1. Adaptive Monte Carlo augmented with normalizing flows, Marylou Gabri\'e, Grant M. Rotskoff, and Eric Vanden-Eijnden, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 119 (10) e2109420119, (2022), arXiv:2105.12603 doi:10.1073/pnas.2109420119
2. Generalization capabilities of translationally equivariant neural networks, Srinath Bulusu, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, Phys. Rev. D 104 (7) 074504, (2021), arXiv:2103.14686 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.074504
3. Gauge covariant neural network for quarks and gluons, Yuki Nagai, and Akio Tomiya, Phys. Rev. D 111 (7) 074501, (2025), arXiv:2103.11965 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.074501
4. Introduction to Normalizing Flows for Lattice Field Theory, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Daniel C. Hackett, Gurtej Kanwar, Kyle Cranmer, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E. Shanahan, (2021), arXiv:2101.08176
5. Lattice Gauge Equivariant Convolutional Neural Networks, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (3) 032003, (2022), arXiv:2012.12901 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.032003
6. Generative Neural Samplers for the Quantum Heisenberg Chain, Johanna Vielhaben, and Nils Strodthoff, Phys. Rev. E 103 (6) 063304, (2021), arXiv:2012.10264 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.103.063304
7. Generative models for sampling of lattice field theories, Matija Medvidovic, Juan Carrasquilla, Lauren E. Hayward, and Bohdan Kulchytskyy, 34th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, (2020), arXiv:2012.01442
8. Self-learning Monte Carlo for non-Abelian gauge theory with dynamical fermions, Yuki Nagai, Akinori Tanaka, and Akio Tomiya, Phys. Rev. D 107 (5) 054501, (2023), arXiv:2010.11900 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.054501
9. Sampling using $SU(N)$ gauge equivariant flows, Denis Boyda, Gurtej Kanwar, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Michael S. Albergo, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 103 (7) 074504, (2021), arXiv:2008.05456 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074504
10. Estimation of Thermodynamic Observables in Lattice Field Theories with Deep Generative Models, Kim A. Nicoli, Christopher J. Anders, Lena Funcke, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Pan Kessel, Shinichi Nakajima, and Paolo Stornati, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (3) 032001, (2021), arXiv:2007.07115 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.032001
11. Continuous-Mixture Autoregressive Networks Learning the Kosterlitz-Thouless Transition, Lingxiao Wang, Yin Jiang, Lianyi He, and Kai Zhou, Chin. Phys. Lett. 39 (12) 120502, (2022), arXiv:2005.04857 doi:10.1088/0256-307X/39/12/120502
12. Machine Learning for Quantum Matter, Juan Carrasquilla, Adv. Phys. X 5 (1) 1797528, (2020), arXiv:2003.11040 doi:10.1080/23746149.2020.1797528
13. Equivariant flow-based sampling for lattice gauge theory, Gurtej Kanwar, Michael S. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C. Hackett, S\'ebastien Racani\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (12) 121601, (2020), arXiv:2003.06413 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.121601
14. Asymptotically unbiased estimation of physical observables with neural samplers, Kim A. Nicoli, Shinichi Nakajima, Nils Strodthoff, Wojciech Samek, Klaus-Robert Müller, and Pan Kessel, Phys. Rev. E 101 (2) 023304, (2020), arXiv:1910.13496 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.101.023304
15. Flow-based generative models for Markov chain Monte Carlo in lattice field theory, M. S. Albergo, G. Kanwar, and P. E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 100 (3) 034515, (2019), arXiv:1904.12072 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.034515
16. Status and Future Perspectives for Lattice Gauge Theory Calculations to the Exascale and Beyond, B\'alint Jo\'o, Chulwoo Jung, Norman H. Christ, William Detmold, Robert Edwards, Martin Savage, and Phiala Shanahan, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 199, (2019), arXiv:1904.09725 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12919-7
17. Hot-dense Lattice QCD: USQCD whitepaper 2018, Alexei Bazavov, Frithjof Karsch, Swagato Mukherjee, and Peter Petreczky, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 194, (2019), arXiv:1904.09951 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12922-0
18. Lattice QCD and Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering, Andreas S. Kronfeld, David G. Richards, William Detmold, Rajan Gupta, Huey-Wen Lin, Keh-Fei Liu, Aaron S. Meyer, Raza Sufian, and Sergey Syritsyn, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 196, (2019), arXiv:1904.09931 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12916-x
19. Lattice Gauge Theory for Physics Beyond the Standard Model, Richard C. Brower, Anna Hasenfratz, Ethan T. Neil, Simon Catterall, George Fleming, Joel Giedt, Enrico Rinaldi, David Schaich, Evan Weinberg, and Oliver Witzel, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 198, (2019), arXiv:1904.09964 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12901-5
20. The Role of Lattice QCD in Searches for Violations of Fundamental Symmetries and Signals for New Physics, Vincenzo Cirigliano, Zohreh Davoudi, Tanmoy Bhattacharya, Taku Izubuchi, Phiala E. Shanahan, Sergey Syritsyn, and Michael L. Wagman, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 197, (2019), arXiv:1904.09704 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12889-8
21. Opportunities for Lattice QCD in Quark and Lepton Flavor Physics, Christoph Lehner, and others, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 195, (2019), arXiv:1904.09479 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12891-2
22. Hadrons and Nuclei, William Detmold, Robert G. Edwards, Jozef J. Dudek, Michael Engelhardt, Huey-Wen Lin, Stefan Meinel, Kostas Orginos, and Phiala Shanahan, Eur. Phys. J. A 55 (11) 193, (2019), arXiv:1904.09512 doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12902-4
23. Machine Learning Holographic Mapping by Neural Network Renormalization Group, Hong-Ye Hu, Shuo-Hui Li, Lei Wang, and Yi-Zhuang You, Phys. Rev. Res. 2 (2) 023369, (2020), arXiv:1903.00804 doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.023369
24. Solving Statistical Mechanics Using Variational Autoregressive Networks, Dian Wu, Lei Wang, and Pan Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (8) 080602, (2019), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.080602
25. Review on Composite Higgs Models, Oliver Witzel, PoS LATTICE2018 006, (2019), arXiv:1901.08216 doi:10.22323/1.334.0006
26. Neural Network Renormalization Group, Shuo-Hui Li, and Lei Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (26) 260601, (2018), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.260601
27. Reducing Autocorrelation Times in Lattice Simulations with Generative Adversarial Networks, Jan M. Pawlowski, and Julian M. Urban, Mach. Learn. Sci. Tech. 1 045011, (2020), arXiv:1811.03533 doi:10.1088/2632-2153/abae73
28. Regressive and generative neural networks for scalar field theory, Phys. Rev. D 100 (1) 011501, (2019), arXiv:1810.12879 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.011501
29. Rational hybrid Monte Carlo with block solvers and multiple pseudofermions, Philippe de Forcrand, and Liam Keegan, Phys. Rev. E 98 (4) 043306, (2018), arXiv:1808.01829 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.98.043306
30. Testing the event-chain algorithm in asymptotically free models, Martin Hasenbusch, and Stefan Schaefer, Phys. Rev. D 98 (5) 054502, (2018), arXiv:1806.11460 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.054502
31. Self-learning Monte Carlo with deep neural networks, Huitao Shen, Junwei Liu, and Liang Fu, Phys. Rev. B 97 (20) 205140, (2018), doi:10.1103/physrevb.97.205140
32. A high-bias, low-variance introduction to Machine Learning for physicists, Pankaj Mehta, Marin Bukov, Ching-Hao Wang, Alexandre G. R. Day, Clint Richardson, Charles K. Fisher, and David J. Schwab, Phys. Rept. 810 1–124, (2019), arXiv:1803.08823 doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2019.03.001
33. Deep Learning using Rectified Linear Units (ReLU), Abien Fred Agarap, (2018), arXiv:1803.08375
34. Symmetry-enforced self-learning Monte Carlo method applied to the Holstein model, Chuang Chen, Xiao Yan Xu, Junwei Liu, George Batrouni, Richard Scalettar, and Zi Yang Meng, Phys. Rev. B 98 (4) 041102, (2018), arXiv:1802.06177 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.98.041102
35. Generalizing Hamiltonian Monte Carlo with Neural Networks, Daniel Levy, Matthew D. Hoffman, and Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, (2017), arXiv:1711.09268
36. Irreversible Markov chains in spin models: Topological excitations, Ze Lei, and Werner Krauth, EPL 121 (1) 10008, (2018), arXiv:1711.08375 doi:10.1209/0295-5075/121/10008
37. Self-learning Monte Carlo method, Junwei Liu, Yang Qi, Zi Yang Meng, and Liang Fu, Phys. Rev. B 95 (4) 041101, (2017), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.95.041101
38. Self-learning Monte Carlo method and cumulative update in fermion systems, Junwei Liu, Huitao Shen, Yang Qi, Zi Yang Meng, and Liang Fu, Phys. Rev. B 95 (24) 241104, (2017), arXiv:1611.09364 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.95.241104
39. Density estimation using Real NVP, Laurent Dinh, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, and Samy Bengio, (2016), arXiv:1605.08803
40. Lattice Gauge Theories and Spin Models, Manu Mathur, and T. P. Sreeraj, Phys. Rev. D 94 (8) 085029, (2016), arXiv:1604.00315 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.085029
41. Group Equivariant Convolutional Networks, Taco S. Cohen, and Max Welling, (2016), arXiv:1602.07576
42. Dual simulation of the two-dimensional lattice U(1) gauge-Higgs model with a topological term, Christof Gattringer, Thomas Kloiber, and Michael Müller-Preussker, Phys. Rev. D 92 (11) 114508, (2015), arXiv:1508.00681 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.114508
43. Variational Inference with Normalizing Flows, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Shakir Mohamed, (2015), arXiv:1505.05770
44. Empirical Evaluation of Rectified Activations in Convolutional Network, Bing Xu, Naiyan Wang, Tianqi Chen, and Mu Li, (2015), arXiv:1505.00853
45. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization, Diederik P. Kingma, and Jimmy Ba, International Conference on Learning Representations, (2014), arXiv:1412.6980
46. Exact Pseudofermion Action for Monte Carlo Simulation of Domain-Wall Fermion, Yu-Chih Chen, and Ting-Wai Chiu, Phys. Lett. B 738 55–60, (2014), arXiv:1403.1683 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2014.09.016
47. A Family of Nonparametric Density Estimation Algorithms, E. G. Tabak, and Cristina V. Turner, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 66 (2) 145–164, (2013), doi:10.1002/cpa.21423
48. Fermions as Global Correction: the QCD Case, Jacob Finkenrath, Francesco Knechtli, and Bjorn Leder, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184 1522–1534, (2013), arXiv:1204.1306 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2013.01.020
49. Testing trivializing maps in the Hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm, Georg P. Engel, and Stefan Schaefer, Comput. Phys. Commun. 182 2107–2114, (2011), arXiv:1102.1852 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2011.05.004
50. Critical slowing down and error analysis in lattice QCD simulations, Stefan Schaefer, Rainer Sommer, and Francesco Virotta, Nucl. Phys. B 845 93–119, (2011), arXiv:1009.5228 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2010.11.020
51. Density estimation by dual ascent of the log-likelihood, Esteban G. Tabak, and Eric Vanden-Eijnden, Commun. Math. Sci. 8 (1) 217–233, (2010), doi:10.4310/cms.2010.v8.n1.a11
52. One-flavor algorithm for Wilson and domain-wall fermions, Kenji Ogawa, Ting-Wai Chiu, and Tung-Han Hsieh, PoS LAT2009 033, (2009), arXiv:0911.5532 doi:10.22323/1.091.0033
53. Investigating the critical slowing down of QCD simulations, Stefan Schaefer, Rainer Sommer, and Francesco Virotta, PoS LAT2009 032, (2009), arXiv:0910.1465 doi:10.22323/1.091.0032
54. Geometric Algorithm for Abelian-Gauge Models, Vicente Azcoiti, Eduardo Follana, Alejandro Vaquero, and Giuseppe Di Carlo, JHEP 08 008, (2009), arXiv:0905.0639 doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/08/008
55. Trivializing maps, the Wilson flow and the HMC algorithm, Martin Luscher, Commun. Math. Phys. 293 899–919, (2010), arXiv:0907.5491 doi:10.1007/s00220-009-0953-7
56. Lattice Gauge Theory with Staggered Fermions: How, Where, and Why (Not), Andreas S. Kronfeld, PoS LATTICE2007 016, (2007), arXiv:0711.0699 doi:10.22323/1.042.0016
57. The Rational Hybrid Monte Carlo Algorithm, M. A. Clark, PoS LAT2006 004, (2006), arXiv:hep-lat/0610048 doi:10.22323/1.032.0004
58. Accelerating dynamical fermion computations using the rational hybrid Monte Carlo (RHMC) algorithm with multiple pseudofermion fields, M. A. Clark, and A. D. Kennedy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 051601, (2007), arXiv:hep-lat/0608015 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.051601
59. HMC algorithm with multiple time scale integration and mass preconditioning, C. Urbach, K. Jansen, A. Shindler, and U. Wenger, Comput. Phys. Commun. 174 87–98, (2006), arXiv:hep-lat/0506011 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2005.08.006
60. Schwarz-preconditioned HMC algorithm for two-flavour lattice QCD, Martin Luscher, Comput. Phys. Commun. 165 199–220, (2005), arXiv:hep-lat/0409106 doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2004.10.004
61. Worm Algorithms for Classical Statistical Models, Nikolay Prokof'ev, and Boris Svistunov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 160601, (2001), arXiv:cond-mat/0103146 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.160601
62. Speeding up the Hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm for dynamical fermions, M. Hasenbusch, and K. Jansen, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 106 1076–1078, (2002), arXiv:hep-lat/0110180 doi:10.1016/S0920-5632(01)01933-8
63. Accelerating the hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm with ILU preconditioning, Mike J. Peardon, (2000), arXiv:hep-lat/0011080
64. The Loop algorithm, H. G. Evertz, Adv. Phys. 52 1, (2003), arXiv:cond-mat/9707221 doi:10.1080/0001873021000049195
65. A New exact method for dynamical fermion computations with nonlocal actions, A. D. Kennedy, Ivan Horvath, and Stefan Sint, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 73 834–836, (1999), arXiv:hep-lat/9809092 doi:10.1016/S0920-5632(99)85217-7
66. UV filtered fermionic Monte Carlo, P. de Forcrand, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 73 822–824, (1999), arXiv:hep-lat/9809145 doi:10.1016/S0920-5632(99)85214-1
67. Fast fermion Monte Carlo, Philippe de Forcrand, and Tetsuya Takaishi, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 53 968–970, (1997), arXiv:hep-lat/9608093 doi:10.1016/S0920-5632(96)00829-8
68. Meron cluster simulation of the theta vacuum in the 2-d O(3) model, Wolfgang Bietenholz, A. Pochinsky, and U. J. Wiese, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 4524–4527, (1995), arXiv:hep-lat/9505019 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.4524
69. Accelerating Wilson fermion matrix inversions by means of the stabilized biconjugate gradient algorithm, A. Frommer, V. Hannemann, B. Nockel, T. Lippert, and K. Schilling, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 5 1073–1088, (1994), arXiv:hep-lat/9404013 doi:10.1142/S012918319400115X
70. Cluster algorithm for two-dimensional U(1) lattice gauge theory, R. Sinclair, Phys. Rev. D 45 2098–2100, (1992), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.45.2098
71. Conditioning Techniques for Dynamical Fermions, Thomas A. DeGrand, and Pietro Rossi, Comput. Phys. Commun. 60 211–214, (1990), doi:10.1016/0010-4655(90)90006-M
72. CRITICAL SLOWING DOWN, Ulli Wolff, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 17 93–102, (1990), doi:10.1016/0920-5632(90)90224-I
73. Improved Estimators for a Cluster Updating of O($n$) Spin Models, Martin Hasenbusch, Nucl. Phys. B 333 581–592, (1990), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90052-F
74. Embedded Dynamics for $\phi^4$ Theory, R. C. Brower, and P. Tamayo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62 1087–1090, (1989), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.1087
75. Collective Monte Carlo Updating for Spin Systems, Ulli Wolff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62 361, (1989), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.361
76. Generalization of the Fortuin-kasteleyn-swendsen-wang Representation and Monte Carlo Algorithm, R. G. Edwards, and A. D. Sokal, Phys. Rev. D 38 2009–2012, (1988), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.38.2009
77. The Pivot algorithm: a highly efficient Monte Carlo method for selfavoiding walk, Neal Madras, and Alan D. Sokal, J. Statist. Phys. 50 109–186, (1988), doi:10.1007/BF01022990
78. Monte Carlo Simulation of a Lattice Field Theory as Correlated Percolation, Ulli Wolff, Nucl. Phys. B 300 501–516, (1988), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90609-8
79. Hybrid Monte Carlo, S. Duane, A. D. Kennedy, B. J. Pendleton, and D. Roweth, Phys. Lett. B 195 216–222, (1987), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)91197-X
80. Nonuniversal critical dynamics in Monte Carlo simulations, Robert H. Swendsen, and Jian-Sheng Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58 86–88, (1987), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.86
81. A New Method for Fermion Monte Carlo, Gyan Bhanot, Urs M. Heller, and Ion O. Stamatescu, Phys. Lett. B 129 440–444, (1983), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90136-3
82. Monte Carlo Integration for Lattice Gauge Theories with Fermions, D. H. Weingarten, and D. N. Petcher, Phys. Lett. B 99 333–338, (1981), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(81)90112-X
83. Duality in Field Theory and Statistical Systems, Robert Savit, Rev. Mod. Phys. 52 453, (1980), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.52.453
84. Percolation and cluster distribution. 1. Cluster multiple labeling technique and critical concentration algorithm, J. Hoshen, and R. Kopelman, Phys. Rev. B 14 3438–3445, (1976), doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.14.3438
85. Hamiltonian Formulation of Wilson's Lattice Gauge Theories, John B. Kogut, and Leonard Susskind, Phys. Rev. D 11 395–408, (1975), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.11.395
86. Monte Carlo Sampling Methods Using Markov Chains and Their Applications, W. K. Hastings, Biometrika 57 97–109, (1970), doi:10.1093/biomet/57.1.97
87. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines, N. Metropolis, A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller, J. Chem. Phys. 21 1087–1092, (1953), doi:10.1063/1.1699114
88. On Information and Sufficiency, S. Kullback, and R. A. Leibler, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 22 (1) 79–86, (1951), doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729694