1. **Lattice Gauge Equivariant Convolutional Neural Networks**, Matteo Favoni, Andreas Ipp, David I\. Müller, and Daniel Schuh, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **128** (3) 032003 (2022) [arXiv:2012.12901](https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.12901) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.032003](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.032003)

2. **Sampling using $SU\(N\)$ gauge equivariant flows**, Denis Boyda, Gurtej Kanwar, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Michael S\. Albergo, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C\. Hackett, and Phiala E\. Shanahan, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **103** (7) 074504 (2021) [arXiv:2008.05456](https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.05456) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074504](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.074504)

3. **Estimation of Thermodynamic Observables in Lattice Field Theories with Deep Generative Models**, Kim A\. Nicoli, Christopher J\. Anders, Lena Funcke, Tobias Hartung, Karl Jansen, Pan Kessel, Shinichi Nakajima, and Paolo Stornati, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **126** (3) 032001 (2021) [arXiv:2007.07115](https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.07115) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.032001](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.032001)

4. **Mapping distinct phase transitions to a neural network**, Dimitrios Bachtis, Gert Aarts, and Biagio Lucini, *Phys\. Rev\. E* **102** (5) 053306 (2020) [arXiv:2007.00355](https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.00355) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.102.053306](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.102.053306)

5. **Extending machine learning classification capabilities with histogram reweighting**, Dimitrios Bachtis, Gert Aarts, and Biagio Lucini, *Phys\. Rev\. E* **102** (3) 033303 (2020) [arXiv:2004.14341](https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.14341) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.102.033303](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.102.033303)

6. **Equivariant flow\-based sampling for lattice gauge theory**, Gurtej Kanwar, Michael S\. Albergo, Denis Boyda, Kyle Cranmer, Daniel C\. Hackett, S\\'ebastien Racani\\\`ere, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, and Phiala E\. Shanahan, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **125** (12) 121601 (2020) [arXiv:2003.06413](https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.06413) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.121601](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.121601)

7. **Towards novel insights in lattice field theory with explainable machine learning**, Stefan Blücher, Lukas Kades, Jan M\. Pawlowski, Nils Strodthoff, and Julian M\. Urban, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **101** (9) 094507 (2020) [arXiv:2003.01504](https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.01504) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.094507](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.094507)

8. **Regressive and generative neural networks for scalar field theory**, *Phys\. Rev\. D* **100** (1) 011501 (2019) [arXiv:1810.12879](https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.12879) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.011501](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.011501)

9. **ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks**, Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffrey E\. Hinton, *Commun\. ACM* **60** (6) 84–90 (2017) [doi:10.1145/3065386](https://doi.org/10.1145/3065386)

10. **Machine Learning of Explicit Order Parameters: From the Ising Model to SU\(2\) Lattice Gauge Theory**, Sebastian Johann Wetzel, and Manuel Scherzer, *Phys\. Rev\. B* **96** (18) 184410 (2017) [arXiv:1705.05582](https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.05582) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.96.184410](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.184410)

11. **Sampling of General Correlators in Worm Algorithm\-based Simulations**, Tobias Rindlisbacher, Oskar \\rAkerlund, and Philippe de Forcrand, *Nucl\. Phys\. B* **909** 542–583 (2016) [arXiv:1602.09017](https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.09017) [doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2016.05.026](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2016.05.026)

12. **ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge**, Olga Russakovsky, and others, *Int\. J\. Comput\. Vision* **115** (3) 211–252 (2015) [arXiv:1409.0575](https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.0575) [doi:10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y](https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y)

13. **Spectroscopy in finite density lattice field theory: An exploratory study in the relativistic Bose gas**, Christof Gattringer, and Thomas Kloiber, *Phys\. Lett\. B* **720** 210–214 (2013) [arXiv:1212.3770](https://arxiv.org/abs/1212.3770) [doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.01.068](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2013.01.068)

14. **Lattice study of the Silver Blaze phenomenon for a charged scalar $\\phi\^4$ field**, Christof Gattringer, and Thomas Kloiber, *Nucl\. Phys\. B* **869** 56–73 (2013) [arXiv:1206.2954](https://arxiv.org/abs/1206.2954) [doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2012.12.005](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2012.12.005)

15. **Functional integrals for QCD at nonzero chemical potential and zero density**, Thomas D \. Cohen, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **91** 222001 (2003) [arXiv:hep-ph/0307089](https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0307089) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.222001](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.222001)

16. **Worm Algorithms for Classical Statistical Models**, Nikolay Prokof'ev, and Boris Svistunov, *Phys\. Rev\. Lett\.* **87** 160601 (2001) [arXiv:cond-mat/0103146](https://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0103146) [doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.160601](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.160601)

17. **Gradient\-based learning applied to document recognition**, Y\. Lecun, L\. Bottou, Y\. Bengio, and P\. Haffner (1998) [doi:10.1109/5.726791](https://doi.org/10.1109/5.726791)

18. **Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function**, G\. Cybenko, *Math\. Control Signals Syst\.* **2** (4) 303–314 (1989) [doi:10.1007/BF02551274](https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02551274)

19. **Neocognitron: A self\-organizing neural network model for a mechanism of pattern recognition unaffected by shift in position**, Kunihiko Fukushima, *Biol\. Cyber\.* **36** (4) 193–202 (1980) [doi:10.1007/BF00344251](https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00344251)