1. Tackling the Sign Problem in the Doped Hubbard Model with Normalizing Flows, Dominic Schuh, Lena Funcke, Janik Kreit, Thomas Luu, and Simran Singh, (2026), arXiv:2603.18205
  2. Generative sampling with physics-informed kernels, Friederike Ihssen, Renzo Kapust, and Jan M. Pawlowski, (2025), arXiv:2510.26678
  3. Sampling in lattice field theory with flow-based generative models, Joe Marsh Rossney, and Joe Marsh Rossney, (2025), doi:10.7488/era/6223
  4. Lecture notes on normalizing flows for lattice quantum field theories, Miranda C. N. Cheng, and Niki Stratikopoulou, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 110 1, (2026), arXiv:2504.18126 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.110
  5. NeuMC -- a package for neural sampling for lattice field theories, Piotr Bialas, Piotr Korcyl, Tomasz Stebel, and Dawid Zapolski, SoftwareX 31 102253, (2025), arXiv:2503.11482 doi:10.1016/j.softx.2025.102253
  6. Machine Learning for Lattice QCD, Akio Tomiya, J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 94 (3) 031006, (2025), doi:10.7566/JPSJ.94.031006
  7. Generative models and theoretical physics, M. Gerdes, (2025)
  8. Super-resolving normalising flows for lattice field theories, Marc Bauer, Renzo Kapust, Jan M. Pawlowski, and Finn Leon Temmen, SciPost Phys. 19 (3) 077, (2025), arXiv:2412.12842 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.19.3.077
  9. AdvNF: Reducing mode collapse in conditional normalising flows using adversarial learning, Vikas Kanaujia, Mathias S. Scheurer, and Vipul Arora, SciPost Phys. 16 (5) 132, (2024), arXiv:2401.15948 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.16.5.132
  10. Flow-based nonperturbative simulation of first-order phase transitions, Yang Bai, and Ting-Kuo Chen, JHEP 10 198, (2024), arXiv:2404.18323 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2024)198
  11. Practical applications of machine-learned flows on gauge fields, Ryan Abbott, Denis Boyda, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, Julian M. Urban, and Michael S. Albergo, PoS LATTICE2023 011, (2024), arXiv:2404.11674 doi:10.22323/1.453.0011
  12. An AI-powered Technology Stack for Solving Many-Electron Field Theory, Pengcheng Hou, Tao Wang, Daniel Cerkoney, Xiansheng Cai, Zhiyi Li, Youjin Deng, Lei Wang, and Kun Chen, (2024), arXiv:2403.18840
  13. Applications of flow models to the generation of correlated lattice QCD ensembles, Ryan Abbott, Aleksandar Botev, Denis Boyda, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 109 (9) 094514, (2024), arXiv:2401.10874 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.094514
  14. Flow-based sampling for lattice field theories, Gurtej Kanwar, 40th International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory, (2024), arXiv:2401.01297
  15. Multi-lattice sampling of quantum field theories via neural operator-based flows, B\'alint M\'at\'e, and Fran\ccois Fleuret, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 5 (4) 045053, (2024), arXiv:2401.00828 doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ad9707
  16. NeuLat: a toolbox for neural samplers in lattice field theories, Kim A. Nicoli, Christopher J. Anders, Lena Funcke, Karl Jansen, Shinichi Nakajima, and Pan Kessel, PoS LATTICE2023 286, (2024), doi:10.22323/1.453.0286
  17. Generative Diffusion Models for Lattice Field Theory, Lingxiao Wang, Gert Aarts, and Kai Zhou, 37th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, (2023), arXiv:2311.03578
  18. Diffusion models as stochastic quantization in lattice field theory, Lingxiao Wang, Gert Aarts, and Kai Zhou, JHEP 05 060, (2024), arXiv:2309.17082 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2024)060
  19. The NFLikelihood: An unsupervised DNNLikelihood from normalizing flows, Humberto Reyes-Gonzalez, and Riccardo Torre, SciPost Phys. Core 7 048, (2024), arXiv:2309.09743 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.7.3.048
  20. Improvement of Heatbath Algorithm in LFT using Generative models, Ali Faraz, Ankur Singha, Dipankar Chakrabarti, Shinichi Nakajima, and Vipul Arora, PoS LATTICE2024 036, (2025), arXiv:2308.08615 doi:10.22323/1.466.0036
  21. Advances in machine-learning-based sampling motivated by lattice quantum chromodynamics, Kyle Cranmer, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Nature Rev. Phys. 5 (9) 526–535, (2023), arXiv:2309.01156 doi:10.1038/s42254-023-00616-w
  22. Parallel tempered metadynamics: Overcoming potential barriers without surfing or tunneling, Timo Eichhorn, Gianluca Fuwa, Christian Hoelbling, and Lukas Varnhorst, Phys. Rev. D 109 (11) 114504, (2024), arXiv:2307.04742 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.114504
  23. Sampling the lattice Nambu-Goto string using Continuous Normalizing Flows, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, and Alessandro Nada, JHEP 02 048, (2024), arXiv:2307.01107 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2024)048
  24. Self-learning Monte Carlo with equivariant Transformer, Yuki Nagai, and Akio Tomiya, J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 93 114007, (2024), arXiv:2306.11527 doi:10.7566/JPSJ.93.114007
  25. Sampling U(1) gauge theory using a retrainable conditional flow-based model, Ankur Singha, Dipankar Chakrabarti, and Vipul Arora, Phys. Rev. D 108 (7) 074518, (2023), arXiv:2306.00581 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.074518
  26. Normalizing flows for lattice gauge theory in arbitrary space-time dimension, Ryan Abbott, and others, (2023), arXiv:2305.02402
  27. Mutual information of spin systems from autoregressive neural networks, Piotr Bia\las, Piotr Korcyl, and Tomasz Stebel, Phys. Rev. E 108 (4) 044140, (2023), arXiv:2304.13412 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.108.044140
  28. Locality-constrained autoregressive cum conditional normalizing flow for lattice field theory simulations, Dinesh P. R, (2023), arXiv:2304.01798
  29. Exploring QCD matter in extreme conditions with Machine Learning, Kai Zhou, Lingxiao Wang, Long-Gang Pang, and Shuzhe Shi, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 135 104084, (2024), arXiv:2303.15136 doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2023.104084
  30. Detecting and mitigating mode-collapse for flow-based sampling of lattice field theories, Kim A. Nicoli, Christopher J. Anders, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Pan Kessel, and Shinichi Nakajima, Phys. Rev. D 108 (11) 114501, (2023), arXiv:2302.14082 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.114501
  31. Comparison of Affine and Rational Quadratic Spline Coupling and Autoregressive Flows through Robust Statistical Tests, Andrea Coccaro, Marco Letizia, Humberto Reyes-Gonzalez, and Riccardo Torre, Symmetry 16 (8) 942, (2024), arXiv:2302.12024 doi:10.3390/sym16080942
  32. Learning trivializing gradient flows for lattice gauge theories, Simone Bacchio, Pan Kessel, Stefan Schaefer, and Lorenz Vaitl, Phys. Rev. D 107 (5) L051504, (2023), arXiv:2212.08469 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.L051504
  33. Aspects of scaling and scalability for flow-based sampling of lattice QCD, Ryan Abbott, and others, Eur. Phys. J. A 59 (11) 257, (2023), arXiv:2211.07541 doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01154-w
  34. Fourier-flow model generating Feynman paths, Shile Chen, Oleh Savchuk, Shiqi Zheng, Baoyi Chen, Horst Stoecker, Lingxiao Wang, and Kai Zhou, Phys. Rev. D 107 (5) 056001, (2023), arXiv:2211.03470 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.056001
  35. Topology changing update algorithms for SU(3) gauge theory, Timo Eichhorn, Christian Hoelbling, Philip Rouenhoff, and Lukas Varnhorst, PoS LATTICE2022 009, (2023), arXiv:2210.11453 doi:10.22323/1.430.0009
  36. Stochastic normalizing flows for lattice field theory, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, Alessandro Nada, and Marco Panero, PoS LATTICE2022 005, (2023), arXiv:2210.03139 doi:10.22323/1.430.0005
  37. Sampling QCD field configurations with gauge-equivariant flow models, Ryan Abbott, and others, PoS LATTICE2022 036, (2023), arXiv:2208.03832 doi:10.22323/1.430.0036
  38. Gauge-equivariant flow models for sampling in lattice field theories with pseudofermions, Ryan Abbott, and others, Phys. Rev. D 106 (7) 074506, (2022), arXiv:2207.08945 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.074506
  39. Conditional normalizing flow for Markov chain Monte~Carlo sampling in the critical region of lattice field theory, Ankur Singha, Dipankar Chakrabarti, and Vipul Arora, Phys. Rev. D 107 (1) 014512, (2023), arXiv:2207.00980 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.014512
  40. Learning lattice quantum field theories with equivariant continuous flows, Mathis Gerdes, Pim de Haan, Corrado Rainone, Roberto Bondesan, and Miranda C. N. Cheng, SciPost Phys. 15 (6) 238, (2023), arXiv:2207.00283 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.6.238
  41. Lattice scalar field theory at complex coupling, Scott Lawrence, Hyunwoo Oh, and Yukari Yamauchi, Phys. Rev. D 106 (11) 114503, (2022), arXiv:2205.12303 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.114503
  42. AI and Theoretical Particle Physics, Rajan Gupta, Tanmoy Bhattacharya, and Boram Yoon, 465–491, (2023), arXiv:2205.05803 doi:10.1142/9789811265679_0026
  43. Exploring phase space with Nested Sampling, David Yallup, Timo Janßen, Steffen Schumann, and Will Handley, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 8, (2022), arXiv:2205.02030 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10632-2
  44. Modern applications of machine learning in quantum sciences, Anna Dawid, and others, (2025), arXiv:2204.04198 doi:10.1017/9781009504942
  45. Prospects for precise predictions of $a_\mu$ in the Standard Model, G. Colangelo, and others, (2022), arXiv:2203.15810
  46. Numerical and geometrical aspects of flow-based variational quantum Monte Carlo, James Stokes, Brian Chen, and Shravan Veerapaneni, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 4 (2) 021001, (2023), arXiv:2203.14824 doi:10.1088/2632-2153/acc8b9
  47. Hierarchical autoregressive neural networks for statistical systems, Piotr Bia\las, Piotr Korcyl, and Tomasz Stebel, Comput. Phys. Commun. 281 108502, (2022), arXiv:2203.10989 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2022.108502
  48. Flow-based density of states for complex actions, Jan M. Pawlowski, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 108 (5) 054511, (2023), arXiv:2203.01243 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.054511
  49. Flow-based sampling in the lattice Schwinger model at criticality, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo J. Rezende, Fernando Romero-L\'opez, Phiala E. Shanahan, and Julian M. Urban, Phys. Rev. D 106 (1) 014514, (2022), arXiv:2202.11712 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.014514
  50. Applications of Machine Learning to Lattice Quantum Field Theory, Denis Boyda, and others, Snowmass 2021, (2022), arXiv:2202.05838
  51. Gradient Estimators for Normalizing Flows, Piotr Bialas, Piotr Korcyl, and Tomasz Stebel, Acta Phys. Polon. B 55 (3) 3–A2, (2024), arXiv:2202.01314 doi:10.5506/APhysPolB.55.3-A2
  52. Stochastic normalizing flows as non-equilibrium transformations, Michele Caselle, Elia Cellini, Alessandro Nada, and Marco Panero, JHEP 07 015, (2022), arXiv:2201.08862 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2022)015
  53. Breaking Through Computational Barriers In Lattice QCD With Artificial Intelligence, Julian Min-Yong Urban, (2022), doi:10.11588/heidok.00031926
  54. Machine Learning Trivializing Maps: A First Step Towards Understanding How Flow-Based Samplers Scale Up, Luigi Del Debbio, Joe Marsh Rossney, and Michael Wilson, PoS LATTICE2021 059, (2022), arXiv:2112.15532 doi:10.22323/1.396.0059
  55. Colloquium: Machine learning in nuclear physics, Amber Boehnlein, and others, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94 (3) 031003, (2022), arXiv:2112.02309 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.94.031003
  56. Machine Learning of Thermodynamic Observables in the Presence of Mode Collapse, Kim A. Nicoli, Christopher J. Anders, Lena Funcke, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Pan Kessel, Shinichi Nakajima, and Paolo Stornati, PoS LATTICE2021 338, (2022), arXiv:2111.11303 doi:10.22323/1.396.0338
  57. Analysis of autocorrelation times in neural Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations, Piotr Bia\las, Piotr Korcyl, and Tomasz Stebel, Phys. Rev. E 107 (1) 015303, (2023), arXiv:2111.10189 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.107.015303
  58. Generative learning for the problem of critical slowing down in lattice Gross-Neveu model, Ankur Singha, Dipankar Chakrabarti, and Vipul Arora, SciPost Phys. Core 5 052, (2022), arXiv:2111.00574 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.5.4.052
  59. Efficient modeling of trivializing maps for lattice {\ensuremath{\phi}}4 theory using normalizing flows: A first look at scalability, Luigi Del Debbio, Joe Marsh Rossney, and Michael Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 104 (9) 094507, (2021), arXiv:2105.12481 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.094507
  60. Unbiased Monte Carlo cluster updates with autoregressive neural networks, Dian Wu, Riccardo Rossi, and Giuseppe Carleo, Phys. Rev. Res. 3 (4) L042024, (2021), arXiv:2105.05650 doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.L042024