1. Sampling QCD field configurations with gauge-equivariant flow models, Ryan Abbott, and others, PoS LATTICE2022 036, (2023), arXiv:2208.03832 doi:10.22323/1.430.0036
2. Conditional normalizing flow for Markov chain Monte~Carlo sampling in the critical region of lattice field theory, Ankur Singha, Dipankar Chakrabarti, and Vipul Arora, Phys. Rev. D 107 (1) 014512, (2023), arXiv:2207.00980 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.014512
3. Learning lattice quantum field theories with equivariant continuous flows, Mathis Gerdes, Pim de Haan, Corrado Rainone, Roberto Bondesan, and Miranda C. N. Cheng, SciPost Phys. 15 (6) 238, (2023), arXiv:2207.00283 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.6.238
4. A lattice QCD perspective on weak decays of $b$ and $c$ quarks Snowmass 2022 White Paper, Peter A. Boyle, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2205.15373
5. Flow-based density of states for complex actions, Jan M. Pawlowski, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 108 (5) 054511, (2023), arXiv:2203.01243 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.054511
6. Flow-based sampling in the lattice Schwinger model at criticality, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 106 (1) 014514, (2022), arXiv:2202.11712 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.014514
7. Applications of Machine Learning to Lattice Quantum Field Theory, Denis Boyda, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2202.05838
8. Continual Repeated Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlo, Alexander G. D. G. Matthews, Michael Arbel, Danilo J. Rezende, and Arnaud Doucet, (2022), arXiv:2201.13117
9. Stochastic normalizing flows as non-equilibrium transformations, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, Alessandro Nada, and Marco Panero, JHEP 07 015, (2022), arXiv:2201.08862 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2022)015
10. Tackling critical slowing down using global correction steps with equivariant flows: the case of the Schwinger model, Jacob Finkenrath, (2022), arXiv:2201.02216
11. Neural Network Field Transformation and Its Application in HMC, Xiao-Yong Jin, PoS LATTICE2021 600, (2022), arXiv:2201.01862 doi:10.22323/1.396.0600
12. Lattice field computations via recursive numerical integration, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Frances Y. Kuo, Hernan Leövey, Dirk Nuyens, and Ian H. Sloan, PoS LATTICE2021 010, (2022), arXiv:2112.05069 doi:10.22323/1.396.0010
13. Comparison of topology changing update algorithms, Timo Eichhorn, and Christian Hoelbling, PoS LATTICE2021 573, (2022), arXiv:2112.05188 doi:10.22323/1.396.0573
14. HMC with Normalizing Flows, Sam Foreman, Taku Izubuchi, Luchang Jin, Xiao-Yong Jin, James C. Osborn, and Akio Tomiya, PoS LATTICE2021 073, (2022), arXiv:2112.01586 doi:10.22323/1.396.0073
15. LeapfrogLayers: A Trainable Framework for Effective Topological Sampling, Sam Foreman, Xiao-Yong Jin, and James C. Osborn, PoS LATTICE2021 508, (2022), arXiv:2112.01582 doi:10.22323/1.396.0508
16. Scaling Up Machine Learning For Quantum Field Theory with Equivariant Continuous Flows, Pim de Haan, Corrado Rainone, Miranda C. N. Cheng, and Roberto Bondesan, (2021), arXiv:2110.02673
17. Inverse Renormalization Group in Quantum Field Theory, Dimitrios Bachtis, Gert Aarts, Francesco Di Renzo, and Biagio Lucini, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (8) 081603, (2022), arXiv:2107.00466 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.081603
18. Flow-based sampling for multimodal and extended-mode distributions in lattice field theory, Daniel C. Hackett, Chung-Chun Hsieh, Sahil Pontula, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Jiunn-Wei Chen, Kai-Feng Chen, Kyle Cranmer, Gurtej Kanwar, and Phiala E. Shanahan, (2021), arXiv:2107.00734
19. Topological sampling through windings, David Albandea, Pilar Hern\'andez, Alberto Ramos, and Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (10) 873, (2021), arXiv:2106.14234 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09677-6
20. Flow-based sampling for fermionic lattice field theories, Michael S. Albergo, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Julian M. Urban, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 104 (11) 114507, (2021), arXiv:2106.05934 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.114507
21. Efficient modeling of trivializing maps for lattice {\ensuremath{\phi}}4 theory using normalizing flows: A first look at scalability, Luigi Del Debbio, Joe Marsh Rossney, and Michael Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 104 (9) 094507, (2021), arXiv:2105.12481 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.094507
22. Adaptive Monte Carlo augmented with normalizing flows, Marylou Gabri\'e, Grant M. Rotskoff, and Eric Vanden-Eijnden, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 119 (10) e2109420119, (2022), arXiv:2105.12603 doi:10.1073/pnas.2109420119
23. Unbiased Monte Carlo cluster updates with autoregressive neural networks, Dian Wu, Riccardo Rossi, and Giuseppe Carleo, Phys. Rev. Res. 3 (4) L042024, (2021), arXiv:2105.05650 doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.L042024
24. Deep Learning Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, Sam Foreman, Xiao-Yong Jin, and James C. Osborn, 9th International Conference on Learning Representations, (2021), arXiv:2105.03418
25. Gauge covariant neural network for quarks and gluons, Yuki Nagai, and Akio Tomiya, Phys. Rev. D 111 (7) 074501, (2025), arXiv:2103.11965 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.074501
26. Introduction to Normalizing Flows for Lattice Field Theory, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, Kyle Cranmer, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E. Shanahan, (2021), arXiv:2101.08176
27. Normalizing Flows and the Real-Time Sign Problem, Scott Lawrence, and Yukari Yamauchi, Phys. Rev. D 103 (11) 114509, (2021), arXiv:2101.05755 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.114509
28. Lattice Gauge Equivariant Convolutional Neural Networks, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (3) 032003, (2022), arXiv:2012.12901 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.032003
29. Self-learning Monte Carlo for non-Abelian gauge theory with dynamical fermions, Yuki Nagai, Akinori Tanaka, and Akio Tomiya, Phys. Rev. D 107 (5) 054501, (2023), arXiv:2010.11900 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.054501
30. Sampling using $SU(N)$ gauge equivariant flows, Denis Boyda, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Michael S. Albergo, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 103 (7) 074504, (2021), arXiv:2008.05456 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074504
31. Estimation of Thermodynamic Observables in Lattice Field Theories with Deep Generative Models, Kim A. Nicoli, Christopher J. Anders, Lena Funcke, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Pan Kessel, Shinichi Nakajima, and Paolo Stornati, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (3) 032001, (2021), arXiv:2007.07115 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.032001
32. Array programming with NumPy, Charles R. Harris, and others, Nature 585 (7825) 357–362, (2020), arXiv:2006.10256 doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2
33. Extending machine learning classification capabilities with histogram reweighting, Dimitrios Bachtis, Gert Aarts, and Biagio Lucini, Phys. Rev. E 102 (3) 033303, (2020), arXiv:2004.14341 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.102.033303
34. Equivariant flow-based sampling for lattice gauge theory, Gurtej Kanwar, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (12) 121601, (2020), arXiv:2003.06413 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.121601
35. Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inference, George Papamakarios, Eric Nalisnick, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Shakir Mohamed, and Balaji Lakshminarayanan, J. Machine Learning Res. 22 (1) 2617–2680, (2021), arXiv:1912.02762 doi:10.5555/3546258.3546315
36. Tensor network formulation of the massless Schwinger model with staggered fermions, Nouman Butt, Simon Catterall, Yannick Meurice, Ryo Sakai, and Judah Unmuth-Yockey, Phys. Rev. D 101 (9) 094509, (2020), arXiv:1911.01285 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.094509
37. Simulating Lattice Gauge Theories within Quantum Technologies, M. C. Ba\~nuls, and others, Eur. Phys. J. D 74 (8) 165, (2020), arXiv:1911.00003 doi:10.1140/epjd/e2020-100571-8
38. Asymptotically unbiased estimation of physical observables with neural samplers, Kim A. Nicoli, Shinichi Nakajima, Nils Strodthoff, Wojciech Samek, Klaus-Robert Müller, and Pan Kessel, Phys. Rev. E 101 (2) 023304, (2020), arXiv:1910.13496 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.101.023304
39. Topological vacuum structure of the Schwinger model with matrix product states, Lena Funcke, Karl Jansen, and Stefan Kühn, Phys. Rev. D 101 (5) 054507, (2020), arXiv:1908.00551 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.054507
40. SciPy 1.0--Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python, Pauli Virtanen, and others, Nature Meth. 17 261, (2020), arXiv:1907.10121 doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2
41. Flow-based generative models for Markov chain Monte Carlo in lattice field theory, M. S. Albergo, G. Kanwar, and P. E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 100 (3) 034515, (2019), arXiv:1904.12072 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.034515
42. Status and Future Perspectives for Lattice Gauge Theory Calculations to the Exascale and Beyond, B\'alint Jo\'o, Chulwoo Jung, Norman H. Christ, William Detmold, Robert Edwards, Martin Savage, and Phiala Shanahan, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 199, (2019), arXiv:1904.09725 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12919-7
43. Lattice QCD and Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering, Andreas S. Kronfeld, David G. Richards, William Detmold, Rajan Gupta, Huey-Wen Lin, Keh-Fei Liu, Aaron S. Meyer, Raza Sufian, and Sergey Syritsyn, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 196, (2019), arXiv:1904.09931 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12916-x
44. Opportunities for Lattice QCD in Quark and Lepton Flavor Physics, Christoph Lehner, and others, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 195, (2019), arXiv:1904.09479 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12891-2
45. Hadrons and Nuclei, William Detmold, Robert G. Edwards, Jozef J. Dudek, Michael Engelhardt, Huey-Wen Lin, Stefan Meinel, Kostas Orginos, and Phiala Shanahan, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 193, (2019), arXiv:1904.09512 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12902-4
46. Solving Statistical Mechanics Using Variational Autoregressive Networks, Dian Wu, Lei Wang, and Pan Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (8) 080602, (2019), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.080602
47. Neural Network Renormalization Group, Shuo-Hui Li, and Lei Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (26) 260601, (2018), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.260601
48. Reducing Autocorrelation Times in Lattice Simulations with Generative Adversarial Networks, Jan M. Pawlowski, and Julian M. Urban, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 1 045011, (2020), arXiv:1811.03533 doi:10.1088/2632-2153/abae73
49. Machine learning determination of dynamical parameters: The Ising model case, Guido Cossu, Luigi Del Debbio, Tommaso Giani, Ava Khamseh, and Michael Wilson, Phys. Rev. B 100 (6) 064304, (2019), arXiv:1810.11503 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.100.064304
50. Horovod: fast and easy distributed deep learning in TensorFlow, Alexander Sergeev, and Mike Del Balso, (2018), arXiv:1802.05799
51. Towards reduction of autocorrelation in HMC by machine learning, Akinori Tanaka, and Akio Tomiya, (2017), arXiv:1712.03893
52. Generalizing Hamiltonian Monte Carlo with Neural Networks, Daniel Levy, Matthew D. Hoffman, and Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, (2017), arXiv:1711.09268
53. Decoupled Weight Decay Regularization, Ilya Loshchilov, and Frank Hutter, (2017), arXiv:1711.05101
54. Exploring cluster Monte Carlo updates with Boltzmann machines, Lei Wang, Phys. Rev. E 96 (5) 051301, (2017), arXiv:1702.08586 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.96.051301
55. Accelerated Monte Carlo simulations with restricted Boltzmann machines, Li Huang, and Lei Wang, Phys. Rev. B 95 (3) 035105, (2017), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.95.035105
56. Density estimation using Real NVP, Laurent Dinh, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, and Samy Bengio, (2016), arXiv:1605.08803
57. Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs), Djork-Arn\'e Clevert, Thomas Unterthiner, and Sepp Hochreiter, (2015), arXiv:1511.07289
58. Variational Inference with Normalizing Flows, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Shakir Mohamed, (2015), arXiv:1505.05770
59. Physics of $\eta'$ with rooted staggered quarks, Stephan Durr, Phys. Rev. D 85 114503, (2012), arXiv:1203.2560 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.114503
60. Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment, John D. Hunter, Comput. Sci. Eng. 9 (3) 90–95, (2007), doi:10.1109/MCSE.2007.55
61. Speeding up the hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm for dynamical fermions, Martin Hasenbusch, Phys. Lett. B 519 177–182, (2001), arXiv:hep-lat/0107019 doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(01)01102-9
62. Topological zero modes in Monte Carlo simulations, H. Dilger, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 6 123–134, (1995), arXiv:hep-lat/9408017 doi:10.1142/S0129183195000101
63. Screening in the lattice Schwinger model, Hermann Dilger, Phys. Lett. B 294 263–268, (1992), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(92)90692-W
64. Conditioning Techniques for Dynamical Fermions, Thomas A. DeGrand, and Pietro Rossi, Comput. Phys. Commun. 60 211–214, (1990), doi:10.1016/0010-4655(90)90006-M
65. Topological Charge and Fermions in the Two-dimensional Lattice U(1) Model. 1. Staggered Fermions, Jan Smit, and Jeroen C. Vink, Nucl. Phys. B 303 36–56, (1988), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90215-5
66. Charge Shielding and Quark Confinement in the Massive Schwinger Model, Sidney R. Coleman, R. Jackiw, and Leonard Susskind, Annals Phys. 93 267, (1975), doi:10.1016/0003-4916(75)90212-2
67. Confinement of Quarks, Kenneth G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 10 2445–2459, (1974), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.10.2445
68. Gauge Invariance and Mass. 2., Julian S. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. 128 2425–2429, (1962), doi:10.1103/PhysRev.128.2425
69. On Information and Sufficiency, S. Kullback, and R. A. Leibler, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 22 (1) 79–86, (1951), doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729694