1. Interpretable Uncertainty Quantification in AI for HEP, Thomas Y. Chen, Biprateep Dey, Aishik Ghosh, Michael Kagan, Brian Nord, and Nesar Ramachandra, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2208.03284 doi:10.2172/1886020
2. Data Science and Machine Learning in Education, Gabriele Benelli, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2207.09060 doi:10.2172/1882567
3. Explainable AI for High Energy Physics, Mark S. Neubauer, and Avik Roy, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2206.06632
4. Physics Community Needs, Tools, and Resources for Machine Learning, Philip Harris, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2203.16255 doi:10.2172/1873720
5. Simulation based inference for efficient theory space sampling: An application to supersymmetric explanations of the anomalous muon g-2, Logan Morrison, Stefano Profumo, Nolan Smyth, and John Tamanas, Phys. Rev. D 106 (11) 115016, (2022), arXiv:2203.13403 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.115016
6. Toward the end-to-end optimization of particle physics instruments with differentiable programming, Tommaso Dorigo, and others, Rev. Phys. 10 100085, (2023), arXiv:2203.13818 doi:10.1016/j.revip.2023.100085
7. Deep learning applications for quality control in particle detector construction, N. Akchurin, J. Damgov, S. Dugad, P. G. C, S. Grönroos, K. Lamichhane, J. Martinez, T. Quast, S. Undleeb, and A. Whitbeck, (2022), arXiv:2203.08969
8. Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier: Modeling, statistics, simulations, and computing needs for direct dark matter detection, Yonatan Kahn, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2203.07700
9. Software and Computing for Small HEP Experiments, Costas Andreopoulos, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2203.07645
10. Machine Learning and Cosmology, Cora Dvorkin, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2203.08056
11. Dark-matter And Neutrino Computation Explored (DANCE) Community Input to Snowmass, Amy Roberts, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2203.08338
12. New directions for surrogate models and differentiable programming for High Energy Physics detector simulation, Andreas Adelmann, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2203.08806
13. HEP computing collaborations for the challenges of the next decade, Simone Campana, Alessandro Di Girolamo, Paul Laycock, Zach Marshall, Heidi Schellman, and Graeme A. Stewart, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2203.07237
14. Machine learning and LHC event generation, Simon Badger, and others, SciPost Phys. 14 (4) 079, (2023), arXiv:2203.07460 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.14.4.079
15. Innovations in trigger and data acquisition systems for next-generation physics facilities, Rainer Bartoldus, Catrin Bernius, and David W. Miller, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2203.07620
16. Solving Simulation Systematics in and with AI/ML, Brett Viren, Jin Huang, Yi Huang, Meifeng Lin, Yihui Ren, Kazuhiro Terao, Dmitrii Torbunov, and Haiwang Yu, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2203.06112
17. Symmetry Group Equivariant Architectures for Physics, Alexander Bogatskiy, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2203.06153
18. Adaptive Machine Learning for Time-Varying Systems: Towards 6D Phase Space Diagnostics of Short Intense Charged Particle Beams, Alexander Scheinker, and Spencer Gessner, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2203.04391
19. Creating simple, interpretable anomaly detectors for new physics in jet substructure, Layne Bradshaw, Spencer Chang, and Bryan Ostdiek, Phys. Rev. D 106 (3) 035014, (2022), arXiv:2203.01343 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.035014
20. Applications of Machine Learning to Lattice Quantum Field Theory, Denis Boyda, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2202.05838
21. Detecting new physics as novelty {\textemdash} Complementarity matters, Xu-Hui Jiang, Aurelio Juste, Ying-Ying Li, and Tao Liu, JHEP 10 085, (2022), arXiv:2202.02165 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2022)085
22. Resolving extreme jet substructure, Yadong Lu, Alexis Romero, Michael James Fenton, Daniel Whiteson, and Pierre Baldi, JHEP 08 046, (2022), arXiv:2202.00723 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2022)046
23. Machine Learning in the Search for New Fundamental Physics, Georgia Karagiorgi, Gregor Kasieczka, Scott Kravitz, Benjamin Nachman, and David Shih, (2021), arXiv:2112.03769
24. Event-Based Anomaly Detection for Searches for New Physics, Sergei Chekanov, and Walter Hopkins, Universe 8 (10) 494, (2022), arXiv:2111.12119 doi:10.3390/universe8100494
25. Electromagnetic shower reconstruction and energy validation with Michel electrons and {\ensuremath{\pi}}$^{0}$ samples for the deep-learning-based analyses in MicroBooNE, P. Abratenko, and others, JINST 16 (12) T12017, (2021), arXiv:2110.11874 doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/12/T12017
26. Challenges for unsupervised anomaly detection in particle physics, Katherine Fraser, Samuel Homiller, Rashmish K. Mishra, Bryan Ostdiek, and Matthew D. Schwartz, JHEP 03 066, (2022), arXiv:2110.06948 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2022)066
27. A cautionary tale of decorrelating theory uncertainties, Aishik Ghosh, and Benjamin Nachman, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (1) 46, (2022), arXiv:2109.08159 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10012-w
28. Deep Set Auto Encoders for Anomaly Detection in Particle Physics, Bryan Ostdiek, SciPost Phys. 12 (1) 045, (2022), arXiv:2109.01695 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.12.1.045
29. Classifying anomalies through outer density estimation, Anna Hallin, Joshua Isaacson, Gregor Kasieczka, Claudius Krause, Benjamin Nachman, Tobias Quadfasel, Matthias Schlaffer, David Shih, and Manuel Sommerhalder, Phys. Rev. D 106 (5) 055006, (2022), arXiv:2109.00546 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.055006
30. Autoencoders on field-programmable gate arrays for real-time, unsupervised new physics detection at 40 MHz at the Large Hadron Collider, Ekaterina Govorkova, and others, Nature Mach. Intell. 4 154–161, (2022), arXiv:2108.03986 doi:10.1038/s42256-022-00441-3
31. A factorisation-aware Matrix element emulator, Daniel Ma\^\itre, and Henry Truong, JHEP 11 066, (2021), arXiv:2107.06625 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2021)066
32. Particle Convolution for High Energy Physics, Chase Shimmin, (2021), arXiv:2107.02908
33. SPANet: Generalized permutationless set assignment for particle physics using symmetry preserving attention, Alexander Shmakov, Michael James Fenton, Ta-Wei Ho, Shih-Chieh Hsu, Daniel Whiteson, and Pierre Baldi, SciPost Phys. 12 (5) 178, (2022), arXiv:2106.03898 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.12.5.178
34. Uncertainty-aware machine learning for high energy physics, Aishik Ghosh, Benjamin Nachman, and Daniel Whiteson, Phys. Rev. D 104 (5) 056026, (2021), arXiv:2105.08742 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.056026
35. Anomaly detection with convolutional Graph Neural Networks, Oliver Atkinson, Akanksha Bhardwaj, Christoph Englert, Vishal S. Ngairangbam, and Michael Spannowsky, JHEP 08 080, (2021), arXiv:2105.07988 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2021)080
36. Jet Single Shot Detection, Adrian Alan Pol, and others, EPJ Web Conf. 251 04027, (2021), arXiv:2105.05785 doi:10.1051/epjconf/202125104027
37. Muon trigger with fast Neural Networks on FPGA, a demonstrator, Matteo Migliorini, Jacopo Pazzini, Andrea Triossi, Marco Zanetti, and Alberto Zucchetta, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2374 (1) 012099, (2022), arXiv:2105.04428 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2374/1/012099
38. Identifying the quantum properties of hadronic resonances using machine learning, Jakub Filipek, Shih-Chieh Hsu, John Kruper, Kirtimaan Mohan, and Benjamin Nachman, SciPost Phys. Core 8 039, (2025), arXiv:2105.04582 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.8.2.039
39. A Reconfigurable Neural Network ASIC for Detector Front-End Data Compression at the HL-LHC, Giuseppe Di Guglielmo, and others, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 68 (8) 2179–2186, (2021), arXiv:2105.01683 doi:10.1109/TNS.2021.3087100
40. Autoencoders for unsupervised anomaly detection in high energy physics, Thorben Finke, Michael Krämer, Alessandro Morandini, Alexander Mück, and Ivan Oleksiyuk, JHEP 06 161, (2021), arXiv:2104.09051 doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2021)161
41. End-to-end jet classification of boosted top quarks with the CMS open data, Michael Andrews, and others, EPJ Web Conf. 251 04030, (2021), arXiv:2104.14659 doi:10.1051/epjconf/202125104030
42. Nanosecond machine learning event classification with boosted decision trees in FPGA for high energy physics, Tae Min Hong, Benjamin Carlson, Brandon Eubanks, Stephen Racz, Stephen Roche, Joerg Stelzer, and Daniel Stumpp, JINST 16 (08) P08016, (2021), arXiv:2104.03408 doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/08/P08016
43. Jet characterization in Heavy Ion Collisions by QCD-Aware Graph Neural Networks, Yogesh Verma, and Satyajit Jena, (2021), arXiv:2103.14906
44. Generalization capabilities of translationally equivariant neural networks, Srinath Bulusu, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, Phys. Rev. D 104 (7) 074504, (2021), arXiv:2103.14686 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.074504
45. Efficient sampling of constrained high-dimensional theoretical spaces with machine learning, Jacob Hollingsworth, Michael Ratz, Philip Tanedo, and Daniel Whiteson, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (12) 1138, (2021), arXiv:2103.06957 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09941-9
46. Graph Neural Network for Object Reconstruction in Liquid Argon Time Projection Chambers, Jeremy Hewes, and others, EPJ Web Conf. 251 03054, (2021), arXiv:2103.06233 doi:10.1051/epjconf/202125103054
47. Point cloud transformers applied to collider physics, Vinicius Mikuni, and Florencia Canelli, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 2 (3) 035027, (2021), arXiv:2102.05073 doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ac07f6
48. Sequence-based Machine Learning Models in Jet Physics, Rafael Teixeira de Lima, (2021), arXiv:2102.06128
49. Scalable, End-to-End, Deep-Learning-Based Data Reconstruction Chain for Particle Imaging Detectors, Francois Drielsma, Kazuhiro Terao, Laura Domin\'e, and Dae Heun Koh, 34th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, (2021), arXiv:2102.01033
50. Development of a vertex finding algorithm using Recurrent Neural Network, Kiichi Goto, Taikan Suehara, Tamaki Yoshioka, Masakazu Kurata, Hajime Nagahara, Yuta Nakashima, Noriko Takemura, and Masako Iwasaki, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 1047 167836, (2023), arXiv:2101.11906 doi:10.1016/j.nima.2022.167836
51. A Convolutional Neural Network based Cascade Reconstruction for the IceCube Neutrino Observatory, R. Abbasi, and others, JINST 16 P07041, (2021), arXiv:2101.11589 doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/07/P07041
52. MLPF: Efficient machine-learned particle-flow reconstruction using graph neural networks, Joosep Pata, Javier Duarte, Jean-Roch Vlimant, Maurizio Pierini, and Maria Spiropulu, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (5) 381, (2021), arXiv:2101.08578 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09158-w
53. Learning to simulate high energy particle collisions from unlabeled data, Jessica N. Howard, Stephan Mandt, Daniel Whiteson, and Yibo Yang, Sci. Rep. 12 7567, (2022), arXiv:2101.08944 doi:10.1038/s41598-022-10966-7
54. The LHC Olympics 2020 a community challenge for anomaly detection in high energy physics, Gregor Kasieczka, and others, Rept. Prog. Phys. 84 (12) 124201, (2021), arXiv:2101.08320 doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ac36b9
55. Fast convolutional neural networks on FPGAs with hls4ml, Thea Aarrestad, and others, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 2 (4) 045015, (2021), arXiv:2101.05108 doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ac0ea1
56. Lattice Gauge Equivariant Convolutional Neural Networks, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (3) 032003, (2022), arXiv:2012.12901 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.032003
57. How to GAN Higher Jet Resolution, Pierre Baldi, Lukas Blecher, Anja Butter, Julian Collado, Jessica N. Howard, Fabian Keilbach, Tilman Plehn, Gregor Kasieczka, and Daniel Whiteson, SciPost Phys. 13 (3) 064, (2022), arXiv:2012.11944 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.13.3.064
58. Unsupervised in-distribution anomaly detection of new physics through conditional density estimation, George Stein, Uros Seljak, and Biwei Dai, 34th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, (2020), arXiv:2012.11638
59. Deep learning jet modifications in heavy-ion collisions, Yi-Lun Du, Daniel Pablos, and Konrad Tywoniuk, JHEP 21 206, (2020), arXiv:2012.07797 doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2021)206
60. Explainable machine learning of the underlying physics of high-energy particle collisions, Yue Shi Lai, Duff Neill, Mateusz P\losko\'n, and Felix Ringer, Phys. Lett. B 829 137055, (2022), arXiv:2012.06582 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137055
61. Zero-permutation jet-parton assignment using a self-attention network, Jason Sang Hun Lee, Inkyu Park, Ian James Watson, and Seungjin Yang, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 84 (6) 427–438, (2024), arXiv:2012.03542 doi:10.1007/s40042-024-01037-3
62. Equivariant Energy Flow Networks for Jet Tagging, Matthew J. Dolan, and Ayodele Ore, Phys. Rev. D 103 (7) 074022, (2021), arXiv:2012.00964 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074022
63. Accelerated Charged Particle Tracking with Graph Neural Networks on FPGAs, Aneesh Heintz, and others, 34th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, (2020), arXiv:2012.01563
64. Explainable AI for ML jet taggers using expert variables and layerwise relevance propagation, Garvita Agarwal, Lauren Hay, Ia Iashvili, Benjamin Mannix, Christine McLean, Margaret Morris, Salvatore Rappoccio, and Ulrich Schubert, JHEP 05 208, (2021), arXiv:2011.13466 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2021)208
65. Learning to identify electrons, Julian Collado, Jessica N. Howard, Taylor Faucett, Tony Tong, Pierre Baldi, and Daniel Whiteson, Phys. Rev. D 103 (11) 116028, (2021), arXiv:2011.01984 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.116028
66. Mapping Machine-Learned Physics into a Human-Readable Space, Taylor Faucett, Jesse Thaler, and Daniel Whiteson, Phys. Rev. D 103 (3) 036020, (2021), arXiv:2010.11998 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.036020
67. Permutationless many-jet event reconstruction with symmetry preserving attention networks, Michael James Fenton, Alexander Shmakov, Ta-Wei Ho, Shih-Chieh Hsu, Daniel Whiteson, and Pierre Baldi, Phys. Rev. D 105 (11) 112008, (2022), arXiv:2010.09206 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.112008
68. FPGAs-as-a-Service Toolkit (FaaST), Dylan Sheldon Rankin, and others, (2020), arXiv:2010.08556 doi:10.1109/H2RC51942.2020.00010
69. Anomaly Detection With Conditional Variational Autoencoders, Adrian Alan Pol, Victor Berger, Gianluca Cerminara, Cecile Germain, and Maurizio Pierini, Eighteenth International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications, (2020), arXiv:2010.05531
70. Disentangling Boosted Higgs Boson Production Modes with Machine Learning, Yi-Lun Chung, Shih-Chieh Hsu, and Benjamin Nachman, JINST 16 P07002, (2021), arXiv:2009.05930 doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/07/P07002
71. Simulation-assisted decorrelation for resonant anomaly detection, Kees Benkendorfer, Luc Le Pottier, and Benjamin Nachman, Phys. Rev. D 104 (3) 035003, (2021), arXiv:2009.02205 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.035003
72. DCTRGAN: Improving the Precision of Generative Models with Reweighting, Sascha Diefenbacher, Engin Eren, Gregor Kasieczka, Anatolii Korol, Benjamin Nachman, and David Shih, JINST 15 (11) P11004, (2020), arXiv:2009.03796 doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/11/P11004
73. Reconstructing boosted Higgs jets from event image segmentation, Jinmian Li, Tianjun Li, and Fang-Zhou Xu, JHEP 04 156, (2021), arXiv:2008.13529 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2021)156
74. HL-LHC Computing Review: Common Tools and Community Software, Thea Aarrestad, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2020), arXiv:2008.13636 doi:10.5281/zenodo.4009114
75. An Attention Based Neural Network for Jet Tagging, Jing Li, and Hao Sun, (2020), arXiv:2009.00170
76. Decoding Dark Matter Substructure without Supervision, Stephon Alexander, Sergei Gleyzer, Hanna Parul, Pranath Reddy, Michael W. Toomey, Emanuele Usai, and Ryker Von Klar, (2020), arXiv:2008.12731
77. Jet Flavour Classification Using DeepJet, Emil Bols, Jan Kieseler, Mauro Verzetti, Markus Stoye, and Anna Stakia, JINST 15 (12) P12012, (2020), arXiv:2008.10519 doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/12/P12012
78. Sampling using $SU(N)$ gauge equivariant flows, Denis Boyda, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Michael S. Albergo, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 103 (7) 074504, (2021), arXiv:2008.05456 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074504
79. Distance-Weighted Graph Neural Networks on FPGAs for Real-Time Particle Reconstruction in High Energy Physics, Yutaro Iiyama, and others, Front. Big Data 3 598927, (2020), arXiv:2008.03601 doi:10.3389/fdata.2020.598927
80. Unsupervised Outlier Detection in Heavy-Ion Collisions, Punnathat Thaprasop, Kai Zhou, Jan Steinheimer, and Christoph Herold, Phys. Scripta 96 (6) 064003, (2021), arXiv:2007.15830 doi:10.1088/1402-4896/abf214
81. Secondary vertex finding in jets with neural networks, Jonathan Shlomi, Sanmay Ganguly, Eilam Gross, Kyle Cranmer, Yaron Lipman, Hadar Serviansky, Haggai Maron, and Nimrod Segol, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (6) 540, (2021), arXiv:2008.02831 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09342-y
82. Anomaly Awareness, Charanjit Kaur Khosa, and Veronica Sanz, SciPost Phys. 15 (2) 053, (2023), arXiv:2007.14462 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.2.053
83. Dealing with Nuisance Parameters using Machine Learning in High Energy Physics: a Review, T. Dorigo, and P. De Castro Manzano, (2020), arXiv:2007.09121
84. Invertible Networks or Partons to Detector and Back Again, Marco Bellagente, Anja Butter, Gregor Kasieczka, Tilman Plehn, Armand Rousselot, Ramon Winterhalder, Lynton Ardizzone, and Ullrich Köthe, SciPost Phys. 9 074, (2020), arXiv:2006.06685 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.9.5.074
85. Semantic Segmentation with Sparse Convolutional Neural Network for Event Reconstruction in MicroBooNE, P. Abratenko, and others, Phys. Rev. D 103 (5) 052012, (2021), arXiv:2012.08513 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.052012
86. Variational autoencoders for anomalous jet tagging, Taoli Cheng, Jean-Fran\ccois Arguin, Julien Leissner-Martin, Jacinthe Pilette, and Tobias Golling, Phys. Rev. D 107 (1) 016002, (2023), arXiv:2007.01850 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.016002
87. Finding New Physics without learning about it: Anomaly Detection as a tool for Searches at Colliders, M. Crispim Rom\~ao, N. F. Castro, and R. Pedro, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (1) 27, (2021), arXiv:2006.05432 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09813-2
88. Lorentz Group Equivariant Neural Network for Particle Physics, Alexander Bogatskiy, Brandon Anderson, Jan T. Offermann, Marwah Roussi, David W. Miller, and Risi Kondor, (2020), arXiv:2006.04780
89. Adversarially Learned Anomaly Detection on CMS Open Data: re-discovering the top quark, Oliver Knapp, Olmo Cerri, Guenther Dissertori, Thong Q. Nguyen, Maurizio Pierini, and Jean-Roch Vlimant, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136 (2) 236, (2021), arXiv:2005.01598 doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01109-4
90. Use of a generalized energy Mover{\textquoteright}s distance in the search for rare phenomena at colliders, M. Crispim Rom\~ao, N. F. Castro, J. G. Milhano, R. Pedro, and T. Vale, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2) 192, (2021), arXiv:2004.09360 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-08891-6
91. Graph Neural Networks for Particle Reconstruction in High Energy Physics detectors, Xiangyang Ju, and others, 33rd Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, (2020), arXiv:2003.11603
92. Compressing deep neural networks on FPGAs to binary and ternary precision with HLS4ML, Vladimir Loncar, and others, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 2 015001, (2021), arXiv:2003.06308 doi:10.1088/2632-2153/aba042
93. Black-Box Optimization with Local Generative Surrogates, (2020), arXiv:2002.04632
94. Object condensation: one-stage grid-free multi-object reconstruction in physics detectors, graph and image data, Jan Kieseler, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (9) 886, (2020), arXiv:2002.03605 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08461-2
95. Fast inference of Boosted Decision Trees in FPGAs for particle physics, Sioni Summers, and others, JINST 15 (05) P05026, (2020), arXiv:2002.02534 doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/05/P05026
96. Anomaly Detection with Density Estimation, Benjamin Nachman, and David Shih, Phys. Rev. D 101 075042, (2020), arXiv:2001.04990 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.075042
97. Simulation Assisted Likelihood-free Anomaly Detection, Anders Andreassen, Benjamin Nachman, and David Shih, Phys. Rev. D 101 (9) 095004, (2020), arXiv:2001.05001 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.095004
98. ABCNet: An attention-based method for particle tagging, Vinicius Mikuni, and Florencia Canelli, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 135 (6) 463, (2020), arXiv:2001.05311 doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00497-3
99. Deep Sets based Neural Networks for Impact Parameter Flavour Tagging in ATLAS, (2020)
100. Learning to isolate muons, Julian Collado, Kevin Bauer, Edmund Witkowski, Taylor Faucett, Daniel Whiteson, and Pierre Baldi, JHEP 21 200, (2020), arXiv:2102.02278 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2021)200
101. Learning multivariate new physics, Raffaele Tito D'Agnolo, Gaia Grosso, Maurizio Pierini, Andrea Wulzer, and Marco Zanetti, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (1) 89, (2021), arXiv:1912.12155 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-08853-y
102. OmniFold: A Method to Simultaneously Unfold All Observables, Anders Andreassen, Patrick T. Komiske, Eric M. Metodiev, Benjamin Nachman, and Jesse Thaler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (18) 182001, (2020), arXiv:1911.09107 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.182001
103. Identifying the nature of the QCD transition in relativistic collision of heavy nuclei with deep learning, Yi-Lun Du, Kai Zhou, Jan Steinheimer, Long-Gang Pang, Anton Motornenko, Hong-Shi Zong, Xin-Nian Wang, and Horst Stöcker, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (6) 516, (2020), arXiv:1910.11530 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8030-7
104. Parametrizing the Detector Response with Neural Networks, Sanha Cheong, Aviv Cukierman, Benjamin Nachman, Murtaza Safdari, and Ariel Schwartzman, JINST 15 (01) P01030, (2020), arXiv:1910.03773 doi:10.1088/1748-0221/15/01/P01030
105. A guide for deploying Deep Learning in LHC searches: How to achieve optimality and account for uncertainty, Benjamin Nachman, SciPost Phys. 8 090, (2020), arXiv:1909.03081 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.8.6.090
106. Adversarially-trained autoencoders for robust unsupervised new physics searches, Andrew Blance, Michael Spannowsky, and Philip Waite, JHEP 10 047, (2019), arXiv:1905.10384 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2019)047
107. Machine learning and the physical sciences, Giuseppe Carleo, Ignacio Cirac, Kyle Cranmer, Laurent Daudet, Maria Schuld, Naftali Tishby, Leslie Vogt-Maranto, and Lenka Zdeborov\'a, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91 (4) 045002, (2019), arXiv:1903.10563 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.91.045002
108. Scalable deep convolutional neural networks for sparse, locally dense liquid argon time projection chamber data, Laura Domin\'e, and Kazuhiro Terao, Phys. Rev. D 102 (1) 012005, (2020), arXiv:1903.05663 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.012005
109. A robust anomaly finder based on autoencoders, Tuhin S. Roy, and Aravind H. Vijay, (2019), arXiv:1903.02032
110. ParticleNet: Jet Tagging via Particle Clouds, Huilin Qu, and Loukas Gouskos, Phys. Rev. D 101 (5) 056019, (2020), arXiv:1902.08570 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.056019
111. Quark-Gluon Jet Discrimination Using Convolutional Neural Networks, Jason Sang Hun Lee, Inkyu Park, Ian James Watson, and Seungjin Yang, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 74 (3) 219–223, (2019), arXiv:2012.02531 doi:10.3938/jkps.74.219
112. Gauge Equivariant Convolutional Networks and the Icosahedral CNN, Taco S. Cohen, Maurice Weiler, Berkay Kicanaoglu, and Max Welling, (2019), arXiv:1902.04615
113. Metric Space of Collider Events, Patrick T. Komiske, Eric M. Metodiev, and Jesse Thaler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (4) 041801, (2019), arXiv:1902.02346 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.041801
114. Extending the search for new resonances with machine learning, Jack H. Collins, Kiel Howe, and Benjamin Nachman, Phys. Rev. D 99 (1) 014038, (2019), arXiv:1902.02634 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.014038
115. Convolutional Neural Networks with Event Images for Pileup Mitigation with the ATLAS Detector, (2019)
116. Variational Autoencoders for New Physics Mining at the Large Hadron Collider, Olmo Cerri, Thong Q. Nguyen, Maurizio Pierini, Maria Spiropulu, and Jean-Roch Vlimant, JHEP 05 036, (2019), arXiv:1811.10276 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2019)036
117. Energy Flow Networks: Deep Sets for Particle Jets, Patrick T. Komiske, Eric M. Metodiev, and Jesse Thaler, JHEP 01 121, (2019), arXiv:1810.05165 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2019)121
118. Searching for New Physics with Deep Autoencoders, Marco Farina, Yuichiro Nakai, and David Shih, Phys. Rev. D 101 (7) 075021, (2020), arXiv:1808.08992 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.075021
119. QCD or What?, Theo Heimel, Gregor Kasieczka, Tilman Plehn, and Jennifer M. Thompson, SciPost Phys. 6 (3) 030, (2019), arXiv:1808.08979 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.6.3.030
120. Reducing model bias in a deep learning classifier using domain adversarial neural networks in the MINERvA experiment, G. N. Perdue, and others, JINST 13 (11) P11020, (2018), arXiv:1808.08332 doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/11/P11020
121. Machine learning at the energy and intensity frontiers of particle physics, Alexander Radovic, Mike Williams, David Rousseau, Michael Kagan, Daniele Bonacorsi, Alexander Himmel, Adam Aurisano, Kazuhiro Terao, and Taritree Wongjirad, Nature 560 (7716) 41–48, (2018), doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0361-2
122. End-to-End Physics Event Classification with CMS Open Data: Applying Image-Based Deep Learning to Detector Data for the Direct Classification of Collision Events at the LHC, M. Andrews, M. Paulini, S. Gleyzer, and B. Poczos, Comput. Softw. Big Sci. 4 (1) 6, (2020), arXiv:1807.11916 doi:10.1007/s41781-020-00038-8
123. Boosting $H\to b\bar b$ with Machine Learning, Joshua Lin, Marat Freytsis, Ian Moult, and Benjamin Nachman, JHEP 10 101, (2018), arXiv:1807.10768 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2018)101
124. Novelty Detection Meets Collider Physics, Jan Hajer, Ying-Ying Li, Tao Liu, and He Wang, Phys. Rev. D 101 (7) 076015, (2020), arXiv:1807.10261 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.076015
125. Deep Learning and its Application to LHC Physics, Dan Guest, Kyle Cranmer, and Daniel Whiteson, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 68 161–181, (2018), arXiv:1806.11484 doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-101917-021019
126. Topology classification with deep learning to improve real-time event selection at the LHC, Thong Q. Nguyen, Daniel Weitekamp, Dustin Anderson, Roberto Castello, Olmo Cerri, Maurizio Pierini, Maria Spiropulu, and Jean-Roch Vlimant, Comput. Softw. Big Sci. 3 (1) 12, (2019), arXiv:1807.00083 doi:10.1007/s41781-019-0028-1
127. INFERNO: Inference-Aware Neural Optimisation, Pablo De Castro, and Tommaso Dorigo, Comput. Phys. Commun. 244 170–179, (2019), arXiv:1806.04743 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2019.06.007
128. Anomaly Detection for Resonant New Physics with Machine Learning, Jack H. Collins, Kiel Howe, and Benjamin Nachman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (24) 241803, (2018), arXiv:1805.02664 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.241803
129. Opening the black box of neural nets: case studies in stop/top discrimination, Thomas Roxlo, and Matthew Reece, (2018), arXiv:1804.09278
130. Fast inference of deep neural networks in FPGAs for particle physics, Javier Duarte, and others, JINST 13 (07) P07027, (2018), arXiv:1804.06913 doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/07/P07027
131. Identifying the relevant dependencies of the neural network response on characteristics of the input space, Stefan Wunsch, Raphael Friese, Roger Wolf, and Günter Quast, Comput. Softw. Big Sci. 2 (1) 5, (2018), arXiv:1803.08782 doi:10.1007/s41781-018-0012-1
132. Pulling Out All the Tops with Computer Vision and Deep Learning, Sebastian Macaluso, and David Shih, JHEP 10 121, (2018), arXiv:1803.00107 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2018)121
133. Learning to classify from impure samples with high-dimensional data, Patrick T. Komiske, Eric M. Metodiev, Benjamin Nachman, and Matthew D. Schwartz, Phys. Rev. D 98 (1) 011502, (2018), arXiv:1801.10158 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.011502
134. CaloGAN : Simulating 3D high energy particle showers in multilayer electromagnetic calorimeters with generative adversarial networks, Michela Paganini, Luke de Oliveira, and Benjamin Nachman, Phys. Rev. D 97 (1) 014021, (2018), arXiv:1712.10321 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.014021
135. Energy flow polynomials: A complete linear basis for jet substructure, Patrick T. Komiske, Eric M. Metodiev, and Jesse Thaler, JHEP 04 013, (2018), arXiv:1712.07124 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2018)013
136. What is the Machine Learning?, Spencer Chang, Timothy Cohen, and Bryan Ostdiek, Phys. Rev. D 97 (5) 056009, (2018), arXiv:1709.10106 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.056009
137. Classification without labels: Learning from mixed samples in high energy physics, Eric M. Metodiev, Benjamin Nachman, and Jesse Thaler, JHEP 10 174, (2017), arXiv:1708.02949 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2017)174
138. Quark versus Gluon Jet Tagging Using Jet Images with the ATLAS Detector, (2017)
139. Accelerating Science with Generative Adversarial Networks: An Application to 3D Particle Showers in Multilayer Calorimeters, Michela Paganini, Luke de Oliveira, and Benjamin Nachman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (4) 042003, (2018), arXiv:1705.02355 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.042003
140. Decorrelated Jet Substructure Tagging using Adversarial Neural Networks, Chase Shimmin, Peter Sadowski, Pierre Baldi, Edison Weik, Daniel Whiteson, Edward Goul, and Andreas S\ogaard, Phys. Rev. D 96 (7) 074034, (2017), arXiv:1703.03507 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.074034
141. Identification of Jets Containing $b$-Hadrons with Recurrent Neural Networks at the ATLAS Experiment, (2017)
142. QCD-Aware Recursive Neural Networks for Jet Physics, Gilles Louppe, Kyunghyun Cho, Cyril Becot, and Kyle Cranmer, JHEP 01 057, (2019), arXiv:1702.00748 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2019)057
143. Deep-learning Top Taggers or The End of QCD?, Gregor Kasieczka, Tilman Plehn, Michael Russell, and Torben Schell, JHEP 05 006, (2017), arXiv:1701.08784 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2017)006
144. Deep learning in color: towards automated quark/gluon jet discrimination, Patrick T. Komiske, Eric M. Metodiev, and Matthew D. Schwartz, JHEP 01 110, (2017), arXiv:1612.01551 doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2017)110
145. Learning to Pivot with Adversarial Networks, Gilles Louppe, Michael Kagan, and Kyle Cranmer, (2016), arXiv:1611.01046
146. Mathematical Properties of Numerical Inversion for Jet Calibrations, Aviv Cukierman, and Benjamin Nachman, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 858 1–11, (2017), arXiv:1609.05195 doi:10.1016/j.nima.2017.03.038
147. Parton Shower Uncertainties in Jet Substructure Analyses with Deep Neural Networks, James Barnard, Edmund Noel Dawe, Matthew J. Dolan, and Nina Rajcic, Phys. Rev. D 95 (1) 014018, (2017), arXiv:1609.00607 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.014018
148. Jet Flavor Classification in High-Energy Physics with Deep Neural Networks, Daniel Guest, Julian Collado, Pierre Baldi, Shih-Chieh Hsu, Gregor Urban, and Daniel Whiteson, Phys. Rev. D 94 (11) 112002, (2016), arXiv:1607.08633 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.112002
149. carl: a likelihood-free inference toolbox, Gilles Louppe, Kyle Cranmer, and Juan Pavez, J. Open Source Softw. 1 (1) 11, (2016), doi:10.21105/joss.00011
150. Parameterized neural networks for high-energy physics, Pierre Baldi, Kyle Cranmer, Taylor Faucett, Peter Sadowski, and Daniel Whiteson, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (5) 235, (2016), arXiv:1601.07913 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4099-4
151. Jet-images {\textemdash} deep learning edition, Luke de Oliveira, Michael Kagan, Lester Mackey, Benjamin Nachman, and Ariel Schwartzman, JHEP 07 069, (2016), arXiv:1511.05190 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2016)069
152. Playing Tag with ANN: Boosted Top Identification with Pattern Recognition, Leandro G. Almeida, Mihailo Backovi\'c, Mathieu Cliche, Seung J. Lee, and Maxim Perelstein, JHEP 07 086, (2015), arXiv:1501.05968 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2015)086
153. Jet-Images: Computer Vision Inspired Techniques for Jet Tagging, Josh Cogan, Michael Kagan, Emanuel Strauss, and Ariel Schwarztman, JHEP 02 118, (2015), arXiv:1407.5675 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2015)118
154. Searching for Exotic Particles in High-Energy Physics with Deep Learning, Pierre Baldi, Peter Sadowski, and Daniel Whiteson, Nature Commun. 5 4308, (2014), arXiv:1402.4735 doi:10.1038/ncomms5308
155. Measurement of the top quark mass with dilepton events selected using neuroevolution at CDF, T. Aaltonen, and others, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 152001, (2009), arXiv:0807.4652 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.152001
156. How to tell quark jets from gluon jets, Jon Pumplin, Phys. Rev. D 44 2025–2032, (1991), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.44.2025