1. A lattice QCD perspective on weak decays of $b$ and $c$ quarks Snowmass 2022 White Paper, Peter A. Boyle, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2205.15373
2. Smart sensors using artificial intelligence for on-detector electronics and ASICs, Gabriella Carini, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2204.13223
3. Impact of lattice $s(x)-\bar{s}(x)$ data in the CTEQ-TEA global analysis, Tie-Jiun Hou, Huey-Wen Lin, Mengshi Yan, and C. -P. Yuan, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2204.07944
4. Computational Challenges for Multi-loop Collider Phenomenology: A Snowmass 2021 White Paper, Fernando Febres Cordero, Andreas von Manteuffel, and Tobias Neumann, Comput. Softw. Big Sci. 6 (1) 14, (2022), arXiv:2204.04200 doi:10.1007/s41781-022-00088-0
5. Quantum Simulation for High-Energy Physics, Christian W. Bauer, and others, PRX Quantum 4 (2) 027001, (2023), arXiv:2204.03381 doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.027001
6. Lattice QCD and the Computational Frontier, Peter Boyle, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2204.00039
7. Physics Community Needs, Tools, and Resources for Machine Learning, Philip Harris, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2203.16255 doi:10.2172/1873720
8. Prospects for precise predictions of $a_\mu$ in the Standard Model, G. Colangelo, and others, (2022), arXiv:2203.15810
9. Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay: A Roadmap for Matching Theory to Experiment, Vincenzo Cirigliano, and others, (2022), arXiv:2203.12169
10. Toward the end-to-end optimization of particle physics instruments with differentiable programming, Tommaso Dorigo, and others, Rev. Phys. 10 100085, (2023), arXiv:2203.13818 doi:10.1016/j.revip.2023.100085
11. Discovering new physics in rare kaon decays, Thomas Blum, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2203.10998
12. Event generators for high-energy physics experiments, J. M. Campbell, and others, SciPost Phys. 16 (5) 130, (2024), arXiv:2203.11110 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.16.5.130
13. Theoretical tools for neutrino scattering: interplay between lattice QCD, EFTs, nuclear physics, phenomenology, and neutrino event generators, L. Alvarez Ruso, and others, J. Phys. G 52 (4) 043001, (2025), arXiv:2203.09030 doi:10.1088/1361-6471/adae26
14. $Celeritas$: GPU-accelerated particle transport for detector simulation in High Energy Physics experiments, S. C. Tognini, P. Canal, T. M. Evans, G. Lima, A. L. Lund, S. R. Johnson, S. Y. Jun, V. R. Pascuzzi, and P. K. Romano, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2203.09467 doi:10.2172/1863002
15. Evolution of HEP Processing Frameworks, Christopher D. Jones, Kyle Knoepfel, Paolo Calafiura, Charles Leggett, and Vakhtang Tsulaia, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2203.14345
16. Snowmass White Paper: The Numerical Conformal Bootstrap, David Poland, and David Simmons-Duffin, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2203.08117
17. Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier White Paper: Numerical relativity for next-generation gravitational-wave probes of fundamental physics, Francois Foucart, Pablo Laguna, Geoffrey Lovelace, David Radice, and Helvi Witek, (2022), arXiv:2203.08139
18. Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier: Modeling, statistics, simulations, and computing needs for direct dark matter detection, Yonatan Kahn, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2203.07700
19. Software and Computing for Small HEP Experiments, Costas Andreopoulos, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2203.07645
20. Dark-matter And Neutrino Computation Explored (DANCE) Community Input to Snowmass, Amy Roberts, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2203.08338
21. Snowmass21 Accelerator Modeling Community White Paper, S. Biedron, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2203.08335
22. New directions for surrogate models and differentiable programming for High Energy Physics detector simulation, Andreas Adelmann, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2203.08806
23. Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier White Paper: Cosmological Simulations for Dark Matter Physics, Arka Banerjee, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2203.07049
24. Snowmass2021 Computational Frontier White Paper: Cosmological Simulations and Modeling, Marcelo A. Alvarez, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2203.07347
25. Machine learning and LHC event generation, Simon Badger, and others, SciPost Phys. 14 (4) 079, (2023), arXiv:2203.07460 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.14.4.079
26. Detector and Beamline Simulation for Next-Generation High Energy Physics Experiments, Sunanda Banerjee, and others, (2022), arXiv:2203.07614 doi:10.2172/1861389
27. Grid: OneCode and FourAPIs, Azusa Yamaguchi, Peter Boyle, Guido Cossu, Gianluca Filaci, Christoph Lehner, and Antonin Portelli, PoS LATTICE2021 035, (2022), arXiv:2203.06777 doi:10.22323/1.396.0035
28. Simulations of Silicon Radiation Detectors for High Energy Physics Experiments, B. Nachman, and others, (2022), arXiv:2203.06216
29. Tensor networks for High Energy Physics: contribution to Snowmass 2021, Yannick Meurice, James C. Osborn, Ryo Sakai, Judah Unmuth-Yockey, Simon Catterall, and Rolando D. Somma, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2203.04902
30. Hadron Spectroscopy with Lattice QCD, John Bulava, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2203.03230 doi:10.2172/1861390
31. Lattice QCD Calculations of Parton Physics, Martha Constantinou, and others, (2022), arXiv:2202.07193
32. Applications of Machine Learning to Lattice Quantum Field Theory, Denis Boyda, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2202.05838
33. LHCb Computing Resources: 2023 requests, Concezio Bozzi, (2022)
34. FLAG Review 2021, Y. Aoki, and others, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (10) 869, (2022), arXiv:2111.09849 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10536-1
35. The Effective Vector Boson Approximation in high-energy muon collisions, Richard Ruiz, Antonio Costantini, Fabio Maltoni, and Olivier Mattelaer, JHEP 06 114, (2022), arXiv:2111.02442 doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2022)114
36. HL-LHC Computing Review Stage-2, Common Software Projects: Event Generators, Efe Yazgan, and others, (2021), arXiv:2109.14938
37. AtlFast3: The Next Generation of Fast Simulation in ATLAS, Georges Aad, and others, Comput. Softw. Big Sci. 6 (1) 7, (2022), arXiv:2109.02551 doi:10.1007/s41781-021-00079-7
38. Nyx: A Massively Parallel AMR Code for Computational Cosmology, Jean Sexton, Zarija Lukic, Ann Almgren, Chris Daley, Brian Friesen, Andrew Myers, and Weiqun Zhang, J. Open Source Softw. 6 (63) 3068, (2021), doi:10.21105/joss.03068
39. Design and engineering of a simplified workflow execution for the MG5aMC event generator on GPUs and vector CPUs, Andrea Valassi, Stefan Roiser, Olivier Mattelaer, and Stephan Hageboeck, EPJ Web Conf. 251 03045, (2021), arXiv:2106.12631 doi:10.1051/epjconf/202125103045
40. MadFlow: automating Monte Carlo simulation on GPU for particle physics processes, Stefano Carrazza, Juan Cruz-Martinez, Marco Rossi, and Marco Zaro, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (7) 656, (2021), arXiv:2106.10279 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09443-8
41. Many-gluon tree amplitudes on modern GPUs: A case study for novel event generators, Enrico Bothmann, Walter Giele, Stefan Hoeche, Joshua Isaacson, and Max Knobbe, SciPost Phys. Codeb. 2022 3, (2022), arXiv:2106.06507 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCodeb.3
42. Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.46 ppm, B. Abi, and others, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (14) 141801, (2021), arXiv:2104.03281 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.141801
43. Physical, numerical, and computational challenges of modeling neutrino transport in core-collapse supernovae, Anthony Mezzacappa, Eirik Endeve, O. E. Bronson Messer, and Stephen W. Bruenn, Liv. Rev. Comput. Astrophys. 6 (1) 4, (2020), arXiv:2010.09013 doi:10.1007/s41115-020-00010-8
44. HL-LHC Computing Review: Common Tools and Community Software, Thea Aarrestad, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2020), arXiv:2008.13636 doi:10.5281/zenodo.4009114
45. The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model, T. Aoyama, and others, Phys. Rept. 887 1–166, (2020), arXiv:2006.04822 doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.07.006
46. Vector boson fusion at multi-TeV muon colliders, Antonio Costantini, Federico De Lillo, Fabio Maltoni, Luca Mantani, Olivier Mattelaer, Richard Ruiz, and Xiaoran Zhao, JHEP 09 080, (2020), arXiv:2005.10289 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2020)080
47. GeantV: Results from the Prototype of Concurrent Vector Particle Transport Simulation in HEP, G. Amadio, and others, Comput. Softw. Big Sci. 5 (1) 3, (2021), arXiv:2005.00949 doi:10.1007/s41781-020-00048-6
48. Challenges in Monte Carlo Event Generator Software for High-Luminosity LHC, Simone Amoroso, and others, Comput. Softw. Big Sci. 5 (1) 12, (2021), arXiv:2004.13687 doi:10.1007/s41781-021-00055-1
49. Simulation of Vector Boson Plus Many Jet Final States at the High Luminosity LHC, Stefan Höche, Stefan Prestel, and Holger Schulz, Phys. Rev. D 100 (1) 014024, (2019), arXiv:1905.05120 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.014024
50. Status and Future Perspectives for Lattice Gauge Theory Calculations to the Exascale and Beyond, B\'alint Jo\'o, Chulwoo Jung, Norman H. Christ, William Detmold, Robert Edwards, Martin Savage, and Phiala Shanahan, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 199, (2019), arXiv:1904.09725 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12919-7
51. Hot-dense Lattice QCD: USQCD whitepaper 2018, Alexei Bazavov, Frithjof Karsch, Swagato Mukherjee, and Peter Petreczky, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 194, (2019), arXiv:1904.09951 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12922-0
52. Lattice QCD and Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering, Andreas S. Kronfeld, David G. Richards, William Detmold, Rajan Gupta, Huey-Wen Lin, Keh-Fei Liu, Aaron S. Meyer, Raza Sufian, and Sergey Syritsyn, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 196, (2019), arXiv:1904.09931 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12916-x
53. Lattice Gauge Theory for Physics Beyond the Standard Model, Richard C. Brower, Anna Hasenfratz, Ethan T. Neil, Simon Catterall, George Fleming, Joel Giedt, Enrico Rinaldi, David Schaich, Evan Weinberg, and Oliver Witzel, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 198, (2019), arXiv:1904.09964 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12901-5
54. The Role of Lattice QCD in Searches for Violations of Fundamental Symmetries and Signals for New Physics, Vincenzo Cirigliano, Zohreh Davoudi, Tanmoy Bhattacharya, Taku Izubuchi, Phiala E. Shanahan, Sergey Syritsyn, and Michael L. Wagman, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 197, (2019), arXiv:1904.09704 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12889-8
55. Opportunities for Lattice QCD in Quark and Lepton Flavor Physics, Christoph Lehner, and others, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 195, (2019), arXiv:1904.09479 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12891-2
56. Hadrons and Nuclei, William Detmold, Robert G. Edwards, Jozef J. Dudek, Michael Engelhardt, Huey-Wen Lin, Stefan Meinel, Kostas Orginos, and Phiala Shanahan, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 193, (2019), arXiv:1904.09512 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12902-4
57. Machine learning for orders of magnitude speedup in multiobjective optimization of particle accelerator systems, Auralee Edelen, Nicole Neveu, Yannick Huber, Matthias Frey, Christopher Mayes, and Andreas Adelmann, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 23 (4) 044601, (2020), arXiv:1903.07759 doi:10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.23.044601
58. ReDecay: A novel approach to speed up the simulation at LHCb, D. Müller, M. Clemencic, G. Corti, and M. Gersabeck, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (12) 1009, (2018), arXiv:1810.10362 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6469-6
59. HEP Software Foundation Community White Paper Working Group - Detector Simulation, J Apostolakis, and others, (2018), arXiv:1803.04165
60. MILC Code Performance on High End CPU and GPU Supercomputer Clusters, Carleton DeTar, Steven Gottlieb, Ruizi Li, and Doug Toussaint, EPJ Web Conf. 175 02009, (2018), doi:10.1051/epjconf/201817502009
61. Performance Portability Strategies for Grid C++ Expression Templates, Peter A. Boyle, M. A. Clark, Carleton DeTar, Meifeng Lin, Verinder Rana, and Alejandro Vaquero Avil\'es-Casco, EPJ Web Conf. 175 09006, (2018), arXiv:1710.09409 doi:10.1051/epjconf/201817509006
62. Deep learning at 15PF: supervised and semi-supervised classification for scientific data, Thorsten Kurth, and others, International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, (2017), arXiv:1708.05256 doi:10.1145/3126908.3126916
63. Recent developments in Geant4, J. Allison, and others, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 835 186–225, (2016), doi:10.1016/j.nima.2016.06.125
64. Grid: A next generation data parallel C++ QCD library, Peter Boyle, Guido Cossu, Azusa Yamaguchi, and Antonin Portelli, PoS LATTICE2015 023, (2016), arXiv:1512.03487 doi:10.22323/1.251.0023
65. Parton distributions for the LHC Run II, Richard D. Ball, and others, JHEP 04 040, (2015), arXiv:1410.8849 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2015)040
66. HACC: Simulating Sky Surveys on State-of-the-Art Supercomputing Architectures, Salman Habib, and others, New Astron. 42 49–65, (2016), arXiv:1410.2805 doi:10.1016/j.newast.2015.06.003
67. Overview of Columbia Physics System, Chulwoo Jung, PoS LATTICE2013 417, (2014), doi:10.22323/1.187.0417
68. Adaptive multigrid algorithm for the lattice Wilson-Dirac operator, R. Babich, J. Brannick, R. C. Brower, M. A. Clark, T. A. Manteuffel, S. F. McCormick, J. C. Osborn, and C. Rebbi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 201602, (2010), arXiv:1005.3043 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.201602
69. Solving Lattice QCD systems of equations using mixed precision solvers on GPUs, M. A. Clark, R. Babich, K. Barros, R. C. Brower, and C. Rebbi, Comput. Phys. Commun. 181 1517–1528, (2010), arXiv:0911.3191 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2010.05.002
70. High resolution simulation of beam dynamics in electron linacs for x-ray free electron lasers, J. Qiang, R. D. Ryne, M. Venturini, A. A. Zholents, and I. V. Pogorelov, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 12 100702, (2009), doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.12.100702
71. Adaptive Multigrid Algorithm for Lattice QCD, J. Brannick, R. C. Brower, M. A. Clark, J. C. Osborn, and C. Rebbi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 041601, (2008), arXiv:0707.4018 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.041601
72. Local coherence and deflation of the low quark modes in lattice QCD, Martin Luscher, JHEP 07 081, (2007), arXiv:0706.2298 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/07/081
73. Noninvariance of Space- and Time-Scale Ranges under a Lorentz Transformation and the Implications for the Study of Relativistic Interactions, J. L. Vay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (13) 130405, (2007), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.130405
74. Accelerating dynamical fermion computations using the rational hybrid Monte Carlo (RHMC) algorithm with multiple pseudofermion fields, M. A. Clark, and A. D. Kennedy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 051601, (2007), arXiv:hep-lat/0608015 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.051601
75. Final Report of the Muon E821 Anomalous Magnetic Moment Measurement at BNL, G. W. Bennett, and others, Phys. Rev. D 73 072003, (2006), arXiv:hep-ex/0602035 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.73.072003
76. Geant4 developments and applications, John Allison, and others, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53 270, (2006), doi:10.1109/TNS.2006.869826
77. Three-dimensional quasistatic model for high brightness beam dynamics simulation, Ji Qiang, S. Lidia, R. D. Ryne, and C. Limborg-Deprey, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 9 044204, (2006), doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.9.044204
78. The Chroma software system for lattice QCD, Robert G. Edwards, and Balint Joo, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 140 832, (2005), arXiv:hep-lat/0409003 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2004.11.254
79. Schwarz-preconditioned HMC algorithm for two-flavour lattice QCD, Martin Luscher, Comput. Phys. Commun. 165 199–220, (2005), arXiv:hep-lat/0409106 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2004.10.004
80. GEANT4 - A Simulation Toolkit, S. Agostinelli, and others, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 506 250–303, (2003), doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01368-8
81. Benchmarking MILC code with OpenMP and MPI, Steven A. Gottlieb, and Sonali Tamhankar, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 94 841–845, (2001), arXiv:hep-lat/0011037 doi:10.1016/S0920-5632(01)01016-7
82. GEANT3, R. Brun, F. Bruyant, M. Maire, A. C. McPherson, and P. Zanarini, (1987)
83. Hybrid Monte Carlo, S. Duane, A. D. Kennedy, B. J. Pendleton, and D. Roweth, Phys. Lett. B 195 216–222, (1987), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)91197-X