1. Lattice Gauge Theory via LLVM-Level Automatic Differentiation, Yuki Nagai, Akio Tomiya, and Hiroshi Ohno, (2026), arXiv:2602.20516
  2. Generative sampling with physics-informed kernels, Friederike Ihssen, Renzo Kapust, and Jan M. Pawlowski, (2025), arXiv:2510.26678
  3. Probing the Nonperturbative Physics of QCD withNormalizing Flows and a moderate number of Pions, Ryan William Abbott, (2025)
  4. Parallel Tempered Metadynamics, Timo Eichhorn, Gianluca Fuwa, Christian Hoelbling, and Lukas Varnhorst, PoS LATTICE2024 061, (2025), arXiv:2503.09747 doi:10.22323/1.466.0061
  5. Improvement in Autocorrelation Times Measured by the Master-Field Technique using Field Transformation HMC in 2+1 Domain Wall Fermion Simulations, Shuhei Yamamoto, Peter Boyle, Taku Izubuchi, Luchang Jin, Christoph Lehner, and Nobuyuki Matsumoto, PoS LATTICE2024 034, (2025), arXiv:2502.05452 doi:10.22323/1.466.0034
  6. Machine Learning for Lattice QCD, Akio Tomiya, J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 94 (3) 031006, (2025), doi:10.7566/JPSJ.94.031006
  7. Machine Learning for Path Deformation and Bayesian Data Analysis in Selected Lattice Field Theories, Marcel Rodekamp, (2024)
  8. Practical applications of machine-learned flows on gauge fields, Ryan Abbott, Denis Boyda, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, Julian M. Urban, and Michael S. Albergo, PoS LATTICE2023 011, (2024), arXiv:2404.11674 doi:10.22323/1.453.0011
  9. Flow-based sampling for lattice field theories, Gurtej Kanwar, 40th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2024), arXiv:2401.01297
  10. NeuLat: a toolbox for neural samplers in lattice field theories, Kim A. Nicoli, Christopher J. Anders, Lena Funcke, Karl Jansen, Shinichi Nakajima, and Pan Kessel, PoS LATTICE2023 286, (2024), doi:10.22323/1.453.0286
  11. Decimation map in 2D for accelerating HMC, Nobuyuki Matsumoto, Richard C. Brower, and Taku Izubuchi, PoS LATTICE2023 033, (2024), arXiv:2312.04800 doi:10.22323/1.453.0033
  12. The NFLikelihood: An unsupervised DNNLikelihood from normalizing flows, Humberto Reyes-Gonzalez, and Riccardo Torre, SciPost Phys. Core 7 048, (2024), arXiv:2309.09743 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.7.3.048
  13. Advances in machine-learning-based sampling motivated by lattice quantum chromodynamics, Kyle Cranmer, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Nature Rev. Phys. 5 (9) 526–535, (2023), arXiv:2309.01156 doi:10.1038/s42254-023-00616-w
  14. Parallel tempered metadynamics: Overcoming potential barriers without surfing or tunneling, Timo Eichhorn, Gianluca Fuwa, Christian Hoelbling, and Lukas Varnhorst, Phys. Rev. D 109 (11) 114504, (2024), arXiv:2307.04742 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.114504
  15. Normalizing flows for lattice gauge theory in arbitrary space-time dimension, Ryan Abbott, and others, (2023), arXiv:2305.02402
  16. Exploring QCD matter in extreme conditions with Machine Learning, Kai Zhou, Lingxiao Wang, Long-Gang Pang, and Shuzhe Shi, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 135 104084, (2024), arXiv:2303.15136 doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2023.104084
  17. Comparison of Affine and Rational Quadratic Spline Coupling and Autoregressive Flows through Robust Statistical Tests, Andrea Coccaro, Marco Letizia, Humberto Reyes-Gonzalez, and Riccardo Torre, Symmetry 16 (8) 942, (2024), arXiv:2302.12024 doi:10.3390/sym16080942
  18. Learning trivializing flows, David Albandea, Luigi Del Debbio, Pilar Hern\'andez, Richard Kenway, J. Marsh Rossney, and Alberto Ramos, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (7) 676, (2023), arXiv:2302.08408 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11838-8
  19. Review on Algorithms for dynamical fermions, Jacob Finkenrath, PoS LATTICE2022 227, (2023), arXiv:2402.11704 doi:10.22323/1.430.0227
  20. Use of Schwinger-Dyson equation in constructing an approximate trivializing map, Peter Boyle, Taku Izubuchi, Luchang Jin, Chulwoo Jung, Christoph Lehner, Nobuyuki Matsumoto, and Akio Tomiya, PoS LATTICE2022 229, (2023), arXiv:2212.11387 doi:10.22323/1.430.0229
  21. Aspects of scaling and scalability for flow-based sampling of lattice QCD, Ryan Abbott, and others, Eur. Phys. J. A 59 (11) 257, (2023), arXiv:2211.07541 doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01154-w
  22. Mitigating the Hubbard Sign Problem. A Novel Application of Machine Learning, Marcel Rodekamp, and Christoph Gäntgen, PoS LATTICE2022 032, (2023), arXiv:2211.09584 doi:10.22323/1.430.0032
  23. Topology changing update algorithms for SU(3) gauge theory, Timo Eichhorn, Christian Hoelbling, Philip Rouenhoff, and Lukas Varnhorst, PoS LATTICE2022 009, (2023), arXiv:2210.11453 doi:10.22323/1.430.0009
  24. GomalizingFlow.jl: A Julia package for Flow-based sampling algorithm for lattice field theory, Akio Tomiya, and Satoshi Terasaki, (2022), arXiv:2208.08903
  25. Sampling QCD field configurations with gauge-equivariant flow models, Ryan Abbott, and others, PoS LATTICE2022 036, (2023), arXiv:2208.03832 doi:10.22323/1.430.0036
  26. Gauge-equivariant flow models for sampling in lattice field theories with pseudofermions, Ryan Abbott, and others, Phys. Rev. D 106 (7) 074506, (2022), arXiv:2207.08945 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074506
  27. Lattice QCD and the Computational Frontier, Peter Boyle, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2204.00039
  28. Prospects for precise predictions of $a_\mu$ in the Standard Model, G. Colangelo, and others, (2022), arXiv:2203.15810
  29. Mitigating the Hubbard sign problem with complex-valued neural networks, Marcel Rodekamp, Evan Berkowitz, Christoph Gäntgen, Stefan Krieg, Thomas Luu, and Johann Ostmeyer, Phys. Rev. B 106 (12) 125139, (2022), arXiv:2203.00390 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.106.125139
  30. Flow-based sampling in the lattice Schwinger model at criticality, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 106 (1) 014514, (2022), arXiv:2202.11712 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.014514
  31. Applications of Machine Learning to Lattice Quantum Field Theory, Denis Boyda, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2202.05838
  32. Breaking Through Computational Barriers In Lattice QCD With Artificial Intelligence, Julian Min-Yong Urban, (2022), doi:10.11588/heidok.00031926
  33. New paths in Lattice gauge theories, Giovanni Pederiva, (2022), doi:10.25335/492j-2q92
  34. LeapfrogLayers: A Trainable Framework for Effective Topological Sampling, Sam Foreman, Xiao-Yong Jin, and James C. Osborn, PoS LATTICE2021 508, (2022), arXiv:2112.01582 doi:10.22323/1.396.0508