1. **Gauge\-equivariant flow models for sampling in lattice field theories with pseudofermions**, Ryan Abbott, and others, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **106** (7) 074506 (2022) [arXiv:2207.08945](https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.08945) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074506](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074506)

2. **Conditional normalizing flow for Markov chain Monte\~Carlo sampling in the critical region of lattice field theory**, Ankur Singha, Dipankar Chakrabarti, and Vipul Arora, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **107** (1) 014512 (2023) [arXiv:2207.00980](https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.00980) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.014512](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.014512)

3. **Learning lattice quantum field theories with equivariant continuous flows**, Mathis Gerdes, Pim de Haan, Corrado Rainone, Roberto Bondesan, and Miranda C\. N\. Cheng, *SciPost Phys\.* **15** (6) 238 (2023) [arXiv:2207.00283](https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.00283) [doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.6.238](https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.6.238)

4. **Lattice scalar field theory at complex coupling**, Scott Lawrence, Hyunwoo Oh, and Yukari Yamauchi, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **106** (11) 114503 (2022) [arXiv:2205.12303](https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.12303) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.114503](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.114503)

5. **Modern applications of machine learning in quantum sciences**, Anna Dawid, and others (2025) [arXiv:2204.04198](https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.04198) [doi:10.1017/9781009504942](https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009504942)

6. **Flow\-based density of states for complex actions**, Jan M\. Pawlowski, and Julian M\. Urban, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **108** (5) 054511 (2023) [arXiv:2203.01243](https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.01243) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.054511](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.054511)

7. **Flow\-based sampling in the lattice Schwinger model at criticality**, Michael S\. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C\. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo J\. Rezende, Fernando Romero\-L\\'opez, Phiala E\. Shanahan, and Julian M\. Urban, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **106** (1) 014514 (2022) [arXiv:2202.11712](https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.11712) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.014514](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.014514)

8. **Applications of Machine Learning to Lattice Quantum Field Theory**, Denis Boyda, and others, *Snowmass 2021* (2022) [arXiv:2202.05838](https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.05838)

9. **Continual Repeated Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlo**, Alexander G\. D\. G\. Matthews, Michael Arbel, Danilo J\. Rezende, and Arnaud Doucet (2022) [arXiv:2201.13117](https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.13117)

10. **Stochastic normalizing flows as non\-equilibrium transformations**, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, Alessandro Nada, and Marco Panero, *JHEP* **07** 015 (2022) [arXiv:2201.08862](https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.08862) [doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2022)015](https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2022)015)

11. **Rethinking the ill\-posedness of the spectral function reconstruction \{\\textemdash\} Why is it fundamentally hard and how Artificial Neural Networks can help**, Shuzhe Shi, Lingxiao Wang, and Kai Zhou, *Comput\. Phys\. Commun\.* **282** 108547 (2023) [arXiv:2201.02564](https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.02564) [doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2022.108547](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2022.108547)

12. **Tackling critical slowing down using global correction steps with equivariant flows: the case of the Schwinger model**, Jacob Finkenrath (2022) [arXiv:2201.02216](https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.02216)

13. **Neural Network Field Transformation and Its Application in HMC**, Xiao\-Yong Jin, *PoS* **LATTICE2021** 600 (2022) [arXiv:2201.01862](https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.01862) [doi:10.22323/1.396.0600](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.396.0600)

14. **Normalizing flows for the real\-time sign problem**, Yukari Yamauchi, and Scott Lawrence, *PoS* **LATTICE2021** 621 (2022) [arXiv:2112.15035](https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.15035) [doi:10.22323/1.396.0621](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.396.0621)

15. **Automatic differentiation approach for reconstructing spectral functions with neural networks**, Lingxiao Wang, Shuzhe Shi, and Kai Zhou, *35th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems* (2021) [arXiv:2112.06206](https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.06206)

16. **Colloquium: Machine learning in nuclear physics**, Amber Boehnlein, and others, *Rev\. Mod\. Phys\.* **94** (3) 031003 (2022) [arXiv:2112.02309](https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.02309) [doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.94.031003](https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.94.031003)

17. **Fully nonperturbative charm\-quark tuning using machine learning**, R\. J\. Hudspith, and D\. Mohler, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **106** (3) 034508 (2022) [arXiv:2112.01997](https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.01997) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.034508](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.034508)

18. **HMC with Normalizing Flows**, Sam Foreman, Taku Izubuchi, Luchang Jin, Xiao\-Yong Jin, James C\. Osborn, and Akio Tomiya, *PoS* **LATTICE2021** 073 (2022) [arXiv:2112.01586](https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.01586) [doi:10.22323/1.396.0073](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.396.0073)

19. **LeapfrogLayers: A Trainable Framework for Effective Topological Sampling**, Sam Foreman, Xiao\-Yong Jin, and James C\. Osborn, *PoS* **LATTICE2021** 508 (2022) [arXiv:2112.01582](https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.01582) [doi:10.22323/1.396.0508](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.396.0508)

20. **Machine Learning of Thermodynamic Observables in the Presence of Mode Collapse**, Kim A\. Nicoli, Christopher J\. Anders, Lena Funcke, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Pan Kessel, Shinichi Nakajima, and Paolo Stornati, *PoS* **LATTICE2021** 338 (2022) [arXiv:2111.11303](https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.11303) [doi:10.22323/1.396.0338](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.396.0338)

21. **Machine learning approaches to the QCD transition**, Andrea Palermo, Lucio Anderlini, Maria Paola Lombardo, Andrey Yuryevich Kotov, and Anton Trunin, *PoS* **LATTICE2021** 030 (2022) [arXiv:2111.05216](https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.05216) [doi:10.22323/1.396.0030](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.396.0030)

22. **Machine learning spectral functions in lattice QCD**, S\. \-Y\. Chen, H\. \-T\. Ding, F\. \-Y\. Liu, G\. Papp, and C\. \-B\. Yang (2021) [arXiv:2110.13521](https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.13521)

23. **Scaling Up Machine Learning For Quantum Field Theory with Equivariant Continuous Flows**, Pim de Haan, Corrado Rainone, Miranda C\. N\. Cheng, and Roberto Bondesan (2021) [arXiv:2110.02673](https://arxiv.org/abs/2110.02673)

24. **Reconstructing QCD spectral functions with Gaussian processes**, Jan Horak, Jan M\. Pawlowski, Jos\\'e Rodr\\'\\iguez\-Quintero, Jonas Turnwald, Julian M\. Urban, Nicolas Wink, and Savvas Zafeiropoulos, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **105** (3) 036014 (2022) [arXiv:2107.13464](https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.13464) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.036014](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.036014)

25. **Inverse Renormalization Group in Quantum Field Theory**, Dimitrios Bachtis, Gert Aarts, Francesco Di Renzo, and Biagio Lucini, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **128** (8) 081603 (2022) [arXiv:2107.00466](https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.00466) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.081603](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.081603)

26. **Flow\-based sampling for multimodal and extended\-mode distributions in lattice field theory**, Daniel C\. Hackett, Chung\-Chun Hsieh, Sahil Pontula, Michael S\. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Jiunn\-Wei Chen, Kai\-Feng Chen, Kyle Cranmer, Gurtej Kanwar, and Phiala E\. Shanahan (2021) [arXiv:2107.00734](https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.00734)

27. **Flow\-based sampling for fermionic lattice field theories**, Michael S\. Albergo, Gurtej Kanwar, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo J\. Rezende, Julian M\. Urban, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C\. Hackett, and Phiala E\. Shanahan, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **104** (11) 114507 (2021) [arXiv:2106.05934](https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.05934) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.114507](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.114507)

28. **Efficient modeling of trivializing maps for lattice \{\\ensuremath\{\\phi\}\}4 theory using normalizing flows: A first look at scalability**, Luigi Del Debbio, Joe Marsh Rossney, and Michael Wilson, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **104** (9) 094507 (2021) [arXiv:2105.12481](https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.12481) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.094507](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.094507)

29. **Adaptive Monte Carlo augmented with normalizing flows**, Marylou Gabri\\'e, Grant M\. Rotskoff, and Eric Vanden\-Eijnden, *Proc\. Nat\. Acad\. Sci\.* **119** (10) e2109420119 (2022) [arXiv:2105.12603](https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.12603) [doi:10.1073/pnas.2109420119](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2109420119)

30. **Unbiased Monte Carlo cluster updates with autoregressive neural networks**, Dian Wu, Riccardo Rossi, and Giuseppe Carleo, *Phys\. Rev\. Res\.* **3** (4) L042024 (2021) [arXiv:2105.05650](https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.05650) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.L042024](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.L042024)

31. **Deep Learning Hamiltonian Monte Carlo**, Sam Foreman, Xiao\-Yong Jin, and James C\. Osborn, *9th International Conference on Learning Representations* (2021) [arXiv:2105.03418](https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.03418)

32. **Gauge covariant neural network for quarks and gluons**, Yuki Nagai, and Akio Tomiya, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **111** (7) 074501 (2025) [arXiv:2103.11965](https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.11965) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.074501](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.074501)

33. **A universal neural network for learning phases**, D\. \-R Tan, J\. \-H Peng, Y\. \-H Tseng, and F\. \-J Jiang, *Eur\. Phys\. J\. Plus* **136** (11) 1116 (2021) [arXiv:2103.10846](https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.10846) [doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-02121-4](https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-02121-4)

34. **Path integral contour deformations for observables in $SU\(N\)$ gauge theory**, William Detmold, Gurtej Kanwar, Henry Lamm, Michael L\. Wagman, and Neill C\. Warrington, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **103** (9) 094517 (2021) [arXiv:2101.12668](https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.12668) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.094517](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.094517)

35. **Introduction to Normalizing Flows for Lattice Field Theory**, Michael S\. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Daniel C\. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, Kyle Cranmer, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E\. Shanahan (2021) [arXiv:2101.08176](https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.08176)

36. **Normalizing Flows and the Real\-Time Sign Problem**, Scott Lawrence, and Yukari Yamauchi, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **103** (11) 114509 (2021) [arXiv:2101.05755](https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.05755) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.114509](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.114509)

37. **Entangled Kernels \-\- Beyond Separability**, Riikka Huusari, and Hachem Kadri, *J\. Machine Learning Res\.* **22** 1–40 (2021) [arXiv:2101.05514](https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.05514)

38. **Lattice Gauge Equivariant Convolutional Neural Networks**, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I\. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **128** (3) 032003 (2022) [arXiv:2012.12901](https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.12901) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.032003](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.032003)

39. **Generative models for sampling of lattice field theories**, Matija Medvidovic, Juan Carrasquilla, Lauren E\. Hayward, and Bohdan Kulchytskyy, *34th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems* (2020) [arXiv:2012.01442](https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.01442)

40. **Self\-learning Monte Carlo for non\-Abelian gauge theory with dynamical fermions**, Yuki Nagai, Akinori Tanaka, and Akio Tomiya, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **107** (5) 054501 (2023) [arXiv:2010.11900](https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.11900) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.054501](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.054501)

41. **Neural\-network analysis of Parton Distribution Functions from Ioffe\-time pseudodistributions**, Luigi Del Debbio, Tommaso Giani, Joseph Karpie, Kostas Orginos, Anatoly Radyushkin, and Savvas Zafeiropoulos, *JHEP* **02** 138 (2021) [arXiv:2010.03996](https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.03996) [doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2021)138](https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2021)138)

42. **Adding machine learning within Hamiltonians: Renormalization group transformations, symmetry breaking and restoration**, Dimitrios Bachtis, Gert Aarts, and Biagio Lucini, *Phys\. Rev\. Res\.* **3** (1) 013134 (2021) [arXiv:2010.00054](https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.00054) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.013134](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.013134)

43. **Finding the deconfinement temperature in lattice Yang\-Mills theories from outside the scaling window with machine learning**, D\. L\. Boyda, M\. N\. Chernodub, N\. V\. Gerasimeniuk, V\. A\. Goy, S\. D\. Liubimov, and A\. V\. Molochkov, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **103** (1) 014509 (2021) [arXiv:2009.10971](https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.10971) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.014509](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.014509)

44. **Sampling using $SU\(N\)$ gauge equivariant flows**, Denis Boyda, Gurtej Kanwar, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Michael S\. Albergo, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C\. Hackett, and Phiala E\. Shanahan, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **103** (7) 074504 (2021) [arXiv:2008.05456](https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.05456) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074504](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074504)

45. **Estimation of Thermodynamic Observables in Lattice Field Theories with Deep Generative Models**, Kim A\. Nicoli, Christopher J\. Anders, Lena Funcke, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Pan Kessel, Shinichi Nakajima, and Paolo Stornati, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **126** (3) 032001 (2021) [arXiv:2007.07115](https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.07115) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.032001](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.032001)

46. **On the generalizability of artificial neural networks in spin models**, Hon Man Yau, and Nan Su, *SciPost Phys\. Core* **5** 032 (2022) [arXiv:2006.15021](https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.15021) [doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.5.2.032](https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.5.2.032)

47. **Machine learning to alleviate Hubbard\-model sign problems**, Jan\-Lukas Wynen, Evan Berkowitz, Stefan Krieg, Thomas Luu, and Johann Ostmeyer, *Phys\. Rev\. B* **103** (12) 125153 (2021) [arXiv:2006.11221](https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.11221) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.103.125153](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.103.125153)

48. **Array programming with NumPy**, Charles R\. Harris, and others, *Nature* **585** (7825) 357–362 (2020) [arXiv:2006.10256](https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.10256) [doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2)

49. **Extending machine learning classification capabilities with histogram reweighting**, Dimitrios Bachtis, Gert Aarts, and Biagio Lucini, *Phys\. Rev\. E* **102** (3) 033303 (2020) [arXiv:2004.14341](https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.14341) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.102.033303](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.102.033303)

50. **Machine Learning for Quantum Matter**, Juan Carrasquilla, *Adv\. Phys\. X* **5** (1) 1797528 (2020) [arXiv:2003.11040](https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.11040) [doi:10.1080/23746149.2020.1797528](https://doi.org/10.1080/23746149.2020.1797528)

51. **Equivariant flow\-based sampling for lattice gauge theory**, Gurtej Kanwar, Michael S\. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C\. Hackett, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E\. Shanahan, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **125** (12) 121601 (2020) [arXiv:2003.06413](https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.06413) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.121601](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.121601)

52. **Discovering Symmetry Invariants and Conserved Quantities by Interpreting Siamese Neural Networks**, Sebastian J\. Wetzel, Roger G\. Melko, Joseph Scott, Maysum Panju, and Vijay Ganesh, *Phys\. Rev\. Res\.* **2** (3) 033499 (2020) [arXiv:2003.04299](https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.04299) [doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.033499](https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevresearch.2.033499)

53. **Towards novel insights in lattice field theory with explainable machine learning**, Stefan Blücher, Lukas Kades, Jan M\. Pawlowski, Nils Strodthoff, and Julian M\. Urban, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **101** (9) 094507 (2020) [arXiv:2003.01504](https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.01504) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.094507](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.094507)

54. **News from bottomonium spectral functions in thermal QCD**, Sam Offler, Gert Aarts, Chris Allton, Jonas Glesaaen, Benjamin Jäger, Seyong Kim, Maria Paola Lombardo, Sinead M\. Ryan, and Jon\-Ivar Skullerud, *PoS* **LATTICE2019** 076 (2019) [arXiv:1912.12900](https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.12900) [doi:10.22323/1.363.0076](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.363.0076)

55. **Asymptotically unbiased estimation of physical observables with neural samplers**, Kim A\. Nicoli, Shinichi Nakajima, Nils Strodthoff, Wojciech Samek, Klaus\-Robert Müller, and Pan Kessel, *Phys\. Rev\. E* **101** (2) 023304 (2020) [arXiv:1910.13496](https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.13496) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.101.023304](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.101.023304)

56. **Machine\-learning prediction for quasiparton distribution function matrix elements**, Rui Zhang, Zhouyou Fan, Ruizi Li, Huey\-Wen Lin, and Boram Yoon, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **101** (3) 034516 (2020) [arXiv:1909.10990](https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.10990) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.034516](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.034516)

57. **SciPy 1\.0\-\-Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python**, Pauli Virtanen, and others, *Nature Meth\.* **17** 261 (2020) [arXiv:1907.10121](https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.10121) [doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2)

58. **Spectral Reconstruction with Deep Neural Networks**, Lukas Kades, Jan M\. Pawlowski, Alexander Rothkopf, Manuel Scherzer, Julian M\. Urban, Sebastian J\. Wetzel, Nicolas Wink, and Felix P\. G\. Ziegler, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **102** (9) 096001 (2020) [arXiv:1905.04305](https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.04305) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.096001](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.096001)

59. **Flow\-based generative models for Markov chain Monte Carlo in lattice field theory**, M\. S\. Albergo, G\. Kanwar, and P\. E\. Shanahan, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **100** (3) 034515 (2019) [arXiv:1904.12072](https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.12072) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.034515](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.034515)

60. **The critical temperature of the 2D\-Ising model through Deep Learning Autoencoders**, Constantia Alexandrou, Andreas Athenodorou, Charalambos Chrysostomou, and Srijit Paul, *Eur\. Phys\. J\. B* **93** (12) 226 (2020) [arXiv:1903.03506](https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.03506) [doi:10.1140/epjb/e2020-100506-5](https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2020-100506-5)

61. **Solving Statistical Mechanics Using Variational Autoregressive Networks**, Dian Wu, Lei Wang, and Pan Zhang, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **122** (8) 080602 (2019) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.080602](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.080602)

62. **Reconstructing parton distribution functions from Ioffe time data: from Bayesian methods to Neural Networks**, Joseph Karpie, Kostas Orginos, Alexander Rothkopf, and Savvas Zafeiropoulos, *JHEP* **04** 057 (2019) [arXiv:1901.05408](https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.05408) [doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2019)057](https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2019)057)

63. **Neural Network Renormalization Group**, Shuo\-Hui Li, and Lei Wang, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **121** (26) 260601 (2018) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.260601](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.260601)

64. **Reducing Autocorrelation Times in Lattice Simulations with Generative Adversarial Networks**, Jan M\. Pawlowski, and Julian M\. Urban, *Mach\. Learn\. Sci\. Tech\.* **1** 045011 (2020) [arXiv:1811.03533](https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.03533) [doi:10.1088/2632-2153/abae73](https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/abae73)

65. **Regressive and generative neural networks for scalar field theory**, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **100** (1) 011501 (2019) [arXiv:1810.12879](https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.12879) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.011501](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.011501)

66. **Machine learning determination of dynamical parameters: The Ising model case**, Guido Cossu, Luigi Del Debbio, Tommaso Giani, Ava Khamseh, and Michael Wilson, *Phys\. Rev\. B* **100** (6) 064304 (2019) [arXiv:1810.11503](https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.11503) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.100.064304](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.064304)

67. **Machine Learning Estimators for Lattice QCD Observables**, Boram Yoon, Tanmoy Bhattacharya, and Rajan Gupta, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **100** (1) 014504 (2019) [arXiv:1807.05971](https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.05971) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.014504](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.014504)

68. **Horovod: fast and easy distributed deep learning in TensorFlow**, Alexander Sergeev, and Mike Del Balso (2018) [arXiv:1802.05799](https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.05799)

69. **Machine learning action parameters in lattice quantum chromodynamics**, Phiala E\. Shanahan, Amalie Trewartha, and William Detmold, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **97** (9) 094506 (2018) [arXiv:1801.05784](https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.05784) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.094506](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.094506)

70. **Towards reduction of autocorrelation in HMC by machine learning**, Akinori Tanaka, and Akio Tomiya (2017) [arXiv:1712.03893](https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.03893)

71. **Generalizing Hamiltonian Monte Carlo with Neural Networks**, Daniel Levy, Matthew D\. Hoffman, and Jascha Sohl\-Dickstein (2017) [arXiv:1711.09268](https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.09268)

72. **Deep Learning Beyond Lefschetz Thimbles**, Andrei Alexandru, Paulo F\. Bedaque, Henry Lamm, and Scott Lawrence, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **96** (9) 094505 (2017) [arXiv:1709.01971](https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.01971) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.094505](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.094505)

73. **Discovering phases, phase transitions, and crossovers through unsupervised machine learning: A critical examination**, Wenjian Hu, Rajiv R\. P\. Singh, and Richard T\. Scalettar, *Phys\. Rev\. E* **95** (6) 062122 (2017) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.95.062122](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.95.062122)

74. **Machine Learning of Explicit Order Parameters: From the Ising Model to SU\(2\) Lattice Gauge Theory**, Sebastian Johann Wetzel, and Manuel Scherzer, *Phys\. Rev\. B* **96** (18) 184410 (2017) [arXiv:1705.05582](https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.05582) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.96.184410](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.184410)

75. **Applications of neural networks to the studies of phase transitions of two\-dimensional Potts models**, Chian\-De Li, Deng\-Ruei Tan, and Fu\-Jiun Jiang, *Annals Phys\.* **391** 312–331 (2018) [arXiv:1703.02369](https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.02369) [doi:10.1016/j.aop.2018.02.018](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2018.02.018)

76. **Exploring cluster Monte Carlo updates with Boltzmann machines**, Lei Wang, *Phys\. Rev\. E* **96** (5) 051301 (2017) [arXiv:1702.08586](https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.08586) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.96.051301](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.96.051301)

77. **Accelerated Monte Carlo simulations with restricted Boltzmann machines**, Li Huang, and Lei Wang, *Phys\. Rev\. B* **95** (3) 035105 (2017) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.95.035105](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.035105)

78. **Density estimation using Real NVP**, Laurent Dinh, Jascha Sohl\-Dickstein, and Samy Bengio (2016) [arXiv:1605.08803](https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.08803)

79. **Variational Inference with Normalizing Flows**, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Shakir Mohamed (2015) [arXiv:1505.05770](https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.05770)

80. **Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human\-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification**, Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun (2015) [arXiv:1502.01852](https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.01852) [doi:10.1109/ICCV.2015.123](https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2015.123)

81. **Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization**, Diederik P\. Kingma, and Jimmy Ba, *International Conference on Learning Representations* (2014) [arXiv:1412.6980](https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980)

82. **Solving Lattice QCD systems of equations using mixed precision solvers on GPUs**, M\. A\. Clark, R\. Babich, K\. Barros, R\. C\. Brower, and C\. Rebbi, *Comput\. Phys\. Commun\.* **181** 1517–1528 (2010) [arXiv:0911.3191](https://arxiv.org/abs/0911.3191) [doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2010.05.002](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2010.05.002)

83. **Trivializing maps, the Wilson flow and the HMC algorithm**, Martin Luscher, *Commun\. Math\. Phys\.* **293** 899–919 (2010) [arXiv:0907.5491](https://arxiv.org/abs/0907.5491) [doi:10.1007/s00220-009-0953-7](https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-009-0953-7)

84. **Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment**, John D\. Hunter, *Comput\. Sci\. Eng\.* **9** (3) 90–95 (2007) [doi:10.1109/MCSE.2007.55](https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55)

85. **The Chroma software system for lattice QCD**, Robert G\. Edwards, and Balint Joo, *Nucl\. Phys\. B Proc\. Suppl\.* **140** 832 (2005) [arXiv:hep-lat/0409003](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/0409003) [doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2004.11.254](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2004.11.254)

86. **Improved Heat Bath Method for Monte Carlo Calculations in Lattice Gauge Theories**, A\. D\. Kennedy, and B\. J\. Pendleton, *Phys\. Lett\. B* **156** 393–399 (1985) [doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)91632-6](https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(85)91632-6)

87. **A New Method for Updating SU\(N\) Matrices in Computer Simulations of Gauge Theories**, N\. Cabibbo, and E\. Marinari, *Phys\. Lett\. B* **119** 387–390 (1982) [doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)90696-7](https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(82)90696-7)

88. **Confinement and the Critical Dimensionality of Space\-Time**, Michael Creutz, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **43** 553–556 (1979) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.43.553](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.43.553)

89. **Monte Carlo Sampling Methods Using Markov Chains and Their Applications**, W\. K\. Hastings, *Biometrika* **57** 97–109 (1970) [doi:10.1093/biomet/57.1.97](https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/57.1.97)

90. **Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines**, N\. Metropolis, A\. W\. Rosenbluth, M\. N\. Rosenbluth, A\. H\. Teller, and E\. Teller, *J\. Chem\. Phys\.* **21** 1087–1092 (1953) [doi:10.1063/1.1699114](https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1699114)