Light-quark connected intermediate-window contributions to the muon <math display="inline"><mi>g</mi><mo>-</mo><mn>2</mn></math> hadronic vacuum polarization from lattice QCD
INSPIRE: 2625158
arXiv: 2301.08274
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.107.114514
Authors: Bazavov, Alexei, Davies, Christine, DeTar, Carleton, El-Khadra, Aida X., Gámiz, Elvira, Gottlieb, Steven, Jay, William I., Jeong, Hwancheol, Kronfeld, Andreas S., Lahert, Shaun, Lepage, G. Peter, Lynch, Michael, Lytle, Andrew T., Mackenzie, Paul B., McNeile, Craig, Neil, Ethan T., Peterson, Curtis T., Ray, Gaurav, Simone, James N., Van de Water, Ruth S., Vaquero, Alejandro
Submitted: 19 January 2023
Subjects:
- hep-lat
- hep-ph
- Lattice
- Phenomenology-HEP
Journal reference: Phys.Rev.D 107 (11) 114514 (2023)
Citations: 121
Abstract
We present a lattice-QCD calculation of the light-quark connected contribution to window observables associated with the leading-order hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, <math display="inline"><msubsup><mi>a</mi><mi>μ</mi><mrow><mi>HVP</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>LO</mi></mrow></msubsup></math>. We employ the MILC Collaboration’s isospin-symmetric QCD gauge-field ensembles, which contain four flavors of dynamical highly improved staggered quarks with four lattice spacings between <math display="inline"><mrow><mi>a</mi><mo>≈</mo><mn>0.06</mn><mi>–</mi><mn>0.15</mn><mtext> </mtext><mtext> </mtext><mi>fm</mi></mrow></math> and close-to-physical quark masses. We consider several effective-field-theory-based schemes for finite volume and other lattice corrections and combine the results via Bayesian model averaging to obtain robust estimates of the associated systematic uncertainties. After unblinding, our final results for the intermediate and “W2” windows are <math display="inline"><mrow><msubsup><mrow><mi>a</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>μ</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>l</mi><mi>l</mi><mo>,</mo><mi mathvariant="normal">W</mi></mrow></msubsup><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mtext>conn</mtext><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mo>=</mo><mn>206.6</mn><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mn>1.0</mn><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mo>×</mo><msup><mrow><mn>10</mn></mrow><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn>10</mn></mrow></msup></mrow></math> and <math display="inline"><msubsup><mi>a</mi><mi>μ</mi><mrow><mi>l</mi><mi>l</mi><mo>,</mo><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">W</mi><mn>2</mn></mrow></mrow></msubsup><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mtext>conn</mtext><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mo>=</mo><mn>100.7</mn><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mn>3.2</mn><mo stretchy="false">)</mo><mo>×</mo><msup><mn>10</mn><mrow><mo>-</mo><mn>10</mn></mrow></msup></math>, respectively.