# First direct lattice calculation of the chiral perturbation theory low\-energy constant ℓ7

**INSPIRE:** [1892216](https://inspirehep.net/literature/1892216)
**arXiv:** [2107\.11895](https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.11895)
**DOI:** [10\.1103/PhysRevD\.104\.074513](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.074513)

**Authors:** Frezzotti, R\., Gagliardi, G\., Lubicz, V\., Martinelli, G\., Sanfilippo, F\., Simula, S\.

**Submitted:** 25 July 2021

**Subjects:**
- hep\-lat
- hep\-ph
- Lattice

**Journal reference:** Phys\.Rev\.D 104 \(7\) 074513 \(2021\)

**Citations:** 10

## Abstract

We evaluate by means of lattice QCD calculations the low\-energy constant \<math display\="inline"\>\<msub\>\<mo\>ℓ\</mo\>\<mn\>7\</mn\>\</msub\>\</math\> which parametrizes strong isospin effects at next\-to\-leading order \(NLO\) in SU\(2\) chiral perturbation theory\. Among all low\-energy constants at NLO, \<math display\="inline"\>\<msub\>\<mo\>ℓ\</mo\>\<mn\>7\</mn\>\</msub\>\</math\> is the one known less precisely, and its uncertainty is currently larger than 50%\. Our strategy is based on the RM123 approach in which the lattice path\-integral is expanded in powers of the isospin breaking parameter \<math display\="inline"\>\<mi mathvariant\="normal"\>Δ\</mi\>\<mi\>m\</mi\>\<mo\>\=\</mo\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<msub\>\<mi\>m\</mi\>\<mi\>d\</mi\>\</msub\>\<mo\>\-\</mo\>\<msub\>\<mi\>m\</mi\>\<mi\>u\</mi\>\</msub\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\<mo\>/\</mo\>\<mn\>2\</mn\>\</math\>\. In order to evaluate the relevant lattice correlators we make use of the recently proposed rotated twisted\-mass \(RTM\) scheme\. Within the RM123 approach, it is possible to cleanly extract the value of \<math display\="inline"\>\<msub\>\<mo\>ℓ\</mo\>\<mn\>7\</mn\>\</msub\>\</math\> from either the pion mass splitting \<math display\="inline"\>\<msub\>\<mi\>M\</mi\>\<msup\>\<mi\>π\</mi\>\<mo\>\+\</mo\>\</msup\>\</msub\>\<mo\>\-\</mo\>\<msub\>\<mi\>M\</mi\>\<msup\>\<mi\>π\</mi\>\<mn\>0\</mn\>\</msup\>\</msub\>\</math\> induced by strong isospin breaking at order \<math display\="inline"\>\<mi mathvariant\="script"\>O\</mi\>\<mrow\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mi mathvariant\="normal"\>Δ\</mi\>\<mi\>m\</mi\>\<msup\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\<mn\>2\</mn\>\</msup\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\</mrow\>\</math\> \(mass method\), or from the coupling of the neutral pion \<math display\="inline"\>\<msup\>\<mi\>π\</mi\>\<mn\>0\</mn\>\</msup\>\</math\> to the isoscalar operator \<math display\="inline"\>\<mrow\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mover accent\="true"\>\<mi\>u\</mi\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>¯\</mo\>\</mover\>\<msub\>\<mi\>γ\</mi\>\<mn\>5\</mn\>\</msub\>\<mi\>u\</mi\>\<mo\>\+\</mo\>\<mover accent\="true"\>\<mi\>d\</mi\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>¯\</mo\>\</mover\>\<msub\>\<mi\>γ\</mi\>\<mn\>5\</mn\>\</msub\>\<mi\>d\</mi\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\</mrow\>\<mo\>/\</mo\>\<msqrt\>\<mn\>2\</mn\>\</msqrt\>\</math\> at order \<math display\="inline"\>\<mi mathvariant\="script"\>O\</mi\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mi mathvariant\="normal"\>Δ\</mi\>\<mi\>m\</mi\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\</math\> \(matrix element method\)\. In this pilot study we limit the analysis to a single ensemble generated by the Extended Twisted Mass Collaboration \(ETMC\) with \<math display\="inline"\>\<msub\>\<mi\>N\</mi\>\<mi\>f\</mi\>\</msub\>\<mo\>\=\</mo\>\<mn\>2\</mn\>\<mo\>\+\</mo\>\<mn\>1\</mn\>\<mo\>\+\</mo\>\<mn\>1\</mn\>\</math\> dynamical quark flavors, which corresponds to a lattice spacing \<math display\="inline"\>\<mi\>a\</mi\>\<mo\>≃\</mo\>\<mn\>0\.095\</mn\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mi\>fm\</mi\>\</math\> and to a pion mass \<math display\="inline"\>\<msub\>\<mi\>M\</mi\>\<mi\>π\</mi\>\</msub\>\<mo\>≃\</mo\>\<mn\>260\</mn\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mtext\> \</mtext\>\<mi\>MeV\</mi\>\</math\>\. We find that the matrix element method outperforms the mass method in terms of resulting statistical accuracy\. Our determination, \<math display\="inline"\>\<msub\>\<mo\>ℓ\</mo\>\<mn\>7\</mn\>\</msub\>\<mo\>\=\</mo\>\<mn\>2\.5\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\(\</mo\>\<mn\>1\.4\</mn\>\<mo stretchy\="false"\>\)\</mo\>\<mo\>×\</mo\>\<msup\>\<mn\>10\</mn\>\<mrow\>\<mo\>\-\</mo\>\<mn\>3\</mn\>\</mrow\>\</msup\>\</math\>, is in agreement and improves previous calculations\.