commun. 10 (1) 5347, (2019), arXiv:1902.08543 doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13068-7
121. Determining eigenstates and thermal states on a quantum computer using quantum imaginary time evolution, Mario Motta, Chong Sun, Adrian Teck Keng Tan, Matthew J. O' Rourke, Erika Ye, Austin J. Minnich, Fernando G. S. L. Brand\~ao, and Garnet Kin-Lic Chan, Nature Phys. 16 205–210, (2019), arXiv:1901.07653 doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0704-4
122. Quantum simulation of scattering in the quantum Ising model, Erik Gustafson, Yannick Meurice, and Judah Unmuth-Yockey, Phys. Rev. D 99 (9) 094503, (2019), arXiv:1901.05944 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.094503
123. Oracles for Gauss's law on digital quantum computers, Jesse R. Stryker, Phys. Rev. A 99 (4) 042301, (2019), arXiv:1812.01617 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.99.042301
124. Randomized Benchmarking under Different Gatesets, Kristine Boone, Arnaud Carignan-Dugas, Joel J. Wallman, and Joseph Emerson, Phys. Rev. A 99 032329, (2019), arXiv:1811.01920 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.99.032329
125. Expressive power of parametrized quantum circuits, Yuxuan Du, Min-Hsiu Hsieh, Tongliang Liu, and Dacheng Tao, Phys. Rev. Res. 2 (3) 033125, (2020), arXiv:1810.11922 doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.029003
126. Emergent statistical bubble localization in a Z2 lattice gauge theory, H. Yarloo, M. Mohseni-Rajaee, and A. Langari, Phys. Rev. B 99 (5) 054403, (2019), arXiv:1810.08434 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.99.054403
127. Self-verifying variational quantum simulation of lattice models, Christian Kokail, and others, Nature 569 (7756) 355–360, (2019), arXiv:1810.03421 doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1177-4
128. Simulation of quantum circuits by low-rank stabilizer decompositions, Sergey Bravyi, Dan Browne, Padraic Calpin, Earl Campbell, David Gosset, and Mark Howard, Quantum 3 181, (2019), arXiv:1808.00128 doi:10.22331/q-2019-09-02-181
129. Simulation of Nonequilibrium Dynamics on a Quantum Computer, Henry Lamm, and Scott Lawrence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (17) 170501, (2018), arXiv:1806.06649 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.170501
130. Practical Quantum Error Mitigation for Near-Future Applications, Suguru Endo, Simon C. Benjamin, and Ying Li, Phys. Rev. X 8 (3) 031027, (2018), arXiv:1712.09271 doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.8.031027
131. Digital quantum simulation of lattice gauge theories in three spatial dimensions, Julian Bender, Erez Zohar, Alessandro Farace, and J. Ignacio Cirac, New J. Phys. 20 (9) 093001, (2018), arXiv:1804.02082 doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aadb71
132. Quantum-classical computation of Schwinger model dynamics using quantum computers, N. Klco, E. F. Dumitrescu, A. J. McCaskey, T. D. Morris, R. C. Pooser, M. Sanz, E. Solano, P. Lougovski, and M. J. Savage, Phys. Rev. A 98 (3) 032331, (2018), arXiv:1803.03326 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.98.032331
133. Rapid High-fidelity Multiplexed Readout of Superconducting Qubits, Johannes Heinsoo, and others, Phys. Rev. Appl. 10 (3) 034040, (2018), arXiv:1801.07904 doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.034040
134. Analytical modeling of parametrically modulated transmon qubits, Nicolas Didier, Eyob A. Sete, Marcus P. da Silva, and Chad Rigetti, Phys. Rev. A 97 (2) 022330, (2018), arXiv:1706.06566 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.97.022330
135. Cloud Quantum Computing of an Atomic Nucleus, E. F. Dumitrescu, A. J. McCaskey, G. Hagen, G. R. Jansen, T. D. Morris, T. Papenbrock, R. C. Pooser, D. J. Dean, and P. Lougovski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 210501, (2018), arXiv:1801.03897 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.210501
136. Parametrically Activated Entangling Gates Using Transmon Qubits, S. A. Caldwell, and others, Phys. Rev. Appl. 10 (3) 034050, (2018), arXiv:1706.06562 doi:10.1103/PhysRevApplied.10.034050
137. Faster Quantum Algorithm to simulate Fermionic Quantum Field Theory, Ali Hamed Moosavian, and Stephen Jordan, Phys. Rev. A 98 (1) 012332, (2018), arXiv:1711.04006 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.98.012332
138. 10-Qubit Entanglement and Parallel Logic Operations with a Superconducting Circuit, Chao Song, and others, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (18) 180511, (2017), arXiv:1703.10302 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.180511
139. Ground States via Spectral Combing on a Quantum Computer, David B. Kaplan, Natalie Klco, and Alessandro Roggero, (2017), arXiv:1709.08250
140. Computation of Molecular Spectra on a Quantum Processor with an Error-Resilient Algorithm, James I. Colless, Vinay V. Ramasesh, Dar Dahlen, Machiel S. Blok, M. \,E. Kimchi-Schwartz, Jarrod R. McClean, Jonathan Carter, Wibe A. de Jong, and Irfan Siddiqi, Phys. Rev. X 8 (1) 011021, (2018), arXiv:1707.06408 doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.8.011021
141. Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets, Abhinav Kandala, Antonio Mezzacapo, Kristan Temme, Maika Takita, Markus Brink, Jerry M. Chow, and Jay M. Gambetta, Nature 549 (7671) 242–246, (2017), arXiv:1704.05018 doi:10.1038/nature23879
142. BQP-completeness of scattering in scalar quantum field theory, Stephen P. Jordan, Hari Krovi, Keith S. M. Lee, and John Preskill, Quantum 2 44, (2018), arXiv:1703.00454 doi:10.22331/q-2018-01-08-44
143. Error Mitigation for Short-Depth Quantum Circuits, Kristan Temme, Sergey Bravyi, and Jay M. Gambetta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (18) 180509, (2017), arXiv:1612.02058 doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.180509
144. Efficient Variational Quantum Simulator Incorporating Active Error Minimization, Ying Li, and Simon C. Benjamin, Phys. Rev. X 7 (2) 021050, (2017), arXiv:1611.09301 doi:10.1103/physrevx.7.021050
145. Finite Correlation Length Implies Efficient Preparation of Quantum Thermal States, Fernando G. S. L. Brand\~ao, and Michael J. Kastoryano, Commun. Math. Phys. 365 (1) 1–16, (2019), arXiv:1609.07877 doi:10.1007/s00220-018-3150-8
146. Improved Classical Simulation of Quantum Circuits Dominated by Clifford Gates, Sergey Bravyi, and David Gosset, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (25) 250501, (2016), arXiv:1601.07601 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.250501
147. Monte Carlo Study of Real Time Dynamics on the Lattice, Andrei Alexandru, Gokce Basar, Paulo F. Bedaque, Sohan Vartak, and Neill C. Warrington, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (8) 081602, (2016), arXiv:1605.08040 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.081602
148. Approaches to the sign problem in lattice field theory, Christof Gattringer, and Kurt Langfeld, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 31 (22) 1643007, (2016), arXiv:1603.09517 doi:10.1142/S0217751X16430077
149. Noise tailoring for scalable quantum computation via randomized compiling, Joel J. Wallman, and Joseph Emerson, Phys. Rev. A 94 (5) 052325, (2016), arXiv:1512.01098 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.94.052325
150. Efficient Bayesian Phase Estimation, Nathan Wiebe, and Chris Granade, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (1) 010503, (2016), arXiv:1508.00869 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.010503
151. Quantum simulation of the Schwinger model: A study of feasibility, Stefan Kühn, J. Ignacio Cirac, and Mari-Carmen Ba\~nuls, Phys. Rev. A 90 042305, (2014), arXiv:1407.4995 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.90.042305
152. $B_s \to K \ell \nu$ form factors from lattice QCD, C. M. Bouchard, G. Peter Lepage, Christopher Monahan, Heechang Na, and Junko Shigemitsu, Phys. Rev. D 90 054506, (2014), arXiv:1406.2279 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.054506
153. Quantum Algorithms for Fermionic Quantum Field Theories, Stephen P. Jordan, Keith S. M. Lee, and John Preskill, (2014), arXiv:1404.7115
154. Fermion-Fermion Scattering in Quantum Field Theory with Superconducting Circuits, L. Garc\'\ia-\'Alvarez, J. Casanova, A. Mezzacapo, I. L. Egusquiza, L. Lamata, G. Romero, and E. Solano, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (7) 070502, (2015), arXiv:1404.2868 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.070502
155. Efficient error models for fault-tolerant architectures and the Pauli twirling approximation, Michael R. Geller, and Zhongyuan Zhou, Phys. Rev. A 88 (1) 012314, (2013), arXiv:1305.2021 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.88.012314
156. A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor, Alberto Peruzzo, Jarrod McClean, Peter Shadbolt, Man-Hong Yung, Xiao-Qi Zhou, Peter J. Love, Al\'an Aspuru-Guzik, and Jeremy L. O'Brien, Nature Commun. 5 (1) 4213, (2014), arXiv:1304.3061 doi:10.1038/ncomms5213
157. Everything you wanted to know about Data Analysis and Fitting but were afraid to ask, Peter Young, (2012), arXiv:1210.3781
158. Thermalization in Nature and on a Quantum Computer, Arnau Riera, Christian Gogolin, and Jens Eisert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (8) 080402, (2012), arXiv:1102.2389 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.080402
159. Quantum Algorithms for Quantum Field Theories, Stephen P. Jordan, Keith S. M. Lee, and John Preskill, Science 336 1130–1133, (2012), arXiv:1111.3633 doi:10.1126/science.1217069
160. Quantum Computation of Scattering in Scalar Quantum Field Theories, Stephen P. Jordan, Keith S. M. Lee, and John Preskill, Quant. Inf. Comput. 14 1014–1080, (2014), arXiv:1112.4833
161. Fast Fits for Lattice QCD Correlators, K. Hornbostel, G. P. Lepage, C. T. H. Davies, R. J. Dowdall, H. Na, and J. Shigemitsu, Phys. Rev. D 85 031504, (2012), arXiv:1111.1363 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.031504
162. Preparing Thermal States of Quantum Systems by Dimension Reduction, Ersen Bilgin, and Sergio Boixo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (17) 170405, (2010), arXiv:1008.4162 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.170405
163. High-Precision c and b Masses, and QCD Coupling from Current-Current Correlators in Lattice and Continuum QCD, C. McNeile, C. T. H. Davies, E. Follana, K. Hornbostel, and G. P. Lepage, Phys. Rev. D 82 034512, (2010), arXiv:1004.4285 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.82.034512
164. Scalable protocol for identification of correctable codes, Marcus Silva, Easwar Magesan, David W. Kribs, and Joseph Emerson, Phys. Rev. A 78 (1) 012347, (2008), arXiv:0710.1900 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.78.012347
165. Asymmetric quantum error-correcting codes, Lev Ioffe, and Marc M\'ezard, Phys. Rev. A 75 (3) 032345, (2007), arXiv:quant-ph/0606107 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.75.032345
166. Robust Dynamical Decoupling of Quantum Systems with Bounded Controls, Lorenza Viola, and Emanuel Knill, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (3) 037901, (2003), arXiv:quant-ph/0208056 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.037901
167. Constrained curve fitting, G. P. Lepage, B. Clark, C. T. H. Davies, K. Hornbostel, P. B. Mackenzie, C. Morningstar, and H. Trottier, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 106 12–20, (2002), arXiv:hep-lat/0110175 doi:10.1016/S0920-5632(01)01638-3
168. A Quantum Adiabatic Evolution Algorithm Applied to Random Instances of an NP-Complete Problem, Edward Farhi, Jeffrey Goldstone, Sam Gutmann, Joshua Lapan, Andrew Lundgren, and Daniel Preda, Science 292 (5516) 1057726, (2001), arXiv:quant-ph/0104129 doi:10.1126/science.1057726
169. Quantum Computation by Adiabatic Evolution, Edward Farhi, Jeffrey Goldstone, Sam Gutmann, and Michael Sipser, (2000), arXiv:quant-ph/0001106
170. Dynamical decoupling of open quantum systems, Lorenza Viola, Emanuel Knill, and Seth Lloyd, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 2417–2421, (1999), arXiv:quant-ph/9809071 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.2417
171. A Quantum algorithm providing exponential speed increase for finding eigenvalues and eigenvectors, Daniel S. Abrams, and Seth Lloyd, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 5162–5165, (1999), arXiv:quant-ph/9807070 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.5162
172. Decomposition formulas of exponential operators and Lie exponentials with some applications to quantum mechanics and statistical physics, Masuo Suzuki, J. Math. Phys. 26 (4) 601, (1985), doi:10.1063/1.526596
173. Continuum Limit and Improved Action in Lattice Theories. 1. Principles and $\varphi^4$ Theory, K. Symanzik, Nucl. Phys. B 226 187–204, (1983), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(83)90468-6
174. Simulating physics with computers, Richard P. Feynman, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21 467–488, (1982), doi:10.1007/BF02650179
175. Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife, B. Efron, Annals Statist. 7 (1) 1–26, (1979), doi:10.1214/aos/1176344552
176. Strong Coupling Calculations of Lattice Gauge Theories: (1+1)-Dimensional Exercises, Tom Banks, Leonard Susskind, and John B. Kogut, Phys. Rev. D 13 1043, (1976), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.13.1043
177. Hamiltonian Formulation of Wilson's Lattice Gauge Theories, John B. Kogut, and Leonard Susskind, Phys. Rev. D 11 395–408, (1975), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.11.395
178. Gauge Invariance and Mass. 2., Julian S. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. 128 2425–2429, (1962), doi:10.1103/PhysRev.128.2425
179. On the product of semi-groups of operators, H. F. Trotter, Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 10 (4) 545–551, (1959), doi:10.1090/s0002-9939-1959-0108732-6
180. Modified Spin-Echo Method for Measuring Nuclear Relaxation Times, S. Meiboom, and D. Gill, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 29 (8) 688, (1958), doi:10.1063/1.1716296
181. Effects of Diffusion on Free Precession in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Experiments, H. Y. Carr, and E. M. Purcell, Phys. Rev. 94 (3) 630, (1954), doi:10.1103/PhysRev.94.630
182. About the Pauli exclusion principle, Pascual Jordan, and Eugene P. Wigner, Z. Phys. 47 631–651, (1928), doi:10.1007/BF01331938