1. Rethinking the ill-posedness of the spectral function reconstruction {\textemdash} Why is it fundamentally hard and how Artificial Neural Networks can help, Shuzhe Shi, Lingxiao Wang, and Kai Zhou, Comput. Phys. Commun. 282 108547, (2023), arXiv:2201.02564 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2022.108547
2. Tackling critical slowing down using global correction steps with equivariant flows: the case of the Schwinger model, Jacob Finkenrath, (2022), arXiv:2201.02216
3. Status of Lattice QCD Determination of Nucleon Form Factors and their Relevance for the Few-GeV Neutrino Program, Aaron S. Meyer, Andr\'e Walker-Loud, and Callum Wilkinson, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 72 205–232, (2022), arXiv:2201.01839 doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-010622-120608
4. Neural Network Field Transformation and Its Application in HMC, Xiao-Yong Jin, PoS LATTICE2021 600, (2022), arXiv:2201.01862 doi:10.22323/1.396.0600
5. Automatic differentiation approach for reconstructing spectral functions with neural networks, Lingxiao Wang, Shuzhe Shi, and Kai Zhou, 35th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, (2021), arXiv:2112.06206
6. Colloquium: Machine learning in nuclear physics, Amber Boehnlein, and others, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94 (3) 031003, (2022), arXiv:2112.02309 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.94.031003
7. Fully nonperturbative charm-quark tuning using machine learning, R. J. Hudspith, and D. Mohler, Phys. Rev. D 106 (3) 034508, (2022), arXiv:2112.01997 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.034508
8. HMC with Normalizing Flows, Sam Foreman, Taku Izubuchi, Luchang Jin, Xiao-Yong Jin, James C. Osborn, and Akio Tomiya, PoS LATTICE2021 073, (2022), arXiv:2112.01586 doi:10.22323/1.396.0073
9. LeapfrogLayers: A Trainable Framework for Effective Topological Sampling, Sam Foreman, Xiao-Yong Jin, and James C. Osborn, PoS LATTICE2021 508, (2022), arXiv:2112.01582 doi:10.22323/1.396.0508
10. FLAG Review 2021, Y. Aoki, and others, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (10) 869, (2022), arXiv:2111.09849 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10536-1
11. Machine learning approaches to the QCD transition, Andrea Palermo, Lucio Anderlini, Maria Paola Lombardo, Andrey Yuryevich Kotov, and Anton Trunin, PoS LATTICE2021 030, (2022), arXiv:2111.05216 doi:10.22323/1.396.0030
12. Machine learning spectral functions in lattice QCD, S. -Y. Chen, H. -T. Ding, F. -Y. Liu, G. Papp, and C. -B. Yang, (2021), arXiv:2110.13521
13. Scaling Up Machine Learning For Quantum Field Theory with Equivariant Continuous Flows, Pim de Haan, Corrado Rainone, Miranda C. N. Cheng, and Roberto Bondesan, (2021), arXiv:2110.02673
14. Reconstructing QCD spectral functions with Gaussian processes, Jan Horak, Jan M. Pawlowski, Jos\'e Rodr\'\iguez-Quintero, Jonas Turnwald, Julian M. Urban, Nicolas Wink, and Savvas Zafeiropoulos, Phys. Rev. D 105 (3) 036014, (2022), arXiv:2107.13464 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.036014
15. Inverse Renormalization Group in Quantum Field Theory, Dimitrios Bachtis, Gert Aarts, Francesco Di Renzo, and Biagio Lucini, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (8) 081603, (2022), arXiv:2107.00466 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.081603
16. Flow-based sampling for multimodal and extended-mode distributions in lattice field theory, Daniel C. Hackett, Chung-Chun Hsieh, Sahil Pontula, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Jiunn-Wei Chen, Kai-Feng Chen, Kyle Cranmer, Gurtej Kanwar, and Phiala E. Shanahan, (2021), arXiv:2107.00734
17. Flow-based sampling for fermionic lattice field theories, Michael S. Albergo, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Julian M. Urban, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 104 (11) 114507, (2021), arXiv:2106.05934 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.114507
18. Efficient modeling of trivializing maps for lattice {\ensuremath{\phi}}4 theory using normalizing flows: A first look at scalability, Luigi Del Debbio, Joe Marsh Rossney, and Michael Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 104 (9) 094507, (2021), arXiv:2105.12481 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.094507
19. Adaptive Monte Carlo augmented with normalizing flows, Marylou Gabri\'e, Grant M. Rotskoff, and Eric Vanden-Eijnden, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 119 (10) e2109420119, (2022), arXiv:2105.12603 doi:10.1073/pnas.2109420119
20. Unbiased Monte Carlo cluster updates with autoregressive neural networks, Dian Wu, Riccardo Rossi, and Giuseppe Carleo, Phys. Rev. Res. 3 (4) L042024, (2021), arXiv:2105.05650 doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.L042024
21. Deep Learning Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, Sam Foreman, Xiao-Yong Jin, and James C. Osborn, 9th International Conference on Learning Representations, (2021), arXiv:2105.03418
22. Solving DWF dirac equation using multi-splitting preconditioned conjugate gradient with tensor cores on NVIDIA GPUs, Jiqun Tu, M. A. Clark, Chulwoo Jung, and Robert D. Mawhinney, (2021), arXiv:2104.05615 doi:10.1145/3468267.3470613
23. Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.46 ppm, B. Abi, and others, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (14) 141801, (2021), arXiv:2104.03281 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.141801
24. Generalization capabilities of translationally equivariant neural networks, Srinath Bulusu, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, Phys. Rev. D 104 (7) 074504, (2021), arXiv:2103.14686 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.074504
25. Gauge covariant neural network for quarks and gluons, Yuki Nagai, and Akio Tomiya, Phys. Rev. D 111 (7) 074501, (2025), arXiv:2103.11965 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.074501
26. A universal neural network for learning phases, D. -R Tan, J. -H Peng, Y. -H Tseng, and F. -J Jiang, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136 (11) 1116, (2021), arXiv:2103.10846 doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-02121-4
27. Quantum field-theoretic machine learning, Dimitrios Bachtis, Gert Aarts, and Biagio Lucini, Phys. Rev. D 103 (7) 074510, (2021), arXiv:2102.09449 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074510
28. A Living Review of Machine Learning for Particle Physics, Matthew Feickert, and Benjamin Nachman, (2021), arXiv:2102.02770
29. Path integral contour deformations for observables in $SU(N)$ gauge theory, William Detmold, Gurtej Kanwar, Henry Lamm, Michael L. Wagman, and Neill C. Warrington, Phys. Rev. D 103 (9) 094517, (2021), arXiv:2101.12668 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.094517
30. Normalizing Flows and the Real-Time Sign Problem, Scott Lawrence, and Yukari Yamauchi, Phys. Rev. D 103 (11) 114509, (2021), arXiv:2101.05755 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.114509
31. Lattice Gauge Equivariant Convolutional Neural Networks, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (3) 032003, (2022), arXiv:2012.12901 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.032003
32. The large $N_{c}$ limit of QCD on the lattice, Pilar Hern\'andez, and Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Eur. Phys. J. A 57 (2) 52, (2021), arXiv:2012.03331 doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00374-2
33. Adding machine learning within Hamiltonians: Renormalization group transformations, symmetry breaking and restoration, Dimitrios Bachtis, Gert Aarts, and Biagio Lucini, Phys. Rev. Res. 3 (1) 013134, (2021), arXiv:2010.00054 doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.013134
34. Finding the deconfinement temperature in lattice Yang-Mills theories from outside the scaling window with machine learning, D. L. Boyda, M. N. Chernodub, N. V. Gerasimeniuk, V. A. Goy, S. D. Liubimov, and A. V. Molochkov, Phys. Rev. D 103 (1) 014509, (2021), arXiv:2009.10971 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.014509
35. Sampling using $SU(N)$ gauge equivariant flows, Denis Boyda, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Michael S. Albergo, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 103 (7) 074504, (2021), arXiv:2008.05456 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074504
36. Estimation of Thermodynamic Observables in Lattice Field Theories with Deep Generative Models, Kim A. Nicoli, Christopher J. Anders, Lena Funcke, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Pan Kessel, Shinichi Nakajima, and Paolo Stornati, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (3) 032001, (2021), arXiv:2007.07115 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.032001
37. On the generalizability of artificial neural networks in spin models, Hon Man Yau, and Nan Su, SciPost Phys. Core 5 032, (2022), arXiv:2006.15021 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.5.2.032
38. Machine learning to alleviate Hubbard-model sign problems, Jan-Lukas Wynen, Evan Berkowitz, Stefan Krieg, Thomas Luu, and Johann Ostmeyer, Phys. Rev. B 103 (12) 125153, (2021), arXiv:2006.11221 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.103.125153
39. Machine Learning for Condensed Matter Physics, Edwin A. Bedolla-Montiel, Luis Carlos Padierna, and Ram\'on Casta\~neda-Priego, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 33 (5) 053001, (2021), arXiv:2005.14228 doi:10.1088/1361-648X/abb895
40. Enhancing Gravitational-Wave Science with Machine Learning, Elena Cuoco, and others, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 2 (1) 011002, (2021), arXiv:2005.03745 doi:10.1088/2632-2153/abb93a
41. Composite electroweak sectors on the lattice, V. Drach, PoS LATTICE2019 242, (2020), arXiv:2005.01002 doi:10.22323/1.363.0242
42. Extending machine learning classification capabilities with histogram reweighting, Dimitrios Bachtis, Gert Aarts, and Biagio Lucini, Phys. Rev. E 102 (3) 033303, (2020), arXiv:2004.14341 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.102.033303
43. Equivariant flow-based sampling for lattice gauge theory, Gurtej Kanwar, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (12) 121601, (2020), arXiv:2003.06413 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.121601
44. Towards novel insights in lattice field theory with explainable machine learning, Stefan Blücher, Lukas Kades, Jan M. Pawlowski, Nils Strodthoff, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 101 (9) 094507, (2020), arXiv:2003.01504 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.094507
45. News from bottomonium spectral functions in thermal QCD, Sam Offler, Gert Aarts, Chris Allton, Jonas Glesaaen, Benjamin Jäger, Seyong Kim, Maria Paola Lombardo, Sinead M. Ryan, and Jon-Ivar Skullerud, PoS LATTICE2019 076, (2019), arXiv:1912.12900 doi:10.22323/1.363.0076
46. Asymptotically unbiased estimation of physical observables with neural samplers, Kim A. Nicoli, Shinichi Nakajima, Nils Strodthoff, Wojciech Samek, Klaus-Robert Müller, and Pan Kessel, Phys. Rev. E 101 (2) 023304, (2020), arXiv:1910.13496 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.101.023304
47. Machine-learning prediction for quasiparton distribution function matrix elements, Rui Zhang, Zhouyou Fan, Ruizi Li, Huey-Wen Lin, and Boram Yoon, Phys. Rev. D 101 (3) 034516, (2020), arXiv:1909.10990 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.034516
48. Classifying topological charge in SU(3) Yang{\textendash}Mills theory with machine learning, Takuya Matsumoto, Masakiyo Kitazawa, and Yasuhiro Kohno, PTEP 2021 (2) 023D01, (2021), arXiv:1909.06238 doi:10.1093/ptep/ptaa138
49. Spectral Reconstruction with Deep Neural Networks, Lukas Kades, Jan M. Pawlowski, Alexander Rothkopf, Manuel Scherzer, Julian M. Urban, Sebastian J. Wetzel, Nicolas Wink, and Felix P. G. Ziegler, Phys. Rev. D 102 (9) 096001, (2020), arXiv:1905.04305 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.096001
50. Flow-based generative models for Markov chain Monte Carlo in lattice field theory, M. S. Albergo, G. Kanwar, and P. E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 100 (3) 034515, (2019), arXiv:1904.12072 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.034515
51. Status and Future Perspectives for Lattice Gauge Theory Calculations to the Exascale and Beyond, B\'alint Jo\'o, Chulwoo Jung, Norman H. Christ, William Detmold, Robert Edwards, Martin Savage, and Phiala Shanahan, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 199, (2019), arXiv:1904.09725 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12919-7
52. Hot-dense Lattice QCD: USQCD whitepaper 2018, Alexei Bazavov, Frithjof Karsch, Swagato Mukherjee, and Peter Petreczky, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 194, (2019), arXiv:1904.09951 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12922-0
53. Lattice QCD and Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering, Andreas S. Kronfeld, David G. Richards, William Detmold, Rajan Gupta, Huey-Wen Lin, Keh-Fei Liu, Aaron S. Meyer, Raza Sufian, and Sergey Syritsyn, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 196, (2019), arXiv:1904.09931 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12916-x
54. Lattice Gauge Theory for Physics Beyond the Standard Model, Richard C. Brower, Anna Hasenfratz, Ethan T. Neil, Simon Catterall, George Fleming, Joel Giedt, Enrico Rinaldi, David Schaich, Evan Weinberg, and Oliver Witzel, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 198, (2019), arXiv:1904.09964 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12901-5
55. The Role of Lattice QCD in Searches for Violations of Fundamental Symmetries and Signals for New Physics, Vincenzo Cirigliano, Zohreh Davoudi, Tanmoy Bhattacharya, Taku Izubuchi, Phiala E. Shanahan, Sergey Syritsyn, and Michael L. Wagman, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 197, (2019), arXiv:1904.09704 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12889-8
56. Opportunities for Lattice QCD in Quark and Lepton Flavor Physics, Christoph Lehner, and others, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 195, (2019), arXiv:1904.09479 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12891-2
57. Hadrons and Nuclei, William Detmold, Robert G. Edwards, Jozef J. Dudek, Michael Engelhardt, Huey-Wen Lin, Stefan Meinel, Kostas Orginos, and Phiala Shanahan, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 193, (2019), arXiv:1904.09512 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12902-4
58. The critical temperature of the 2D-Ising model through Deep Learning Autoencoders, Constantia Alexandrou, Andreas Athenodorou, Charalambos Chrysostomou, and Srijit Paul, Eur. Phys. J. B 93 (12) 226, (2020), arXiv:1903.03506 doi:10.1140/epjb/e2020-100506-5
59. Solving Statistical Mechanics Using Variational Autoregressive Networks, Dian Wu, Lei Wang, and Pan Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (8) 080602, (2019), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.080602
60. Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay: Status and Prospects, Michelle J. Dolinski, Alan W. P. Poon, and Werner Rodejohann, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 69 219–251, (2019), arXiv:1902.04097 doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-101918-023407
61. Neural Network Renormalization Group, Shuo-Hui Li, and Lei Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (26) 260601, (2018), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.260601
62. Reducing Autocorrelation Times in Lattice Simulations with Generative Adversarial Networks, Jan M. Pawlowski, and Julian M. Urban, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 1 045011, (2020), arXiv:1811.03533 doi:10.1088/2632-2153/abae73
63. Regressive and generative neural networks for scalar field theory, Phys. Rev. D 100 (1) 011501, (2019), arXiv:1810.12879 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.011501
64. Machine learning determination of dynamical parameters: The Ising model case, Guido Cossu, Luigi Del Debbio, Tommaso Giani, Ava Khamseh, and Michael Wilson, Phys. Rev. B 100 (6) 064304, (2019), arXiv:1810.11503 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.100.064304
65. Progress and prospects of lattice supersymmetry, David Schaich, PoS LATTICE2018 005, (2019), arXiv:1810.09282 doi:10.22323/1.334.0005
66. Machine Learning Estimators for Lattice QCD Observables, Boram Yoon, Tanmoy Bhattacharya, and Rajan Gupta, Phys. Rev. D 100 (1) 014504, (2019), arXiv:1807.05971 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.014504
67. Lattice QCD and heavy ion collisions: a review of recent progress, Claudia Ratti, Rept. Prog. Phys. 81 (8) 084301, (2018), arXiv:1804.07810 doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aabb97
68. New physics searches in nuclear and neutron $\beta$ decay, Martin Gonz\'alez-Alonso, Oscar Naviliat-Cuncic, and Nathal Severijns, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 104 165–223, (2019), arXiv:1803.08732 doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2018.08.002
69. Horovod: fast and easy distributed deep learning in TensorFlow, Alexander Sergeev, and Mike Del Balso, (2018), arXiv:1802.05799
70. Machine learning action parameters in lattice quantum chromodynamics, Phiala E. Shanahan, Amalie Trewartha, and William Detmold, Phys. Rev. D 97 (9) 094506, (2018), arXiv:1801.05784 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.094506
71. Towards reduction of autocorrelation in HMC by machine learning, Akinori Tanaka, and Akio Tomiya, (2017), arXiv:1712.03893
72. Generalizing Hamiltonian Monte Carlo with Neural Networks, Daniel Levy, Matthew D. Hoffman, and Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, (2017), arXiv:1711.09268
73. Deep Learning Beyond Lefschetz Thimbles, Andrei Alexandru, Paulo F. Bedaque, Henry Lamm, and Scott Lawrence, Phys. Rev. D 96 (9) 094505, (2017), arXiv:1709.01971 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.094505
74. NuSTEC White Paper: Status and challenges of neutrino{\textendash}nucleus scattering, L. Alvarez-Ruso, and others, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 100 1–68, (2018), arXiv:1706.03621 doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2018.01.006
75. Machine Learning of Explicit Order Parameters: From the Ising Model to SU(2) Lattice Gauge Theory, Sebastian Johann Wetzel, and Manuel Scherzer, Phys. Rev. B 96 (18) 184410, (2017), arXiv:1705.05582 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.96.184410
76. Quasi-parton distribution functions, momentum distributions, and pseudo-parton distribution functions, A. V. Radyushkin, Phys. Rev. D 96 (3) 034025, (2017), arXiv:1705.01488 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.034025
77. Applications of neural networks to the studies of phase transitions of two-dimensional Potts models, Chian-De Li, Deng-Ruei Tan, and Fu-Jiun Jiang, Annals Phys. 391 312–331, (2018), arXiv:1703.02369 doi:10.1016/j.aop.2018.02.018
78. Nucleon Structure Functions from Operator Product Expansion on the Lattice, A. J. Chambers, R. Horsley, Y. Nakamura, H. Perlt, P. E. L. Rakow, G. Schierholz, A. Schiller, K. Somfleth, R. D. Young, and J. M. Zanotti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (24) 242001, (2017), arXiv:1703.01153 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.242001
79. Exploring cluster Monte Carlo updates with Boltzmann machines, Lei Wang, Phys. Rev. E 96 (5) 051301, (2017), arXiv:1702.08586 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.96.051301
80. Statistics of baryon correlation functions in lattice QCD, Michael L. Wagman, and Martin J. Savage, Phys. Rev. D 96 (11) 114508, (2017), arXiv:1611.07643 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.114508
81. Status and Future of Nuclear Matrix Elements for Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay: A Review, Jonathan Engel, and Javier Men\'endez, Rept. Prog. Phys. 80 (4) 046301, (2017), arXiv:1610.06548 doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aa5bc5
82. Lattice Gauge Theories and Spin Models, Manu Mathur, and T. P. Sreeraj, Phys. Rev. D 94 (8) 085029, (2016), arXiv:1604.00315 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.085029
83. Introductory lectures on lattice QCD at nonzero baryon number, Gert Aarts, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 706 (2) 022004, (2016), arXiv:1512.05145 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/706/2/022004
84. Grid: A next generation data parallel C++ QCD library, Peter Boyle, Guido Cossu, Azusa Yamaguchi, and Antonin Portelli, PoS LATTICE2015 023, (2016), arXiv:1512.03487 doi:10.22323/1.251.0023
85. Lattice tests of beyond Standard Model dynamics, Thomas DeGrand, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88 015001, (2016), arXiv:1510.05018 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.88.015001
86. Parton Physics on a Euclidean Lattice, Xiangdong Ji, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 262002, (2013), arXiv:1305.1539 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.262002
87. SU(N) gauge theories at large N, Biagio Lucini, and Marco Panero, Phys. Rept. 526 93–163, (2013), arXiv:1210.4997 doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2013.01.001
88. Restoration of Rotational Symmetry in the Continuum Limit of Lattice Field Theories, Zohreh Davoudi, and Martin J. Savage, Phys. Rev. D 86 054505, (2012), arXiv:1204.4146 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.054505
89. Transport Properties of the Quark-Gluon Plasma: A Lattice QCD Perspective, Harvey B. Meyer, Eur. Phys. J. A 47 86, (2011), arXiv:1104.3708 doi:10.1140/epja/i2011-11086-3
90. Solving Lattice QCD systems of equations using mixed precision solvers on GPUs, M. A. Clark, R. Babich, K. Barros, R. C. Brower, and C. Rebbi, Comput. Phys. Commun. 181 1517–1528, (2010), arXiv:0911.3191 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2010.05.002
91. Trivializing maps, the Wilson flow and the HMC algorithm, Martin Luscher, Commun. Math. Phys. 293 899–919, (2010), arXiv:0907.5491 doi:10.1007/s00220-009-0953-7
92. Simulating QCD at finite density, Philippe de Forcrand, PoS LAT2009 010, (2009), arXiv:1005.0539 doi:10.22323/1.091.0010
93. Dual superconductor models of color confinement, Georges Ripka, 639, (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0310102 doi:10.1007/b94800
94. The Confinement problem in lattice gauge theory, J. Greensite, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 51 1, (2003), arXiv:hep-lat/0301023 doi:10.1016/S0146-6410(03)90012-3
95. Transport coefficients, spectral functions and the lattice, Gert Aarts, and Jose Maria Martinez Resco, JHEP 04 053, (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0203177 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/04/053
96. Maximum entropy analysis of the spectral functions in lattice QCD, M. Asakawa, T. Hatsuda, and Y. Nakahara, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 46 459–508, (2001), arXiv:hep-lat/0011040 doi:10.1016/S0146-6410(01)00150-8
97. Hybrid Monte Carlo, S. Duane, A. D. Kennedy, B. J. Pendleton, and D. Roweth, Phys. Lett. B 195 216–222, (1987), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)91197-X