1. Variance reduction in lattice QCD observables via normalizing flows, Ryan Abbott, Denis Boyda, Yang Fu, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, (2026), arXiv:2603.02984
  2. A scalable flow-based approach to mitigate topological freezing, Claudio Bonanno, Andrea Bulgarelli, Elia Cellini, Alessandro Nada, Dario Panfalone, Davide Vadacchino, and Lorenzo Verzichelli, 42th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2026), arXiv:2601.20708
  3. Entanglement in lattice field theory: new methods and new results, Andrea Bulgarelli, (2025)
  4. Particle Monte Carlo methods for Lattice Field Theory, David Yallup, 39th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems}: {Includes Machine Learning and the Physical Sciences (ML4PS), (2025), arXiv:2511.15196
  5. Group-Equivariant Diffusion Models for Lattice Field Theory, Octavio Vega, Javad Komijani, Aida El-Khadra, and Marina Marinkovic, (2025), arXiv:2510.26081
  6. Scaling flow-based approaches for topology sampling in SU(3) gauge theory, Claudio Bonanno, Andrea Bulgarelli, Elia Cellini, Alessandro Nada, Dario Panfalone, Davide Vadacchino, and Lorenzo Verzichelli, JHEP 04 051, (2026), arXiv:2510.25704 doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2026)051
  7. Efficient lattice field theory simulation using adaptive normalizing flow on a resistive memory-based neural differential equation solver, Meng Xu, Jichang Yang, Ning Lin, Qundao Xu, Siqi Tang, Han Wang, Xiaojuan Qi, Zhongrui Wang, and Ming Xu, (2025), arXiv:2509.12812
  8. Probing the Nonperturbative Physics of QCD withNormalizing Flows and a moderate number of Pions, Ryan William Abbott, (2025)
  9. Sampling in lattice field theory with flow-based generative models, Joe Marsh Rossney, and Joe Marsh Rossney, (2025), doi:10.7488/era/6223
  10. NeuMC -- a package for neural sampling for lattice field theories, Piotr Bialas, Piotr Korcyl, Tomasz Stebel, and Dawid Zapolski, SoftwareX 31 102253, (2025), arXiv:2503.11482 doi:10.1016/j.softx.2025.102253
  11. Parallel Tempered Metadynamics, Timo Eichhorn, Gianluca Fuwa, Christian Hoelbling, and Lukas Varnhorst, PoS LATTICE2024 061, (2025), arXiv:2503.09747 doi:10.22323/1.466.0061
  12. Machine-learning approaches to accelerating lattice simulations, Scott Lawrence, PoS LATTICE2024 010, (2025), arXiv:2502.02670 doi:10.22323/1.466.0010
  13. Progress in Normalizing Flows for 4d Gauge Theories, Ryan Abbott, Denis Boyda, Gurtej Kanwar, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Daniel C. Hackett, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, PoS LATTICE2024 066, (2025), arXiv:2502.00263 doi:10.22323/1.466.0066
  14. CASK: A Gauge Covariant Transformer for Lattice Gauge Theory, Yuki Nagai, Hiroshi Ohno, and Akio Tomiya, PoS LATTICE2024 030, (2025), arXiv:2501.16955 doi:10.22323/1.466.0030
  15. Machine Learning for Lattice QCD, Akio Tomiya, J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 94 (3) 031006, (2025), doi:10.7566/JPSJ.94.031006
  16. Scaling of stochastic normalizing flows in SU(3) lattice gauge theory, Andrea Bulgarelli, Elia Cellini, and Alessandro Nada, Phys. Rev. D 111 (7) 074517, (2025), arXiv:2412.00200 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.074517
  17. AdvNF: Reducing mode collapse in conditional normalising flows using adversarial learning, Vikas Kanaujia, Mathias S. Scheurer, and Vipul Arora, SciPost Phys. 16 (5) 132, (2024), arXiv:2401.15948 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.16.5.132
  18. Practical applications of machine-learned flows on gauge fields, Ryan Abbott, Denis Boyda, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, Julian M. Urban, and Michael S. Albergo, PoS LATTICE2023 011, (2024), arXiv:2404.11674 doi:10.22323/1.453.0011
  19. Applications of flow models to the generation of correlated lattice QCD ensembles, Ryan Abbott, Aleksandar Botev, Denis Boyda, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 109 (9) 094514, (2024), arXiv:2401.10874 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.094514
  20. Flow-based sampling for lattice field theories, Gurtej Kanwar, 40th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2024), arXiv:2401.01297
  21. Exact lattice chiral symmetry in 2D gauge theory, Evan Berkowitz, Aleksey Cherman, and Theodore Jacobson, Phys. Rev. D 110 (1) 014510, (2024), arXiv:2310.17539 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.014510
  22. Diffusion models as stochastic quantization in lattice field theory, Lingxiao Wang, Gert Aarts, and Kai Zhou, JHEP 05 060, (2024), arXiv:2309.17082 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2024)060
  23. Training normalizing flows with computationally intensive target probability distributions, Piotr Bia\las, Piotr Korcyl, and Tomasz Stebel, Comput. Phys. Commun. 298 109094, (2024), arXiv:2308.13294 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2024.109094
  24. Improvement of Heatbath Algorithm in LFT using Generative models, Ali Faraz, Ankur Singha, Dipankar Chakrabarti, Shinichi Nakajima, and Vipul Arora, PoS LATTICE2024 036, (2025), arXiv:2308.08615 doi:10.22323/1.466.0036
  25. Advances in machine-learning-based sampling motivated by lattice quantum chromodynamics, Kyle Cranmer, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Nature Rev. Phys. 5 (9) 526–535, (2023), arXiv:2309.01156 doi:10.1038/s42254-023-00616-w
  26. Parallel tempered metadynamics: Overcoming potential barriers without surfing or tunneling, Timo Eichhorn, Gianluca Fuwa, Christian Hoelbling, and Lukas Varnhorst, Phys. Rev. D 109 (11) 114504, (2024), arXiv:2307.04742 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.114504
  27. Self-learning Monte Carlo with equivariant Transformer, Yuki Nagai, and Akio Tomiya, J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 93 114007, (2024), arXiv:2306.11527 doi:10.7566/JPSJ.93.114007
  28. Sampling U(1) gauge theory using a retrainable conditional flow-based model, Ankur Singha, Dipankar Chakrabarti, and Vipul Arora, Phys. Rev. D 108 (7) 074518, (2023), arXiv:2306.00581 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.074518
  29. Phase Diagram of the Two-Flavor Schwinger Model at Zero Temperature, Ross Dempsey, Igor R. Klebanov, Silviu S. Pufu, Benjamin T. S\ogaard, and Bernardo Zan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (3) 031603, (2024), arXiv:2305.04437 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.031603
  30. Normalizing flows for lattice gauge theory in arbitrary space-time dimension, Ryan Abbott, and others, (2023), arXiv:2305.02402
  31. Mutual information of spin systems from autoregressive neural networks, Piotr Bia\las, Piotr Korcyl, and Tomasz Stebel, Phys. Rev. E 108 (4) 044140, (2023), arXiv:2304.13412 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.108.044140
  32. Learning trivializing flows, David Albandea, Luigi Del Debbio, Pilar Hern\'andez, Richard Kenway, J. Marsh Rossney, and Alberto Ramos, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (7) 676, (2023), arXiv:2302.08408 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11838-8
  33. Learning Interpolations between Boltzmann Densities, B\'alint M\'at\'e, and Fran\ccois Fleuret, (2023), arXiv:2301.07388
  34. Learning trivializing gradient flows for lattice gauge theories, Simone Bacchio, Pan Kessel, Stefan Schaefer, and Lorenz Vaitl, Phys. Rev. D 107 (5) L051504, (2023), arXiv:2212.08469 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.L051504
  35. Simulating first-order phase transition with hierarchical autoregressive networks, Piotr Bia\las, Paulina Czarnota, Piotr Korcyl, and Tomasz Stebel, Phys. Rev. E 107 (5) 054127, (2023), arXiv:2212.04955 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.107.054127
  36. Aspects of scaling and scalability for flow-based sampling of lattice QCD, Ryan Abbott, and others, Eur. Phys. J. A 59 (11) 257, (2023), arXiv:2211.07541 doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01154-w
  37. Quantum-probabilistic Hamiltonian learning for generative modeling and anomaly detection, Jack Y. Araz, and Michael Spannowsky, Phys. Rev. A 108 (6) 062422, (2023), arXiv:2211.03803 doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.108.062422
  38. Deformation Theory of Boltzmann Distributions, B\'alint M\'at\'e, and Fran\ccois Fleuret, 36th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems}: {Workshop on Machine Learning and the Physical Sciences, (2022), arXiv:2210.13772
  39. Topology changing update algorithms for SU(3) gauge theory, Timo Eichhorn, Christian Hoelbling, Philip Rouenhoff, and Lukas Varnhorst, PoS LATTICE2022 009, (2023), arXiv:2210.11453 doi:10.22323/1.430.0009
  40. Report of the Snowmass 2021 Topical Group on Lattice Gauge Theory, Zohreh Davoudi, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2209.10758
  41. Sampling QCD field configurations with gauge-equivariant flow models, Ryan Abbott, and others, PoS LATTICE2022 036, (2023), arXiv:2208.03832 doi:10.22323/1.430.0036
  42. Gauge-equivariant flow models for sampling in lattice field theories with pseudofermions, Ryan Abbott, and others, Phys. Rev. D 106 (7) 074506, (2022), arXiv:2207.08945 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074506
  43. Conditional normalizing flow for Markov chain Monte~Carlo sampling in the critical region of lattice field theory, Ankur Singha, Dipankar Chakrabarti, and Vipul Arora, Phys. Rev. D 107 (1) 014512, (2023), arXiv:2207.00980 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.014512
  44. Discrete chiral symmetry and mass shift in the lattice Hamiltonian approach to the Schwinger model, Ross Dempsey, Igor R. Klebanov, Silviu S. Pufu, and Bernardo Zan, Phys. Rev. Res. 4 (4) 043133, (2022), arXiv:2206.05308 doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.043133
  45. AI and Theoretical Particle Physics, Rajan Gupta, Tanmoy Bhattacharya, and Boram Yoon, 465–491, (2023), arXiv:2205.05803 doi:10.1142/9789811265679_0026
  46. Hierarchical autoregressive neural networks for statistical systems, Piotr Bia\las, Piotr Korcyl, and Tomasz Stebel, Comput. Phys. Commun. 281 108502, (2022), arXiv:2203.10989 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2022.108502
  47. Flow-based density of states for complex actions, Jan M. Pawlowski, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 108 (5) 054511, (2023), arXiv:2203.01243 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.054511
  48. Breaking Through Computational Barriers In Lattice QCD With Artificial Intelligence, Julian Min-Yong Urban, (2022), doi:10.11588/heidok.00031926
  49. Gauge covariant neural network for quarks and gluons, Yuki Nagai, and Akio Tomiya, Phys. Rev. D 111 (7) 074501, (2025), arXiv:2103.11965 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.074501