First-principle calculation of the <math altimg="si31.svg"><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>η</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>c</mi></mrow></msub><mo>→</mo><mn>2</mn><mi>γ</mi></mrow></math> decay width from lattice QCD

INSPIRE: 1924284
arXiv: 2109.09381
DOI: 10.1016/j.scib.2023.07.041

Authors: Meng, Yu, Feng, Xu, Liu, Chuan, Wang, Teng, Zou, Zuoheng

Submitted: 20 September 2021

Subjects:

Journal reference: Sci.Bull. 68 2263 (2023)

Citations: 30

Abstract

We perform a lattice QCD calculation of the <math altimg="si32.svg"><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>η</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>c</mi></mrow></msub><mo>→</mo><mn>2</mn><mi>γ</mi></mrow></math> decay width using a model-independent method that requires no momentum extrapolation of the off-shell form factors. This method also provides a straightforward and simple way to examine the finite-volume effects. The calculation is accomplished using <math altimg="si33.svg"><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>N</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>f</mi></mrow></msub><mo linebreak="goodbreak" linebreakstyle="after">=</mo><mn>2</mn></mrow></math> twisted mass fermion ensembles. The statistically significant excited-state effects are observed and eliminated using a multi-state fit. The impact of fine-tuning the charm quark mass is also examined and confirmed to be well-controlled. Finally, using three lattice spacings for the continuum extrapolation, we obtain the decay width <math altimg="si34.svg"><mrow><msub><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mi></mrow><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>η</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>c</mi></mrow></msub><mi>γ</mi><mi>γ</mi></mrow></msub><mo linebreak="goodbreak" linebreakstyle="after">=</mo><mn>6.67</mn><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mn>16</mn><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">stat</mi></mrow></msub><msub><mrow><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mn>6</mn><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">syst</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math> keV, which differs significantly from the Particle Data Group’s reported value of <math altimg="si35.svg"><mrow><msub><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mi></mrow><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>η</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>c</mi></mrow></msub><mi>γ</mi><mi>γ</mi></mrow></msub><mo linebreak="goodbreak" linebreakstyle="after">=</mo><mn>5.4</mn><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><mn>4</mn><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow></math> keV (2.9<math altimg="si36.svg"><mrow><mi>σ</mi></mrow></math> tension). We provide insight into the comparison between our findings, previous theoretical predictions, and experimental measurements.