1. Gauge-equivariant flow models for sampling in lattice field theories with pseudofermions, Ryan Abbott, and others, Phys. Rev. D 106 (7) 074506, (2022), arXiv:2207.08945 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074506
2. Conditional normalizing flow for Markov chain Monte~Carlo sampling in the critical region of lattice field theory, Ankur Singha, Dipankar Chakrabarti, and Vipul Arora, Phys. Rev. D 107 (1) 014512, (2023), arXiv:2207.00980 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.014512
3. Learning lattice quantum field theories with equivariant continuous flows, Mathis Gerdes, Pim de Haan, Corrado Rainone, Roberto Bondesan, and Miranda C. N. Cheng, SciPost Phys. 15 (6) 238, (2023), arXiv:2207.00283 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.6.238
4. Lattice scalar field theory at complex coupling, Scott Lawrence, Hyunwoo Oh, and Yukari Yamauchi, Phys. Rev. D 106 (11) 114503, (2022), arXiv:2205.12303 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.114503
5. Modern applications of machine learning in quantum sciences, Anna Dawid, and others, (2025), arXiv:2204.04198 doi:10.1017/9781009504942
6. Flow-based density of states for complex actions, Jan M. Pawlowski, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 108 (5) 054511, (2023), arXiv:2203.01243 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.054511
7. Flow-based sampling in the lattice Schwinger model at criticality, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 106 (1) 014514, (2022), arXiv:2202.11712 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.014514
8. Applications of Machine Learning to Lattice Quantum Field Theory, Denis Boyda, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2202.05838
9. Continual Repeated Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlo, Alexander G. D. G. Matthews, Michael Arbel, Danilo J. Rezende, and Arnaud Doucet, (2022), arXiv:2201.13117
10. Stochastic normalizing flows as non-equilibrium transformations, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, Alessandro Nada, and Marco Panero, JHEP 07 015, (2022), arXiv:2201.08862 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2022)015
11. Rethinking the ill-posedness of the spectral function reconstruction {\textemdash} Why is it fundamentally hard and how Artificial Neural Networks can help, Shuzhe Shi, Lingxiao Wang, and Kai Zhou, Comput. Phys. Commun. 282 108547, (2023), arXiv:2201.02564 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2022.108547
12. Tackling critical slowing down using global correction steps with equivariant flows: the case of the Schwinger model, Jacob Finkenrath, (2022), arXiv:2201.02216
13. Neural Network Field Transformation and Its Application in HMC, Xiao-Yong Jin, PoS LATTICE2021 600, (2022), arXiv:2201.01862 doi:10.22323/1.396.0600
14. Normalizing flows for the real-time sign problem, Yukari Yamauchi, and Scott Lawrence, PoS LATTICE2021 621, (2022), arXiv:2112.15035 doi:10.22323/1.396.0621
15. Automatic differentiation approach for reconstructing spectral functions with neural networks, Lingxiao Wang, Shuzhe Shi, and Kai Zhou, 35th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, (2021), arXiv:2112.06206
16. Colloquium: Machine learning in nuclear physics, Amber Boehnlein, and others, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94 (3) 031003, (2022), arXiv:2112.02309 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.94.031003
17. Fully nonperturbative charm-quark tuning using machine learning, R. J. Hudspith, and D. Mohler, Phys. Rev. D 106 (3) 034508, (2022), arXiv:2112.01997 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.034508
18. HMC with Normalizing Flows, Sam Foreman, Taku Izubuchi, Luchang Jin, Xiao-Yong Jin, James C. Osborn, and Akio Tomiya, PoS LATTICE2021 073, (2022), arXiv:2112.01586 doi:10.22323/1.396.0073
19. LeapfrogLayers: A Trainable Framework for Effective Topological Sampling, Sam Foreman, Xiao-Yong Jin, and James C. Osborn, PoS LATTICE2021 508, (2022), arXiv:2112.01582 doi:10.22323/1.396.0508
20. Machine Learning of Thermodynamic Observables in the Presence of Mode Collapse, Kim A. Nicoli, Christopher J. Anders, Lena Funcke, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Pan Kessel, Shinichi Nakajima, and Paolo Stornati, PoS LATTICE2021 338, (2022), arXiv:2111.11303 doi:10.22323/1.396.0338
21. Machine learning approaches to the QCD transition, Andrea Palermo, Lucio Anderlini, Maria Paola Lombardo, Andrey Yuryevich Kotov, and Anton Trunin, PoS LATTICE2021 030, (2022), arXiv:2111.05216 doi:10.22323/1.396.0030
22. Machine learning spectral functions in lattice QCD, S. -Y. Chen, H. -T. Ding, F. -Y. Liu, G. Papp, and C. -B. Yang, (2021), arXiv:2110.13521
23. Scaling Up Machine Learning For Quantum Field Theory with Equivariant Continuous Flows, Pim de Haan, Corrado Rainone, Miranda C. N. Cheng, and Roberto Bondesan, (2021), arXiv:2110.02673
24. Reconstructing QCD spectral functions with Gaussian processes, Jan Horak, Jan M. Pawlowski, Jos\'e Rodr\'\iguez-Quintero, Jonas Turnwald, Julian M. Urban, Nicolas Wink, and Savvas Zafeiropoulos, Phys. Rev. D 105 (3) 036014, (2022), arXiv:2107.13464 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.036014
25. Inverse Renormalization Group in Quantum Field Theory, Dimitrios Bachtis, Gert Aarts, Francesco Di Renzo, and Biagio Lucini, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (8) 081603, (2022), arXiv:2107.00466 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.081603
26. Flow-based sampling for multimodal and extended-mode distributions in lattice field theory, Daniel C. Hackett, Chung-Chun Hsieh, Sahil Pontula, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Jiunn-Wei Chen, Kai-Feng Chen, Kyle Cranmer, Gurtej Kanwar, and Phiala E. Shanahan, (2021), arXiv:2107.00734
27. Flow-based sampling for fermionic lattice field theories, Michael S. Albergo, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Julian M. Urban, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 104 (11) 114507, (2021), arXiv:2106.05934 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.114507
28. Efficient modeling of trivializing maps for lattice {\ensuremath{\phi}}4 theory using normalizing flows: A first look at scalability, Luigi Del Debbio, Joe Marsh Rossney, and Michael Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 104 (9) 094507, (2021), arXiv:2105.12481 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.094507
29. Adaptive Monte Carlo augmented with normalizing flows, Marylou Gabri\'e, Grant M. Rotskoff, and Eric Vanden-Eijnden, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 119 (10) e2109420119, (2022), arXiv:2105.12603 doi:10.1073/pnas.2109420119
30. Unbiased Monte Carlo cluster updates with autoregressive neural networks, Dian Wu, Riccardo Rossi, and Giuseppe Carleo, Phys. Rev. Res. 3 (4) L042024, (2021), arXiv:2105.05650 doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.L042024
31. Deep Learning Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, Sam Foreman, Xiao-Yong Jin, and James C. Osborn, 9th International Conference on Learning Representations, (2021), arXiv:2105.03418
32. Gauge covariant neural network for quarks and gluons, Yuki Nagai, and Akio Tomiya, Phys. Rev. D 111 (7) 074501, (2025), arXiv:2103.11965 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.074501
33. A universal neural network for learning phases, D. -R Tan, J. -H Peng, Y. -H Tseng, and F. -J Jiang, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136 (11) 1116, (2021), arXiv:2103.10846 doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-02121-4
34. Path integral contour deformations for observables in $SU(N)$ gauge theory, William Detmold, Gurtej Kanwar, Henry Lamm, Michael L. Wagman, and Neill C. Warrington, Phys. Rev. D 103 (9) 094517, (2021), arXiv:2101.12668 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.094517
35. Introduction to Normalizing Flows for Lattice Field Theory, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, Kyle Cranmer, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E. Shanahan, (2021), arXiv:2101.08176
36. Normalizing Flows and the Real-Time Sign Problem, Scott Lawrence, and Yukari Yamauchi, Phys. Rev. D 103 (11) 114509, (2021), arXiv:2101.05755 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.114509
37. Entangled Kernels -- Beyond Separability, Riikka Huusari, and Hachem Kadri, J. Machine Learning Res. 22 1–40, (2021), arXiv:2101.05514
38. Lattice Gauge Equivariant Convolutional Neural Networks, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (3) 032003, (2022), arXiv:2012.12901 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.032003
39. Generative models for sampling of lattice field theories, Matija Medvidovic, Juan Carrasquilla, Lauren E. Hayward, and Bohdan Kulchytskyy, 34th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, (2020), arXiv:2012.01442
40. Self-learning Monte Carlo for non-Abelian gauge theory with dynamical fermions, Yuki Nagai, Akinori Tanaka, and Akio Tomiya, Phys. Rev. D 107 (5) 054501, (2023), arXiv:2010.11900 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.054501
41. Neural-network analysis of Parton Distribution Functions from Ioffe-time pseudodistributions, Luigi Del Debbio, Tommaso Giani, Joseph Karpie, Kostas Orginos, Anatoly Radyushkin, and Savvas Zafeiropoulos, JHEP 02 138, (2021), arXiv:2010.03996 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2021)138
42. Adding machine learning within Hamiltonians: Renormalization group transformations, symmetry breaking and restoration, Dimitrios Bachtis, Gert Aarts, and Biagio Lucini, Phys. Rev. Res. 3 (1) 013134, (2021), arXiv:2010.00054 doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.013134
43. Finding the deconfinement temperature in lattice Yang-Mills theories from outside the scaling window with machine learning, D. L. Boyda, M. N. Chernodub, N. V. Gerasimeniuk, V. A. Goy, S. D. Liubimov, and A. V. Molochkov, Phys. Rev. D 103 (1) 014509, (2021), arXiv:2009.10971 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.014509
44. Sampling using $SU(N)$ gauge equivariant flows, Denis Boyda, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Michael S. Albergo, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 103 (7) 074504, (2021), arXiv:2008.05456 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074504
45. Estimation of Thermodynamic Observables in Lattice Field Theories with Deep Generative Models, Kim A. Nicoli, Christopher J. Anders, Lena Funcke, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Pan Kessel, Shinichi Nakajima, and Paolo Stornati, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (3) 032001, (2021), arXiv:2007.07115 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.032001
46. On the generalizability of artificial neural networks in spin models, Hon Man Yau, and Nan Su, SciPost Phys. Core 5 032, (2022), arXiv:2006.15021 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.5.2.032
47. Machine learning to alleviate Hubbard-model sign problems, Jan-Lukas Wynen, Evan Berkowitz, Stefan Krieg, Thomas Luu, and Johann Ostmeyer, Phys. Rev. B 103 (12) 125153, (2021), arXiv:2006.11221 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.103.125153
48. Array programming with NumPy, Charles R. Harris, and others, Nature 585 (7825) 357–362, (2020), arXiv:2006.10256 doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2
49. Extending machine learning classification capabilities with histogram reweighting, Dimitrios Bachtis, Gert Aarts, and Biagio Lucini, Phys. Rev. E 102 (3) 033303, (2020), arXiv:2004.14341 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.102.033303
50. Machine Learning for Quantum Matter, Juan Carrasquilla, Adv. Phys. X 5 (1) 1797528, (2020), arXiv:2003.11040 doi:10.1080/23746149.2020.1797528
51. Equivariant flow-based sampling for lattice gauge theory, Gurtej Kanwar, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (12) 121601, (2020), arXiv:2003.06413 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.121601
52. Discovering Symmetry Invariants and Conserved Quantities by Interpreting Siamese Neural Networks, Sebastian J. Wetzel, Roger G. Melko, Joseph Scott, Maysum Panju, and Vijay Ganesh, Phys. Rev. Res. 2 (3) 033499, (2020), arXiv:2003.04299 doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.033499
53. Towards novel insights in lattice field theory with explainable machine learning, Stefan Blücher, Lukas Kades, Jan M. Pawlowski, Nils Strodthoff, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 101 (9) 094507, (2020), arXiv:2003.01504 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.094507
54. News from bottomonium spectral functions in thermal QCD, Sam Offler, Gert Aarts, Chris Allton, Jonas Glesaaen, Benjamin Jäger, Seyong Kim, Maria Paola Lombardo, Sinead M. Ryan, and Jon-Ivar Skullerud, PoS LATTICE2019 076, (2019), arXiv:1912.12900 doi:10.22323/1.363.0076
55. Asymptotically unbiased estimation of physical observables with neural samplers, Kim A. Nicoli, Shinichi Nakajima, Nils Strodthoff, Wojciech Samek, Klaus-Robert Müller, and Pan Kessel, Phys. Rev. E 101 (2) 023304, (2020), arXiv:1910.13496 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.101.023304
56. Machine-learning prediction for quasiparton distribution function matrix elements, Rui Zhang, Zhouyou Fan, Ruizi Li, Huey-Wen Lin, and Boram Yoon, Phys. Rev. D 101 (3) 034516, (2020), arXiv:1909.10990 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.034516
57. SciPy 1.0--Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python, Pauli Virtanen, and others, Nature Meth. 17 261, (2020), arXiv:1907.10121 doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2
58. Spectral Reconstruction with Deep Neural Networks, Lukas Kades, Jan M. Pawlowski, Alexander Rothkopf, Manuel Scherzer, Julian M. Urban, Sebastian J. Wetzel, Nicolas Wink, and Felix P. G. Ziegler, Phys. Rev. D 102 (9) 096001, (2020), arXiv:1905.04305 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.096001
59. Flow-based generative models for Markov chain Monte Carlo in lattice field theory, M. S. Albergo, G. Kanwar, and P. E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 100 (3) 034515, (2019), arXiv:1904.12072 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.034515
60. The critical temperature of the 2D-Ising model through Deep Learning Autoencoders, Constantia Alexandrou, Andreas Athenodorou, Charalambos Chrysostomou, and Srijit Paul, Eur. Phys. J. B 93 (12) 226, (2020), arXiv:1903.03506 doi:10.1140/epjb/e2020-100506-5
61. Solving Statistical Mechanics Using Variational Autoregressive Networks, Dian Wu, Lei Wang, and Pan Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (8) 080602, (2019), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.080602
62. Reconstructing parton distribution functions from Ioffe time data: from Bayesian methods to Neural Networks, Joseph Karpie, Kostas Orginos, Alexander Rothkopf, and Savvas Zafeiropoulos, JHEP 04 057, (2019), arXiv:1901.05408 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2019)057
63. Neural Network Renormalization Group, Shuo-Hui Li, and Lei Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (26) 260601, (2018), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.260601
64. Reducing Autocorrelation Times in Lattice Simulations with Generative Adversarial Networks, Jan M. Pawlowski, and Julian M. Urban, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 1 045011, (2020), arXiv:1811.03533 doi:10.1088/2632-2153/abae73
65. Regressive and generative neural networks for scalar field theory, Phys. Rev. D 100 (1) 011501, (2019), arXiv:1810.12879 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.011501
66. Machine learning determination of dynamical parameters: The Ising model case, Guido Cossu, Luigi Del Debbio, Tommaso Giani, Ava Khamseh, and Michael Wilson, Phys. Rev. B 100 (6) 064304, (2019), arXiv:1810.11503 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.100.064304
67. Machine Learning Estimators for Lattice QCD Observables, Boram Yoon, Tanmoy Bhattacharya, and Rajan Gupta, Phys. Rev. D 100 (1) 014504, (2019), arXiv:1807.05971 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.014504
68. Horovod: fast and easy distributed deep learning in TensorFlow, Alexander Sergeev, and Mike Del Balso, (2018), arXiv:1802.05799
69. Machine learning action parameters in lattice quantum chromodynamics, Phiala E. Shanahan, Amalie Trewartha, and William Detmold, Phys. Rev. D 97 (9) 094506, (2018), arXiv:1801.05784 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.094506
70. Towards reduction of autocorrelation in HMC by machine learning, Akinori Tanaka, and Akio Tomiya, (2017), arXiv:1712.03893
71. Generalizing Hamiltonian Monte Carlo with Neural Networks, Daniel Levy, Matthew D. Hoffman, and Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, (2017), arXiv:1711.09268
72. Deep Learning Beyond Lefschetz Thimbles, Andrei Alexandru, Paulo F. Bedaque, Henry Lamm, and Scott Lawrence, Phys. Rev. D 96 (9) 094505, (2017), arXiv:1709.01971 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.094505
73. Discovering phases, phase transitions, and crossovers through unsupervised machine learning: A critical examination, Wenjian Hu, Rajiv R. P. Singh, and Richard T. Scalettar, Phys. Rev. E 95 (6) 062122, (2017), doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.95.062122
74. Machine Learning of Explicit Order Parameters: From the Ising Model to SU(2) Lattice Gauge Theory, Sebastian Johann Wetzel, and Manuel Scherzer, Phys. Rev. B 96 (18) 184410, (2017), arXiv:1705.05582 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.96.184410
75. Applications of neural networks to the studies of phase transitions of two-dimensional Potts models, Chian-De Li, Deng-Ruei Tan, and Fu-Jiun Jiang, Annals Phys. 391 312–331, (2018), arXiv:1703.02369 doi:10.1016/j.aop.2018.02.018
76. Exploring cluster Monte Carlo updates with Boltzmann machines, Lei Wang, Phys. Rev. E 96 (5) 051301, (2017), arXiv:1702.08586 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.96.051301
77. Accelerated Monte Carlo simulations with restricted Boltzmann machines, Li Huang, and Lei Wang, Phys. Rev. B 95 (3) 035105, (2017), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.95.035105
78. Density estimation using Real NVP, Laurent Dinh, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, and Samy Bengio, (2016), arXiv:1605.08803
79. Variational Inference with Normalizing Flows, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Shakir Mohamed, (2015), arXiv:1505.05770
80. Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification, Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun, (2015), arXiv:1502.01852 doi:10.1109/ICCV.2015.123
81. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization, Diederik P. Kingma, and Jimmy Ba, International Conference on Learning Representations, (2014), arXiv:1412.6980
82. Solving Lattice QCD systems of equations using mixed precision solvers on GPUs, M. A. Clark, R. Babich, K. Barros, R. C. Brower, and C. Rebbi, Comput. Phys. Commun. 181 1517–1528, (2010), arXiv:0911.3191 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2010.05.002
83. Trivializing maps, the Wilson flow and the HMC algorithm, Martin Luscher, Commun. Math. Phys. 293 899–919, (2010), arXiv:0907.5491 doi:10.1007/s00220-009-0953-7
84. Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment, John D. Hunter, Comput. Sci. Eng. 9 (3) 90–95, (2007), doi:10.1109/MCSE.2007.55
85. The Chroma software system for lattice QCD, Robert G. Edwards, and Balint Joo, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 140 832, (2005), arXiv:hep-lat/0409003 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2004.11.254
86. Improved Heat Bath Method for Monte Carlo Calculations in Lattice Gauge Theories, A. D. Kennedy, and B. J. Pendleton, Phys. Lett. B 156 393–399, (1985), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85)91632-6
87. A New Method for Updating SU(N) Matrices in Computer Simulations of Gauge Theories, N. Cabibbo, and E. Marinari, Phys. Lett. B 119 387–390, (1982), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)90696-7
88. Confinement and the Critical Dimensionality of Space-Time, Michael Creutz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 553–556, (1979), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.43.553
89. Monte Carlo Sampling Methods Using Markov Chains and Their Applications, W. K. Hastings, Biometrika 57 97–109, (1970), doi:10.1093/biomet/57.1.97
90. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines, N. Metropolis, A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller, J. Chem. Phys. 21 1087–1092, (1953), doi:10.1063/1.1699114