1. **Learning trivializing flows**, David Albandea, Luigi Del Debbio, Pilar Hern\\'andez, Richard Kenway, J\. Marsh Rossney, and Alberto Ramos, *Eur\. Phys\. J\. C* **83** (7) 676 (2023) [arXiv:2302.08408](https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.08408) [doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11838-8](https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11838-8)

2. **Fourier\-flow model generating Feynman paths**, Shile Chen, Oleh Savchuk, Shiqi Zheng, Baoyi Chen, Horst Stoecker, Lingxiao Wang, and Kai Zhou, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **107** (5) 056001 (2023) [arXiv:2211.03470](https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.03470) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.056001](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.056001)

3. **Deformation Theory of Boltzmann Distributions**, B\\'alint M\\'at\\'e, and Fran\\ccois Fleuret, *36th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems\}: \{Workshop on Machine Learning and the Physical Sciences* (2022) [arXiv:2210.13772](https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.13772)

4. **Stochastic normalizing flows for lattice field theory**, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, Alessandro Nada, and Marco Panero, *PoS* **LATTICE2022** 005 (2023) [arXiv:2210.03139](https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.03139) [doi:10.22323/1.430.0005](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.430.0005)

5. **GomalizingFlow\.jl: A Julia package for Flow\-based sampling algorithm for lattice field theory**, Akio Tomiya, and Satoshi Terasaki (2022) [arXiv:2208.08903](https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.08903)

6. **Sampling QCD field configurations with gauge\-equivariant flow models**, Ryan Abbott, and others, *PoS* **LATTICE2022** 036 (2023) [arXiv:2208.03832](https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.03832) [doi:10.22323/1.430.0036](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.430.0036)

7. **Gauge\-equivariant flow models for sampling in lattice field theories with pseudofermions**, Ryan Abbott, and others, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **106** (7) 074506 (2022) [arXiv:2207.08945](https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.08945) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074506](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074506)

8. **Conditional normalizing flow for Markov chain Monte\~Carlo sampling in the critical region of lattice field theory**, Ankur Singha, Dipankar Chakrabarti, and Vipul Arora, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **107** (1) 014512 (2023) [arXiv:2207.00980](https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.00980) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.014512](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.014512)

9. **Learning lattice quantum field theories with equivariant continuous flows**, Mathis Gerdes, Pim de Haan, Corrado Rainone, Roberto Bondesan, and Miranda C\. N\. Cheng, *SciPost Phys\.* **15** (6) 238 (2023) [arXiv:2207.00283](https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.00283) [doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.6.238](https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.6.238)

10. **Flow\-based density of states for complex actions**, Jan M\. Pawlowski, and Julian M\. Urban, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **108** (5) 054511 (2023) [arXiv:2203.01243](https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.01243) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.054511](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.054511)

11. **Flow\-based sampling in the lattice Schwinger model at criticality**, Michael S\. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C\. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo J\. Rezende, Fernando Romero\-L\\'opez, Phiala E\. Shanahan, and Julian M\. Urban, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **106** (1) 014514 (2022) [arXiv:2202.11712](https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.11712) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.014514](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.014514)

12. **Stochastic normalizing flows as non\-equilibrium transformations**, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, Alessandro Nada, and Marco Panero, *JHEP* **07** 015 (2022) [arXiv:2201.08862](https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.08862) [doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2022)015](https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2022)015)

13. **Tackling critical slowing down using global correction steps with equivariant flows: the case of the Schwinger model**, Jacob Finkenrath (2022) [arXiv:2201.02216](https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.02216)

14. **Neural Network Field Transformation and Its Application in HMC**, Xiao\-Yong Jin, *PoS* **LATTICE2021** 600 (2022) [arXiv:2201.01862](https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.01862) [doi:10.22323/1.396.0600](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.396.0600)

15. **HMC with Normalizing Flows**, Sam Foreman, Taku Izubuchi, Luchang Jin, Xiao\-Yong Jin, James C\. Osborn, and Akio Tomiya, *PoS* **LATTICE2021** 073 (2022) [arXiv:2112.01586](https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.01586) [doi:10.22323/1.396.0073](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.396.0073)

16. **LeapfrogLayers: A Trainable Framework for Effective Topological Sampling**, Sam Foreman, Xiao\-Yong Jin, and James C\. Osborn, *PoS* **LATTICE2021** 508 (2022) [arXiv:2112.01582](https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.01582) [doi:10.22323/1.396.0508](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.396.0508)

17. **Scaling Up Machine Learning For Quantum Field Theory with Equivariant Continuous Flows**, Pim de Haan, Corrado Rainone, Miranda C\. N\. Cheng, and Roberto Bondesan (2021) [arXiv:2110.02673](https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.02673)

18. **Inverse Renormalization Group in Quantum Field Theory**, Dimitrios Bachtis, Gert Aarts, Francesco Di Renzo, and Biagio Lucini, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **128** (8) 081603 (2022) [arXiv:2107.00466](https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.00466) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.081603](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.081603)

19. **Flow\-based sampling for multimodal and extended\-mode distributions in lattice field theory**, Daniel C\. Hackett, Chung\-Chun Hsieh, Sahil Pontula, Michael S\. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Jiunn\-Wei Chen, Kai\-Feng Chen, Kyle Cranmer, Gurtej Kanwar, and Phiala E\. Shanahan (2021) [arXiv:2107.00734](https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.00734)

20. **Flow\-based sampling for fermionic lattice field theories**, Michael S\. Albergo, Gurtej Kanwar, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo J\. Rezende, Julian M\. Urban, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C\. Hackett, and Phiala E\. Shanahan, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **104** (11) 114507 (2021) [arXiv:2106.05934](https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.05934) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.114507](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.114507)

21. **Efficient modeling of trivializing maps for lattice \{\\ensuremath\{\\phi\}\}4 theory using normalizing flows: A first look at scalability**, Luigi Del Debbio, Joe Marsh Rossney, and Michael Wilson, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **104** (9) 094507 (2021) [arXiv:2105.12481](https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.12481) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.094507](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.094507)

22. **Adaptive Monte Carlo augmented with normalizing flows**, Marylou Gabri\\'e, Grant M\. Rotskoff, and Eric Vanden\-Eijnden, *Proc\. Nat\. Acad\. Sci\.* **119** (10) e2109420119 (2022) [arXiv:2105.12603](https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.12603) [doi:10.1073/pnas.2109420119](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2109420119)

23. **Unbiased Monte Carlo cluster updates with autoregressive neural networks**, Dian Wu, Riccardo Rossi, and Giuseppe Carleo, *Phys\. Rev\. Res\.* **3** (4) L042024 (2021) [arXiv:2105.05650](https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.05650) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.L042024](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.L042024)

24. **Deep Learning Hamiltonian Monte Carlo**, Sam Foreman, Xiao\-Yong Jin, and James C\. Osborn, *9th International Conference on Learning Representations* (2021) [arXiv:2105.03418](https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.03418)

25. **Gauge covariant neural network for quarks and gluons**, Yuki Nagai, and Akio Tomiya, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **111** (7) 074501 (2025) [arXiv:2103.11965](https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.11965) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.074501](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.074501)

26. **Introduction to Normalizing Flows for Lattice Field Theory**, Michael S\. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Daniel C\. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, Kyle Cranmer, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E\. Shanahan (2021) [arXiv:2101.08176](https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.08176)

27. **Normalizing Flows and the Real\-Time Sign Problem**, Scott Lawrence, and Yukari Yamauchi, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **103** (11) 114509 (2021) [arXiv:2101.05755](https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.05755) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.114509](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.114509)

28. **Self\-learning Monte Carlo for non\-Abelian gauge theory with dynamical fermions**, Yuki Nagai, Akinori Tanaka, and Akio Tomiya, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **107** (5) 054501 (2023) [arXiv:2010.11900](https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.11900) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.054501](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.054501)

29. **Sampling using $SU\(N\)$ gauge equivariant flows**, Denis Boyda, Gurtej Kanwar, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Michael S\. Albergo, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C\. Hackett, and Phiala E\. Shanahan, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **103** (7) 074504 (2021) [arXiv:2008.05456](https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.05456) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074504](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074504)

30. **Estimation of Thermodynamic Observables in Lattice Field Theories with Deep Generative Models**, Kim A\. Nicoli, Christopher J\. Anders, Lena Funcke, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Pan Kessel, Shinichi Nakajima, and Paolo Stornati, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **126** (3) 032001 (2021) [arXiv:2007.07115](https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.07115) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.032001](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.032001)

31. **Array programming with NumPy**, Charles R\. Harris, and others, *Nature* **585** (7825) 357–362 (2020) [arXiv:2006.10256](https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.10256) [doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2)

32. **Language Models are Few\-Shot Learners**, Tom B\. Brown, and others, *Adv\. Neural Inf\. Process\. Syst\.* **33** 1901 (2020) [arXiv:2005.14165](https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.14165)

33. **Extending machine learning classification capabilities with histogram reweighting**, Dimitrios Bachtis, Gert Aarts, and Biagio Lucini, *Phys\. Rev\. E* **102** (3) 033303 (2020) [arXiv:2004.14341](https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.14341) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.102.033303](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.102.033303)

34. **Equivariant flow\-based sampling for lattice gauge theory**, Gurtej Kanwar, Michael S\. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C\. Hackett, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E\. Shanahan, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **125** (12) 121601 (2020) [arXiv:2003.06413](https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.06413) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.121601](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.121601)

35. **Normalizing Flows on Tori and Spheres**, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, George Papamakarios, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Michael S\. Albergo, Gurtej Kanwar, Phiala E\. Shanahan, and Kyle Cranmer (2020) [arXiv:2002.02428](https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.02428)

36. **Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inference**, George Papamakarios, Eric Nalisnick, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Shakir Mohamed, and Balaji Lakshminarayanan, *J\. Machine Learning Res\.* **22** (1) 2617–2680 (2021) [arXiv:1912.02762](https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.02762) [doi:10.5555/3546258.3546315](https://doi.org/10.5555/3546258.3546315)

37. **Asymptotically unbiased estimation of physical observables with neural samplers**, Kim A\. Nicoli, Shinichi Nakajima, Nils Strodthoff, Wojciech Samek, Klaus\-Robert Müller, and Pan Kessel, *Phys\. Rev\. E* **101** (2) 023304 (2020) [arXiv:1910.13496](https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.13496) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.101.023304](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.101.023304)

38. **SciPy 1\.0\-\-Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python**, Pauli Virtanen, and others, *Nature Meth\.* **17** 261 (2020) [arXiv:1907.10121](https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.10121) [doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2)

39. **Flow\-based generative models for Markov chain Monte Carlo in lattice field theory**, M\. S\. Albergo, G\. Kanwar, and P\. E\. Shanahan, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **100** (3) 034515 (2019) [arXiv:1904.12072](https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.12072) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.034515](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.034515)

40. **Status and Future Perspectives for Lattice Gauge Theory Calculations to the Exascale and Beyond**, B\\'alint Jo\\'o, Chulwoo Jung, Norman H\. Christ, William Detmold, Robert Edwards, Martin Savage, and Phiala Shanahan, *Eur\. Phys\. J\. A* **55** (11) 199 (2019) [arXiv:1904.09725](https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.09725) [doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12919-7](https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2019-12919-7)

41. **Hot\-dense Lattice QCD: USQCD whitepaper 2018**, Alexei Bazavov, Frithjof Karsch, Swagato Mukherjee, and Peter Petreczky, *Eur\. Phys\. J\. A* **55** (11) 194 (2019) [arXiv:1904.09951](https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.09951) [doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12922-0](https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2019-12922-0)

42. **Lattice QCD and Neutrino\-Nucleus Scattering**, Andreas S\. Kronfeld, David G\. Richards, William Detmold, Rajan Gupta, Huey\-Wen Lin, Keh\-Fei Liu, Aaron S\. Meyer, Raza Sufian, and Sergey Syritsyn, *Eur\. Phys\. J\. A* **55** (11) 196 (2019) [arXiv:1904.09931](https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.09931) [doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12916-x](https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2019-12916-x)

43. **Lattice Gauge Theory for Physics Beyond the Standard Model**, Richard C\. Brower, Anna Hasenfratz, Ethan T\. Neil, Simon Catterall, George Fleming, Joel Giedt, Enrico Rinaldi, David Schaich, Evan Weinberg, and Oliver Witzel, *Eur\. Phys\. J\. A* **55** (11) 198 (2019) [arXiv:1904.09964](https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.09964) [doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12901-5](https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2019-12901-5)

44. **The Role of Lattice QCD in Searches for Violations of Fundamental Symmetries and Signals for New Physics**, Vincenzo Cirigliano, Zohreh Davoudi, Tanmoy Bhattacharya, Taku Izubuchi, Phiala E\. Shanahan, Sergey Syritsyn, and Michael L\. Wagman, *Eur\. Phys\. J\. A* **55** (11) 197 (2019) [arXiv:1904.09704](https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.09704) [doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12889-8](https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2019-12889-8)

45. **Opportunities for Lattice QCD in Quark and Lepton Flavor Physics**, Christoph Lehner, and others, *Eur\. Phys\. J\. A* **55** (11) 195 (2019) [arXiv:1904.09479](https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.09479) [doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12891-2](https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2019-12891-2)

46. **Hadrons and Nuclei**, William Detmold, Robert G\. Edwards, Jozef J\. Dudek, Michael Engelhardt, Huey\-Wen Lin, Stefan Meinel, Kostas Orginos, and Phiala Shanahan, *Eur\. Phys\. J\. A* **55** (11) 193 (2019) [arXiv:1904.09512](https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.09512) [doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12902-4](https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2019-12902-4)

47. **Solving Statistical Mechanics Using Variational Autoregressive Networks**, Dian Wu, Lei Wang, and Pan Zhang, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **122** (8) 080602 (2019) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.080602](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.080602)

48. **Neural Network Renormalization Group**, Shuo\-Hui Li, and Lei Wang, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **121** (26) 260601 (2018) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.260601](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.260601)

49. **Reducing Autocorrelation Times in Lattice Simulations with Generative Adversarial Networks**, Jan M\. Pawlowski, and Julian M\. Urban, *Mach\. Learn\. Sci\. Tech\.* **1** 045011 (2020) [arXiv:1811.03533](https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.03533) [doi:10.1088/2632-2153/abae73](https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/abae73)

50. **Machine learning determination of dynamical parameters: The Ising model case**, Guido Cossu, Luigi Del Debbio, Tommaso Giani, Ava Khamseh, and Michael Wilson, *Phys\. Rev\. B* **100** (6) 064304 (2019) [arXiv:1810.11503](https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.11503) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.100.064304](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.064304)

51. **Horovod: fast and easy distributed deep learning in TensorFlow**, Alexander Sergeev, and Mike Del Balso (2018) [arXiv:1802.05799](https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.05799)

52. **Towards reduction of autocorrelation in HMC by machine learning**, Akinori Tanaka, and Akio Tomiya (2017) [arXiv:1712.03893](https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.03893)

53. **Generalizing Hamiltonian Monte Carlo with Neural Networks**, Daniel Levy, Matthew D\. Hoffman, and Jascha Sohl\-Dickstein (2017) [arXiv:1711.09268](https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.09268)

54. **Looking behind the Standard Model with lattice gauge theory**, Benjamin Svetitsky, *EPJ Web Conf\.* **175** 01017 (2018) [arXiv:1708.04840](https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.04840) [doi:10.1051/epjconf/201817501017](https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201817501017)

55. **Exploring cluster Monte Carlo updates with Boltzmann machines**, Lei Wang, *Phys\. Rev\. E* **96** (5) 051301 (2017) [arXiv:1702.08586](https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.08586) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.96.051301](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.96.051301)

56. **Accelerated Monte Carlo simulations with restricted Boltzmann machines**, Li Huang, and Lei Wang, *Phys\. Rev\. B* **95** (3) 035105 (2017) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.95.035105](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.035105)

57. **Density estimation using Real NVP**, Laurent Dinh, Jascha Sohl\-Dickstein, and Samy Bengio (2016) [arXiv:1605.08803](https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.08803)

58. **Review of strongly\-coupled composite dark matter models and lattice simulations**, Graham D\. Kribs, and Ethan T\. Neil, *Int\. J\. Mod\. Phys\. A* **31** (22) 1643004 (2016) [arXiv:1604.04627](https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.04627) [doi:10.1142/S0217751X16430041](https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X16430041)

59. **Lattice Gauge Theories and Spin Models**, Manu Mathur, and T\. P\. Sreeraj, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **94** (8) 085029 (2016) [arXiv:1604.00315](https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.00315) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.085029](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.085029)

60. **Lattice tests of beyond Standard Model dynamics**, Thomas DeGrand, *Rev\. Mod\. Phys\.* **88** 015001 (2016) [arXiv:1510.05018](https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.05018) [doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.88.015001](https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.88.015001)

61. **Recent progress in simulations of gauge theories on the lattice**, Luigi Del Debbio, *J\. Phys\. Conf\. Ser\.* **640** (1) 012049 (2015) [doi:10.1088/1742-6596/640/1/012049](https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/640/1/012049)

62. **Variational Inference with Normalizing Flows**, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Shakir Mohamed (2015) [arXiv:1505.05770](https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.05770)

63. **Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human\-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification**, Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun (2015) [arXiv:1502.01852](https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.01852) [doi:10.1109/ICCV.2015.123](https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2015.123)

64. **Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization**, Diederik P\. Kingma, and Jimmy Ba, *International Conference on Learning Representations* (2014) [arXiv:1412.6980](https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980)

65. **NICE: Non\-linear Independent Components Estimation**, Laurent Dinh, David Krueger, and Yoshua Bengio (2014) [arXiv:1410.8516](https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.8516)

66. **Lattice Gauge Theory for Condensed Matter Physics: Ferromagnetic Superconductivity as its Example**, Ikuo Ichinose, and Tetsuo Matsui, *Mod\. Phys\. Lett\. B* **28** 1430012 (2014) [arXiv:1408.0089](https://arxiv.org/abs/1408.0089) [doi:10.1142/S0217984914300129](https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217984914300129)

67. **ADADELTA: An Adaptive Learning Rate Method**, Matthew D\. Zeiler (2012) [arXiv:1212.5701](https://arxiv.org/abs/1212.5701)

68. **Status and challenges of simulations with dynamical fermions**, Stefan Schaefer, *PoS* **LATTICE2012** 001 (2012) [arXiv:1211.5069](https://arxiv.org/abs/1211.5069) [doi:10.22323/1.164.0001](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.164.0001)

69. **Non\-renormalizability of the HMC algorithm**, Martin Luscher, and Stefan Schaefer, *JHEP* **04** 104 (2011) [arXiv:1103.1810](https://arxiv.org/abs/1103.1810) [doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2011)104](https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2011)104)

70. **Testing trivializing maps in the Hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm**, Georg P\. Engel, and Stefan Schaefer, *Comput\. Phys\. Commun\.* **182** 2107–2114 (2011) [arXiv:1102.1852](https://arxiv.org/abs/1102.1852) [doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2011.05.004](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2011.05.004)

71. **Critical slowing down and error analysis in lattice QCD simulations**, Stefan Schaefer, Rainer Sommer, and Francesco Virotta, *Nucl\. Phys\. B* **845** 93–119 (2011) [arXiv:1009.5228](https://arxiv.org/abs/1009.5228) [doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2010.11.020](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2010.11.020)

72. **Adaptive multigrid algorithm for the lattice Wilson\-Dirac operator**, R\. Babich, J\. Brannick, R\. C\. Brower, M\. A\. Clark, T\. A\. Manteuffel, S\. F\. McCormick, J\. C\. Osborn, and C\. Rebbi, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **105** 201602 (2010) [arXiv:1005.3043](https://arxiv.org/abs/1005.3043) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.201602](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.201602)

73. **Quantum chromodynamics on the lattice**, Christof Gattringer, and Christian B\. Lang, **788** (2010) [doi:10.1007/978-3-642-01850-3](https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01850-3)

74. **Investigating the critical slowing down of QCD simulations**, Stefan Schaefer, Rainer Sommer, and Francesco Virotta, *PoS* **LAT2009** 032 (2009) [arXiv:0910.1465](https://arxiv.org/abs/0910.1465) [doi:10.22323/1.091.0032](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.091.0032)

75. **Trivializing maps, the Wilson flow and the HMC algorithm**, Martin Luscher, *Commun\. Math\. Phys\.* **293** 899–919 (2010) [arXiv:0907.5491](https://arxiv.org/abs/0907.5491) [doi:10.1007/s00220-009-0953-7](https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-009-0953-7)

76. **Adaptive Multigrid Algorithm for Lattice QCD**, J\. Brannick, R\. C\. Brower, M\. A\. Clark, J\. C\. Osborn, and C\. Rebbi, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **100** 041601 (2008) [arXiv:0707.4018](https://arxiv.org/abs/0707.4018) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.041601](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.041601)

77. **The Monte Carlo method in quantum field theory**, Colin Morningstar, *21st Annual Hampton University Graduate Studies Program* (2007) [arXiv:hep-lat/0702020](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/0702020)

78. **Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment**, John D\. Hunter, *Comput\. Sci\. Eng\.* **9** (3) 90–95 (2007) [doi:10.1109/MCSE.2007.55](https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55)

79. **Critical slowing down of topological modes**, Luigi Del Debbio, Gian Mario Manca, and Ettore Vicari, *Phys\. Lett\. B* **594** 315–323 (2004) [arXiv:hep-lat/0403001](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/0403001) [doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.05.038](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2004.05.038)

80. **Full QCD algorithms towards the chiral limit**, Martin Hasenbusch, *Nucl\. Phys\. B Proc\. Suppl\.* **129** 27–33 (2004) [arXiv:hep-lat/0310029](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/0310029) [doi:10.1016/S0920-5632(03)02504-0](https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5632(03)02504-0)

81. **Cost of QCD simulations with n\(f\) \= 2 dynamical Wilson fermions**, Thomas Lippert, *Nucl\. Phys\. B Proc\. Suppl\.* **106** 193–194 (2002) [arXiv:hep-lat/0203009](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/0203009) [doi:10.1016/S0920-5632(01)01661-9](https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5632(01)01661-9)

82. **Computational cost of full QCD simulations experienced by CP\-PACS and JLQCD Collaborations**, A\. Ukawa, *Nucl\. Phys\. B Proc\. Suppl\.* **106** 195–196 (2002) [doi:10.1016/S0920-5632(01)01662-0](https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5632(01)01662-0)

83. **Speeding up the hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm for dynamical fermions**, Martin Hasenbusch, *Phys\. Lett\. B* **519** 177–182 (2001) [arXiv:hep-lat/0107019](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/0107019) [doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(01)01102-9](https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(01)01102-9)

84. **Requirements for high performance computing for lattice QCD: Report of the ECFA working panel**, F\. Jegerlehner, R\. D\. Kenway, G\. Martinelli, Christopher Michael, O\. Pene, B\. Petersson, R\. Petronzio, Christopher T\. Sachrajda, and K\. Schilling (2000) [doi:10.5170/CERN-2000-002](https://doi.org/10.5170/CERN-2000-002)

85. **CRITICAL SLOWING DOWN**, Ulli Wolff, *Nucl\. Phys\. B Proc\. Suppl\.* **17** 93–102 (1990) [doi:10.1016/0920-5632(90)90224-I](https://doi.org/10.1016/0920-5632(90)90224-I)

86. **Hybrid Monte Carlo**, S\. Duane, A\. D\. Kennedy, B\. J\. Pendleton, and D\. Roweth, *Phys\. Lett\. B* **195** 216–222 (1987) [doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)91197-X](https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(87)91197-X)

87. **Monte Carlo Integration for Lattice Gauge Theories with Fermions**, D\. H\. Weingarten, and D\. N\. Petcher, *Phys\. Lett\. B* **99** 333–338 (1981) [doi:10.1016/0370-2693(81)90112-X](https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(81)90112-X)

88. **A Proposal for Monte Carlo Simulations of Fermionic Systems**, F\. Fucito, E\. Marinari, G\. Parisi, and C\. Rebbi, *Nucl\. Phys\. B* **180** 369 (1981) [doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90055-9](https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(81)90055-9)

89. **Monte Carlo Sampling Methods Using Markov Chains and Their Applications**, W\. K\. Hastings, *Biometrika* **57** 97–109 (1970) [doi:10.1093/biomet/57.1.97](https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/57.1.97)

90. **Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines**, N\. Metropolis, A\. W\. Rosenbluth, M\. N\. Rosenbluth, A\. H\. Teller, and E\. Teller, *J\. Chem\. Phys\.* **21** 1087–1092 (1953) [doi:10.1063/1.1699114](https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1699114)

91. **On Information and Sufficiency**, S\. Kullback, and R\. A\. Leibler, *The Annals of Mathematical Statistics* **22** (1) 79–86 (1951) [doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729694](https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177729694)