1. Hadronic tau decays at higher orders in QCD, Gauhar Abbas, and Vartika Singh, (2026), arXiv:2601.11277
2. A Euclidean Monte-Carlo-informed route to ground-state preparation for quantum simulation of scalar field theory, Navya Gupta, Christopher David White, and Zohreh Davoudi, 41st International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2025), arXiv:2510.24875
3. Accurate Ground States of SU(2) Lattice Gauge Theory in 2+1D and 3+1D, Thomas Spriggs, Eliska Greplova, Juan Carrasquilla, and Jannes Nys, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136 (10) 101902, (2026), arXiv:2509.12323 doi:10.1103/wsk2-qcvy
4. Quantum simulation of out-of-equilibrium dynamics in gauge theories, Jad C. Halimeh, Niklas Mueller, Johannes Knolle, Zlatko Papi\'c, and Zohreh Davoudi, (2025), arXiv:2509.03586
5. Renormalized Yukawa Hamiltonian: Spectrum, parton distribution functions, and resource estimates for quantum simulation, Carter M. Gustin, Kamil Serafin, William A. Simon, Alexis Ralli, Gary R. Goldstein, and Peter J. Love, Phys. Rev. D 113 (1) 016018, (2026), arXiv:2508.14837 doi:10.1103/9y1c-52sx
6. Second-order renormalized Hamiltonian of Yukawa theory, Kamil Serafin, Carter M. Gustin, and Peter J. Love, Phys. Rev. D 112 (9) 096003, (2025), arXiv:2508.02972 doi:10.1103/63qr-r25y
7. TASI/CERN/KITP Lecture Notes on ''Toward Quantum Computing Gauge Theories of Nature'', Zohreh Davoudi, (2025), arXiv:2507.15840
8. Real-time estimators for scattering observables: A full account of finite-volume errors for quantum simulation, Ivan M. Burbano, Marco A. Carrillo, Rana Urek, Anthony N. Ciavarella, and Ra\'ul A. Brice\~no, Phys. Rev. D 113 (7) L071502, (2026), arXiv:2506.06511 doi:10.1103/dc17-4zjy
9. Euclidean-Monte-Carlo-informed ground-state preparation for quantum simulation of scalar field theory, Navya Gupta, Christopher David White, and Zohreh Davoudi, (2025), arXiv:2506.02313
10. Quantum computation of hadron scattering in a lattice gauge theory, Zohreh Davoudi, Chung-Chun Hsieh, and Saurabh V. Kadam, (2025), arXiv:2505.20408
11. Analog charged black hole formation via percolation: Exploring cosmic censorship and Hoop conjecture, Nitesh Jaiswal, and S. Shankaranarayanan, Phys. Rev. D 111 (10) L101502, (2025), arXiv:2502.09317 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.L101502
12. Hamiltonian Lattice Gauge Theories: emergent properties from tensor network methods, Giovanni Cataldi, (2025), arXiv:2501.11115
13. Towards determination of the strong coupling $α_s(m_Z)$ from four-flavor lattice QCD using the continuous $β$-function method, Yash Mandlecha, and others, PoS LATTICE2025 207, (2025), arXiv:2603.21059
14. Nuclear correlation functions using first-principle calculations of lattice quantum chromodynamics, Debsubhra Chakraborty, Piyush Srivastava, Arpith Kumar, and Nilmani Mathur, Phys. Rev. D 110 (11) 114505, (2024), arXiv:2411.08962 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.114505
15. Exploring phases of non-abelian gauge theories with perturbation theory, Fabiana De Cesare, (2024)
16. Fully gauge-fixed SU(2) Hamiltonian for quantum simulations, Dorota M. Grabowska, Christopher F. Kane, and Christian W. Bauer, Phys. Rev. D 111 (11) 114516, (2025), arXiv:2409.10610 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.114516
17. Review of particle physics, S. Navas, and others, Phys. Rev. D 110 (3) 030001, (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001
18. Gapless deconfined phase in a ZN-symmetric Hamiltonian created in a cold-atom setup, Mykhailo V. Rakov, Luca Tagliacozzo, Maciej Lewenstein, Jakub Zakrzewski, and Titas Chanda, Phys. Rev. B 110 (19) 195114, (2024), arXiv:2407.12109 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.110.195114
19. Tensor networks for lattice gauge theories beyond one dimension, Giuseppe Magnifico, Giovanni Cataldi, Marco Rigobello, Peter Majcen, Daniel Jaschke, Pietro Silvi, and Simone Montangero, Commun. Phys. 8 (1) 322, (2025), arXiv:2407.03058 doi:10.1038/s42005-025-02125-x
20. Analog Quantum Simulator of a Quantum Field Theory with Fermion-Spin Systems in Silicon, Ali Rad, Alexander Schuckert, Eleanor Crane, Gautam Nambiar, Fan Fei, Jonathan Wyrick, Richard M. Silver, Mohammad Hafezi, Zohreh Davoudi, and Michael J. Gullans, (2024), arXiv:2407.03419
21. B-meson semileptonic decays from highly improved staggered quarks, Andrew Lytle, Carleton DeTar, Elvira G\'amiz, Steven Gottlieb, William Jay, Aida X. El-Khadra, Andreas Kronfeld, Jack Laiho, James N. Simone, and Alejandro Vaquero, PoS LATTICE2023 240, (2024), arXiv:2403.03959 doi:10.22323/1.453.0240
22. Scattering wave packets of hadrons in gauge theories: Preparation on a quantum computer, Zohreh Davoudi, Chung-Chun Hsieh, and Saurabh V. Kadam, Quantum 8 1520, (2024), arXiv:2402.00840 doi:10.22331/q-2024-11-11-1520
23. Strategies for simulating the time evolution of Hamiltonian lattice field theories, Siddharth Hariprakash, Neel S. Modi, Michael Kreshchuk, Christopher F. Kane, and Christian W. Bauer, Phys. Rev. A 111 (2) 022419, (2025), arXiv:2312.11637 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.111.022419
24. Quantum Algorithms for Simulating Nuclear Effective Field Theories, James D. Watson, Jacob Bringewatt, Alexander F. Shaw, Andrew M. Childs, Alexey V. Gorshkov, and Zohreh Davoudi, (2023), arXiv:2312.05344
25. Theoretical Developments in Lattice Gauge Theory for Applications in Double-beta Decay Processes and Quantum Simulation, Saurabh Vasant Kadam, (2023), arXiv:2312.00780 doi:10.13016/dspace/cvbq-c4jt
26. Lattice real-time simulations with learned optimal kernels, Daniel Alvestad, Alexander Rothkopf, and D\'enes Sexty, Phys. Rev. D 109 (3) L031502, (2024), arXiv:2310.08053 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.L031502
27. New basis for Hamiltonian SU(2) simulations, Irian D'Andrea, Christian W. Bauer, Dorota M. Grabowska, and Marat Freytsis, Phys. Rev. D 109 (7) 074501, (2024), arXiv:2307.11829 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.074501
28. High-Energy Collision of Quarks and Mesons in the Schwinger Model: From Tensor Networks to Circuit QED, Ron Belyansky, Seth Whitsitt, Niklas Mueller, Ali Fahimniya, Elizabeth R. Bennewitz, Zohreh Davoudi, and Alexey V. Gorshkov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (9) 091903, (2024), arXiv:2307.02522 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.091903
29. Quantum simulation of fundamental particles and forces, Christian W. Bauer, Zohreh Davoudi, Natalie Klco, and Martin J. Savage, Nature Rev. Phys. 5 (7) 420–432, (2023), arXiv:2404.06298 doi:10.1038/s42254-023-00599-8
30. Impact of SeaQuest data on PDF fits at large x, S. Alekhin, M. V. Garzelli, S. Kulagin, and S. -O. Moch, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (9) 829, (2023), arXiv:2306.01918 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11999-6
31. Simulating Z2 lattice gauge theory on a quantum computer, Clement Charles, Erik J. Gustafson, Elizabeth Hardt, Florian Herren, Norman Hogan, Henry Lamm, Sara Starecheski, Ruth S. Van de Water, and Michael L. Wagman, Phys. Rev. E 109 (1) 015307, (2024), arXiv:2305.02361 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.109.015307
32. Fundamental Symmetries, Neutrons, and Neutrinos (FSNN): Whitepaper for the 2023 NSAC Long Range Plan, B. Acharya, and others, (2023), arXiv:2304.03451
33. B-meson semileptonic decays with highly improved staggered quarks, Andrew Lytle, Carleton DeTar, Aida X. El-Khadra, Elvira G\'amiz, Steven Gottlieb, William Jay, Andreas Kronfeld, James N. Simone, and Alejandro Vaquero, PoS LATTICE2022 418, (2023), arXiv:2301.09229 doi:10.22323/1.430.0418
34. Synergy between NP and HEP research goals and efforts in fundamental symmetries and interactions, Tanmoy Bhattacharya, Rajan Gupta, and Kate Scholberg, (2023), arXiv:2301.03086
35. Inverse problems, real-time dynamics and lattice simulations, Alexander Rothkopf, EPJ Web Conf. 274 01004, (2022), arXiv:2211.10680 doi:10.1051/epjconf/202227401004
36. Stout Smearing on a Quantum Computer, Erik J. Gustafson, (2022), arXiv:2211.05607
37. Snowmass Theory Frontier Report, N. Craig, and others, (2022), arXiv:2211.05772 doi:10.2172/1915426
38. TF08 Snowmass Report: BSM Model Building, Patrick J. Fox, and others, (2022), arXiv:2210.03075
39. Gradient flow step-scaling function for SU(3) with Nf=6 or 4 fundamental flavors, Anna Hasenfratz, Claudio Rebbi, and Oliver Witzel, Phys. Rev. D 106 (11) 114509, (2022), arXiv:2209.14224 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.114509
40. Review of neutral naturalness, Brian Batell, Matthew Low, Ethan T. Neil, and Christopher B. Verhaaren, Phys. Rept. 1165 1–49, (2026), arXiv:2203.05531 doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2025.12.001