1. Study of background from accidental coincidence signalsin the PandaX-II experiment*, Abdusalam Abdukerim, and others, Chin. Phys. C 46 (10) 103001, (2022), arXiv:2204.11175 doi:10.1088/1674-1137/ac7cd8
  2. Dark Matter Search Results from the PandaX-4T Commissioning Run, Yue Meng, and others, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (26) 261802, (2021), arXiv:2107.13438 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.261802
  3. Recommended conventions for reporting results from direct dark matter searches, D. Baxter, and others, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (10) 907, (2021), arXiv:2105.00599 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09655-y
  4. Determination of responses of liquid xenon to low energy electron and nuclear recoils using a PandaX-II detector, Binbin Yan, and others, Chin. Phys. C 45 (7) 075001, (2021), arXiv:2102.09158 doi:10.1088/1674-1137/abf6c2
  5. A Search for Solar Axions and Anomalous Neutrino Magnetic Moment with the Complete PandaX-II Data, Xiaopeng Zhou, and others, Chin. Phys. Lett. 38 (1) 011301, (2021), arXiv:2008.06485 doi:10.1088/0256-307X/38/10/109902
  6. Results of dark matter search using the full PandaX-II exposure, Qiuhong Wang, and others, Chin. Phys. C 44 (12) 125001, (2020), arXiv:2007.15469 doi:10.1088/1674-1137/abb658
  7. Pseudo-Dirac Dark Matter in XENON1T, Wei Chao, Yu Gao, and Ming jie Jin, (2020), arXiv:2006.16145
  8. Experimental search for dark matter in China, Li Zhao, and Jianglai Liu, Front. Phys. (Beijing) 15 (4) 44301, (2020), arXiv:2004.04547 doi:10.1007/s11467-020-0960-x
  9. Simplified dark matter models with loop effects in direct detection and the constraints from indirect detection and collider search, Tong Li, and Peiwen Wu, Chin. Phys. C 43 (11) 113102, (2019), arXiv:1904.03407 doi:10.1088/1674-1137/43/11/113102
  10. Direct Detection of WIMP Dark Matter: Concepts and Status, Marc Schumann, J. Phys. G 46 (10) 103003, (2019), arXiv:1903.03026 doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ab2ea5
  11. Dark matter direct search sensitivity of the PandaX-4T experiment, Hongguang Zhang, and others, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 62 (3) 31011, (2019), arXiv:1806.02229 doi:10.1007/s11433-018-9259-0
  12. Loop Effects in Direct Detection, Nicole F. Bell, Giorgio Busoni, and Isaac W. Sanderson, JCAP 08 017, (2018), arXiv:1803.01574 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/08/017
  13. Dark Matter Results From 54-Ton-Day Exposure of PandaX-II Experiment, Xiangyi Cui, and others, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (18) 181302, (2017), arXiv:1708.06917 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.181302
  14. Exploring the dark matter inelastic frontier with 79.6 days of PandaX-II data, Xun Chen, and others, Phys. Rev. D 96 (10) 102007, (2017), arXiv:1708.05825 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.102007
  15. DirectDM: a tool for dark matter direct detection, Fady Bishara, Joachim Brod, Benjamin Grinstein, and Jure Zupan, (2017), arXiv:1708.02678
  16. Displaced Vertices from Pseudo-Dirac Dark Matter, Alessandro Davoli, Andrea De Simone, Thomas Jacques, and Ver\'onica Sanz, JHEP 11 025, (2017), arXiv:1706.08985 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2017)025
  17. The waning of the WIMP? A review of models, searches, and constraints, Giorgio Arcadi, Ma\'\ira Dutra, Pradipta Ghosh, Manfred Lindner, Yann Mambrini, Mathias Pierre, Stefano Profumo, and Farinaldo S. Queiroz, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (3) 203, (2018), arXiv:1703.07364 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5662-y
  18. Inelastic frontier: Discovering dark matter at high recoil energy, Joseph Bramante, Patrick J. Fox, Graham D. Kribs, and Adam Martin, Phys. Rev. D 94 (11) 115026, (2016), arXiv:1608.02662 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.115026
  19. Dark Matter Search Results from the Commissioning Run of PandaX-II, Andi Tan, and others, Phys. Rev. D 93 (12) 122009, (2016), arXiv:1602.06563 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.122009
  20. Physics reach of the XENON1T dark matter experiment, E. Aprile, and others, JCAP 04 027, (2016), arXiv:1512.07501 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/04/027
  21. First results from the LUX dark matter experiment at the Sanford Underground Research Facility, D. S. Akerib, and others, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 091303, (2014), arXiv:1310.8214 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.091303
  22. Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics, Glen Cowan, Kyle Cranmer, Eilam Gross, and Ofer Vitells, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 1554, (2011), arXiv:1007.1727 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1554-0
  23. Pseudo-Dirac Dark Matter Leaves a Trace, Andrea De Simone, Veronica Sanz, and Hiromitsu Phil Sato, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 121802, (2010), arXiv:1004.1567 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.121802
  24. Constraints on inelastic dark matter from XENON10, J. Angle, and others, Phys. Rev. D 80 115005, (2009), arXiv:0910.3698 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.115005
  25. The Status of inelastic dark matter, David Tucker-Smith, and Neal Weiner, Phys. Rev. D 72 063509, (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0402065 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.063509
  26. Presentation of search results: The $CL_s$ technique, Alexander L. Read, J. Phys. G 28 2693–2704, (2002), doi:10.1088/0954-3899/28/10/313
  27. Inelastic dark matter, David Tucker-Smith, and Neal Weiner, Phys. Rev. D 64 043502, (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0101138 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.64.043502
  28. Confidence level computation for combining searches with small statistics, Thomas Junk, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 434 435–443, (1999), arXiv:hep-ex/9902006 doi:10.1016/S0168-9002(99)00498-2
  29. Review of mathematics, numerical factors, and corrections for dark matter experiments based on elastic nuclear recoil, J. D. Lewin, and P. F. Smith, Astropart. Phys. 6 87–112, (1996), doi:10.1016/S0927-6505(96)00047-3
  30. Detectability of Certain Dark Matter Candidates, Mark W. Goodman, and Edward Witten, Phys. Rev. D 31 3059, (1985), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.31.3059