# \<math display\="inline"\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>RI\</mi\>\<mo\>/\</mo\>\<mi\>MOM\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</math\> and \<math display\="inline"\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>RI\</mi\>\<mo\>/\</mo\>\<mi\>SMOM\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</math\> renormalization of quark bilinear operators using overlap fermions

**INSPIRE:** [2069716](https://inspirehep.net/literature/2069716)
**arXiv:** [2204\.09246](https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.09246)
**DOI:** [10\.1103/PhysRevD\.106\.114506](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.114506)

**Authors:** He, Fangcheng, Bi, Yu\-Jiang, Draper, Terrence, Liu, Keh\-Fei, Liu, Zhaofeng, Yang, Yi\-Bo

**Submitted:** 20 April 2022

**Subjects:**
- hep\-lat
- Lattice

**Journal reference:** Phys\.Rev\.D 106 \(11\) 114506 \(2022\)

**Citations:** 15

## Abstract

We present the vector, scalar, and tensor renormalization constants \(RCs\) using overlap fermions with either regularization independent momentum subtraction \(\<math display\="inline"\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>RI\</mi\>\<mo\>/\</mo\>\<mi\>MOM\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</math\>\) or symmetric momentum subtraction \(\<math display\="inline"\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>RI\</mi\>\<mo\>/\</mo\>\<mi\>SMOM\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</math\>\) as the intermediate scheme on the lattice with lattice spacings \<math display\="inline"\>\<mi\>a\</mi\>\</math\> from 0\.04 fm to 0\.12 fm\. Our gauge field configurations from the MILC and RBC/UKQCD collaborations include sea quarks using either the domain wall or the HISQ action, respectively\. The results show that \<math display\="inline"\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>RI\</mi\>\<mo\>/\</mo\>\<mi\>MOM\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</math\> and \<math display\="inline"\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>RI\</mi\>\<mo\>/\</mo\>\<mi\>SMOM\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</math\> can provide consistent renormalization constants to the \<math display\="inline"\>\<mover accent\="true"\>\<mi\>MS\</mi\>\<mo stretchy\="true"\>¯\</mo\>\</mover\>\</math\> scheme, after proper \<math display\="inline"\>\<msup\>\<mi\>a\</mi\>\<mn\>2\</mn\>\</msup\>\<msup\>\<mi\>p\</mi\>\<mn\>2\</mn\>\</msup\>\</math\> extrapolations\. But at \<math display\="inline"\>\<mi\>p\</mi\>\<mo\>∼\</mo\>\<mn\>2\</mn\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mi\>GeV\</mi\>\</math\>, both \<math display\="inline"\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>RI\</mi\>\<mo\>/\</mo\>\<mi\>MOM\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</math\> and \<math display\="inline"\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>RI\</mi\>\<mo\>/\</mo\>\<mi\>SMOM\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</math\> suffer from nonperturbative effects which cannot be removed by the perturbative matching\. The comparison between the results with different sea actions also suggests that the renormalization constant is discernibly sensitive to the lattice spacing but not to the bare gauge coupling in the gauge action\.