1. Generation of genuine entanglement up to 51 superconducting qubits, Sirui Cao, and others, Nature 619 (7971) 738–742, (2023), doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06195-1
2. Evidence for the utility of quantum computing before fault tolerance, Youngseok Kim, and others, Nature 618 (7965) 500–505, (2023), doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06096-3
3. Variational quantum time evolution without the quantum geometric tensor, Julien Gacon, Jannes Nys, Riccardo Rossi, Stefan Woerner, and Giuseppe Carleo, Phys. Rev. Res. 6 (1) 013143, (2024), arXiv:2303.12839 doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.013143
4. Strategies for the determination of the running coupling of (2+1)-dimensional QED with quantum computing, Giuseppe Clemente, Arianna Crippa, and Karl Jansen, Phys. Rev. D 106 (11) 114511, (2022), arXiv:2206.12454 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.114511
5. Dynamical Hadron Formation in Long-Range Interacting Quantum Spin Chains, Joseph Vovrosh, Rick Mukherjee, Alvise Bastianello, and Johannes Knolle, PRX Quantum 3 (4) 040309, (2022), arXiv:2204.05641 doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.3.040309
6. Towards quantum simulations in particle physics and beyond on noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices, Lena Funcke, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Stefan Kühn, Manuel Schneider, Paolo Stornati, and Xiaoyang Wang, Phil. Trans. A. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 380 (2216) 20210062, (2021), arXiv:2110.03809 doi:10.1098/rsta.2021.0062
7. Towards a variational Jordan{\textendash}Lee{\textendash}Preskill quantum algorithm, Junyu Liu, Zimu Li, Han Zheng, Xiao Yuan, and Jinzhao Sun, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 3 (4) 045030, (2022), arXiv:2109.05547 doi:10.1088/2632-2153/aca06b
8. Hardware-efficient variational quantum algorithms for time evolution, Marcello Benedetti, Mattia Fiorentini, and Michael Lubasch, Phys. Rev. Res. 3 (3) 033083, (2021), arXiv:2009.12361 doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.033083
9. Trailhead for quantum simulation of SU(3) Yang-Mills lattice gauge theory in the local multiplet basis, Anthony Ciavarella, Natalie Klco, and Martin J. Savage, Phys. Rev. D 103 (9) 094501, (2021), arXiv:2101.10227 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.094501
10. Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms, Kishor Bharti, and others, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94 (1) 015004, (2022), arXiv:2101.08448 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.94.015004
11. Model-free readout-error mitigation for quantum expectation values, Ewout van den Berg, Zlatko K. Minev, and Kristan Temme, Phys. Rev. A 105 (3) 032620, (2022), arXiv:2012.09738 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.105.032620
12. Variational preparation of finite-temperature states on a quantum computer, R. Sagastizabal, and others, npj Quantum Inf. 7 130, (2021), arXiv:2012.03895 doi:10.1038/s41534-021-00468-1
13. Dimensional Expressivity Analysis of Parametric Quantum Circuits, Lena Funcke, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Stefan Kühn, and Paolo Stornati, Quantum 5 422, (2021), arXiv:2011.03532 doi:10.22331/q-2021-03-29-422
14. Measurement error mitigation in quantum computers through classical bit-flip correction, Lena Funcke, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Stefan Kühn, Paolo Stornati, and Xiaoyang Wang, Phys. Rev. A 105 (6) 062404, (2022), arXiv:2007.03663 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.105.062404
15. Variational quantum Boltzmann machines, Christa Zoufal, Aur\'elien Lucchi, and Stefan Woerner, Quantum Machine Intelligence 3 (1) 7, (2021), arXiv:2006.06004 doi:10.1007/s42484-020-00033-7
16. Practical quantum computation of chemical and nuclear energy levels using quantum imaginary time evolution and Lanczos algorithms, Kübra Yeter-Aydeniz, Raphael C. Pooser, and George Siopsis, npj Quantum Inf. 6 63, (2020), arXiv:1912.06226 doi:10.1038/s41534-020-00290-1
17. Simulating Lattice Gauge Theories within Quantum Technologies, M. C. Ba\~nuls, and others, Eur. Phys. J. D 74 (8) 165, (2020), arXiv:1911.00003 doi:10.1140/epjd/e2020-100571-8
18. Variational ansatz-based quantum simulation of imaginary time evolution, Sam McArdle, Tyson Jones, Suguru Endo, Ying Li, Simon C. Benjamin, and Xiao Yuan, npj Quantum Inf. 5 75, (2019), arXiv:1804.03023 doi:10.1038/s41534-019-0187-2
19. SU(2) non-Abelian gauge field theory in one dimension on digital quantum computers, Natalie Klco, Jesse R. Stryker, and Martin J. Savage, Phys. Rev. D 101 (7) 074512, (2020), arXiv:1908.06935 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.074512
20. Efficient quantum measurement of Pauli operators in the presence of finite sampling error, Ophelia Crawford, Barnaby van Straaten, Daochen Wang, Thomas Parks, Earl Campbell, and Stephen Brierley, Quantum 5 385, (2021), arXiv:1908.06942 doi:10.22331/q-2021-01-20-385
21. Determining eigenstates and thermal states on a quantum computer using quantum imaginary time evolution, Mario Motta, Chong Sun, Adrian Teck Keng Tan, Matthew J. O' Rourke, Erika Ye, Austin J. Minnich, Fernando G. S. L. Brand\~ao, and Garnet Kin-Lic Chan, Nature Phys. 16 205–210, (2019), arXiv:1901.07653 doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0704-4
22. Theory of variational quantum simulation, Xiao Yuan, Suguru Endo, Qi Zhao, Ying Li, and Simon C. Benjamin, Quantum 3 191, (2019), arXiv:1812.08767 doi:10.22331/q-2019-10-07-191
23. Variational Thermal Quantum Simulation via Thermofield Double States, Jingxiang Wu, and Timothy H. Hsieh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (22) 220502, (2019), arXiv:1811.11756 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.220502
24. Confined Quasiparticle Dynamics in Long-Range Interacting Quantum Spin Chains, Fangli Liu, Rex Lundgren, Paraj Titum, Guido Pagano, Jiehang Zhang, Christopher Monroe, and Alexey V. Gorshkov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (15) 150601, (2019), arXiv:1810.02365 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.150601
25. Quantum computational chemistry, Sam McArdle, Suguru Endo, Alan Aspuru-Guzik, Simon C. Benjamin, and Xiao Yuan, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92 (1) 015003, (2020), arXiv:1808.10402 doi:10.1103/revmodphys.92.015003
26. Practical Quantum Error Mitigation for Near-Future Applications, Suguru Endo, Simon C. Benjamin, and Ying Li, Phys. Rev. X 8 (3) 031027, (2018), arXiv:1712.09271 doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.8.031027
27. Quantum-classical computation of Schwinger model dynamics using quantum computers, N. Klco, E. F. Dumitrescu, A. J. McCaskey, T. D. Morris, R. C. Pooser, M. Sanz, E. Solano, P. Lougovski, and M. J. Savage, Phys. Rev. A 98 (3) 032331, (2018), arXiv:1803.03326 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.98.032331
28. Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond, John Preskill, Quantum 2 79, (2018), arXiv:1801.00862 doi:10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79
29. Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets, Abhinav Kandala, Antonio Mezzacapo, Kristan Temme, Maika Takita, Markus Brink, Jerry M. Chow, and Jay M. Gambetta, Nature 549 (7671) 242–246, (2017), arXiv:1704.05018 doi:10.1038/nature23879
30. Error Mitigation for Short-Depth Quantum Circuits, Kristan Temme, Sergey Bravyi, and Jay M. Gambetta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (18) 180509, (2017), arXiv:1612.02058 doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.180509
31. Efficient Variational Quantum Simulator Incorporating Active Error Minimization, Ying Li, and Simon C. Benjamin, Phys. Rev. X 7 (2) 021050, (2017), arXiv:1611.09301 doi:10.1103/physrevx.7.021050
32. Quantum algorithms for Gibbs sampling and hitting-time estimation, Anirban Narayan Chowdhury, and Rolando D. Somma, Quant. Inf. Comput. 17 (1-2) 0041–0064, (2017), arXiv:1603.02940 doi:10.26421/QIC17.1-2-3
33. Computational Analysis of 3D Ising Model Using Metropolis Algorithms, A. F. Sonsin, M. R. Cortes, D. R. Nunes, J. V. Gomes, and R. S. Costa, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 630 (1) 012057, (2015), doi:10.1088/1742-6596/630/1/012057
34. Emergence and Frustration of Magnetism with Variable-Range Interactions in a Quantum Simulator, R. Islam, C. Senko, W. C. Campbell, S. Korenblit, J. Smith, A. Lee, E. E. Edwards, C. C. J. Wang, J. K. Freericks, and C. Monroe, Science 340 (6132) 583–587, (2013), arXiv:1210.0142 doi:10.1126/science.1232296
35. Minimally entangled typical thermal state algorithms, Steven R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, New J. Phys. 12 (5) 055026, (2010), doi:10.1088/1367-2630/12/5/055026
36. Minimally Entangled Typical Quantum States at Finite Temperature, Steven R. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (19) 190601, (2009), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.190601
37. Criticality, the area law, and the computational power of PEPS, F. Verstraete, M. M. Wolf, D. Perez-Garcia, and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 220601, (2006), arXiv:quant-ph/0601075 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.220601
38. On the problem of equilibration and the computation of correlation functions on a quantum computer, Barbara M. Terhal, and David P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. A 61 22301, (2000), arXiv:quant-ph/9810063 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.61.22301
39. Two-dimensional Ising model as a soluble problem of many fermions, T. D. Schultz, D. C. Mattis, and Elliott H. Lieb, Rev. Mod. Phys. 36 856–871, (1964), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.36.856