# First\-principle calculation of the \<math altimg\="si31\.svg"\>\<mrow\>\<msub\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>η\</mi\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>c\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</msub\>\<mo\>→\</mo\>\<mn\>2\</mn\>\<mi\>γ\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</math\> decay width from lattice QCD

**INSPIRE:** [1924284](https://inspirehep.net/literature/1924284)
**arXiv:** [2109\.09381](https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.09381)
**DOI:** [10\.1016/j\.scib\.2023\.07\.041](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2023.07.041)

**Authors:** Meng, Yu, Feng, Xu, Liu, Chuan, Wang, Teng, Zou, Zuoheng

**Submitted:** 20 September 2021

**Subjects:**
- hep\-lat
- hep\-ex
- hep\-ph
- Lattice
- Experiment\-HEP
- Phenomenology\-HEP

**Journal reference:** Sci\.Bull\. 68 2263 \(2023\)

**Citations:** 30

## Abstract

We perform a lattice QCD calculation of the \<math altimg\="si32\.svg"\>\<mrow\>\<msub\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>η\</mi\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>c\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</msub\>\<mo\>→\</mo\>\<mn\>2\</mn\>\<mi\>γ\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</math\> decay width using a model\-independent method that requires no momentum extrapolation of the off\-shell form factors\. This method also provides a straightforward and simple way to examine the finite\-volume effects\. The calculation is accomplished using \<math altimg\="si33\.svg"\>\<mrow\>\<msub\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>N\</mi\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>f\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</msub\>\<mo linebreak\="goodbreak" linebreakstyle\="after"\>\=\</mo\>\<mn\>2\</mn\>\</mrow\>\</math\> twisted mass fermion ensembles\. The statistically significant excited\-state effects are observed and eliminated using a multi\-state fit\. The impact of fine\-tuning the charm quark mass is also examined and confirmed to be well\-controlled\. Finally, using three lattice spacings for the continuum extrapolation, we obtain the decay width \<math altimg\="si34\.svg"\>\<mrow\>\<msub\>\<mrow\>\<mi mathvariant\="normal"\>Γ\</mi\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<msub\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>η\</mi\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>c\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</msub\>\<mi\>γ\</mi\>\<mi\>γ\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</msub\>\<mo linebreak\="goodbreak" linebreakstyle\="after"\>\=\</mo\>\<mn\>6\.67\</mn\>\<msub\>\<mrow\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>16\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi mathvariant\="normal"\>stat\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</msub\>\<msub\>\<mrow\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>6\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi mathvariant\="normal"\>syst\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</msub\>\</mrow\>\</math\> keV, which differs significantly from the Particle Data Group’s reported value of \<math altimg\="si35\.svg"\>\<mrow\>\<msub\>\<mrow\>\<mi mathvariant\="normal"\>Γ\</mi\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<msub\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>η\</mi\>\</mrow\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>c\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</msub\>\<mi\>γ\</mi\>\<mi\>γ\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</msub\>\<mo linebreak\="goodbreak" linebreakstyle\="after"\>\=\</mo\>\<mn\>5\.4\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>4\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\</mrow\>\</math\> keV \(2\.9\<math altimg\="si36\.svg"\>\<mrow\>\<mi\>σ\</mi\>\</mrow\>\</math\> tension\)\. We provide insight into the comparison between our findings, previous theoretical predictions, and experimental measurements\.