1. **Continual Repeated Annealed Flow Transport Monte Carlo**, Alexander G\. D\. G\. Matthews, Michael Arbel, Danilo J\. Rezende, and Arnaud Doucet (2022) [arXiv:2201.13117](https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.13117)

2. **Tackling critical slowing down using global correction steps with equivariant flows: the case of the Schwinger model**, Jacob Finkenrath (2022) [arXiv:2201.02216](https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.02216)

3. **Lattice field computations via recursive numerical integration**, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Frances Y\. Kuo, Hernan Leövey, Dirk Nuyens, and Ian H\. Sloan, *PoS* **LATTICE2021** 010 (2022) [arXiv:2112.05069](https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.05069) [doi:10.22323/1.396.0010](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.396.0010)

4. **Comparison of topology changing update algorithms**, Timo Eichhorn, and Christian Hoelbling, *PoS* **LATTICE2021** 573 (2022) [arXiv:2112.05188](https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.05188) [doi:10.22323/1.396.0573](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.396.0573)

5. **HMC with Normalizing Flows**, Sam Foreman, Taku Izubuchi, Luchang Jin, Xiao\-Yong Jin, James C\. Osborn, and Akio Tomiya, *PoS* **LATTICE2021** 073 (2022) [arXiv:2112.01586](https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.01586) [doi:10.22323/1.396.0073](https://doi.org/10.22323/1.396.0073)

6. **FLAG Review 2021**, Y\. Aoki, and others, *Eur\. Phys\. J\. C* **82** (10) 869 (2022) [arXiv:2111.09849](https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.09849) [doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10536-1](https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10536-1)

7. **Electric field decay without pair production: lattice, bosonization and novel worldline instantons**, Xu\-Yao Hu, Matthew Kleban, and Cedric Yu, *JHEP* **03** 197 (2022) [arXiv:2107.04561](https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.04561) [doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2022)197](https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2022)197)

8. **Flow\-based sampling for multimodal and extended\-mode distributions in lattice field theory**, Daniel C\. Hackett, Chung\-Chun Hsieh, Sahil Pontula, Michael S\. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Jiunn\-Wei Chen, Kai\-Feng Chen, Kyle Cranmer, Gurtej Kanwar, and Phiala E\. Shanahan (2021) [arXiv:2107.00734](https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.00734)

9. **Topological sampling through windings**, David Albandea, Pilar Hern\\'andez, Alberto Ramos, and Fernando Romero\-L\\'opez, *Eur\. Phys\. J\. C* **81** (10) 873 (2021) [arXiv:2106.14234](https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.14234) [doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09677-6](https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09677-6)

10. **Flow\-based sampling for fermionic lattice field theories**, Michael S\. Albergo, Gurtej Kanwar, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo J\. Rezende, Julian M\. Urban, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C\. Hackett, and Phiala E\. Shanahan, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **104** (11) 114507 (2021) [arXiv:2106.05934](https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.05934) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.114507](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.114507)

11. **Efficient modeling of trivializing maps for lattice \{\\ensuremath\{\\phi\}\}4 theory using normalizing flows: A first look at scalability**, Luigi Del Debbio, Joe Marsh Rossney, and Michael Wilson, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **104** (9) 094507 (2021) [arXiv:2105.12481](https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.12481) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.094507](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.094507)

12. **Adaptive Monte Carlo augmented with normalizing flows**, Marylou Gabri\\'e, Grant M\. Rotskoff, and Eric Vanden\-Eijnden, *Proc\. Nat\. Acad\. Sci\.* **119** (10) e2109420119 (2022) [arXiv:2105.12603](https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.12603) [doi:10.1073/pnas.2109420119](https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2109420119)

13. **Deep Learning Hamiltonian Monte Carlo**, Sam Foreman, Xiao\-Yong Jin, and James C\. Osborn, *9th International Conference on Learning Representations* (2021) [arXiv:2105.03418](https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.03418)

14. **Decoherence: a numerical study**, Chris Nagele, Oliver Janssen, and Matthew Kleban, *J\. Phys\. A* **56** (8) 085301 (2023) [arXiv:2010.04803](https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.04803) [doi:10.1088/1751-8121/acb977](https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/acb977)

15. **Sampling using $SU\(N\)$ gauge equivariant flows**, Denis Boyda, Gurtej Kanwar, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Michael S\. Albergo, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C\. Hackett, and Phiala E\. Shanahan, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **103** (7) 074504 (2021) [arXiv:2008.05456](https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.05456) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074504](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074504)

16. **Automatic Fine\-Tuning in the Two\-Flavor Schwinger Model**, Howard Georgi, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **125** (18) 181601 (2020) [arXiv:2007.15965](https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.15965) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.181601](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.181601)

17. **Estimation of Thermodynamic Observables in Lattice Field Theories with Deep Generative Models**, Kim A\. Nicoli, Christopher J\. Anders, Lena Funcke, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Pan Kessel, Shinichi Nakajima, and Paolo Stornati, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **126** (3) 032001 (2021) [arXiv:2007.07115](https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.07115) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.032001](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.032001)

18. **Array programming with NumPy**, Charles R\. Harris, and others, *Nature* **585** (7825) 357–362 (2020) [arXiv:2006.10256](https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.10256) [doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2)

19. **Equivariant flow\-based sampling for lattice gauge theory**, Gurtej Kanwar, Michael S\. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C\. Hackett, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E\. Shanahan, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **125** (12) 121601 (2020) [arXiv:2003.06413](https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.06413) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.121601](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.121601)

20. **Normalizing Flows on Tori and Spheres**, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, George Papamakarios, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Michael S\. Albergo, Gurtej Kanwar, Phiala E\. Shanahan, and Kyle Cranmer (2020) [arXiv:2002.02428](https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.02428)

21. **Tensor network formulation of the massless Schwinger model with staggered fermions**, Nouman Butt, Simon Catterall, Yannick Meurice, Ryo Sakai, and Judah Unmuth\-Yockey, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **101** (9) 094509 (2020) [arXiv:1911.01285](https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.01285) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.094509](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.094509)

22. **Simulating Lattice Gauge Theories within Quantum Technologies**, M\. C\. Ba\\\~nuls, and others, *Eur\. Phys\. J\. D* **74** (8) 165 (2020) [arXiv:1911.00003](https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.00003) [doi:10.1140/epjd/e2020-100571-8](https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2020-100571-8)

23. **Topological vacuum structure of the Schwinger model with matrix product states**, Lena Funcke, Karl Jansen, and Stefan Kühn, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **101** (5) 054507 (2020) [arXiv:1908.00551](https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.00551) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.054507](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.054507)

24. **SciPy 1\.0\-\-Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python**, Pauli Virtanen, and others, *Nature Meth\.* **17** 261 (2020) [arXiv:1907.10121](https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.10121) [doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2)

25. **Neural Spline Flows**, Conor Durkan, Artur Bekasov, Iain Murray, and George Papamakarios (2019) [arXiv:1906.04032](https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.04032)

26. **Flow\-based generative models for Markov chain Monte Carlo in lattice field theory**, M\. S\. Albergo, G\. Kanwar, and P\. E\. Shanahan, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **100** (3) 034515 (2019) [arXiv:1904.12072](https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.12072) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.034515](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.034515)

27. **Flux unwinding in the lattice Schwinger model**, Chris Nagele, J\. Eduardo Cejudo, Tim Byrnes, and Matthew Kleban, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **99** (9) 094501 (2019) [arXiv:1811.03096](https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.03096) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.094501](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.094501)

28. **Horovod: fast and easy distributed deep learning in TensorFlow**, Alexander Sergeev, and Mike Del Balso (2018) [arXiv:1802.05799](https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.05799)

29. **The topological susceptibility in the large\-$N$ limit of SU\($N$\) Yang\{\\textendash\}Mills theory**, Marco C\\\`e, Miguel Garc\\'\\ia Vera, Leonardo Giusti, and Stefan Schaefer, *Phys\. Lett\. B* **762** 232–236 (2016) [arXiv:1607.05939](https://arxiv.org/abs/1607.05939) [doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.09.029](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2016.09.029)

30. **Density estimation using Real NVP**, Laurent Dinh, Jascha Sohl\-Dickstein, and Samy Bengio (2016) [arXiv:1605.08803](https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.08803)

31. **Variational Inference with Normalizing Flows**, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Shakir Mohamed (2015) [arXiv:1505.05770](https://arxiv.org/abs/1505.05770)

32. **Critical behavior of the lattice Schwinger model with a topological term at $\\theta\=\\pi$ using the Grassmann tensor renormalization group**, Yuya Shimizu, and Yoshinobu Kuramashi, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **90** (7) 074503 (2014) [arXiv:1408.0897](https://arxiv.org/abs/1408.0897) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.074503](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.074503)

33. **Grassmann tensor renormalization group approach to one\-flavor lattice Schwinger model**, Yuya Shimizu, and Yoshinobu Kuramashi, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **90** (1) 014508 (2014) [arXiv:1403.0642](https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.0642) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.014508](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.014508)

34. **Lattice study of the Schwinger model at fixed topology**, Christopher Czaban, and Marc Wagner, *31st International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory* (2013) [arXiv:1310.5258](https://arxiv.org/abs/1310.5258)

35. **Unwinding Inflation**, Guido D'Amico, Roberto Gobbetti, Matthew Kleban, and Marjorie Schillo, *JCAP* **03** 004 (2013) [arXiv:1211.4589](https://arxiv.org/abs/1211.4589) [doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/03/004](https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2013/03/004)

36. **Physics of $\\eta'$ with rooted staggered quarks**, Stephan Durr, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **85** 114503 (2012) [arXiv:1203.2560](https://arxiv.org/abs/1203.2560) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.114503](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.114503)

37. **Critical slowing down and error analysis in lattice QCD simulations**, Stefan Schaefer, Rainer Sommer, and Francesco Virotta, *Nucl\. Phys\. B* **845** 93–119 (2011) [arXiv:1009.5228](https://arxiv.org/abs/1009.5228) [doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2010.11.020](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2010.11.020)

38. **Finite volume QCD at fixed topological charge**, Sinya Aoki, Hidenori Fukaya, Shoji Hashimoto, and Tetsuya Onogi, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **76** 054508 (2007) [arXiv:0707.0396](https://arxiv.org/abs/0707.0396) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76.054508](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.76.054508)

39. **Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment**, John D\. Hunter, *Comput\. Sci\. Eng\.* **9** (3) 90–95 (2007) [doi:10.1109/MCSE.2007.55](https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55)

40. **Critical slowing down of topological modes**, Luigi Del Debbio, Gian Mario Manca, and Ettore Vicari, *Phys\. Lett\. B* **594** 315–323 (2004) [arXiv:hep-lat/0403001](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/0403001) [doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.05.038](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2004.05.038)

41. **Monte Carlo errors with less errors**, Ulli Wolff, *Comput\. Phys\. Commun\.* **156** 143–153 (2004) [arXiv:hep-lat/0306017](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/0306017) [doi:10.1016/S0010-4655(03)00467-3](https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4655(03)00467-3)

42. **QCD at fixed topology**, R\. Brower, S\. Chandrasekharan, John W\. Negele, and U\. J\. Wiese, *Phys\. Lett\. B* **560** 64–74 (2003) [arXiv:hep-lat/0302005](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/0302005) [doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(03)00369-1](https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(03)00369-1)

43. **theta dependence of SU\(N\) gauge theories**, Luigi Del Debbio, Haralambos Panagopoulos, and Ettore Vicari, *JHEP* **08** 044 (2002) [arXiv:hep-th/0204125](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0204125) [doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/08/044](https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2002/08/044)

44. **The U\(A\)\(1\) problem on the lattice with Ginsparg\-Wilson fermions**, Leonardo Giusti, G\. C\. Rossi, M\. Testa, and G\. Veneziano, *Nucl\. Phys\. B* **628** 234–252 (2002) [arXiv:hep-lat/0108009](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/0108009) [doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(02)00093-7](https://doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(02)00093-7)

45. **Chiral symmetry in the two flavor lattice Schwinger model**, I\. Hip, C\. B\. Lang, and R\. Teppner, *Nucl\. Phys\. B Proc\. Suppl\.* **63** 682–684 (1998) [arXiv:hep-lat/9709030](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/9709030) [doi:10.1016/S0920-5632(97)00871-2](https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5632(97)00871-2)

46. **Topological charge and the spectrum of the fermion matrix in lattice QED in two\-dimensions**, C\. R\. Gattringer, I\. Hip, and C\. B\. Lang, *Nucl\. Phys\. B* **508** 329–352 (1997) [arXiv:hep-lat/9707011](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/9707011) [doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00620-2](https://doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00620-2)

47. **Hybrid Monte Carlo and topological modes of full QCD**, B\. Alles, G\. Boyd, Massimo D'Elia, A\. Di Giacomo, and E\. Vicari, *Phys\. Lett\. B* **389** 107–111 (1996) [arXiv:hep-lat/9607049](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/9607049) [doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(96)01247-6](https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(96)01247-6)

48. **Topological zero modes in Monte Carlo simulations**, H\. Dilger, *Int\. J\. Mod\. Phys\. C* **6** 123–134 (1995) [arXiv:hep-lat/9408017](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-lat/9408017) [doi:10.1142/S0129183195000101](https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129183195000101)

49. **Screening in the lattice Schwinger model**, Hermann Dilger, *Phys\. Lett\. B* **294** 263–268 (1992) [doi:10.1016/0370-2693(92)90692-W](https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(92)90692-W)

50. **On the fermion condensate in Schwinger model**, Andrei V\. Smilga, *Phys\. Lett\. B* **278** 371–376 (1992) [doi:10.1016/0370-2693(92)90209-M](https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(92)90209-M)

51. **Topological Charge and Fermions in the Two\-dimensional Lattice U\(1\) Model\. 1\. Staggered Fermions**, Jan Smit, and Jeroen C\. Vink, *Nucl\. Phys\. B* **303** 36–56 (1988) [doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90215-5](https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(88)90215-5)

52. **Hybrid Monte Carlo**, S\. Duane, A\. D\. Kennedy, B\. J\. Pendleton, and D\. Roweth, *Phys\. Lett\. B* **195** 216–222 (1987) [doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)91197-X](https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(87)91197-X)

53. **More About the Massive Schwinger Model**, Sidney R\. Coleman, *Annals Phys\.* **101** 239 (1976) [doi:10.1016/0003-4916(76)90280-3](https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(76)90280-3)

54. **Charge Shielding and Quark Confinement in the Massive Schwinger Model**, Sidney R\. Coleman, R\. Jackiw, and Leonard Susskind, *Annals Phys\.* **93** 267 (1975) [doi:10.1016/0003-4916(75)90212-2](https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(75)90212-2)

55. **Confinement of Quarks**, Kenneth G\. Wilson, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **10** 2445–2459 (1974) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.10.2445](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.10.2445)

56. **Gauge Invariance and Mass\. 2\.**, Julian S\. Schwinger, *Phys\. Rev\.* **128** 2425–2429 (1962) [doi:10.1103/PhysRev.128.2425](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.128.2425)

57. **Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines**, N\. Metropolis, A\. W\. Rosenbluth, M\. N\. Rosenbluth, A\. H\. Teller, and E\. Teller, *J\. Chem\. Phys\.* **21** 1087–1092 (1953) [doi:10.1063/1.1699114](https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1699114)