1. A roadmap to cosmological parameter analysis with third-order shear statistics - II. Analytic covariance estimate, Laila Linke, Sven Heydenreich, Pierre A. Burger, and Peter Schneider, Astron. Astrophys. 672 A185, (2023), arXiv:2212.04485 doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245652
2. It takes two to know one: Computing accurate one-point PDF covariances from effective two-point PDF models, Cora Uhlemann, Oliver Friedrich, Aoife Boyle, Alex Gough, Alexandre Barthelemy, Francis Bernardeau, and Sandrine Codis, Open J. Astrophys. 6 2023, (2022), arXiv:2210.07819 doi:10.21105/astro.2210.07819
3. A roadmap to cosmological parameter analysis with third-order shear statistics - I. Modelling and validation, Sven Heydenreich, Laila Linke, Pierre Burger, and Peter Schneider, Astron. Astrophys. 672 A44, (2023), arXiv:2208.11686 doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244820
4. KiDS-1000 cosmology: Constraints from density split statistics, Pierre A. Burger, and others, Astron. Astrophys. 669 A69, (2023), arXiv:2208.02171 doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244673
5. Non-Gaussian modelling and statistical denoising of Planck dust polarisation full-sky maps using scattering transforms, J. -M. Delouis, E. Allys, E. Gauvrit, and F. Boulanger, Astron. Astrophys. 668 A122, (2022), arXiv:2207.12527 doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244566
6. Detecting the non-Gaussianity of the 21-cm signal during reionization with the wavelet scattering transform, Bradley Greig, Yuan-Sen Ting, and Alexander A. Kaurov, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 519 (4) 5288–5303, (2023), arXiv:2207.09082 doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3822
7. Exploration of 3D wavelet scattering transform coefficients for line-intensity mapping measurements, Dongwoo T. Chung, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 517 (2) 1625–1639, (2022), arXiv:2207.06383 doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2662
8. Towards a full wCDM map-based analysis for weak lensing surveys, Dominik Zürcher, Janis Fluri, Virginia Ajani, Silvan Fischbacher, Alexandre Refregier, and Tomasz Kacprzak, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 525 (1) 761–784, (2023), arXiv:2206.01450 doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2212
9. Going beyond the galaxy power spectrum: An analysis of BOSS data with wavelet scattering transforms, Georgios Valogiannis, and Cora Dvorkin, Phys. Rev. D 106 (10) 103509, (2022), arXiv:2204.13717 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.103509
10. Map-based cosmology inference with lognormal cosmic shear maps, Supranta Sarma Boruah, Eduardo Rozo, and Pier Fiedorowicz, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 516 (3) 4111–4122, (2022), arXiv:2204.13216 doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2508
11. Persistent homology in cosmic shear - II. A tomographic analysis of DES-Y1, Sven Heydenreich, Benjamin Brück, Pierre Burger, Joachim Harnois-D\'eraps, Sandra Unruh, Tiago Castro, Klaus Dolag, and Nicolas Martinet, Astron. Astrophys. 667 A125, (2022), arXiv:2204.11831 doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243868
12. Extremely expensive likelihoods: a variational-Bayes solution for precision cosmology, Matteo Rizzato, and Elena Sellentin, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 521 (1) 1152–1161, (2023), arXiv:2203.05009 doi:10.1093/mnras/stad638
13. How to quantify fields or textures? A guide to the scattering transform, Sihao Cheng, and Brice M\'enard, (2021), arXiv:2112.01288
14. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmology with moments of weak lensing mass maps, M. Gatti, and others, Phys. Rev. D 106 (8) 083509, (2022), arXiv:2110.10141 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.083509
15. Towards an optimal estimation of cosmological parameters with the wavelet scattering transform, Georgios Valogiannis, and Cora Dvorkin, Phys. Rev. D 105 (10) 103534, (2022), arXiv:2108.07821 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.103534
16. Lifting weak lensing degeneracies with a field-based likelihood, Natalia Porqueres, Alan Heavens, Daniel Mortlock, and Guilhem Lavaux, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 509 (3) 3194–3202, (2021), arXiv:2108.04825 doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3234
17. Numerical complexity of the joint nulled weak-lensing probability distribution function, Alexandre Barthelemy, Francis Bernardeau, Sandrine Codis, and Cora Uhlemann, Phys. Rev. D 105 (4) 043537, (2022), arXiv:2106.11632 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.043537
18. Fast estimation of aperture-mass statistics {\textendash} II. Detectability of higher order statistics in current and future surveys, Lucas Porth, and Robert E. Smith, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 508 (3) 3474–3494, (2021), arXiv:2106.04594 doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2819
19. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmology from cosmic shear and robustness to data calibration, A. Amon, and others, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2) 023514, (2022), arXiv:2105.13543 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.023514
20. Weak lensing scattering transform: dark energy and neutrino mass sensitivity, Sihao Cheng (程思浩), and Brice M\'enard, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 507 (1) 1012–1020, (2021), arXiv:2103.09247 doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2102
21. In the realm of the Hubble tension{\textemdash}a review of solutions, Eleonora Di Valentino, Olga Mena, Supriya Pan, Luca Visinelli, Weiqiang Yang, Alessandro Melchiorri, David F. Mota, Adam G. Riess, and Joseph Silk, Class. Quant. Grav. 38 (15) 153001, (2021), arXiv:2103.01183 doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac086d
22. Impact of baryons in cosmic shear analyses with tomographic aperture mass statistics, Nicolas Martinet, Tiago Castro, Joachim Harnois-D\'eraps, Eric Jullo, Carlo Giocoli, and Klaus Dolag, Astron. Astrophys. 648 A115, (2021), arXiv:2012.09614 doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202040155
23. Nuw CDM cosmology from the weak-lensing convergence PDF, Aoife Boyle, Cora Uhlemann, Oliver Friedrich, Alexandre Barthelemy, Sandrine Codis, Francis Bernardeau, Carlo Giocoli, and Marco Baldi, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 505 (2) 2886–2902, (2021), arXiv:2012.07771 doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1381
24. Probability distribution function of the aperture mass field with large deviation theory, Alexandre Barthelemy, Sandrine Codis, and Francis Bernardeau, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 503 (4) 5204–5222, (2021), arXiv:2012.03831 doi:10.1093/mnras/stab818
25. Cosmic shear cosmology beyond two-point statistics: a combined peak count and correlation function analysis of DES-Y1, Joachim Harnois-D\'eraps, Nicolas Martinet, Tiago Castro, Klaus Dolag, Benjamin Giblin, Catherine Heymans, Hendrik Hildebrandt, and Qianli Xia, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 506 (2) 1623–1650, (2021), arXiv:2012.02777 doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1623
26. Higher-order statistics of shear field via a machine learning approach, Carolina Parroni, \'Edouard Tollet, Vincenzo F. Cardone, Roberto Maoli, and Roberto Scaramella, Astron. Astrophys. 645 A123, (2021), arXiv:2011.10438 doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038715
27. Probing dark energy with tomographic weak-lensing aperture mass statistics, Nicolas Martinet, Joachim Harnois-D\'eraps, Eric Jullo, and Peter Schneider, Astron. Astrophys. 646 A62, (2021), arXiv:2010.07376 doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039679
28. Self-calibration of weak lensing systematic effects using combined two- and three-point statistics, Susan Pyne, and Benjamin Joachimi, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 503 (2) 2300–2317, (2021), arXiv:2010.00614 doi:10.1093/mnras/stab413
29. Accurate analytic model for the weak lensing convergence one-point probability distribution function and its autocovariance, Leander Thiele, J. Colin Hill, and Kendrick M. Smith, Phys. Rev. D 102 (12) 123545, (2020), arXiv:2009.06547 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.123545
30. KiDS-1000 Cosmology: Multi-probe weak gravitational lensing and spectroscopic galaxy clustering constraints, Catherine Heymans, and others, Astron. Astrophys. 646 A140, (2021), arXiv:2007.15632 doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039063
31. Persistent homology in cosmic shear: constraining parameters with topological data analysis, Sven Heydenreich, Benjamin Brück, and Joachim Harnois-D\'eraps, Astron. Astrophys. 648 A74, (2021), arXiv:2007.13724 doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039048
32. A new approach to observational cosmology using the scattering transform, Sihao Cheng, Yuan-Sen Ting, Brice M\'enard, and Joan Bruna, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 499 (4) 5902–5914, (2020), arXiv:2006.08561 doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3165
33. Fast estimation of aperture-mass statistics I: aperture mass variance and an application to the CFHTLenS data, Lucas Porth, Robert E. Smith, Patrick Simon, Laura Marian, and Stefan Hilbert, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 499 (2) 2474–2492, (2020), arXiv:2006.08665 doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2900
34. Constraining neutrino masses with weak-lensing multiscale peak counts, Virginia Ajani, Austin Peel, Valeria Pettorino, Jean-Luc Starck, Zack Li, and Jia Liu, Phys. Rev. D 102 (10) 103531, (2020), arXiv:2001.10993 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.103531
35. Going deep with Minkowski functionals of convergence maps, Carolina Parroni, Vincenzo F. Cardone, Roberto Maoli, and Roberto Scaramella, Astron. Astrophys. 633 A71, (2020), arXiv:1911.06243 doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935988
36. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: cosmology with moments of weak lensing mass maps {\textendash} validation on simulations, M. Gatti, and others, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 498 (3) 4060–4087, (2020), arXiv:1911.05568 doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2680
37. The Accuracy of Weak Lensing Simulations, Stefan Hilbert, and others, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 493 (1) 305–319, (2020), arXiv:1910.10625 doi:10.1093/mnras/staa281
38. Euclid preparation. VII. Forecast validation for Euclid cosmological probes, A. Blanchard, and others, Astron. Astrophys. 642 A191, (2020), arXiv:1910.09273 doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038071
39. Euclid: Reconstruction of Weak Lensing mass maps for non-Gaussianity studies, S. Pires, and others, Astron. Astrophys. 638 A141, (2020), arXiv:1910.03106 doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936865
40. Optimizing simulation parameters for weak lensing analyses involving non-Gaussian observables, Jos\'e Manuel Zorrilla Matilla, Stefan Waterval, and Zolt\'an Haiman, Astron. J. 159 (6) 284, (2020), arXiv:1909.12345 doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab8f8c
41. A gravitational lensing detection of filamentary structures connecting luminous red galaxies, Qianli Xia, and others, Astron. Astrophys. 633 A89, (2020), arXiv:1909.05852 doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936678
42. A nulling strategy for modelling lensing convergence in cones with large deviation theory, A. Barthelemy, S. Codis, C. Uhlemann, F. Bernardeau, and R. Gavazzi, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 492 (3) 3420–3439, (2020), arXiv:1909.02615 doi:10.1093/mnras/staa053
43. Cosmic Shear Covariance Matrix in $w$CDM: Cosmology Matters, Joachim Harnois-Deraps, Benjamin Giblin, and Benjamin Joachimi, Astron. Astrophys. 631 A160, (2019), arXiv:1905.06454 doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935912
44. Non-Gaussianity in the Weak Lensing Correlation Function Likelihood -- Implications for Cosmological Parameter Biases, Chien-Hao Lin, Joachim Harnois-D\'eraps, Tim Eifler, Taylor Pospisil, Rachel Mandelbaum, Ann B. Lee, and Sukhdeep Singh, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 499 (2) 2977–2993, (2020), arXiv:1905.03779 doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2948
45. Minkowski functionals of convergence maps and the lensing figure of merit, Martina Vicinanza, Vincenzo F. Cardone, Roberto Maoli, Roberto Scaramella, Xinzhong Er, and Ismael Tereno, Phys. Rev. D 99 (4) 043534, (2019), arXiv:1905.00410 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.043534
46. Euclid Preparation. IV. Impact of undetected galaxies on weak-lensing shear measurements, N. Martinet, and others, Astron. Astrophys. 627 A59, (2019), arXiv:1902.00044 doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935187
47. Constraining neutrino mass with the tomographic weak lensing one-point probability distribution function and power spectrum, Jia Liu, and Mathew S. Madhavacheril, Phys. Rev. D 99 (8) 083508, (2019), arXiv:1809.10747 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.083508
48. Fast and easy super-sample covariance of large scale structure observables, Fabien Lacasa, and Julien Grain, Astron. Astrophys. 624 A61, (2019), arXiv:1809.05437 doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834343
49. Euclid preparation: II. The EuclidEmulator -- A tool to compute the cosmology dependence of the nonlinear matter power spectrum, Mischa Knabenhans, and others, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 484 5509–5529, (2019), arXiv:1809.04695 doi:10.1093/mnras/stz197
50. Weak Lensing Light-Cones in Modified Gravity simulations with and without Massive Neutrinos, Carlo Giocoli, Marco Baldi, and Lauro Moscardini, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 481 (2) 2813–2828, (2018), arXiv:1806.04681 doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2465
51. Breaking degeneracies in modified gravity with higher (than 2nd) order weak-lensing statistics, Austin Peel, Valeria Pettorino, Carlo Giocoli, Jean-Luc Starck, and Marco Baldi, Astron. Astrophys. 619 A38, (2018), arXiv:1805.05146 doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833481
52. Cosmological Simulations for Combined-Probe Analyses: Covariance and Neighbour-Exclusion Bias, J. Harnois-D\'eraps, and others, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 481 (1) 1337–1367, (2018), arXiv:1805.04511 doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2319
53. Weak-lensing peaks in simulated light cones: investigating the coupling between dark matter and dark energy, Carlo Giocoli, Lauro Moscardini, Marco Baldi, Massimo Meneghetti, and Robert B. Metcalf, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 478 (4) 5436–5448, (2018), arXiv:1801.01886 doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1312
54. The effect of baryons in the cosmological lensing PDFs, Tiago Castro, Miguel Quartin, Carlo Giocoli, Stefano Borgani, and Klaus Dolag, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 478 (1) 1305–1325, (2018), arXiv:1711.10017 doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1117
55. Density Split Statistics: Joint Model of Counts and Lensing in Cells, O. Friedrich, and others, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2) 023508, (2018), arXiv:1710.05162 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.023508
56. Density Split Statistics: Cosmological Constraints from Counts and Lensing in Cells in DES Y1 and SDSS Data, D. Gruen, and others, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2) 023507, (2018), arXiv:1710.05045 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.023507
57. KiDS-450: cosmological constraints from weak-lensing peak statistics {\textendash} II: Inference from shear peaks using N-body simulations, Nicolas Martinet, and others, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 474 (1) 712–730, (2018), arXiv:1709.07678 doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2793
58. KiDS+GAMA: cosmology constraints from a joint analysis of cosmic shear, galaxy{\textendash}galaxy lensing, and angular clustering, Edo van Uitert, and others, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 476 (4) 4662–4689, (2018), arXiv:1706.05004 doi:10.1093/mnras/sty551
59. Cluster mass calibration at high redshift: HST weak lensing analysis of 13 distant galaxy clusters from the South Pole Telescope Sunyaev{\textendash}Zel'dovich Survey, T. Schrabback, and others, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 474 (2) 2635–2678, (2018), arXiv:1611.03866 doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2666
60. Cosmological constraints from the convergence 1-point probability distribution, Kenneth Patton, Jonathan Blazek, Klaus Honscheid, Eric Huff, Peter Melchior, Ashley J. Ross, and Eric Suchyta, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 472 (1) 439–446, (2017), arXiv:1611.01486 doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1626
61. The DESI Experiment Part I: Science,Targeting, and Survey Design, Amir Aghamousa, and others, (2016), arXiv:1611.00036
62. Quantifying lost information due to covariance matrix estimation in parameter inference, Elena Sellentin, and Alan F. Heavens, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 464 (4) 4658–4665, (2017), arXiv:1609.00504 doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2697
63. The 2-degree Field Lensing Survey: design and clustering measurements, Chris Blake, and others, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 462 (4) 4240–4265, (2016), arXiv:1608.02668 doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1990
64. KiDS-450: Cosmological parameter constraints from tomographic weak gravitational lensing, H. Hildebrandt, and others, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 465 1454, (2017), arXiv:1606.05338 doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2805
65. The COSMOS2015 Catalog: Exploring the 1{\ensuremath{<}} z{\ensuremath{<}} 6 Universe with half a million galaxies, C. Laigle, and others, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 224 (2) 24, (2016), arXiv:1604.02350 doi:10.3847/0067-0049/224/2/24
66. A new model to predict weak-lensing peak counts III. Filtering technique comparisons, Chieh-An Lin, Martin Kilbinger, and Sandrine Pires, Astron. Astrophys. 593 A88, (2016), arXiv:1603.06773 doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628565
67. Cosmology constraints from shear peak statistics in Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data, T. Kacprzak, and others, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 463 (4) 3653–3673, (2016), arXiv:1603.05040 doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2070
68. Improving lognormal models for cosmological fields, Henrique S. Xavier, Filipe B. Abdalla, and Benjamin Joachimi, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 459 (4) 3693–3710, (2016), arXiv:1602.08503 doi:10.1093/mnras/stw874
69. Dark Energy Versus Modified Gravity, Austin Joyce, Lucas Lombriser, and Fabian Schmidt, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 66 95–122, (2016), arXiv:1601.06133 doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-102115-044553
70. CFHTLenS revisited: assessing concordance with Planck including astrophysical systematics, Shahab Joudaki, and others, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 465 (2) 2033–2052, (2017), arXiv:1601.05786 doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2665
71. Weak lensing of large scale structure in the presence of screening, Nicolas Tessore, Hans A. Winther, R. Benton Metcalf, Pedro G. Ferreira, and Carlo Giocoli, JCAP 10 036, (2015), arXiv:1508.04011 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/10/036
72. Emulating the CFHTLenS Weak Lensing data: Cosmological Constraints from moments and Minkowski functionals, Andrea Petri, Jia Liu, Zoltan Haiman, Morgan May, Lam Hui, and Jan M. Kratochvil, Phys. Rev. D 91 (10) 103511, (2015), arXiv:1503.06214 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.103511
73. Wide-Field InfrarRed Survey Telescope-Astrophysics Focused Telescope Assets WFIRST-AFTA 2015 Report, D. Spergel, and others, (2015), arXiv:1503.03757
74. Cosmological constraints from Subaru weak lensing cluster counts, Takashi Hamana, Junya Sakurai, Michitaro Koike, and Lance Miller, Publ. Astron. Soc. Jap. 67 (3) 34, (2015), arXiv:1503.01851 doi:10.1093/pasj/psv034
75. Disentangling dark sector models using weak lensing statistics, Carlo Giocoli, R. Benton Metcalf, Marco Baldi, Massimo Meneghetti, Lauro Moscardini, and Margarita Petkova, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 452 (3) 2757–2772, (2015), arXiv:1502.03442 doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1473
76. Planck 2015 results. I. Overview of products and scientific results, R. Adam, and others, Astron. Astrophys. 594 A1, (2016), arXiv:1502.01582 doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527101
77. Cosmology with the SPHEREX All-Sky Spectral Survey, Olivier Dor\'e, and others, (2014), arXiv:1412.4872
78. Cosmology with cosmic shear observations: a review, Martin Kilbinger, Rept. Prog. Phys. 78 086901, (2015), arXiv:1411.0115 doi:10.1088/0034-4885/78/8/086901
79. Simulations of weak gravitational lensing {\textendash} II. Including finite support effects in cosmic shear covariance matrices, Joachim Harnois-D\'eraps, and Ludovic van Waerbeke, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 450 (3) 2857–2873, (2015), arXiv:1406.0543 doi:10.1093/mnras/stv794
80. Modified Gravity-GADGET: A new code for cosmological hydrodynamical simulations of modified gravity models, Ewald Puchwein, Marco Baldi, and Volker Springel, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 436 348, (2013), arXiv:1305.2418 doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1575
81. The Coyote Universe Extended: Precision Emulation of the Matter Power Spectrum, Katrin Heitmann, Earl Lawrence, Juliana Kwan, Salman Habib, and David Higdon, Astrophys. J. 780 111, (2014), arXiv:1304.7849 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/780/1/111
82. CFHTLenS: Mapping the Large Scale Structure with Gravitational Lensing, Ludovic Van Waerbeke, and others, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 433 3373, (2013), arXiv:1303.1806 doi:10.1093/mnras/stt971
83. Effect of baryonic feedback on two- and three-point shear statistics: prospects for detection and improved modelling, Elisabetta Semboloni, Henk Hoekstra, and Joop Schaye, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 434 148, (2013), arXiv:1210.7303 doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1013
84. Revising the Halofit Model for the Nonlinear Matter Power Spectrum, Ryuichi Takahashi, Masanori Sato, Takahiro Nishimichi, Atsushi Taruya, and Masamune Oguri, Astrophys. J. 761 152, (2012), arXiv:1208.2701 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/761/2/152
85. High Performance P3M N-body code: CUBEP3M, Joachim Harnois-Deraps, Ue-Li Pen, Ilian T. Iliev, Hugh Merz, J. D. Emberson, and Vincent Desjacques, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 436 540, (2013), arXiv:1208.5098 doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1591
86. Extragalactic science, cosmology, and Galactic archaeology with the Subaru Prime Focus Spectrograph, Richard Ellis, and others, Publ. Astron. Soc. Jap. 66 (1) R1, (2014), arXiv:1206.0737 doi:10.1093/pasj/pst019
87. Fast Calculation of the Weak Lensing Aperture Mass Statistic, Adrienne Leonard, Sandrine Pires, and Jean-Luc Starck, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 423 3405, (2012), arXiv:1204.4293 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21133.x
88. Measuring primordial non-Gaussianity with weak-lensing surveys, Stefan Hilbert, Laura Marian, Robert E. Smith, and Vincent Desjacques, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 426 2870, (2012), arXiv:1204.4530 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21841.x
89. Euclid Definition Study Report, R. Laureijs, and others, (2011), arXiv:1110.3193
90. Probing Cosmology with Weak Lensing Minkowski Functionals, Jan M. Kratochvil, Eugene A. Lim, Sheng Wang, Zoltan Haiman, Morgan May, and Kevin Huffenberger, Phys. Rev. D 85 103513, (2012), arXiv:1109.6334 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.103513
91. The persistent cosmic web and its filamentary structure I: Theory and implementation, Thierry Sousbie, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 414 350, (2011), arXiv:1009.4015 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18394.x
92. Cosmology with the shear-peak statistics, J. P. Dietrich, and J. Hartlap, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 402 1049, (2010), arXiv:0906.3512 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15948.x
93. Fisher Matrices and Confidence Ellipses: A Quick-Start Guide and Software, Dan Coe, (2009), arXiv:0906.4123
94. The cosmology dependence of weak lensing cluster counts, Laura Marian, Robert E. Smith, and Gary M. Bernstein, Astrophys. J. Lett. 698 L33–L36, (2009), arXiv:0811.1991 doi:10.1088/0004-637X/698/1/L33
95. Dark energy constraints and correlations with systematics from CFHTLS weak lensing, SNLS supernovae Ia and WMAP5, M. Kilbinger, and others, Astron. Astrophys. 497 677, (2009), arXiv:0810.5129 doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200811247
96. LSST: from Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products, \vZeljko Ivezi\'c, and others, Astrophys. J. 873 (2) 111, (2019), arXiv:0805.2366 doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c
97. Very weak lensing in the CFHTLS Wide: Cosmology from cosmic shear in the linear regime, L. Fu, and others, Astron. Astrophys. 479 9–25, (2008), arXiv:0712.0884 doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078522
98. Report of the Dark Energy Task Force, Andreas Albrecht, and others, (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0609591
99. Why your model parameter confidences might be too optimistic: Unbiased estimation of the inverse covariance matrix, J. Hartlap, Patrick Simon, and P. Schneider, Astron. Astrophys. 464 399, (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0608064 doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066170
100. GaBoDS: The Garching-Bonn Deep Survey. 9.. A sample of 158 shear-selected mass concentration candidates, Mischa Schirmer, Thomas Erben, Marco Hetterscheidt, and Peter Schneider, Astron. Astrophys. 462 875, (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0607022 doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20065955
101. Weak lensing survey of galaxy clusters in the CFHTLS Deep, Raphael Gavazzi, and Genevieve Soucail, Astron. Astrophys. 462 459, (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0605591 doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20065677
102. Searching for galaxy clusters using the aperture mass statistics in 50 VLT fields, Marco Hetterscheidt, T. Erben, P. Schneider, R. Maoli, Ludovic Van Waerbeke, and Y. Mellier, Astron. Astrophys. 442 43, (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0504635 doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053339
103. Searching for massive clusters in weak lensing surveys, Takashi Hamana, Masahiro Takada, and Naoki Yoshida, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 350 893, (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0310607 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07691.x
104. The Three - point correlation function of cosmic shear. 2. Relation to the bispectrum of the projected mass density and generalized third - order aperture measures, Peter Schneider, Martin Kilbinger, and Marco Lombardi, Astron. Astrophys. 431 9–25, (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0308328 doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20034217
105. The skewness of the aperture mass statistic, Micael Jarvis, G. Bernstein, and B. Jain, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 352 338–352, (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0307393 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07926.x
106. The Three-point correlation function of cosmic shear: I. The Natural components, Peter Schneider, and Marco Lombardi, Astron. Astrophys. 397 809–818, (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0207454 doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20021541
107. Weak-lensing halo numbers and dark-matter profiles, Matthias Bartelmann, Lindsay King, and Peter Schneider, Astron. Astrophys. 378 361, (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0103465 doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011199
108. Discriminating weak lensing from intrinsic spin correlations using the curl-gradient decomposition, Robert G. Crittenden, Priyamvada Natarajan, Ue-Li Pen, and Tom Theuns, Astrophys. J. 568 20–27, (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0012336 doi:10.1086/338838
109. Statistics of weak lensing at small angular scales: analytical predictions for lower order moments, Dipak Munshi, and Bhuvnesh Jain, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 322 107, (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/9912330 doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04069.x
110. Efficient computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FRW models, Antony Lewis, Anthony Challinor, and Anthony Lasenby, Astrophys. J. 538 473–476, (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9911177 doi:10.1086/309179
111. The nonGaussian tail of cosmic-shear statistics, Guido Kruse, and Peter Schneider, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 318 321, (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9904192 doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03389.x
112. Measurements of $\Omega$ and $\Lambda$ from 42 High Redshift Supernovae, S. Perlmutter, and others, Astrophys. J. 517 565–586, (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9812133 doi:10.1086/307221
113. Statistics of dark matter haloes expected from weak lensing surveys, Guido Kruse, and Peter Schneider, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 302 821, (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9806071 doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02195.x
114. Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant, Adam G. Riess, and others, Astron. J. 116 1009–1038, (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9805201 doi:10.1086/300499
115. A New finite-field mass reconstruction algorithm, Stella Seitz, and Peter Schneider, Astron. Astrophys. 374 740–745, (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/9802051 doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20010493
116. Minkowski functionals used in the morphological analysis of cosmic microwave background anisotropy maps, Jens Schmalzing, and Krzysztof M. Gorski, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 297 355, (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9710185 doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01467.x
117. Baryonic features in the matter transfer function, Daniel J. Eisenstein, and Wayne Hu, Astrophys. J. 496 605, (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9709112 doi:10.1086/305424
118. A new measure for cosmic shear, Peter Schneider, Ludovic van Waerbeke, Bhuvnesh Jain, and Guido Kruse, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 296 873–892, (1998), arXiv:astro-ph/9708143 doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01422.x
119. Karhunen-Loeve eigenvalue problems in cosmology: How should we tackle large data sets?, Max Tegmark, Andy Taylor, and Alan Heavens, Astrophys. J. 480 22, (1997), arXiv:astro-ph/9603021 doi:10.1086/303939
120. Eigenmode analysis of galaxy redshift surveys I. theory and methods, Michael S. Vogeley, and Alexander S. Szalay, Astrophys. J. 465 34–53, (1996), arXiv:astro-ph/9601185 doi:10.1086/177399
121. Cluster mass estimates from weak lensing, Matthias Bartelmann, Astron. Astrophys. 303 643, (1995), arXiv:astro-ph/9412051
122. Cluster lens reconstruction using only observed local data - an improved finite-field inversion technique, Stella Seitz, and Peter Schneider, Astron. Astrophys. 305 383, (1996), arXiv:astro-ph/9503096
123. Gravitational lensing of distant field galaxies by rich clusters: I. - faint galaxy redshift distributions, Ian Smail, Richard S. Ellis, and Michael J. Fitchett, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 270 245, (1994), arXiv:astro-ph/9402048 doi:10.1093/mnras/270.2.245
124. Mapping the dark matter with weak gravitational lensing, Nick Kaiser, and Gordon Squires, Astrophys. J. 404 441–450, (1993), doi:10.1086/172297