1. Machine learning for four-dimensional SU(3) lattice gauge theories, Urs Wenger, 42th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2026), arXiv:2604.12416
2. Scalable Generative Sampling and Multilevel Estimation for Lattice Field Theories Near Criticality, A. Singha, J. Kauffmann, E. Cellini, K. Jansen, and S. Nakajima, (2026), arXiv:2604.10209
3. Variance reduction in lattice QCD observables via normalizing flows, Ryan Abbott, Denis Boyda, Yang Fu, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, (2026), arXiv:2603.02984
4. Diffusion Models for SU(2) Lattice Gauge Theory in Two Dimensions, H. Alharazin, J. Yu. Panteleeva, and B. -D. Sun, (2026), arXiv:2602.09045
5. Generalizable Equivariant Diffusion Models for Non-Abelian Lattice Gauge Theory, Gert Aarts, Diaa E. Habibi, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, Thomas R. Ranner, Lingxiao Wang, Wei Wang, and Qianteng Zhu, (2026), arXiv:2601.19552
6. Introduction to Lattice Field Theory, Ra\'ul A. Brice\~no, (2025), arXiv:2512.22368
7. Variational Autoregressive Networks Applied to $\phi^4$ Field Theory Systems, Moxian Qian, and Shiyang Chen, (2025), arXiv:2512.19575
8. Computing quantum entanglement with machine learning, Andrea Bulgarelli, Elia Cellini, Karl Jansen, Stefan Kühn, Alessandro Nada, Shinichi Nakajima, Kim A. Nicoli, and Marco Panero, 42th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2025), arXiv:2512.11389
9. Entanglement in lattice field theory: new methods and new results, Andrea Bulgarelli, (2025)
10. Particle Monte Carlo methods for Lattice Field Theory, David Yallup, 39th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems}: {Includes Machine Learning and the Physical Sciences (ML4PS), (2025), arXiv:2511.15196
11. Group-Equivariant Diffusion Models for Lattice Field Theory, Octavio Vega, Javad Komijani, Aida El-Khadra, and Marina Marinkovic, (2025), arXiv:2510.26081
12. Generative sampling with physics-informed kernels, Friederike Ihssen, Renzo Kapust, and Jan M. Pawlowski, (2025), arXiv:2510.26678
13. Scaling flow-based approaches for topology sampling in SU(3) gauge theory, Claudio Bonanno, Andrea Bulgarelli, Elia Cellini, Alessandro Nada, Dario Panfalone, Davide Vadacchino, and Lorenzo Verzichelli, JHEP 04 051, (2026), arXiv:2510.25704 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2026)051
14. Efficient lattice field theory simulation using adaptive normalizing flow on a resistive memory-based neural differential equation solver, Meng Xu, Jichang Yang, Ning Lin, Qundao Xu, Siqi Tang, Han Wang, Xiaojuan Qi, Zhongrui Wang, and Ming Xu, (2025), arXiv:2509.12812
15. Probing the Nonperturbative Physics of QCD withNormalizing Flows and a moderate number of Pions, Ryan William Abbott, (2025)
16. Sampling in lattice field theory with flow-based generative models, Joe Marsh Rossney, and Joe Marsh Rossney, (2025), doi:10.7488/era/6223
17. Simulating correlated electrons with symmetry-enforced normalizing flows, Dominic Schuh, Janik Kreit, Evan Berkowitz, Lena Funcke, Thomas Luu, Kim A. Nicoli, and Marcel Rodekamp, Phys. Rev. Res. 8 (1) L012071, (2026), arXiv:2506.17015 doi:10.1103/4741-cvvs
18. Physics-conditioned diffusion models for lattice gauge theory, Qianteng Zhu, Gert Aarts, Wei Wang, Kai Zhou, and Lingxiao Wang, JHEP 03 111, (2026), arXiv:2502.05504 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2026)111
19. Machine Learning for Lattice QCD, Akio Tomiya, J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 94 (3) 031006, (2025), doi:10.7566/JPSJ.94.031006
20. Generative models and theoretical physics, M. Gerdes, (2025)
21. Super-resolving normalising flows for lattice field theories, Marc Bauer, Renzo Kapust, Jan M. Pawlowski, and Finn Leon Temmen, SciPost Phys. 19 (3) 077, (2025), arXiv:2412.12842 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.19.3.077
22. Scaling of stochastic normalizing flows in SU(3) lattice gauge theory, Andrea Bulgarelli, Elia Cellini, and Alessandro Nada, Phys. Rev. D 111 (7) 074517, (2025), arXiv:2412.00200 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.074517
23. Flow-Based Sampling for Entanglement Entropy and the Machine Learning of Defects, Andrea Bulgarelli, Elia Cellini, Karl Jansen, Stefan Kühn, Alessandro Nada, Shinichi Nakajima, Kim A. Nicoli, and Marco Panero, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 (15) 151601, (2025), arXiv:2410.14466 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.151601
24. Nonperturbative trivializing flows for lattice gauge theories, Mathis Gerdes, Pim de Haan, Roberto Bondesan, and Miranda C. N. Cheng, Phys. Rev. D 112 (9) 094516, (2025), arXiv:2410.13161 doi:10.1103/31d5-hvp6
25. Sampling SU(3) pure gauge theory with Stochastic Normalizing Flows, Andrea Bulgarelli, Elia Cellini, and Alessandro Nada, PoS LATTICE2024 040, (2025), arXiv:2409.18861 doi:10.22323/1.466.0040
26. Numerical determination of the width and shape of the effective string using Stochastic Normalizing Flows, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, and Alessandro Nada, JHEP 02 090, (2025), arXiv:2409.15937 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2025)090
27. Future trends in lattice QCD simulations, Jacob Finkenrath, PoS EuroPLEx2023 009, (2024), doi:10.22323/1.451.0009
28. Bayesian RG flow in neural network field theories, Jessica N. Howard, Marc S. Klinger, Anindita Maiti, and Alexander G. Stapleton, SciPost Phys. Core 8 027, (2025), arXiv:2405.17538 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.8.1.027
29. Flow-based nonperturbative simulation of first-order phase transitions, Yang Bai, and Ting-Kuo Chen, JHEP 10 198, (2024), arXiv:2404.18323 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2024)198
30. Practical applications of machine-learned flows on gauge fields, Ryan Abbott, Denis Boyda, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, Julian M. Urban, and Michael S. Albergo, PoS LATTICE2023 011, (2024), arXiv:2404.11674 doi:10.22323/1.453.0011
31. Fine grinding localized updates via gauge equivariant flows in the 2D Schwinger model, Jacob Finkenrath, PoS LATTICE2023 022, (2024), arXiv:2402.12176 doi:10.22323/1.453.0022
32. Applications of flow models to the generation of correlated lattice QCD ensembles, Ryan Abbott, Aleksandar Botev, Denis Boyda, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 109 (9) 094514, (2024), arXiv:2401.10874 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.094514
33. Flow-based sampling for lattice field theories, Gurtej Kanwar, 40th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2024), arXiv:2401.01297
34. Stochastic Approaches and the Physics of Ultracold Fermions: From Lattice Simulations to Machine Learning, Marc Bauer, (2024), doi:10.11588/heidok.00035711
35. Generative Diffusion Models for Lattice Field Theory, Lingxiao Wang, Gert Aarts, and Kai Zhou, 37th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, (2023), arXiv:2311.03578
36. Diffusion models as stochastic quantization in lattice field theory, Lingxiao Wang, Gert Aarts, and Kai Zhou, JHEP 05 060, (2024), arXiv:2309.17082 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2024)060
37. Sampling Nambu-Goto theory using Normalizing Flows, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, and Alessandro Nada, PoS LATTICE2023 015, (2024), arXiv:2309.14983 doi:10.22323/1.453.0015
38. Advances in machine-learning-based sampling motivated by lattice quantum chromodynamics, Kyle Cranmer, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Nature Rev. Phys. 5 (9) 526–535, (2023), arXiv:2309.01156 doi:10.1038/s42254-023-00616-w
39. Parallel tempered metadynamics: Overcoming potential barriers without surfing or tunneling, Timo Eichhorn, Gianluca Fuwa, Christian Hoelbling, and Lukas Varnhorst, Phys. Rev. D 109 (11) 114504, (2024), arXiv:2307.04742 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.114504
40. Sampling the lattice Nambu-Goto string using Continuous Normalizing Flows, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, and Alessandro Nada, JHEP 02 048, (2024), arXiv:2307.01107 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2024)048
41. Normalizing flows for lattice gauge theory in arbitrary space-time dimension, Ryan Abbott, and others, (2023), arXiv:2305.02402
42. Gauge-equivariant pooling layers for preconditioners in lattice QCD, Christoph Lehner, and Tilo Wettig, Phys. Rev. D 110 (3) 034517, (2024), arXiv:2304.10438 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.034517
43. Locality-constrained autoregressive cum conditional normalizing flow for lattice field theory simulations, Dinesh P. R, (2023), arXiv:2304.01798
44. Exploring QCD matter in extreme conditions with Machine Learning, Kai Zhou, Lingxiao Wang, Long-Gang Pang, and Shuzhe Shi, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 135 104084, (2024), arXiv:2303.15136 doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2023.104084
45. Detecting and mitigating mode-collapse for flow-based sampling of lattice field theories, Kim A. Nicoli, Christopher J. Anders, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Pan Kessel, and Shinichi Nakajima, Phys. Rev. D 108 (11) 114501, (2023), arXiv:2302.14082 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.114501
46. Learning trivializing flows, David Albandea, Luigi Del Debbio, Pilar Hern\'andez, Richard Kenway, J. Marsh Rossney, and Alberto Ramos, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (7) 676, (2023), arXiv:2302.08408 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11838-8
47. Review on Algorithms for dynamical fermions, Jacob Finkenrath, PoS LATTICE2022 227, (2023), arXiv:2402.11704 doi:10.22323/1.430.0227
48. Learning trivializing gradient flows for lattice gauge theories, Simone Bacchio, Pan Kessel, Stefan Schaefer, and Lorenz Vaitl, Phys. Rev. D 107 (5) L051504, (2023), arXiv:2212.08469 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.L051504
49. Flow-based density of states for complex actions, Jan M. Pawlowski, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 108 (5) 054511, (2023), arXiv:2203.01243 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.054511
50. Gauge covariant neural network for quarks and gluons, Yuki Nagai, and Akio Tomiya, Phys. Rev. D 111 (7) 074501, (2025), arXiv:2103.11965 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.074501